[1] Trung, N.X., Hiep, T.X., 2026. Ecological governance in the Mekong: U.S. engagement and ASEAN's role amid strategic rivalry with China. Research in Ecology. 8(4), 153–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v8i4.13383

[2] Sor, R., Ngor, P.B., Soum, S., et al., 2021. Water quality degradation in the Lower Mekong Basin. Water. 13(11), 1555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13111555

[3] Ly, S., Uk, S., Theng, V., et al., 2024. Integration of life cycle and habitat conditions in modeling fish biomass in the floodplain of the Lower Mekong Basin. Ecological Modelling. 488, 110605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110605

[4] Zhang, M., 2023. Cooperation on transboundary fine dust: Revisiting Korea's prudential environmental diplomacy toward China and its policy effectiveness. Asian Perspective. 47(3), 489–511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2023.a905235

[5] Sebastião, S.P., Soares, I., 2023. Environmental diplomacy: From transnational policies to the role of ambassadors – the contribution of David Attenborough (2018–2020). Journal of Communication Management. 27(2), 207–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-04-2022-0030

[6] Sakaguchi, I., Ishii, A., Sanada, Y., et al., 2021. Japan's environmental diplomacy and the future of Asia-Pacific environmental cooperation. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 21(1), 121–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcaa020

[7] Li, G., Zakari, A., Tawiah, V., 2020. Does environmental diplomacy reduce CO₂ emissions? A panel group means analysis. Science of the Total Environment. 722, 137790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137790

[8] Abid, N., Ceci, F., Razzaq, A., 2023. Inclusivity of information and communication technology in ecological governance for sustainable resources management in G10 countries. Resources Policy. 81, 103378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103378

[9] Feng, X., Qiu, H., Liu, M., et al., 2024. Innovation of grassland ecological governance systems: Synergy between government regulation and grassroots governance. Ecological Economics. 217, 108087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108087

[10] Xia, Y., Tian, Z., Ding, C., 2024. Collaborative governance in action: Driving ecological sustainability in the Yangtze River basin. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 12, 1463179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1463179

[11] Winkler, K.J., Garcia Rodrigues, J., Albrecht, E., et al., 2021. Governance of ecosystem services: A review of empirical literature. Ecosystems and People. 17(1), 306–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1938235

[12] Paauw, M., Scown, M., Triyanti, A., et al., 2022. Adaptive governance of river deltas under accelerating environmental change. Utrecht Law Review. 18(2), 30–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.803

[13] Winter, A.K., Karvonen, A., 2022. Climate governance at the fringes: Peri-urban flooding drivers and responses. Land Use Policy. 117, 106124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106124

[14] May, C.K., 2022. Complex adaptive governance systems: A framework to understand institutions, organizations, and people in socio-ecological systems. Socio-Ecological Practice Research. 4(1), 39–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-021-00101-7

[15] Tri, V.P.D., Yarina, L., Nguyen, H.Q., et al., 2023. Progress toward resilient and sustainable water management in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water. 10(6), e1670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1670

[16] Fallon, A., Jones, R.W., Keskinen, M., 2022. Bringing resilience-thinking into water governance: Two illustrative case studies from South Africa and Cambodia. Global Environmental Change. 75, 102542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102542

[17] Rocha, J., Lanyon, C., Peterson, G., 2022. Upscaling the resilience assessment through comparative analysis. Global Environmental Change. 72, 102419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102419

[18] Shepherd, P.M., Dissart, J.-C., 2022. Reframing vulnerability and resilience to climate change through the lens of capability generation. Ecological Economics. 201, 107556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107556

[19] Rölfer, L., Abson, D.J., Máñez Costa, M., et al., 2022. Leveraging governance performance to enhance climate resilience. Earth's Future. 10(10), e2022EF003012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003012

[20] Mehryar, S., Yazdanpanah, V., Tong, J., 2024. AI and climate resilience governance. iScience. 27(6), 109812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.109812

