Molecular identification of hammerhead shark trunks from the southern Gulf of California using multiplex PCR

Authors

  • Thelma A Aguilar-Rendón Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa
  • José Juan Rendón-Herrera Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa
  • Virginia Osuna-González Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa
  • Erick Cristóbal Oñate González Autonomous University of Nuevo León
  • Omar Domínguez-Domínguez Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo
  • Nancy Claudia Saavedra-Sotelo Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jfsr.v2i1.1685

Abstract

The demand for shark fins in Asiatic markets has resulted in excessive increases in shark catches, even for species that may be under protection or subject to management. As such, it has been necessary to develop and promote monitoring efforts for exploited species and taxonomic groups in order to improve fishing management strategies for elasmobranchs. Identifying species from landings is one of many fishing management problems because landed organisms have usually already been processed and are therefore incomplete, which makes identification problematic, impedes the generation of proper species records, and leads to poor fishery assessments. Tools that can correctly identify species, such as various molecular techniques, have become essential for accurate fishery assessments. In this study, 30 hammerhead trunks from artisanal fisheries from the southern portion of the Gulf of California were identified using multiplex PCR (17 Sphyrna lewini and 13 Sphyrna zygaena). The total fee to identify each trunk with this technique was ~ $3.80 and the procedure required 2 to 5 days. When compared with other widely-used methods, such as PCR-RFLP or barcoding, multiplex PCR is fast, efficient, low-cost, and easy to implement in a laboratory.

Keywords:

Sphyrna; ITS2; molecular marker; ribosomal DNA; electrophoreses

References

[1] Bonfil R (1994) Overview of world elasmobranch fisheries. [R]. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 341. Roma.

[2] Shivji M, Clarke S, Pank M, Natanson L, Kohler N, Stanhope M (2002) Genetic identification of pelagic shark body parts for conservation and trade monitoring. [J]. Conservation Biology, 16: 1036-1047. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01188.x.

[3] Abercrombie D, Clarke SC, Shivji MS (2005) Global-scale genetic identification of hammerhead sharks: Application to assessment of the international fin trade and law enforcement. [J]. Conservation Genetics, 6: 775-788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9036-2

[4] Lack M and Sant G (2009) Trends in global shark catch and recent developments in management. [M]. TRAFFIC International. 30 pp.

[5] Musick JA and Musick S (2011) Sharks. [R]. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Reviews and Studies. FAO. Rome.

[6] Dent F and Clarke S (2015) State of the global market for shark products. [R]. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 590. FAO. Rome. 187 pp.

[7] Dulvy NK, Simpfendorfer CA, Davidson LNK, Fordham SV, Bräutigam A, Sant G, Welch DJ (2017) Challenges and Priorities in Shark and Ray Conservation. [J]. Current Biology, 27, 11: R565-R572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.038.

[8] Clarke SC, Milner-Gulland EJ, BjØrndal T (2007). Social, Economic, and Regulatory Drivers of the Shark Fin Trade. [J]. Marine Resource Economics, 22, 3: 305-327.

[9] Musick JA (2005) Shark utilization. In Musick J and Bonfil R (eds) Elasmobranch fisheries management techniques. [R]. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 474. Rome.

[10] Steinke D, Berdard AM, Horn RL, Hilton P, Hanner R, Shivij MS (2017) DNA analysis of traded shark fins and mobulid gill plates reveals a high proportion of species of conservation concern. [J]. Scientific Reports, 7, 9505. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10123-5

[11] Castillo-Géniz JL and Tovar-Ávila J (2016). Tiburones mexicanos de importancia en la CITES. [R]. Instituto Nacional de la Pesca. México. P: 11-15.

[12] Pérez-Jiménez JC (2014) Historical records reveal potential extirpation of four hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna spp.) in Mexico Pacific waters. [J]. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 24: 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-014-9353-y

[13] Castro JI (1983) The Sharks of North American Waters. [M]. Texas: Texas A&M University Press, College Station. 180 pp.

[14] Dudgeon CL, Blower DC, Broderick D, Giles JL, Holmes BJ, Kashiwagi T, Krück NC, Morgan JAT, Tillett BJ, Ovenden JR 2012. A review of the application of molecular genetics for fisheries management and conservation of sharks and rays. [J]. Journal of Fish Biology, 80: 1789-1843.10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03265.x

[15] Holmes HH, Steinke D, Ward RD (2009) Identification of shark and ray fins using DNA barcoding. [J]. Fisheries Research, 95, 2–3: 280-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2008.09.036

[16] Castro JI, Woodley C, Brudek R (1999). A preliminary evaluation of the status of shark species. [R]. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 380. Roma. 72 pp.

