
Subsurface Integrity at the Energy-Environment Interface: Advances in Ground Construction for Oil and Gas Storage and Transport Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i6.13415Abstract
The integrity of the subsurface at the energy environment interface is essential for the safe, long-term and responsible storage and transportation of oil and gas. The latest developments in materials, design techniques, and monitoring systems have revolutionized the design and operation of subsurface infrastructure in a manner that employs simultaneous solutions to mechanical, chemical, and geotechnical problems. The case in this review is the state-of-the-art developments in the subsurface construction, storage system, and transport network, including high-performance alloys, geopolymers, composite linings, and bio-mediated stabilization systems. The adaptive structural designs, such as reinforced foundations, multi-layer linings, and flexible pipeline systems, enhance resilience during conditions of a difference in settlement, cyclic loading, and geochemical exposure. By using fiber-optic sensing, digital twins, and machine learning, predictive management and monitoring help detect a possible failure on time and optimize the interventions in the operations. The environmental safeguards are also critically assessed in the review, such as erosion control, groundwater protection, and sustainable construction practices, focusing on how they are integrated with operational and regulatory goals. The shortage of geological predictability, material behavior over long periods, and adjustment to new energy sources, including hydrogen and CO2, are stated, and future research and practice directions are outlined. The article highlights the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach that is holistic, showing that the key to resilient, sustainable, and safe subsurface energy infrastructure is integrated engineering, materials, and monitoring strategies that can address energy and environmental demands as they change.
Keywords:
Subsurface Integrity; Oil and Gas Storage; Pipeline Transport; Geotechnical Engineering; Monitoring and Predictive ManagementReferences
[1] Xie, S., He, B., Chen, L., et al., 2025. Key elements in integrity management of underground gas storage: A framework for energy safety. Energies. 18(2), 378.
[2] Schultz, R.A., Mutlu, U., Bere, A., 2016. Critical issues in subsurface integrity. In Proceedings of the 50th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Houston, TX, USA, 26–29 June 2016.
[3] Matos, C.R., Carneiro, J.F., Silva, P.P., 2019. Overview of large-scale underground energy storage technologies for integration of renewable energies and criteria for reservoir identification. Journal of Energy Storage. 21, 241–258.
[4] Delmastro, C., Lavagno, E., Schranz, L., 2016. Energy and underground. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 55, 96–102.
[5] Elalfy, D.A., Gouda, E., Kotb, M.F., et al., 2024. Comprehensive review of energy storage systems technologies, objectives, challenges, and future trends. Energy Strategy Reviews. 54, 101482.
[6] Wijewickreme, D., 2012. Role of geotechnical engineering in assuring the integrity of buried pipeline systems. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Sustainable Built Environments, Kandy, Sri Lanka, 14–16 December 2012.
[7] Anyadiegwu, C.I., Anyanwu, E.E., 2012. Environmental impact of underground natural gas storage. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. 4(2), 188–209.
[8] Jiang, H., Liu, T., Ren, K., et al., 2024. An Integrated Solution for Operational Planning in an Intelligent Underground Gas Storage System. In Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 4–7 November 2024.
[9] Basu, D., Misra, A., Puppala, A.J., 2015. Sustainability and geotechnical engineering: Perspectives and review. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 52(1), 96–113.
[10] Li, B., Li, Z.-C, Zhou, Y.-W, et al., 2025. Comprehensive research on high performance graphene oxide-geopolymer anticorrosive coating: Material design and corrosion resistance. Construction and Building Materials. 491, 142749.
[11] Verma, H., Ray, A., Rai, R., et al., 2021. Ground improvement using chemical methods: A review. Heliyon. 7(7), e07678.
[12] Onyechi, V.N., 2021. Pipeline integrity and risk prevention: Real-time monitoring, structural health analytics, and failure mitigation in harsh operating environments. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews. 3(2), 139–151.
[13] Carney, B., Hull, R., Trujillo, K., et al., 2020. Learnings from the Marcellus Shale Energy and Environmental Lab (MSEEL) Using Fiber Optic Tools and Geomechanical Modeling. In Proceedings of the 8th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Online, 20–22 July 2020.
