Future Scenarios for CO2 Sequestration by Oil Palm in Southeast Asia Versus Other Regions to Reduce Climate Change
Authors
-
Robert Russell Monteith Paterson
Centre of Biological Engineering, Gualtar Campus, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/sadr.v1i1.10082Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil fuels are a significant contributor to climate change. Concentrations of CO2 were in balance when emissions were controlled by the photosynthetic capabilities of organisms on land and in oceans. Palm oil is a valuable commodity, and vast plantations of oil palm (OP) have been created, especially in Malaysia and Indonesia, which have involved destroying rainforests and growing palms on peat soil, which increases CO2 emissions. However, OPs are effective at sequestrating CO2, and growing OPs on degraded land may allow sequestration to combat climate change. Future scenarios for CO2 sequestration are presented in this report by employing a CLIMEX computer programme, climate models, and narratives to determine optimal future sequestration. High levels of CO2 sequestration by OP will be maintained generally until 2070, but this will decrease dramatically by 2100. Parts of Malaysia and Indonesia will have significantly greater sequestration than others. Some novel regions of high sequestration may occur in Paraguay and Uganda. Overall, it cannot be assumed that the OP will continue to sequester CO2 in the same places where it currently grows well. The modelling provides a basis for making decisions regarding where to grow OP for CO2 sequestration in the future. More modelling of future OP growth is required, focusing on the CO2 sequestration potential.
Keywords:
Elaeis guineensis; CLIMEX; Narrative Model; Carbon Dioxide; Climate Change; Sequestration; MalaysiaReferences
[1] Murphy, D.J., 2024. Carbon sequestration by tropical trees and crops: a case study of oil palm. Agriculture. 14, 1133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071133
[2] Colozza, D., 2024. UNICEF. Climate Change and Nutrition in Indonesia. A Review of the Evidence for Policy and Programme Strengthening. United Nations Children’s Fund: Jakarta, Indonesia.
[3] Hansen, J.E., Sato, M., Simons, L., et al., 2023. Global warming in the pipeline. Oxford Open Climate Change. 3, 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfclm/kgad008
[4] Anon., 2025. Copernicus Climate Change Service. Available from: https://climate.copernicus.eu (cited 1 January 2025).
[5] Grüter, R., Trachsel, T., Laube, P., et al., 2022. Expected global suitability of coffee, cashew and avocado due to climate change. PLoS ONE. 17, e0261976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261976
[6] Cassamo, C.T., Draper, D., Romeiras, M.M., et al., 2023. Impact of climate changes in the suitable areas for Coffea arabica L. production in Mozambique: agroforestry as an alternative management system to strengthen crop sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 346, 108341.
[7] Ogunkanmi, L., MacCarthy, D.S., Adiku, S.G.K., 2022. Impact of extreme temperature and soil water stress on the growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Agriculture. 12, 43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010043
[8] Paterson, R.R.M., 2023. Future climate effects on yield and mortality of conventional versus modified oil palm in SE Asia. Plants. 12, 2236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122236
[9] Paterson, R.R.M., Kumar, L., Taylor, S., et al., 2015. Future climate effects on suitability for growth of oil palms in Malaysia and Indonesia. Scientific Reports. 5, 14457.
[10] Paterson, R.R.M., Kumar, L., Shabani, F., et al., 2017. World climate suitability projections to 2050 and 2100 for growing oil palms. Journal of Agricultural Science. 155, 659–702.
[11] Soares, J.R.S., Ramos, R.S., Siqueira da Silva, R., et al., 2021. Climate change impact assessment on worldwide rain fed soybean based on species distribution models. Tropical Ecology. 62, 612–625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-021-00174-1
[12] Forzieri, G., Dakos, V., McDowell, N.G., et al., 2022. Emerging signals of declining forest resilience under climate change. Nature. 608, 534–539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04959-9
[13] Bottino, M.J., Nobre, P., Giarolla, E., et al., 2024. Amazon savannization and climate change are projected to increase dry season length and temperature extremes over Brazil. Scientific Reports. 14, 5131.
[14] Allen, M.R., Frame, D.J., Fridlingstein, P., et al., 2024. Geological net zero and the need for disaggregated accounting for carbon sinks. Nature. 638(8050), 343–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08326-8
[15] Wang, N., Akimbo, K., Nemet, G., 2021. What went wrong? Learning from three decades of carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS) pilot and demonstration projects. Energy Policy. 158, 112546.