[17] INP (2012) Plan de Manejo de la Pesquería de Tiburones y Rayas del Pacífico Mexicano. [R]. Dirección General Adjunta de Investigación Pesquera en el Pacífico. México: Instituto Nacional de Pesca.

[18] Smith E, Au D, Show C (1998) Intrinsic rebound potentials of 26 species of Pacific sharks. [J]. Marine and Freshwater Research, 49, 7: 663 - 678. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF97135

[19] Clarke SC, Magnussen JE, Abercrombie DA, McAllister MK, Shivji MS (2006) Identification of shark species composition and proportion in the Hong Kong shark fin market base on molecular genetics and trade records. [J]. Conservation Biology, 20: 201-211.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00247.x

[20] Liu SYV, Chan CLC, Lin O, Hu CS, Chen CA (2013) DNA barcoding of shark meats identify species composition and CITES-listed species from the markets in Taiwan. [J]. PLOS ONE, 8, 11: e79373. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079373

[21] Chuang PS, Hung TC, Chang HA, Huang CK, Shiao JC (2016) The species and origin of shark fins in Taiwan´s fishing ports, markets, and customs detention: a DNA barcoding analysis. [J]. PLOS ONE, 11, 1: e0147290. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147290

[22] Feitosa LM, Barbosa-Martins AP, Giarrizzo T, Macedo W, Monteiro IL, Gemaque R, Silva-Nuñes JL, Gomes F, Schneider H, Sampaio I, Souza R, Sales JB, Rodrigues-Filho LF, Tchaicka L, Carvalho-Costa LF (2018) DNA-based identification reveals illegal trade of threatened shark species in a global elasmobranch conservation hotspot. [J]. Scientific Reports, 8, 3347. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21683-5

[23] Pank M, Stanhope M, Natanson L, Kohler N, Shivji M (2001) Rapid and simultaneous identification of body parts from the morphologically similar sharks Carcharhinus obscurus and Carcharhinus plumbeus (Carcharhinidae) using multiplex PCR. [J]. Marine Biotechnology, 3: 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101260000071

[24] Chapple DG and Ritchie PA (2013) A retrospective approach to testing the DNA barcoding method. [J]. PLOS ONE, 8, 11: e77882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077882

[25] Mendonça FF, Hashimoto DT, Porto-Foresti F, Oliveira C, Gadig OB, Foresti F (2009) Identification of the shark species Rhizoprionodon lalandii and R. porosus (Elasmobranchii, Carcharhinidae) by multiplex PCR and PCR-RFLP techniques. [J]. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9: 771-773.10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02524.x

[26] Caballero S, Cardeñosa D, Soler G, Hyde J (2012) Application of multiplex PCR approaches for shark molecular identification: feasibility and applications for fisheries management and conservation in the Eastern Tropical Pacific. [J]. Molecular Ecology Resources, 12: 233-237:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03089.x

[27] Sebastian H, Haye PA, Shivhi MS (2008) Characterization of the pelagic shark-fin trade in north-central Chile by genetic identification and trader surveys. [J]. Journal of Fish Biology, 73: 2293–2304.10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02016.x

[28] Clarke SC, McAllister MK, Milner-Gulland EJ, Kirkwood GP, Michielsens CGJ, Agnew DJ, Pikitch EK, Nakano H, Shivji MS (2006) Global estimates of shark catches using trade records from commercial markets. [J] Ecology Letters, 9: 1115-1126.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00968.x

[29] Sembiring A, Pertiwi NPD, Mahardini A, Wulandari R, Kurniasih EM, Kuncoro AW, Cahyani NKD, Anggoro AW, Ulfa M, Madduppa H, Carpenter KE, Barber PH, Mahardika GN (2015) DNA barcoding reveals target fisheries for endangered sharks in Indonesia. [J]. Fisheries Research, 164: 130-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.11.003

[30] da Silva Rodrigues-Filho LF, da Rocha TC, Sena do Rêgo P, Schneider H, Sampaio I, Vallinoto M (2009) Identification and phylogenetic inferences on stocks of sharks affected by the fishing industry off the Northern coast of Brazil. [J]. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 32, 2: 405-413. 10.1590/S1415-47572009005000039

[31] Jabado RW, Al Ghais SM, Hamza W, Herderson AC, Spaet JLY, Shivji MS, Hanner RH (2015) The trade in sharks and their products in the United Arab Emirates. [J]. Biological Conservation, 181: 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.032

[32] Vélez-Zuazo X and Agnarsson I (2011) Shark tales: a molecular species-level phylogeny of sharks (Selachimorpha, Chondrichthyes). [J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 58, 2: 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.11.018

[33] Bineesh KK, Gopalakrishnan A, Akhilesh KV, Sajeela KA, Abdussamad EM, Pillai NGK, Basheer VS, Jena JK, Ward RD (2016). DNA barcoding reveals species composition of shark and rays in the Indian commercial fishery. [J]. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 28, 4: 458-472: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1137900.