[14] Rojas, L., Peña, Á., Garcia, J., 2025. AI-driven predictive maintenance in mining: A systematic literature review on fault detection, digital twins, and intelligent asset management. Applied Sciences. 15(6), 3337.
[15] Lu, M., 2010. Rock engineering problems related to underground hydrocarbon storage. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2(4), 289–297.
[16] Firme, P.A.L.P., Roehl, D., Romanel, C., 2019. Salt caverns history and geomechanics towards future natural gas strategic storage in Brazil. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 72, 103006.
[17] Rajendra Kumar, P., Muthukkumaran, K., Sharma, C., 2024. Reviewing Slope Stability Integration in Disaster Management and Land Use Planning. In: Sharma, C., Shukla, A.K., Pathak, S., et al. (Eds.). Sustainable Development and Geospatial Technology: Volume 2: Applications and Future Directions. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 139–151.
[18] Krevor, S., De Coninck, H., Gasda, S.E., et al., 2023. Subsurface carbon dioxide and hydrogen storage for a sustainable energy future. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 4(2), 102–118.
[19] Wood, D.A., 2024. Well integrity for underground gas storage relating to natural gas, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen. In: Wood, D.A., Cai, J. (Eds.). Sustainable Natural Gas Drilling: Technologies and Applications for the Energy Transition. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 551–576.
[20] Opoku Duartey, K., Ampomah, W., Rahnema, H., et al., 2025. Underground hydrogen storage: Transforming subsurface science into sustainable energy solutions. Energies. 18(3), 748.
[21] Bai, M., Zhang, Z., Fu, X., 2016. A review on well integrity issues for CO2 geological storage and enhanced gas recovery. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 59, 920–926.
[22] Zhang, Y., Oldenburg, C.M., Zhou, Q., et al., 2022. Advanced monitoring and simulation for underground gas storage risk management. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 208, 109763.
[23] Zemenkova, M.Y., Gladenko, A., Zemenkov, Y.D., 2020. Innovative intelligent technologies for predictive reliability and risk management in oil and gas transport and storage systems. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2285 (1), 050012.
[24] Mahmood, Y., Afrin, T., Huang, Y., et al., 2023. Sustainable development for oil and gas infrastructure from risk, reliability, and resilience perspectives. Sustainability. 15(6), 4953.
[25] Schultz, R.A.,Williams-Stroud, S., Horváth, B., et al., 2023. Underground energy-related product storage and sequestration: Site characterization, risk analysis and monitoring. In: Miocic, J.M., Heinemann, N., Alcalde, J., et al. (Eds.). Enabling Secure Subsurface Storage in Future Energy Systems. Geological Society: London, UK. pp. 37–59.
[26] Alsubaih, A.A.S., Sepehrnoori, K., Delshad, M., et al., 2025. A Comprehensive Review of Well Integrity Challenges and Digital Twin Applications Across Conventional, Unconventional, and Storage Wells. Energies. 18(17), 4757.
[27] Bai, M., Sun, J., Song, K., et al., 2015. Evaluation of mechanical well integrity during CO2 underground storage. Environmental Earth Sciences. 73(11), 6815–6825.
[28] Roy, S., Bhalla, S.K., 2017. Role of geotechnical properties of soil on civil engineering structures. Resources and Environment. 7(4), 103–109.
[29] Evans, D.J., Schultz, R.A., 2017. Analysis of occurrences at underground fuel storage facilities and assessment of the main mechanisms leading to loss of storage integrity. In Proceedings of the ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, CA, USA, 25–28 June 2017.
[30] Farh, H.M.H., Seghier, M.E.A.B., Zayed, T., 2023. A comprehensive review of corrosion protection and control techniques for metallic pipelines. Engineering Failure Analysis. 143, 106885.
[31] Chaithra, M., Krishnamoorthy, A., Avinash, A.R., 2023. A review on the modelling techniques of liquid storage tanks considering fluid–structure–soil interaction effects with a focus on the mitigation of seismic effects through base isolation techniques. Sustainability. 15(14), 11040.
