Climate Change Impacts on Soil Formation and Biotechnological Rehabilitation of Saline Soils in the Dried Aral Sea Seabed
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v8i5.117343Received:24 August 2026 |Revised:26 September 2026 |Accepted:30 September 2026 |Published Online:19 October 2026
Abstract
The dried Aral Sea seabed has become one of the most complex newly formed arid landscapes in Central Asia, where climate warming, moisture deficit, wind activity and salt accumulation jointly influence early soil formation and vegetation recovery. The rehabilitation experiment was conducted using control and treatment plots across the same salinity gradient. The biotechnological treatment was evaluated using soil salinity, organic carbon, microbial biomass, vegetation indices, plant survival and soil and vegetation rehabilitation indicators. Between 2021 and 2025, mean air temperature increased from 13.70 to 15.19 °C, annual precipitation declined from 106.33 to 67.84 mm, and evaporation increased from 1,551.81 to 1,739.58 mm. During the same period, mean electrical conductivity increased from 24.59 to 29.35 dS m⁻1, whereas soil moisture, soil organic carbon (SOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) all declined. During the same period, mean electrical conductivity increased from 24.59 to 29.35 dS m⁻1, soil organic carbon decreased from 2.93 to 2.35 g kg⁻1, microbial biomass carbon declined from 79.41 to 59.72 mg kg⁻1, NDVI decreased from 0.100 to 0.073, and SAVI decreased from 0.232 to 0.184. The strongest degradation was observed in extremely saline soils, where low moisture, high salt concentration and weak biological activity limited natural soil development. In contrast, treated plots showed clear improvement by 2025, with lower electrical conductivity (EC), higher SOC, stronger microbial biomass, better vegetation response and higher plant survival compared with the control. These findings show that the observed warmer, drier and more evaporative conditions were associated with increasing salinity constraints and weaker soil biological functioning during 2021–2025, while biotechnological rehabilitation improved soil and vegetation indicators, particularly under moderate and strong salinity.
Keywords:
Dried Aral Sea Seabed,Saline Soil,Soil Formation,Climate Change,NDVIReferences
[1] Micklin, P., 2007. The Aral Sea disaster. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 35, 47–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140120
[2] Micklin, P., 2016. The future Aral Sea: Hope and despair. Environmental Earth Sciences. 75, 844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5614-5
[3] Yang, X., Wang, N., Chen, A., et al., 2020. Changes in area and water volume of the Aral Sea in the arid Central Asia over the period of 1960–2018 and their causes. Catena. 191, 104566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104566
[4] He, H., Hamdi, R., Luo, G., et al., 2022. Numerical study on the climatic effect of the Aral Sea. Atmospheric Research. 268, 105977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105977
[5] Issanova, G., Abuduwaili, J., Tynybayeva, K., et al., 2022. Assessment of the soil cover in the dried Aral seabed in Kazakhstan and climate change in the region. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 233(12), 525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05966-2
[6] Jabbarov, Z., Kholdorov, S., Nomozov, U., et al., 2025. The drying of the Aral Sea: Soil formation and restoration potential on the seabed. Soil Science Annual. 76(2), 207727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37501/soilsa/207727
[7] Issanova, G., Abuduwaili, J., Tynybayeva, K., 2023. Soil Cover of the Dried Aral Seabed in Kazakhstan. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 1–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29867-7
[8] Corwin, D.L., 2021. Climate change impacts on soil salinity in agricultural areas. European Journal of Soil Science. 72(2), 842–862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13010
[9] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2024. Global Status of Salt-Affected Soils: Main Report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cd3044en
[10] Hassani, A., Azapagic, A., Shokri, N., 2021. Global predictions of primary soil salinization under changing climate in the 21st century. Nature Communications. 12, 6663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26907-3
[11] Qadir, M., Quillérou, E., Nangia, V., et al., 2014. Economics of salt-induced land degradation and restoration. Natural Resources Forum. 38(4), 282–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12054
[12] Stavi, I., Thevs, N., Priori, S., 2021. Soil salinity and sodicity in drylands: A review of causes, effects, monitoring and restoration. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 9, 712831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.712831
[13] Richards, L.A. (Ed.), 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA. pp. 1–160.
[14] Daliakopoulos, I.N., Tsanis, I.K., Koutroulis, A., et al., 2016. The threat of soil salinity: A European scale review. Science of the Total Environment. 573, 727–739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.177
[15] Setia, R., Gottschalk, P., Smith, P., et al., 2013. Soil salinity decreases global soil organic carbon stocks. Science of the Total Environment. 465, 267–272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.028
[16] Lehmann, J., Bossio, D.A., Kögel-Knabner, I., et al., 2020. The concept and future prospects of soil health. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 1, 544–553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0080-8
[17] Bünemann, E.K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., et al., 2018. Soil quality—A critical review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 120, 105–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030
[18] Bhaduri, D., Sihi, D., Bhowmik, A., et al., 2022. A review on effective soil health bio-indicators for ecosystem restoration and sustainability. Frontiers in Microbiology. 13, 938481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.938481
[19] Kumawat, C., Kumar, A., Parshad, J., et al., 2022. Microbial diversity and adaptation under salt-affected soils: A review. Sustainability. 14(15), 9280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159280
[20] Pistelli, L., Libik-Konieczny, M., Hasanuzzaman, M., 2023. Editorial: Plant-microbe interactions and their role in salinity tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science. 14, 1142563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1142563
[21] Wang, X., Xu, L., Qi, X., et al., 2025. Microbial assembly and stress-tolerance mechanisms in salt-adapted plants along the shore of a salt lake: Implications for saline–alkaline soil remediation. Microorganisms. 13(8), 1942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13081942
[22] An, J., Kim, S., Chang, H., et al., 2018. Vegetation establishment improves topsoil properties and enzyme activities in the dry Aral Sea Bed, Kazakhstan. Forestist. 68(1), 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/forestist.2018.001
[23] Kim, G., Ahn, J., Chang, H., et al., 2024. Effect of vegetation introduction versus natural recovery on topsoil properties in the dried Aral Sea bed. Land Degradation & Development. 35(13), 4121–4132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5209
[24] Rouse Jr., J.W., Haas, R.H., Schell, J.A., et al., 1974. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In Proceedings of the Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium, Washington, DC, USA, 10–14 December 1973; pp. 309–317.
