Effect of Fermented Shrimp Waste Level in Feed on Biological Value on Native Chicken

Authors

  • Abun Abun Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, Padjadjaran University, Sumedang-West Java, Indonesia
  • Kiki Haetami Department of Fisheries, Padjadjaran University, Sumedang-West Java, Indonesia
  • Denny Rusmana Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, Padjadjaran University, Sumedang-West Java, Indonesia
  • Triyogi Ganda Sukma Atmaja Alumni of Animal Husbandry, Padjadjaran University, Sumedang-West Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jzr.v3i4.4083

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the effect and obtain the level of use of fermented shrimp waste in the feed that produces the best biological value in native chickens. The study used 125 one-day-old chickens (DOC) placed in 25 cages randomly, containing five chickens reared for eight weeks. The study used experimental methods, and the experimental design used was a completely randomized design with five types of treatment, namely, feed without the use of fermented shrimp waste (R0), feed containing 5% fermented shrimp waste (R1), feed containing 10% fermented shrimp waste (R2), feed containing 15% fermented shrimp waste (R3), and feed containing 20% fermented shrimp waste (R4), each treatment was repeated five times. The observed variables were absorbed nitrogen, nitrogen stored in the body, and biological value. Data were analysed using ANOVA and Duncan's Multiple Distance Test. The results showed that the use of fermented shrimp waste at a level of 20% in feed resulted in the best biological value in native chickens.

Keywords:

Shrimp waste; Fermentation; Biological value; Feed; Native chicken

References

[1] M. Abdel-Tawwab, M. H. Ahmad, Y. A. E. Khattab, and A. M. E. Shalaby, “Effect of dietary protein level, initial body weight, and their interaction on the growth, feed utilization, and physiological alterations of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.),” Aquaculture, vol. 298, no. 3-4, pp. 267-274, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.10.027.

[2] C. O. Brito et al., “Metabolizable energy and nutrient digestibility of shrimp waste meal obtained from extractive fishing for broilers,” Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., vol. 263, no. August 2019, p. 114467, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114467.

[3] X. Mao, N. Guo, J. Sun, and C. Xue, “Comprehensive utilization of shrimp waste based on biotechnological methods: A review,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 143, pp. 814-823, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.042.

[4] M. Mirzah, Montesqrit, E. Fitrah, and A. Choirul, “Effect of the Substitution the Fish Meal with Shrimp Head Waste Fermented in Diet on Broiler Performance,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 478, no. 1, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/478/1/012076.

[5] B. WAHYUNTARI, J. JUNIANTO, and S. SETYAHADI, “Process Design of Microbiological Chitin Extraction,” Microbiol. Indones., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 39-45, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5454/mi.5.1.7.

[6] J. Chakravarty, C. L. Yang, J. Palmer, and C. J. Brigham, “Chitin extraction from lobster shell waste using microbial culture-based methods,” Appl. Food Biotechnol., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 141-154, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/afb.v%vi%i.20787.

[7] C. Gehring, M. Davenport, and J. Jaczynski, “Functional and Nutritional Quality of Protein and Lipid Recovered from Fish Processing by-Products and Underutilized Aquatic Species Using Isoelectric Solubilization / Precipitation,” Curr. Nutr. Food Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17-39, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/157340109787314703.

[8] A. A. Saleh, B. A. Paray, and M. A. O. Dawood, “Olive cake meal and bacillus licheniformis impacted the growth performance, muscle fatty acid content, and health status of broiler chickens,” Animals, vol. 10, no. 4, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040695.

[9] Y. H. Yu, T. Y. Hsu, W. J. Chen, Y. B. Horng, and Y. H. Cheng, “The effect of Bacillus licheniformis-fermented products and postpartum dysgalactia syndrome on litter performance traits, milk composition, and fecal microbiota in sows,” Animals, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1-13, 2020.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112044.

[10] K. H. Lin and Y. H. Yu, “Evaluation of bacillus licheniformis-fermented feed additive as an antibiotic substitute: Effect on the growth performance, diarrhea incidence, and cecal microbiota in weaning piglets,” Animals, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-16, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091649.

