Growth Performance, Physicochemical Properties of Meat of Broiler Chicken’s Supplemented with Bacillus pumilus

Authors

  • Shoaib Ahmed Pirzado Postgraduate Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Sindh, 70060, Pakistan
  • Masroor Ali Bughio Postgraduate Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Sindh, 70060, Pakistan
  • Uroosa Majeed Postgraduate Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Sindh, 70060, Pakistan
  • Gulfam Ali Mughal Postgraduate Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Sindh, 70060, Pakistan
  • Ghulam Shabir Barham Postgraduate Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Sindh, 70060, Pakistan
  • Dildar Hussain Kalhoro Postgraduate Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Sindh, 70060, Pakistan
  • Mansoor Tariq Samo Postgraduate Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Sindh, 70060, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jzr.v3i4.4016

Abstract

This study examined that the efficiency of Bacillus pumilus (BP) on growth performance and meat quality of broiler chickens. A total of day old 240 male broiler chicks were purchased from local hatchery Hyderabad. The chicks were allocated into four groups with six replicates of 10 birds in each replicate. Four diets were prepared for experiment, which included control as basal diet, BP- 0.1 (CONT + 0.1% BP), BP-0.2 (CONT + 0.2% BP) and AGP (CONT + zinc bacitracin 20 ppm) as antibiotic growth promotor. The results showed that live body weight (LBW), average daily gain was recorded higher (P<0.01) in birds fed diet with BP-0.1 than control and BP0.2 groups, as well as ADFI also increased in BP-0.1 than control group. BP-0.1 supplementation significantly reduced feed conversion ratio (FCR) than other groups(P<0.01). Both moisture and crude protein (CP) content influenced by supplementation of BP-0.1 than other groups. However, birds fed diet with BP-0.1 had least fat content in breast meat compared with the other groups (P<0.01). In addition, BP-0.1probiotic- fed birds had the lowest (P<0.01) pH, cooking loss (CL) and drip loss (DL) as compared to control, BP-0.2 and AGP groups. The water holding capacity (WHC) were found higher in BP-0.1 as compared to other groups (P<0.01). In conclusion, Bacillus pumilus probiotic supplementation is a promising approach for substitution of antibiotics in broiler diet for enhancement of growth performance and physiochemical properties of meat.

Keywords:

Growth performance; Meat quality; Bacillus pumilu; Probiotics; Broilers

References

[1] Petracci M, Mudalal S, Bonfiglio A, Cavani C. Occurrence of white striping under commercial conditions and its impact on breast meat quality in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 2013, 92(6):1670-1675.

[2] Bai K., Huang Q., Zhang J., He J., Zhang L., Wang T. Supplemental effects of probiotic Bacillus subtilis fmbJ on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, and meat quality of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 2017, 96:74-82.

[3] Pirzado, S.A., Arain, M.A., Huiyi, C., Fazlani, S.A., Alagawany, M. and Gouhua, L. Effect of Azomite on growth performance, immune function and tibia breaking strength of broiler chickens during starter period. Animal Biotechnology, 2021, 1-6.

[4] Teodora, P. Effect of probiotics in poultry for improving meat quality. Current Opinion in Food Science. 2017, 14:72-77.

[5] Mingmongkolchai, S., Panbangred, W. Bacillus probiotics: an alternative to antibiotics for livestock production. Journal of applied microbiology. 2018, 124(6): 1334-1346.

[6] Zhang S., Zhong G., Shao D., Wang Q., Hu Y., Wu T., Ji C., Shi S. Dietary supplementation with Bacillus subtilis promotes growth performance of broilers by altering the dominant microbial community. Poultry Science, 2021:100935.

[7] Rivera-Pérez, W., Barquero-Calvo, E., Chaves, A. J. Effect of the use of probiotic Bacillus subtilis (QST 713) as a growth promoter in broilers: an alternative to bacitracin methylene disalicylate. Poultry Science, 2021: 100(9), 101372.

[8] Bilal, M., Si, W., Barbe, F., Chevaux, E., Sienkiewicz, O. and Zhao, X. Effects of novel probiotic strains of Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus subtilis on production, gut health, and immunity of broiler chickens raised under suboptimal conditions. Poultry Science, 2021, 100(3):100871.

[9] Kuebutornye, F.K.A., Abarike, E.D., Lu, Y. A review on the application of Bacillus as probiotics in aquaculture. Fish Shellfish Immunol, 2019, 87: 820-828.