[25] Huete, A.R., 1988. A soil-adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sensing of Environment. 25(3), 295–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X
[26] Cui, M., Zheng, X., Li, Y., et al., 2023. Analysis of NDVI trends and driving factors in the buffer zone of the Aral Sea. Water. 15(13), 2473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132473
[27] Allbed, A., Kumar, L., 2013. Soil salinity mapping and monitoring in arid and semi-arid regions using remote sensing technology: A review. Advances in Remote Sensing. 2(4), 373–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ars.2013.24040
[28] Scudiero, E., Skaggs, T.H., Corwin, D.L., 2015. Regional-scale soil salinity assessment using Landsat ETM+ canopy reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment. 169, 335–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.08.026
[29] Scudiero, E., Corwin, D.L., Anderson, R.G., et al., 2016. Moving forward on remote sensing of soil salinity at regional scale. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 4, 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00065
[30] Haq, Y.U., Shahbaz, M., Asif, H.M.S., et al., 2023. Spatial mapping of soil salinity using machine learning and remote sensing in Kot Addu, Pakistan. Sustainability. 15(17), 12943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712943
[31] Salem, O.H., Jia, Z., 2024. Evaluation of different soil salinity indices using remote sensing techniques in Siwa Oasis, Egypt. Agronomy. 14(4), 723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040723
[32] Wang, F., Han, L., Liu, L., et al., 2024. Advancements and perspective in the quantitative assessment of soil salinity utilizing remote sensing and machine learning algorithms: A review. Remote Sensing. 16(24), 4812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244812
[33] Hasanuzzaman, M., Nahar, K., Alam, M.M., et al., 2014. Potential use of halophytes to remediate saline soils. BioMed Research International. 2014(1), 589341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/589341
[34] Shrivastava, P., Kumar, R., 2015. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 22(2), 123–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001
[35] Etesami, H., Beattie, G.A., 2018. Mining halophytes for plant growth-promoting halotolerant bacteria to enhance the salinity tolerance of non-halophytic crops. Frontiers in Microbiology. 9, 148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00148
[36] Navarro-Torre, S., García-Caparrós, P., Nogales, A., et al., 2023. Sustainable agricultural management of saline soils in arid and semi-arid Mediterranean regions through halophytes, microbial and soil-based technologies. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 212, 105397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105397
[37] Gao, Z.-W., Ding, J., Ali, B., et al., 2024. Putting biochar in action: A black gold for efficient mitigation of salinity stress in plants. Review and future directions. ACS Omega. 9(29), 31237–31253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c07921
[38] Shelke, D.B., Chambhare, M.R., Sonawane, H.B., et al., 2025. Synergistic approaches in halophyte-microbe interactions: Mitigating soil salinity and industrial contaminants for sustainable agriculture. Discover Life. 55, 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11084-025-09688-3
[39] Akhtar, S.S., Andersen, M.N., Liu, F., 2015. Biochar mitigates salinity stress in potato. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 201(5), 368–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12132
[40] Zhang, Y., Miao, S., Song, Y., et al., 2024. Biochar application reduces saline-alkali stress by improving soil functions and regulating the diversity and abundance of soil bacterial community in highly saline-alkali paddy field. Sustainability. 16(3), 1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031001
[41] Song, J., Guan, X., Cui, H., et al., 2025. The impact of salt-tolerant plants on soil nutrients and microbial communities in soda saline-alkali lands of the Songnen plain. Frontiers in Microbiology. 16, 1592834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1592834
[42] Liang, S., Wang, S.-N., Zhou, L.-L., et al., 2023. Combination of biochar and functional bacteria drives the ecological improvement of saline-alkali soil. Plants. 12(2), 284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020284
[43] Wang, W., Zhou, L., He, Y., et al., 2025. Synergistic promoting mechanism of modified biochar combined with functional microbial agent on saline-alkali soil improvement. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 40, 104639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2025.104639
[44] Bony, L., Dhar, A., Wilkinson, S.R., et al., 2025. Assessing electrical conductivity and sodium adsorption ratio as soil salinity indicators in reclaimed well sites. Land. 14(11), 2125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112125
[45] Daunoras, J., Kačergius, A., Gudiukaitė, R., 2024. Role of soil microbiota enzymes in soil health and activity changes depending on climate change and the type of soil ecosystem. Biology. 13(2), 85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13020085
[46] Semenov, M.V., Zhelezova, A.D., Ksenofontova, N.A., et al., 2025. Microbiological indicators for assessing the effects of agricultural practices on soil health: A review. Agronomy. 15(2), 335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15020335
Downloads
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2026 Adilbek Imanmurzaev, Yunus Karimov, Oralkhan Sultashova, Vahob Rafiqov, Yakhshimurad Khudaybergenov, Sami Boymurotov, Sadokatkhon Uktamova, Hamdam Tursunboyev

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



Adilbek Imanmurzaev 
