Welcome to Bilingual Publishing Group

Research Progress on Atmospheric Sulfur Cycle Model

Authors

  • Jianjun Meng Email School of atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
  • Yuteng Xiao School of atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
Received: 24 October 2018

Abstract

We summarized the basic contents and the applicable conditions of typical
atmospheric sulfur cycle models, especially the classical atmospheric sulfur cycle model and the independent sulfur cycle model which is based on OsloCTM2 model.We introduced atmospheric sulfur cycle models which are coupled with some general circulation models such as ECHAM, LMDZ, CSIRO, MASINGAR, RCA2, NICAM and MIROC. Although there are many kinds of atmospheric sulfur cycle models, there are still some problems such as lack of relevant data support, comprehensive consideration of chemistry, radiation and dynamics, and interdisciplinary integrated research in the study of sulfur cycle models. To solve these problems, we proposed to optimize the quality of atmospheric sulfur emission and observation data, establish a shared database system, formulate relevant database usage regulations, strengthen the cooperation and resource sharing among subjects, and establish comprehensive high-resolution atmospheric sulfur cycle models.


References

[1] Atkinson R, Baulch DL, Cox R A, et al. 1989. Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Supplement III. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 21: 115-150.

[2] Austin PM, Houze RAJ. 2010. A technique for computing vertical transports by precipitating cumuli. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 30: 1100-1111.

[3] Berge E. 1993. Coupling of wet scavenging of sulphur to clouds in a numerical weather prediction model.Tellus Series B: Chemical Physical Meteorology, 45:1-22.

[4] Berglen TF, Berntsen TK, Isaksen ISA, et al. 2004. A global model of the coupled sulfur /oxidant chemistry in the troposphere: The sulfur cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109: 2083 2089.

[5] Emori S, Nozawa T, Numaguti A, et al. 2001.Importance of Cumulus Parameterization for Precipitation Simulation over East Asia in June. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 79: 939-947.

[6] Feichter J, Crutzen PJ. 1990. Parameterization of vertical tracer transport due to deep cumulus convection in a global transport model and its evaluation with 222 Radon measurements. Tellus Series B: Chemical Physical Meteorology, 42: 100-117.

[7] Hynes AJ, Wine PH, Semmes DH. 1986. Kinetics and mechanism of hydroxyl reactions with organic sulfides. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 90: 4148-4156.

[8] Jacobson MZ, Jacobson MZ. 2005. Fundamentals of atmospheric modeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[9] Trent HL, Li ZX. 1991. Sensitivity of an atmospheric general circulation model to prescribed SST changes: Feedback effects associated with the simulation of cloud optical properties. Climate Dynamics, 5: 175-187.

[10] Verma S, Boucher O, Upadhyaya HC, et al. 2013. Variations in sulfate aerosols concentration during winter monsoon season for two consecutive years using a general circulation model. Atmósfera, 26: 359-367.

Article Type

Article