[16] Paterson, R.R.M., Lima, N., 2018. Climate change affecting oil palm agronomy, and oil palm cultivation increasing climate change, require amelioration. Ecology and Evolution. 8, 452–461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3610
[17] Lamade, E., Bouillet, J.P., 2005. Carbon storage and global change: the role of oil palm. OCL. 12, 154–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl.2005.0154
[18] Murphy, D., 2024. The role of oil palm crops in global carbon sequestration. Proceedings of The Oil and Fats International Congress (OFIC) 2024; October 22–23, 2024; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/denis-murphy-3b144a26_our-latest-report-on-sustainable-palm-oil-activity-7297281055110189057-s-rE/ (accessed on 10 January 2025).
[19] Pulhin, F.B., Lasco, R.D., Urquiola, J.P., 2014. Carbon sequestration potential of OP in Bohol, Philippines. Ecosystem Development Journal. 4, 14–19.
[20] Kho, L.K., Jepsen, M.R., 2015. Carbon stock of oil palm plantations and tropical forests in Malaysia: a review. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. 36, 139–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12100
[21] Paterson, R.R.M., 2022. Longitudinal trends of future suitable climate for conserving oil palm indicates refuges in tropical south-east Asia with comparisons to Africa and South America. Pacific Conservation Biology. 28, 57–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PC20067
[22] Jamaludin, N.F., Muis, Z.A., Hashim, H., et al., 2024. A holistic mitigation model for net zero emissions in the palm oil industry. Heliyon. 10, e27265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27265
[23] Fleiss, S., Hill, J.K., McClean, C., et al., 2018. Potential impacts of climate change on oil palm cultivation. A science-for-policy paper by the SEnSOR programme. Available from: https://sensorproject.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Climate-change-report-FINAL.pdf (cited 1 January 2025).
[24] White, A.C., Rogers, A., Rees, M., et al., 2016. How can we make plants grow faster? A source–sink perspective on growth rate. Journal of Experimental Botany. 67, 31–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv447
[25] Walker, A.P., De Kauwe, M.G., Bastos, A., et al., 2021. Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO₂. New Phytologist. 229, 2413–2445.
[26] Way, D.A., Cook, A., Rogers, A., 2021. The effects of rising CO₂ concentrations on terrestrial systems: scaling it up. New Phytologist. 229, 2383–2385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17096
[27] Beringer, T., Müller, C., Chatterton, J., et al., 2023. CO₂ fertilization effect may balance climate change impacts on oil palm cultivation. Environmental Research Letters. 18, 054019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/accbd5
[28] Paterson, R.R.M., 2024. Comment on ‘CO₂ fertilization effect may balance climate change impacts on oil palm cultivation’. Environmental Research Letters. 19, 018003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad1345
[29] Murphy, D.J., Goggin, K., Paterson, R.R.M., 2021. Oil palm in the 2020s and beyond: Challenges and solutions. CABI Agriculture and Bioscience. 2, 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-021-00058-3
[30] Anon., 2024. Annual carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions worldwide from 1940 to 2024. Statistica. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/276629/global-co2-emissions/ (cited 1 January 2025).
[31] Paterson, R.R.M., 2020. OP survival under climate change in Kalimantan and alternative SE Asian palm oil countries with future basal stem rot assessments. Forest Pathology. 50, e12604.
[32] Paterson, R.R.M., 2020. Oil palm survival under climate change in Malaysia with future basal stem rot assessments. Forest Pathology. 11, 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12641
[33] Paterson, R.R.M., 2020. Depletion of Indonesian oil palm plantations implied from modeling OP mortality and Ganoderma boninense rot under future climate. AIMS Environmental Science. 7, 366–379.
[34] Paterson, R.R.M., 2022. Future scenarios for Fusarium wilt disease and mortality of oil palm in Nigeria, Ghana and Cameroon, extrapolated to Malaysia and Indonesia. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 162, 105–117.
[35] Paterson, R.R.M., 2020. Future scenarios for oil palm mortality and infection by Phytophthora palmivora in Colombia, Ecuador and Brazil, extrapolated to Malaysia and Indonesia. Phytoparasitica. 48, 513–523.
[36] Rüegg, J., 2017. Oil palm plantations in savannas: impact on biomass carbon stocks and soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics [Master Thesis]. Zurich, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. pp. 1–75.
[37] Ddamulira, G., Asiimwe, A., Masika, F., et al., 2024. Agronomic suitability for oil palm growing in Uganda. Journal of Agricultural Science. 16, 14–21.
[38] Nair, S., 2020. Designing policy pilots under climate uncertainty: a conceptual framework for comparative analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 22, 344–359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1695973
[39] Holzkämper, A., 2017. Adapting agricultural production systems to climate change—what’s the use of models? Agriculture. 7, 86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7100086
[40] Schipper, E.L.F., 2020. Maladaptation: When adaptation to climate change goes very wrong. One Earth. 3, 409–414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.014
[41] Thompson, E., 2020. Escape From Model Land. Basic Books: London, UK. pp. 1–320.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Robert Russell Monteith Paterson
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.