Road Kills of Bufotes viridis (Laurenti, 1768): A Case Study from Konya Province of Turkey

Authors

  • Ufuk BÜLBÜL Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Trabzon, 61080, Turkey
  • Halime Koc-Gur Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Trabzon, 61080, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jzr.v4i1.4300

Abstract

The present study reports vehicle collisions of Bufotes viridis (The green toad) in Konya province from Turkey. Our study was performed in more than fifty localities on Yunak-Akşehir highway (D-695). The records were taken in a short time; it is important and remarkable to come across a large number of dead individuals of an amphibian species in a short time. Among all recorded mortalities (n= 246), the highest value belonged to subadults (45% of the cases), followed by juveniles (35% of the cases). The lowest rate among the carcasses was belonged to the adult individuals (20% of the cases). There can be many factors that cause the road kills: These factors are grouped according to the literature under the headings of “direct causes”, “indirect causes” and “potential causes” for the road kills. In this study, we evaluated the effects of some factors for Bufotes viridis. In general, all terrestrial and semi-aquatic amphibian species, which populations are located the roadsides, suffer from road kills. Because of this situation, there is a need for both further studies and habitat restorations for amphibians.

Keywords:

Mortality; Amphibians; Urbanization; Traffic; The green toad

References

[1] Wyman, R.L., 1990. What’s Happening to the Amphibians? Conservation Biology. 4(4), 350-352. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2385926.

[2] Blaustein, A.R., Wake, D.B., Sousa, W.P., 1994. Amphibian Declines: Judging Stability, Persistence, and Susceptibility of Populations to Local and Global Extinctions. Conservation Biology. 8(1), 60-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994. 08010060.x.

[3] Hels, T., Buchwald, E., 2001. The Effect of Road Kills on Amphibian Populations. Biological Conservation. 99(3), 331-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00215-9.

[4] Beebee, T.J.C., 2013. Effects of Road Mortality and Mitigation Measures on Amphibian Populations. Conservation Biology. 27(4), 657-668. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23525294.

[5] Mader, H.J., 1984. Animal Habitat Isolation by Roads and Agricultural Fields. Biological Conservation. 29, 81-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(84)90015-6.

[6] Andrews, A., 1990. Fragmentation of Habitat by Roads and Utility Corridors: A Review. Australian Zoologist. 26(3-4), 130-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.1990.005.

[7] Reed, R.A., Johnson-Barnard, J., Baker, W.L., 1996. Contribution of Roads to Forest Fragmentation in the Rocky Mountains. Conservation Biology. 10(4), 1098-1106. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2387146.

[8] Stuart, S.N., Chanson, J.S., Cox, N.A., Young, B.E., Rodrigues, A.S.L., Fischman, D.L., Waller, R.W., 2004. Status and Trends of Amphibian Declines and Extinctions Worldwide. Science. 306, 1783-1786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103538.

[9] Fahrig, L., Rytwinski, T., 2009. Effects of Roads on Animal Abundance: An Empirical Review and Synthesis. Ecology and Society. 14(1), 21. DOI: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/ art21/.

[10] Helldin, J.O., Petrovan, S.O., 2019. Effectiveness of Small Road Tunnels and Fences in Reducing Amphibian Roadkill and Barrier Effects at Retrofitted Roads in Sweden. PeerJ Multidisciplinary: Life, Environment, Medicine. 7, e7518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7518.

[11] Cushman, S.A., 2006. Effects of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation on Amphibians: A Review and Prospectus . Biological Conservation. 128, 231-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.031.

[12] Puky, M., 2005. Amphibian Road Kills: A Global Perspective. 325-338.

[13] Collins, J.P., Storfer, A., 2003. Global Amphibian Declines: Sorting the Hypotheses. Diversity and Distributions. 9, 89-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003. 00012.x.

[14] Waldman, B., Tocher, M., 1998. Behavioural Ecology, Genetic Diversity, and Declining Amphibian Populations. 394-443.

[15] Hatch AC, Blaustein AR. Combined Effects of UVB, Nitrate, and Low pH Reduce the Survival and Activity Level of Larval Cascades frogs (Rana cascadae). Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; 2000; 39: 494-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002440010132.

[16] Cooke, A.S., 1995. Road Mortality of Common Toads (Bufo bufo) Near a Breeding Site, 1974-1994. Amphibia Reptilia. 16, 87-90.

[17] Fahrig, L., Pedlar, J.H., Pope, S.E., Taylor, P.D., Wegner, J.F., 1995. Effect of Road Traffic on Amphibian Density. Biological Conservation. 73, 177-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(94)00102-V.

[18] Vos, C.C., Chardon, J.P., 1998. Effects of Habitat Fragmentation and Road Density on the Distribution Pattern of the Moor Frog, Rana arvalis. Journal of Applied Ecology. 35, 44-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998. 00284.x.

[19] Cosentino, B.J., Marsh, D.M., Jones, K.S., Apodaca, J.J., Bates, C., Beach, J., Beard, K.H., Becklin, K., Bell, J.M., Crockett, C., Fawson, G., Fjelsted, J., Forys, E.A., Genet, K.S., Grover, M., Holmes, J., Indeck, K., Karraker, N.E., Kilpatrick, E.S., Langen, T.A., Mugel, S.G., Molina, A., Vonesh, J.R., Weaver, R.J., Willey, A., 2004. Citizen Science Reveals Widespread Negative Effects of Roads on Amphibian Distributions. Biological Conservation. 180, 31-8.

