Marketing Program Implementation of Greek Fisheries Firms

Authors

  • Eleni Kaimakoudi Agricultural Economics Research Institute
  • Christina Sepetzoglou Department of Marine Sciences, School of the Environment, University of Aegean

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jfsr.v1i2.1108

Abstract

This study analyses the marketing program implementation in Greek fisheries firms. In this perspective, quantitative research with personal interviews to fisheries firms’ executives is elaborated. Data were analyzed elaborating cluster and discriminant analysis. Findings reveal that there are two distinct groups of Greek fisheries firms regarding their decisions about the components of marketing mix. The results demonstrate that there are differences among the two groups mainly in terms of price and distribution policies. Particularly, 62.6% of sample firms seem to dispose a differential marketing mix, while 37.4% of sample firms seem to dispose a non-differential marketing mix. Notably, both clusters are not aware of quality and sustainability assurance certifications regarding seafood products. From this perspective, there is a potential for a better organized marketing program implementation aiming to respond efficiently in modern market needs.

Keywords:

Marketing program implementation; Marketing mix elements; Fisheries firms; Cluster analysis

References

[1] Lee, R., Naylor, G., and Chen, Q. Linking customer resources to firm success: The role of marketing program implementation, Journal of Business Research, 2011, 64: 394-400

[2] Adams, P., Freitas, B, and Fontana, R. Strategic orientation, innovation performance and the moderating influence of marketing management. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 97: 129-140.

[3] Kaimakoudi, E., Polymeros, K. and Batzios, Ch. Investigating export performance of Balkan and Eastern European fisheries sector. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2014, 9: 219 – 230.

[4] CFP. 2018. CFP Facts and figures on the common fisheries policy. Basic statistical data 2018 Edition.

[5] ISBN 978-92-79-74555-3; DOI:10.2771/294952

[6] Kaimakoudi, E., Polymeros, K, Schinaraki, M. and Batzios, Ch. Consumers’ attitudes towards fisheries products. Procedia Technology, 2013, 8: 90–96.

[7] Wilden, R., Gudergan, P., Nielsen, B., and Lings, I. Dynamic Capabilities and Performance: Strategy, Structure and Environment. Long Range Planning, 2013, 46: 72-96.

[8] Schroder, M., McEachern, M. Fast foods and ethical consumer value: a focus on McDonald’s and KFC. British Food Journal, 2005, 107(4): 212 – 224

[9] Milagrosa, A., Institutional economic analysis of vegetable production and marketing in northern Philippines: Social Capital, Institutions and Governance 2007, Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University.

[10] Zanoli, R., Gambelli, D., and Vairo, D. Scenarios of the organic food market in Europe. Food Policy, 2012, 37: 41–57

[11] Forsman S. How do small rural food-processing firms compete? A resource-based approach to competitive strategies. Agricultural and food science, 2004, Supplement 1, x13: 1 – 130

[12] Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., and Tatham, R. Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2006: 233 - 678

[13] Quazi, H., Khoob, Y., Tanc, C., and Wong, P. Motivation for ISO 14000 certification: development of a predictive model. Omega, 2001, 29: 525–542

[14] Ahmed, N., Young, J., Dey, M, and Muir, J. From production to consumption: a case study of tilapia marketing systems in Bangladesh. Aquaculture International. 2011.

[15] DOI: 10.1007/s10499-011-9441-0

[16] Malvarosa, L. and Cozzolino, M. The “fasolari” fishery in Northern Adriatic: the role of PO in enhancing the sector competitiveness. Eurofish magazine 2016, no. 2/2016 February, 2016 Copenaghen

[17] Villasante, S., Rodrıguez, D., Antelo, M., Quaas, M., and Osterblom, H. The Global Seafood Market Performance Index: A theoretical proposal and potential empirical applications. Marine Policy, 2012, 36: 142-152

[18] DOI: org/10.1016/j.marpol.2011.04.007

[19] Whitmarsh, D., and Palmieri, G. Consumer behaviour and environmental preferences: a case study of Scottish salmon aquaculture. Aquaculture Research, 2011, 42: 142-147.

[20] DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02672.x

[21] Castro, M, Digal, L., Bayogan, R., and Alcomendras, D. Consumer Preferences for Canned Tuna Products: The Case of the Largest Tuna-Producing City in the Philippines. Asian Fisheries Science, 2016, 29: 192-205

[22] Cozzolino, M. Consumers interested in certified products. Eurofish magazine 2018, N°1/2018, 2018.

[23] Capitello, R, and Sirieix, L. Consumers’ Perceptions of Sustainable Wine: An Exploratory Study in France and Italy. Economies, 2019, 33.

[24] DOI: 10.3390/economies7020033

[25] Zander, K and Feucht, Y. Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Seafood Made in Europe, Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 2017.

[26] DOI: 10.1080/08974438.2017.1413611

[27] Gambelli, D., Vairo, D., Solfanelli, F., and Zanoli, R. Economic performance of organic aquaculture: A systematic review. Marine Policy. 2019, In press.

[28] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103542

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 1 , Iss. 2 (October 2019)

Article Type

Articles

License

Copyright and Licensing

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

Journal of Fisheries Science publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by Journal of Fisheries Science agree to have the CC BY-NC 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for non-commercial use. As long as you follow the license terms and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material.

License Policy for Reuse of Third-Party Materials

If a manuscript submitted to the journal contains the materials which are held in copyright by a third-party, authors are responsible for obtaining permissions from the copyright holder to reuse or republish any previously published figures, illustrations, charts, tables, photographs, and text excerpts, etc. When submitting a manuscript, official written proof of permission must be provided and clearly stated in the cover letter.
The editorial office of the journal has the right to reject/retract articles that reuse third-party materials without permission.

Journal Policies on Data Sharing

We encourage authors to share articles published in our journal to other data platforms, but only if it is noted that it has been published in this journal.