[32] Wang, Z., Glais, Y., Qiao, L., et al., 2018. Hydro-geochemical analysis of the interplay between the groundwater, host rock and water curtain system for an underground oil storage facility. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 71, 466–477.
[33] Corina, A., Zikovic, V., Soustelle, V., et al., 2022. Review of Current Practices and Existing Experimental Data for Well and Rock Materials under Cyclic Hydrogen Injection and Withdrawal: H2020 HyUSPRe Project Report D. 5.1. HyUSPRe Project Consortium: The Hague, The Netherlands.
[34] Sharma, V.B., Tewari, S., Biswas, S., et al., 2024. A comprehensive study of techniques utilized for structural health monitoring of oil and gas pipelines. Structural Health Monitoring. 23(3), 1816–1841.
[35] Soroush, M., Mohammadtabar, M., Roostaei, M., et al., 2022. Downhole monitoring using distributed acoustic sensing: Fundamentals and two decades deployment in oil and gas industries. In Proceedings of the SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat, Oman, 21–23 March 2022.
[36] Ling, J., Feng, K., Wang, T., et al., 2023. Data modeling techniques for pipeline integrity assessment: A state-of-the-art survey. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 72, 1–17.
[37] Afrazi, M., Armaghani, D.J., Afrazi, H., et al., 2025. Real‐time monitoring of tunnel structures using digital twin and artificial intelligence: A short overview. Deep Underground Science and Engineering. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dug2.70029
[38] Kaczmarek, A., Blachowski, J., 2025. Remote Sensing Perspective on Monitoring and Predicting Underground Energy Sources Storage Environmental Impacts: Literature Review. Remote Sensing. 17(15), 2628.
[39] Sridhar, N., Thodla, R., Gui, F., et al., 2018. Corrosion-resistant alloy testing and selection for oil and gas production. Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology. 53(1_suppl), 75–89.
[40] Correia, J.B., Rodrigues, F., Santos, N., et al., 2022. Data management in digital twins for the oil and gas industry: beyond the osdu data platform. Journal of Information and Data Management. 13(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/jidm.2022.2506
[41] Cruz, A.M., Krausmann, E., 2013. Vulnerability of the oil and gas sector to climate change and extreme weather events. Climatic Change. 121(1), 41–53.
[42] Prodhan, R.K., Islam, M.M., Fazle, A.B., 2022. Integration of advanced NDT techniques & implementing QA/QC programs in enhancing safety and integrity in oil & gas operations. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 3(2), 1–35.
[43] Mohamed, A.-M.O., El Gamal, M., 2024. A novel polymerized sulfur concrete for underground hydrogen storage in lined rock caverns. Sustainability. 16(19), 8595.
[44] Pham, T.A., Nadimi, S., Sutman, M., 2024. Critical review of physical-mechanical principles in geostructure-soil interface mechanics. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 42(8), 6757–6808.
[45] Egwu, F.C., Eisazadeh, A., 2026. From Lime to Geopolymers: Emerging Trends and Advances in Sustainable Soil Stabilization. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies. 11(1), 2.
[46] Liu, Z., Beng, J., Wu, Y., et al., 2024. Microbial induced calcite precipitation for improving low-cohesive soil: Mechanisms, methods and macroscopic properties. Low-Carbon Materials and Green Construction. 2(1), 30.
[47] Zhang, T., Lowry, G.V., Capiro, N.L., et al., 2019. In situ remediation of subsurface contamination: Opportunities and challenges for nanotechnology and advanced materials. Environmental Science: Nano. 6(5), 1283–1302.
[48] Khatib, Z., Walsh, J., 2014. Extending the Life of Mature Assets: How integrating subsurface & surface knowledge and best practices can increase production and maintain integrity. In Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27–29 October 2014.
[49] Susani, S., 2024. Advances in Assessing the Sustainability of Geotechnical Ground Improvement Processes [PhD Thesis]. Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca: Milan, Italy.
[50] Yusuf, M., Agbahiwe, O.K., Animashaun, T.A., et al., 2025. Advances in Sustainable Geotechnical Engineering: A Review of Bio-mediated Soil Stabilisation, Cellular Confinement Systems, and Waste-Based Soil Improvements. Path of Science. 11(6), 7009–7021.