[21] Blaxekjær, L., 2016. Korea as green middle power: Green growth strategic action in the field of global environmental governance. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 16(3), 443–476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcv023

[22] Kang, M.H., 2022. South Korea's New Southern Policy as middle power diplomacy. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis. 34(1), 37–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22883/kjda.2022.34.1.003

[23] Abbondanza, G., 2022. Whither the Indo-Pacific? Middle power strategies from Australia, South Korea and Indonesia. International Affairs. 98(2), 403–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab231

[24] Yoo, I.T., Cho, Y.C., 2022. Middle power diplomacy knowledge production in South Korea: A critical interpretation. Asian Perspective. 46(4), 627–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2022.0025

[25] Pratama, A., Karim, M.F., 2023. Middle power and symbolic power in climate change negotiations: The case of Indonesia's strategy in the Katowice Climate Change Conference. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional. 25(1), 114–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v25i1.1260

[26] Beringen, E., 2023. How Australia's middle power identity has informed its behaviour at the BBNJ negotiations. Chinese Journal of Environmental Law. 7(1), 42–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/24686042-12340097

[27] Johnson, M.F., Rodríguez, L.A., Quijano Hoyos, M., 2021. Intrastate environmental peacebuilding: A review of the literature. World Development. 137, 105150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105150

[28] Johnson, M.F., Ide, T., Gonzalez Cruz, J., 2023. Conceptualizing resilience within environmental peacebuilding. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 65, 101362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101362

[29] Hachmann, S., Löhr, K., Morales-Muñoz, H., et al., 2023. Conceptualizing community-based environmental peacebuilding in Cesar, Colombia. Human Ecology. 51(2), 221–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-023-00399-9

[30] Rüland, A.-L., 2023. The effectiveness of science diplomacy between adversarial states: Insights from US–Cuban and US–Iranian science collaborations. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy. 18(4), 509–533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-bja10147

[31] Chiu, N., 2023. Orbis non sufficit—Co-operation and discord in global space and disarmament governance. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy. 18(2–3), 351–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-bja10164

[32] Beltran, M., Tjahjono, B., Suoneto, T.N., et al., 2024. Rethinking marine plastics pollution: Science diplomacy and multi-level governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 90(1), 237–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231183909

[33] Gehrke, C., 2023. Wild polar bear conservation: A case of successful Arctic science diplomacy? Marine Policy. 155, 105783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105783

[34] Cooper, A.F. (Ed.), 1997. Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25902-1

[35] Lu, M., Yanco, S.W., Carlson, B.S., et al., 2025. A theoretical framework for scaling ecological niches from individuals to species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 122(35), e2425582122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2425582122

[36] Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., 2023. The macroecological understanding of ecological niches. In The Macroecological Perspective: Theories, Models and Methods. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 167–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44611-5_5

[37] Ahn, S.H., 2019. Anatomy of the Republic of Korea's niche strategic engagement in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS): ROK's tailor-made strategy and its security policy implication. Korean Journal of Policy Studies. 34(3), 97–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52372/kjps34305

[38] Teo, S., 2023. South Korea in the ASEAN-centered regional network. Asian Politics & Policy. 15(1), 98–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12676

[39] Howe, B.M., 2022. Whither South Korean niche diplomacy in an era of competing triangulation? Korea Europe Review: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Politics, Society, and Economics. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48770/ker.2022.no2.9

[40] Kumar, S., Park, E., Tran, D.D., et al., 2026. Counterfactual modeling isolates sand mining impacts, revealing it as a key driver of Mekong Delta destabilization. Science Advances. 12(28), eaef0558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aef0558

[41] Po, S., Primiano, C.B., 2021. Explaining China's Lancang-Mekong cooperation as an institutional balancing strategy: Dragon guarding the water. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 75(3), 323–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2021.1893266

[42] Tho, T.V., 2025. Mekong-Japan cooperation: Current status and prospects. TNU Journal of Science and Technology. 230(11), 476–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.13399 (in Vietnamese)

[43] Pich, C., 2021. The Mekong River and Mekong subregion cooperation. In: Deth, S.U., Murg, B.J., Ou, V., et al. (Eds.). Cambodia 2040: International Relations and Governance, Vol. 3. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Future Forum: Phnom Penh, Cambodia. pp. 49–71.

