Unraveling the Synergy: Standards, Regional Innovation, and Global Connectivity
Authors
-
RIICS RIICS
BPG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/riics.v1i1.9682Abstract
In an era characterized by rapid globalization and technological advancements, the synergy between standards, regional innovation, and global connectivity has emerged as a crucial determinant of economic growth and competitiveness. This paper aims to unravel the complex relationships and mechanisms underlying this synergy. It begins by examining the significance of standards in promoting regional innovation, highlighting how they provide a framework for technological development, enhance intra-regional collaboration, and drive the adoption of best practices. Subsequently, the study delves into the role of international cooperation on standards in breaking down global barriers and facilitating the transfer of knowledge and technology across regions. Through in-depth case studies of successful regional-international standard-setting collaborations, the paper illustrates the tangible benefits and outcomes that can be achieved when regions and international entities work in tandem. Additionally, it identifies the challenges faced in this process, such as cultural differences, conflicting interests, and technological disparities, and proposes practical solutions to address these issues. Looking ahead, the paper explores the future prospects and trends in the interplay between standards, regional innovation, and global connectivity, especially in the context of emerging technologies. Finally, the research offers valuable insights for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and standard-setting organizations, emphasizing the need to foster a more collaborative and inclusive environment to fully harness the potential of this synergy for sustainable development.
References
[1] Porter, M. E. (1990). *The Competitive Advantage of Nations*. New York: Free Press.
[2] Lundvall, B. - A. (1992). *National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning*. London: Pinter.
[3] Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. *Research Policy*, 26(4 - 5), 475 - 491.
[4] ISO. (2022). *ISO Strategic Plan 2023 - 2027*. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/strategy.html 5. IEC. (2023). *IEC Standardization Management Board - Strategy and Objectives*. Retrieved from https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/67068
[5] Archibugi, D., & Iammarino, S. (2002). The globalizing learning economy. *Journal of Technology Transfer*, 27(1), 11 - 27.
[6] OECD. (2023). *OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2023*. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sti/innovation/oecd - science - technology - and - industry - outlook.htm
[7] Chesbrough, H. (2003). *Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology*. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
[8] Li, Y., & Liu, X. (2021). Connecting Emerging Industry and Regional Innovation System: Linkages, effect and paradigm in China. *Technovation*, 106, 102287.
[9] Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. *Harvard Business Review*, 89(1/2), 62 - 77.
[10] Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. *Research Policy*, 34(8), 1173 - 1190.
[11] Archibugi, D., & Michie, J. (1997). Technology, Globalisation and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[12] Freeman, C. (1987). *Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan*. London: Pinter.
[13] Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). *National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis*. New York: Oxford University Press.