[11] A. A. Ayad, D. A. Gad El-Rab, S. A. Ibrahim, and L. L. Williams, “Nitrogen sources effect on lactobacillus reuteri growth and performance cultivated in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) by-products,” Fermentation, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 2-11, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/FERMENTATION6030064.

[12] K. C. Mountzouris, P. Tsirtsikos, E. Kalamara, S. Nitsch, G. Schatzmayr, and K. Fegeros, “Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and modulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities,” Poult. Sci., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 309-317, Feb. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.2.309.

[13] S. H. Shirazi, S. R. Rahman, and M. M. Rahman, “Short communication: Production of extracellular lipases by Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 595-597, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008868905587.

[14] A. Pulvirenti et al., “Selection of wine saccharomyces cerevisiae strains and their screening for the adsorption activity of pigments, phenolics and ochratoxin A,” Fermentation, vol. 6, no. 3, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/FERMENTATION6030080.

[15] T. Nolte et al., “Growth performance of local chicken breeds, a high-performance genotype and their crosses fed with regional faba beans to replace soy,” Animals, vol. 10, no. 4, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040702.

[16] F. C. Wilson, “Basic Processes Edited by.”

[17] W. Arbia, L. Arbia, L. Adour, and A. Amrane, “Ftb_51_1_012_025,” Chitin Recover. Using Biol. Methods, Food Technol. Biotechnol, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 12-25, 2013.

[18] M. A. N. Filho et al., “Cafeteria-type feeding of chickens indicates a preference for insect (Tenebrio molitor) larvae meal,” Animals, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1-13, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040627.

[19] Abun, T. Widjastuti, and K. Haetami, “Value of Metabolizable Energy and Digestibility of Nutrient Concentrate from Fermented Shrimp Waste for Domestic Chickens,” Pakistan J. Nutr., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 134- 140, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2019.134.140.

[20] S. A. Kaczmarek, M. Hejdysz, M. Kubiś, S. Nowaczewski, R. Mikuła, and A. Rutkowski, “Effects of feeding intact, ground and/or pelleted rapeseed on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of broiler chickens,” Arch. Anim. Nutr., vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 222-236, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2019.1688557.

[21] Abun, T. Widjastuti, and K. Haetami, “Effect of Time Processing at Steps of Bioprocess Shrimp Waste by Three Microbes on Protein Digestibility and Metabolizable Energy Products of Native Chicken,” Agrolife Sci. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 209-213, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://agrolifejournal.usamv.ro/index.php/scientific-papers/260-effect-of-time-processing-at-steps-of-bioprocess-shrimp-waste-by-three-microbes-on-protein-digestibility-and-metabolizable-energy-products-of-native-chicken#spucontentCitation31.

[22] A. G. Gernat, “The effect of using different levels of shrimp meal in laying hen diets,” Poult. Sci., vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 633-636, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.5.633.

[23] L. E. Ponce and A. G. Gernat, “The effect of using different levels of tilapia by-product meal in broiler diets,” Poult. Sci., vol. 81, no. 7, pp. 1045-1049, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.7.1045.

[24] A. Haddar, N. Hmidet, O. Ghorbel-Bellaaj, N. Fakhfakh-Zouari, A. Sellami-Kamoun, and M. Nasri, “Alkaline proteases produced by Bacillus licheniformis RP1 grown on shrimp wastes: Application in chitin extraction, chicken feather-degradation and as a dehairing agent,” Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 669-678, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-010-0410-7.

[25] Y. Wang et al., “Potential effects of acidifier and amylase as substitutes for antibiotic on the growth performance, nutrient digestion and gut microbiota in yellow-feathered broilers,” Animals, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-10, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101858.

[26] M. Arif et al., “The biodegradation role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae against harmful effects of mycotoxin contaminated diets on broiler performance, immunity status, and carcass characteristics,” Animals, vol. 10, no. 2, Feb. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020238.