[51] Chang, Z., Chunni, H., Wanghua, S., 2025. Resilience of rock engineering: Concept, mechanism, evaluation and enhancement. Geoenvironmental Disasters. 12(1), 21.
[52] Uliasz-Misiak, B., Misiak, J., 2024. Underground gas storage in saline aquifers: Geological aspects. Energies. 17(7), 1666.
[53] Li, H., Ma, H., Zhang, H., et al., 2024. A New Evaluation System for Feasibility and Stability Analyses of Ultra-Large Salt Caverns Gas Storage. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 57(5), 3091–3107.
[54] Perera, M.S.A., 2023. A review of underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs: Insights into various rock-fluid interaction mechanisms and their impact on the process integrity. Fuel. 334, 126677.
[55] Ali, M., Isah, A., Yekeen, N., et al., 2025. Recent progress in underground hydrogen storage. Energy & Environmental Science. 18(12), 5740–5810.
[56] Lupunga, M.A., Huang, L., Li, H., 2024. Foundation Treatment, Reinforcement and Design Optimization for Oil Storage Tanks at TAZAMA Pipelines Limited (Ndola, Copperbelt Province, Zambia). Technium. 21, 1–37.
[57] Antaki, G.A., 2003. Piping and Pipeline Engineering: Design, Construction, Maintenance, Integrity, and Repair. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.
[58] Freifeld, B.M., Oldenburg, C., Jordan, P., et al., 2016. Well Integrity for Natural Gas Storage in Depleted Reservoirs and Aquifers. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL): Berkeley, CA, USA.
[59] Wen, C., Hu, S., Wang, J., et al., 2026. Fiber optic sensing technology in underground pipeline health monitoring: A comprehensive review. Structural Health Monitoring. 25(1), 630–658.
[60] Wong, B., McCann, J.A., 2021. Failure detection methods for pipeline networks: From acoustic sensing to cyber-physical systems. Sensors. 21(15), 4959.
[61] Klimchuk, A., MacDonald, R., Ferris, W., 2016. Performance Analysis of Engineered Liner Systems Used to Store Saline Fluids in the Canadian Oil and Gas Industry: Physical and Environmental Influences. Petroleum Technology Alliance Canada (PTAC): Calgary, AB, Canada.
[62] Beskopylny, A.N., Shcherban’, E.M., Stel’makh, S.A., et al., 2024. Analysis of the current state of research on bio-healing concrete (bioconcrete). Materials. 17(18), 4508.
[63] Kitanidis, P.K., 2015. Persistent questions of heterogeneity, uncertainty, and scale in subsurface flow and transport. Water Resources Research. 51(8), 5888–5904.
[64] Stoicescu, A.A., Ripeanu, R.G., Tănase, M., et al., 2025. Multifactorial analysis of defects in oil storage tanks: Implications for structural performance and safety. Processes. 13(8), 2575.
[65] King, M., Jain, A., Bhakar, R., et al., 2021. Overview of current compressed air energy storage projects and analysis of the potential underground storage capacity in India and the UK. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 139, 110705.
[66] i Vijaylakshm, S., 2025. Integration of Remote Sensing and Geotechnical Engineering Approaches for Sustainable Environmental Monitoring. Journal of Remote Sensing, Environmental Science & Geotechnical Engineering. 10(2), 79–90.
[67] Oni, B.A., Adebayo, I.A., Ojo, V.O., et al., 2025. Insight into underground hydrogen storage in aquifers: Current status, modeling, economic approaches and future outlook. Energy & Fuels. 39(22), 10274–10303.
[68] Cosford, J., Van Zeyl, D., Penner, L., 2014. Terrain analysis for pipeline design, construction, and operation. Journal of Pipeline Engineering. 13(3), 149–165.
[69] Liu, X., Liu, J., Wei, L., et al., 2026. A comprehensive review of geological detection technologies in horizontal directional drilling tunneling. In: Wu, M., Ding, H., Chen, J., et al. (Eds.). Leading the Way Forward: Resilience, Smart Technology, Low Carbon, and Sustainable Development. CRC Press: London, UK.