[34] O´Bryhim JR, Parsons ECM, Lance ST (2017) Forensic species identification of elasmobranch products sold in Costa Rica markets. [J]. Fisheries Research, 186, 1: 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.08.020

[35] Almerón-Souza F, Sperb C, Castillo CL, Figueiredo PICC, Gonçalves LT, Machado R, Oliveira LR, Valiati VH, Fagundes JR (2018) Molecular identification of shark meat from local markets in Southern Brazil base on DNA Barcoding: evidence for mislabeling and trade of endangered species. [J]. Frontiers in Genetics, 9: 138. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00138

[36] Appleyard SA, White WT, Vieira S, Sabub B (2018). Artisanal shark fishing in Milne Bay Province, Papua New Guinea: biomass estimation from genetically identified shark and ray fins. [J]. Scientific Reports, 8, 1: 6693. 10.1038/s41598-018-25101-8

[37] Kuguru G, Maduna S, da Silva C, Gennari E, Rhode C, Bester-van der Merwe A (2018) DNA barcoding of chondrichthyans in South African fisheries. [J]. Fisheries Research, 206: 292-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.05.023

[38] Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis. [M]. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall Internationl. London. 944 pp.

[39] Aljanabi SM and Martinez I (1997) Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. [J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 25, 2: 4692–4693. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.22.4692

[40] Chapman D, Abercrombie D, Douady C, Pikitch E, Stanhope M, Shivji M (2003) A streamlined, bi-organelle, multiplex PCR approach to species identification: application to global conservation and trade monitoring of the great white shark, Carcharodon carcharias. [J]. Conservation Genetics, 4: 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024771215616

[41] Gaither MR, Szabó Z, Crepeau MW, Brid CE, Toonen RJ (2011) Preservation of corals in salt-saturated DMSO buffer is superior ethanol for PCR experiments. [J]. Coral Reefs 30: 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-010-0687-1

[42] Bizzarro JJ, Smith WD, Castillo–Géniz JL, Ocampo-Torres A, Márquez–Farías JF, Hueter RE (2009) The seasonal importance of small coastal sharks and rays in the artisanal elasmobranch fishery of Sinaloa, Mexico. [J]. Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 4, 4: 513-531.

[43] Corro-Espinosa D (2016) La importancia pesquera de los tiburones incluidos en el apéndice II de la CITES en aguas de México. Sinaloa. [M]. In: Castillo-Géniz JL and Tovar-Ávila J (eds) Tiburones mexicanos de importancia en la CITES. Instituto Nacional de Pesca. Mexico. P: 29 – 93.

[44] Coiraton C, Amezcua F, Salgado-Ugarte IH (2017) Estructura de longitudes de las capturas del tiburón martillo común (Sphyrna lewini) en el Pacífico mexicano. [J]. Ciencia Pesquera, 25: 27-40.

[45] Castro JI (2011) Sharks of North America. [M]. Oxford University Press USA. 613 pp.

[46] Saldaña-Ruíz LE (2017) The artisanal shark fishery in the Gulf of California: Historical catch reconstruction and vulnerability of shark species to the fishery. [D]. Doctor of Science thesis. Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada. Ensenada, Baja California, México. 73 pp.

[47] Tovar-Ávila J and Gallegos-Camacho R (2014) Oldest estimated age for Sphyrna mokarran (Carcharhiniformes: Sphyrnidae) in the Mexican Pacific. [J]. Hidrobiológica, 24, 2: 163-165.

[48] Cocolin L, D’Agaro ED, Manzano M, Lanari D, Comi G (2000) Rapid PCR-RFLP method for the identification of marine fish fillets (Seabass, Seabream, Umbrine, and Dentex). [J]. Journal of Food Science, 65: 1315-1317. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb10604.x

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 2 , Iss. 1 (March 2020)

Article Type

Articles

License

Copyright and Licensing

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

Journal of Fisheries Science publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by Journal of Fisheries Science agree to have the CC BY-NC 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for non-commercial use. As long as you follow the license terms and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material.

License Policy for Reuse of Third-Party Materials

If a manuscript submitted to the journal contains the materials which are held in copyright by a third-party, authors are responsible for obtaining permissions from the copyright holder to reuse or republish any previously published figures, illustrations, charts, tables, photographs, and text excerpts, etc. When submitting a manuscript, official written proof of permission must be provided and clearly stated in the cover letter.
The editorial office of the journal has the right to reject/retract articles that reuse third-party materials without permission.

Journal Policies on Data Sharing

We encourage authors to share articles published in our journal to other data platforms, but only if it is noted that it has been published in this journal.