[44] Minh, H.V.T., Kumar, P., Meraj, G., et al., 2024. Climate-driven runoff variability in semi-mountainous reservoirs of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta: Insights for sustainable water management. Irrigation and Drainage. 73(4), 1633–1653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2968

[45] Zhang, C., Zhu, R., Sui, X., et al., 2021. Understanding patterns of taxonomic diversity, functional diversity, and ecological drivers of fish fauna in the Mekong River. Global Ecology and Conservation. 28, e01711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01711

[46] Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (WWT), 2023. The Status of Wetland Habitats in the Cambodia Lower Mekong Delta. Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (WWT): Slimbridge, UK.

[47] Park, E., 2024. Sand mining in the Mekong Delta: Extent and compounded impacts. Science of the Total Environment. 924, 171620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171620

[48] Lee, K.H., Ro, Y.J., 2021. The New Southern Policy Plus: Progress and Way Forward. SSRN. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4062021

[49] Yeh, K.-H., Li, S., 2025. South-South cooperation across the Mekong: Practices, dilemmas, and pathways of competitive regionalism. Medjunarodni Problemi. 77(3), 467–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP2503467Y

[50] Aini, R.Q., 2026. Hedging in disguise: South Korea and ASEAN's alignment behaviours amid great powers competition. Thammasat Review. 29(1), 91–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70730/tureview.v29i1.241470

[51] Yi, S., Ryu, M., Suh, J., et al., 2020. K-water's integrated water resources management system (K-HIT, K-water Hydro Intelligent Toolkit). Water International. 45(6), 552–573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2020.1830583

[52] Le, H.K., Tran, D.T., 2025. Strategic transformation: Analyzing South Korea's national security strategy under President Yoon Suk-yeol. Thu Dau Mot University Journal of Science. 7(2), 424–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37550/tdmu.EJS/2025.02.642

[53] So, J.K., 2019. Inclusive growth through Saemaul Undong in Korea. Area Development and Policy. 4(4), 399–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2018.1549503

[54] Mekong River Commission, 2024. Mekong River Basin 2023 State of the Basin Report. Mekong River Commission: Vientiane, Laos. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52107/mrc.c80wb7

[55] Mekong Institute, n.d. Mekong-Republic of Korea Cooperation Fund: Supporting Catalytic and Innovative Activities in Seven Priority Sectors. Available from: https://mekonginstitute.org/what-we-do/mkcf-fund/mkcf-projects-overview/ (cited 20 July 2026).

[56] Suporn, T., Bunyavejchewin, P., 2024. Mekong–ROK cooperation: A perspective from Thailand. Asian Affairs: An American Review. 51(2), 80–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2023.2298173

[57] Mekong River Commission, 2024. MRC Annual Report 2023. Mekong River Commission: Vientiane, Laos.

[58] Nghi, N.T., Tu, N.C., 2025. The US-China competition in Southeast Asia from the perspective of offensive realism. Strategic Analysis. 49(5), 517–535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2025.2604352

[59] Xuan, T.N., Kim, A.N., 2025. The U.S. perspective on Mekong sub-regional cooperation and policy implications for Vietnam. Social Sciences Information Review. 19(2), 38–45. Available from: https://www.vjol.info.vn/ssirev/en/article/view/128979/

[60] Lee, Y., Han, S., Cho, Y., 2025. Navigating the path to smart and sustainable cities: Insights from South Korea's National Strategic Smart City Program. Land. 14(5), 928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land14050928

[61] Dang, A.T., Kumar, L., Reid, M., et al., 2021. Modelling the susceptibility of wetland plant species under climate change in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Ecological Informatics. 64, 101358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101358