[70] Diniță, A., Ripeanu, R.G., Ilincă, C.N., et al., 2023. Advancements in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A comprehensive analysis. Polymers. 16(1), 2.
[71] Najafi, M., 2011. Pipeline rehabilitation systems for service life extension. In: Karbhari, V.M., Lee, L.S. (Eds.). Service Life Estimation and Extension of Civil Engineering Structures. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 262–289.
[72] Otegui, J.L., 2014. Challenges to the integrity of old pipelines buried in stable ground. Engineering Failure Analysis. 42, 311–323.
[73] Lei, W., Saeed, L., 2024. Climate-Resilient Geotechnics: Unsaturated Soils, Bio-Mediated Ground Improvement, and Nature-Based Solutions. Multidisciplinary Engineering Science Open. 1, 1–12.
[74] Ryder, A., Rapson, S., Domeney, R., 2016. Pipeline Technology and the Environment. In: Orszulik, S. (Ed.). Environmental Technology in the Oil Industry. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 321–373.
[75] Chen, P., 2025. Advancements and future outlook of safety monitoring, inspection and assessment technologies for oil and gas pipeline networks. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering. 5, 100267.
[76] Wang, Y., Rezaei, A., Hicks, S., 2025. Digital twin applications in geotechnical engineering: A systematic review. Machine Learning and Data Science in Geotechnics. 1(1), 78–92.
[77] Khwaja, S.A., Paul, S., 2022. Inspection of coated hydrogen transportation pipelines. Applied Sciences. 12(19), 9503.
[78] Witkowski, A., Rusin, A., Majkut, M., et al., 2015. Advances in Carbon Dioxide Compression and Pipeline Transportation Processes. Springer: Cham, Switzerland.
[79] Kaushal, V., Najafi, M., Serajiantehrani, R., 2020. Environmental impacts of conventional open-cut pipeline installation and trenchless technology methods: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice. 11(2), 03120001.
[80] Mihyeon Jeon, C., Amekudzi, A., 2005. Addressing sustainability in transportation systems: Definitions, indicators, and metrics. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. 11(1), 31–50.
[81] Sadeghi, K., Alsaadi, H.B., 2024. Towards Advanced Sustainable Materials for Onshore and Offshore Petroleum Platforms: A Critical Review of Technological Integration. Terra Joule Journal. 1(2), 5.
[82] Cherp, A., Jewell, J., Goldthau, A., 2011. Governing global energy: Systems, transitions, complexity. Global Policy. 2(1), 75–88.
[83] Mihai, S., Yqoob, M., Hung, D.V., et al., 2022. Digital twins: A survey on enabling technologies, challenges, trends and future prospects. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 24(4), 2255–2291.
[84] Ahmad, M.A., Yi, X., Munir, Q., et al., 2025. Nano-engineered Self-Healing Concrete: Application, Mechanism, Challenge and Prospect. Journal of Building Engineering. 113, 114179.
[85] Wan, Z., Qin, J., Wei, Z., 2023. Overview of technical research on safety monitoring, early warning, and risk assessment for underground structural engineering construction. Emergency Management Science and Technology. 3(1), 18.
[86] Day-Lewis, F.D., Slater, L.D., Robinson, J., et al., 2017. An overview of geophysical technologies appropriate for characterization and monitoring at fractured-rock sites. Journal of Environmental Management. 204, 709–720.
[87] O’Malley, M.J., Anwar, M.B., Heinen, S., et al., 2020. Multicarrier energy systems: Shaping our energy future. Proceedings of the IEEE. 108(9), 1437–1456.
[88] Shashank, B.S., Sharma, S., Sowmya, S., et al., 2016. State-of-the-art on geotechnical engineering perspective on bio-mediated processes. Environmental Earth Sciences. 75(3), 270.
[89] Xu, Y., Maican, C. 2025. An information processing theory framework for intelligent fault diagnosis and predictive maintenance. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 11, 1724801.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2026 Wei Fan, Long Yang, Fangfang B ai, Lin Fan

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.




Wei Fan