[27] H. El-Hamid et al., “Single and combined effects of Clostridium butyricum and Saccharomyces cerevisi-ae on growth indices, intestinal health, and immunity of broilers,” Animals, vol. 8, no. 10, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8100184.

[28] T. Widjastuti, A. Abun, A. Destian, and S. Darana, “Utilising Zn and Cu product in the corn meal substrate at Saccharomyces cerevisiae bioprocess and its implementation on internal quality of broiler,” J. Indones. Trop. Anim. Agric., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 236- 240, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jitaa.34.4.236-240.

[29] G. Da Xue, S. B. Wu, M. Choct, and R. A. Swick, “Effects of yeast cell wall on growth performance, immune responses and intestinal short chain fatty acid concentrations of broilers in an experimental necrotic enteritis model,” Anim. Nutr., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 399-405, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.08.002.

[30] C. Qin et al., “Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii and Bacillus subtilis B10 on gut microbiota modulation in broilers,” Anim. Nutr., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 358-366, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2018.03.004.

[31] Yuan Shi-bin, “Effects of dietary supplementation of chitosan on growth performance and immune index in ducks,” African J. Biotechnol., vol. 11, no. 14, pp. 3490-3495, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/ajb11.1648.

[32] S. Yadav and R. Jha, “Strategies to modulate the intestinal microbiota and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, and health of poultry,” J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0310-9.

[33] S. Movahhedkhah, B. Rasouli, A. Seidavi, D. Mazzei, V. Laudadio, and V. Tufarelli, “Summer savory (Satureja hortensis l.) extract as natural feed additive in broilers: Effects on growth, plasma constituents, immune response, and ileal microflora,” Animals, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 5-12, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9030087.

[34] M. Flis et al., “The influence of the partial replacing of inorganic salts of Calcium, Zinc, Iron, and Copper with amino acid complexes on bone development in male pheasants from aviary breeding,” Animals, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1-12, May 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050237.

[35] M. Kidd and P. Tillman, “Key principles concerning dietary amino acid responses in broilers,” j, vol. 221, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.012.

[36] N. Sharma, M. Choct, M. Toghyani, Y. Laurenson, R. Swick, and C. Girish, “Dietary energy, digestible lysine, and available phosphorus levels affect growth performance, carcass traits, and amino acid digestibility of broilers,” j, vol. 97, no. 4, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex405.

[37] S. M. Ghoreyshi et al., “Effects of dietary supplementation of l-carnitine and excess lysine-methionine on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and immunity markers of broiler chicken,” Animals, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1-17, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060362.

[38] D. Yin et al., “Influence of starch sources and dietary protein levels on intestinal functionality and intestinal mucosal amino acids catabolism in broiler chickens,” J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0334-9.

[39] M. Alagawany et al., “Nutritional significance of amino acids, vitamins and minerals as nutraceuticals in poultry production and health-a comprehensive review,” Veterinary Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 1. Taylor and Francis Ltd., pp. 1-29, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2020.1857887.

[40] C. J. Fox, P. Blow, J. H. Brown, and I. Watson, “The effect of various processing methods on the physical and biochemical properties of shrimp head meals and their utilization by juvenile Penaeus monodon Fab.,” Aquaculture, vol. 122, no. 2-3, pp. 209-226, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)90511-8.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 3 , Iss. 4 (October 2021)

Article Type

Articles

License

Copyright and Licensing

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

Journal of Zoological Research publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by Journal of Zoological Research agree to have the CC BY-NC 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for non-commercial use. As long as you follow the license terms and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material.

License Policy for Reuse of Third-Party Materials

If a manuscript submitted to the journal contains the materials which are held in copyright by a third-party, authors are responsible for obtaining permissions from the copyright holder to reuse or republish any previously published figures, illustrations, charts, tables, photographs, and text excerpts, etc. When submitting a manuscript, official written proof of permission must be provided and clearly stated in the cover letter.
The editorial office of the journal has the right to reject/retract articles that reuse third-party materials without permission.

Journal Policies on Data Sharing

We encourage authors to share articles published in our journal to other data platforms, but only if it is noted that it has been published in this journal.