[10] Chu, J., Wang, Y., Zhao, B., Zhang, X. M., Liu, K., Mao, L., & Kalamiyets, E. Isolation and identification of new antibacterial compounds from Bacillus pumilus. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2019, 103(20): 8375-8381.

[11] Zhang, N., Wang, L., & Wei, Y. Effects of Bacillus pumilus on growth performance, immunological indicators and gut mirobiota of mice. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2021, 105: 797-805.

[12] Zhao, C., Zhu, J., Hu, J., Dong, X., Sun, L., Zhang, X. and Miao, S. Effects of dietary Bacillus pumilus on growth performance, innate immunity and digestive enzymes of giant freshwater prawns (Macrobrachium rosenbergii). Aquaculture Nutrition, 2019, 25(3):712- 720.

[13] Munglue, P., Kronghinrach, K., Rattana, K., Sangchanjiradet, S. and Dasri, K. Effect of dietary Bacilluspumilus A1_YM_1 on growth, intestinal morphology and some hematological parameters of hybrid catfish (Clarias macrocephalus× Clarias gariepinus). Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 2019, 24(2).

[14] Liu, S., Wang, S., Cai, Y., Li, E., Ren, Z., Wu, Y., ... & Zhou, Y. Beneficial effects of a host gut-derived probiotic, Bacillus pumilus, on the growth, non-specific immune response and disease resistance of juvenile golden pompano, Trachinotus ovatus. Aquaculture, 2020, 514, 734 - 446.

[15] Kandeepan, G., Anjaneyulu, A.S.R., Kondaiah, N., Mendirarta. S.K. Quality of buffalo meat keema at different storage temperature. African Journal of Food, 2009, (6): 410-417.

[16] Sen, A.R., Santra, A., Karim, S.A. Carcass yield, composition and meat quality attributes of sheep and goat under semiarid conditions. Meat Science, 2004, (66): 757-763.

[17] Kondaiah, N., Anjaneyulu, A.S.R. Rao, K.V., Sharma, N., Joshi, H.B. Effect of salt and phosphate on the quality of buffalo Wardlaw, F.B., L.H. McCaskil and J.C. Action. 1973. Effect of postmortem muscle changes on poultry meat loaf properties, Journal of Food Science, 1985, (38):421-423.

[18] Wardlaw, F.B., McCaskil, L.H., Action, J.C. Effect of postmortem muscle changes on poultry meat loaf properties, Journal of Food Science, 1973 (38):421- 423.

[19] AOAC, (2005). Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C., USA.

[20] Ghosh, K., Sen, S.K., Ray, A.K. Characterization of Bacilli isolated from the gut of Rohu, Labeo rohita, fingerlings and its significance in digestion. Journal of Applied Aquaculture, 2002,12(3): 33-42.

[21] Stęczny, K., Kokoszynski, D. Effects of probiotics and sex on physicochemical, sensory and microstructural characteristics of broiler chicken meat. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2019, 18(1): 1385-1393.

[22] Khaksefidi. A., Rahimi, S.H. Effect of Probiotic Inclusion in the Diet of Broiler Chickens on Performance, Feed Efficiency and Carcass Quality. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 2005, 18, (8): 1153-1156.

[23] Liu, X., Yan, H., Le Lv, Q.X., Yin, C., Zhang, K., Wang, P. and Hu, J. Growth performance and meat quality of broiler chickens supplemented with Bacillus licheniformis in drinking water. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 2012, 25(5): 682.

[24] Kral, M. Meat quality of broiler chickens fed diets with Bacillus subtilis and malic acid additives. Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 2013, 46(2): 375-378.

[25] Hossain, M.E., Kim, G.M., Lee, S.K., Yang, C.J. Growth performance, meat yield, oxidative stability, and fatty acid composition of meat from broilers fed diets supplemented with a medicinal plant and probiotics. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2012, 25(8):1159.

[26] Abdurrahman, Z.H., Pramono, Y.B., Suthama, N. Feeding effect of inulin derived from dahlia tuber combined with Lactobacillus sp. on meat protein mass of crossbred kampong chicken. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture, 2016, 41(1).

[27] Hossain, M.M., Begum, M. and Kim, I.H. Effect of Bacillus subtilis, Clostridium butyricum and Lactobacillus acidophilus endospores on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, relative organ weight, microbial shedding and excreta noxious gas emission in broilers. Veterinarni Medicina, 2015, 60(2): 77-86.

[28] Astuti: The use of lactate acid bacterium, Streptococcus thermophilus from fish digestion organ to growth and cholesterol level of chicken broiler strain Hubbart. International Journal of Development Research, 2015, 5:5695-5698.

[29] Aluwong, T., Hassan, F., Dzenda, T., Kawu, M. and Ayo, J. Effect of different levels of supplemental yeast on body weight, thyroid hormone metabolism and lipid profile of broiler chickens. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 2013, 75(3): 291-298.

[30] Salaj, R., Štofilová, J., Šoltesová, A., Hertelyová, Z., Hijová, E., Bertková, I., Strojný, L., Kružliak, P. and Bomba, A., 2013. The effects of two Lactobacillus plantarum strains on rat lipid metabolism receiving a high fat diet. The Scientific World Journal, 2013. Article ID 135142 | https://doi. org/10.1155/2013/135142.

[31] Fajrih, N., Suthama, N. and Yunianto, V.D. Body resistance and productive performances of crossbred local chicken fed inulin of dahlia tubers. Media Peternakan, 2014, 37(2): 108-108.

[32] Weitkunat, K., Schumann, S., Petzke, K.J., Blaut, M., Loh, G. and Klaus, S. Effects of dietary inulin on bacterial growth, short-chain fatty acid production and hepatic lipid metabolism in gnotobiotic mice. The Journal of nutritional biochemistry, 2015, 26(9): 929-937.

[33] Sanudo C. The organoleptic quality of meat (II) Cattle World, 1992, 10 :78-86.

[34] Ivanovic, S., Pisinov, B., Savic, D.M.S.B. and Sto-janovic, Z. Influence of probiotics on quality of chicken meat. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2012, 7(14): 2191-2196.

[35] Castellini, C., Mugnai, C.A.N.D. and Dal Bosco, A., 2002. Effect of organic production system on broiler carcass and meat quality. Meat science, 2002, 60(3): 219-225.

[36] Mohammed, A. A., Zaki, R. S., Negm, E. A., Mahmoud, M. A., Cheng, H. W. Effects of dietary supplementation of a probiotic (Bacillus subtilis) on bone mass and meat quality of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 2021, 100(3): 100-906.

[37] Abreu, L.R.A., P.G.M.A. Martins, V.M.P. Ribeiro, G.C. Gouveia, G.F. Moraes. Genetic association between residual feed intake and carcass traits in a herd of Nellore beef cattle. Livestock Science, 2019, 225:53-61.

[38] Abdulla, N.R., Mohd Zamri, A.N., Sabow, A.B., Kareem, K.Y., Nurhazirah, S., Ling, F.H., Sazili, A.Q. and Loh, T.C. Physico-chemical properties of breast muscle in broiler chickens fed probiotics, antibiotics or antibiotic-probiotic mix. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2017, 45(1): 64-70.

[39] Zhou, X., Wang, Y., Gu, Q. and Li, W. Effect of dietary probiotic, Bacillus coagulans, on growth performance, chemical composition, and meat quality of Guangxi Yellow chicken. Poultry science, 2010, 89(3): 588-593.

[40] Pietras, M. The effect of probiotics on selected blood and meat parameters of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 2001, 10: 297-302.

[41] Lawson, M.A. The role of integrin degradation in post-mortem drip loss in pork. Meat Science, 2004, 68:559-566.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 3 , Iss. 4 (October 2021)

Article Type

Articles

License

Copyright and Licensing

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

Journal of Zoological Research publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by Journal of Zoological Research agree to have the CC BY-NC 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for non-commercial use. As long as you follow the license terms and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material.

License Policy for Reuse of Third-Party Materials

If a manuscript submitted to the journal contains the materials which are held in copyright by a third-party, authors are responsible for obtaining permissions from the copyright holder to reuse or republish any previously published figures, illustrations, charts, tables, photographs, and text excerpts, etc. When submitting a manuscript, official written proof of permission must be provided and clearly stated in the cover letter.
The editorial office of the journal has the right to reject/retract articles that reuse third-party materials without permission.

Journal Policies on Data Sharing

We encourage authors to share articles published in our journal to other data platforms, but only if it is noted that it has been published in this journal.