[20] Gibbs, J.P., Shriver, W.G., 2005. Can Road Mortality Limit Populations of Pool-breeding Amphibians? Wetlands Ecology and Management. 13(3), 281-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-004-7522-9.

[21] Beebee, T.J.C., Griffiths, R.A., 2005. The Amphibian Decline Crisis: A Watershed for Conservation Bio-logy? Biological Conservation. 125, 271-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.009.

[22] Nyström, P., Hansson, J., Månsson, J., Sundstedt, M., Reslow, C., Broström, A., 2007. A Documented Amphibian Decline over 40 Years: Possible Causes and Implications for Species Recovery. Biological Conservation. 138(3-4), 399-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.05.007.

[23] Sillero, N., 2008. Amphibian Mortality Levels on Spanish Country Roads: Descriptive and Spatial Analysis. Amphibia Reptilia. 29, 337-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853808785112066.

[24] Elzanowski, A., Ciesiolkiewicz, J., Kaczor, M., Radwanska, J., Urban, R., 2009. Amphibian Road Mortality in Europe: A Meta-Analysis with New Data from Poland. European Journal of Wildlife Research. 55, 33-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0211-x.

[25] Hartel, T., Moga, C.I., Öllerer, K., Puky, M., 2009. Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Amphibian Road Mortality with a Rana dalmatina and Bufo bufo Predominance Along the Middle Section of the Târnava Mare Basin, Romania. North-Western Journal of Zoology. 5(1), 130-141.

[26] Salinas, F., Delgado-Ospina, I., López-Aranda, F., 2011. Amphibians and Reptiles Killed by Motor Vehicles in a Sub-Andean Forest in Western Colombia. Caldasia. 33(1), 121-138.

[27] Tok, C.V., Ayaz, D., Çiçek, K., 2011. Road Mortality of Amphibians and Reptiles in the Anatolian Part of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology. 35(6), 851-857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-0911-97.

[28] Bülbül, U., Eroğlu, A.İ., Kutrup, B., Kurnaz, M., Koç-Gür, H., Odabaş, Y., 2019. Road Kills of Amphibian and Reptile Species in Edirne and Kırklareli Provinces of Turkey. Sinop University Journal of Natural Sciences. 4, 109-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33484/sinopfbd.532723.

[29] Koç-Gür, H., Bülbül, U., Özkan, H., 2020. A Survey of Road Kills on Ampibians and Reptiles in Isparta Province of Turkey. Contemporary Studies in Natural Sciences and Mathematics. 13-20.

[30] Temple, H.J.E., Cox, N.A., 2009. European Red List of Amphibians. 1-42.

[31] Telenchev, I., Mladenov, V., Georgieva, R., Redl, E., Natchev, N., 2017. Data of Herpetofauna-Vehicle Collisions in the Region of Burgas city, SE Bulgaria. 128-132.

[32] Ramos, E., Meza-Joya, F.L., 2018. Reptile Road Mortality in A Fragmented Landscape of the Middle Magdalena Valley Colombia. Herpetology Notes. 11, 81-91.

[33] Ensabella, F., Loriga, S., Formichetti, P., Isotti, R., Sorace, A., 2003. Breeding Site Selection of Bufo viridis in the City of Rome (Italy). Amphibia-Reptilia. 24, 396-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853803322440853.

[34] Kaczmarski, M., Szala, K., Kloskowski, J., 2019. Early Onset of Breeding Season in the Green Toad Bufotes viridis in Western Poland. Herpetozoa. 32, 109-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/herpetozoa.32.e35825.

[35] Mazgajska, J., Mazgajskİ, T.D., 2020. Two Amphibian Species in the Urban Environment: Changes in the Occurrence, Spawning Phenology and Adult Condition of Common and Green Toads. The European Zoological Journal. 87(1), 170-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2020.1744743.

[36] Pawłowski, A., 1993. Płazy miasta Poznania [Amphibians of Poznan agglomeration]. University of Adam Mickiewicz, Poznań.

[37] Tóth-Ronkay, M., Bajor, Z., Bárány, A., Földvári, G., Görföl, T., Halpern, B., Leél-Ӧssy, S., Mészáros, R., Péntek, A.L., Tóth, B., Tóth, Z., Vörös, J., 2015. Budapest. Vertebrates and Invertebrates of European Cities: Selected Non-Avian Fauna. 27-73.

[38] Mazgajska, J., 1996. Distribution of Amphibians in Urban Water Bodies (Warsaw Agglomeration, Poland). Ekologia Polska. 44, 245-257.

[39] Ogielska, M., Kierzkowski, P., 2010. Amphibians of Wrocław. Fragmenta Faunistica. 53, 195-212.

[40] Sinsch, U., Leskovar, A.M., 2011. Does thermoregulatory Behavior of Green Toads (Bufo viridis) Constrain Geographical Range in the West? A Comparison with the Performance of Syntopic Natterjacks (Bufo calamita). Journal of Thermal Biology. 36, 346-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2011.06.012.

[41] Herczeg, D., Galle, R., Molnar, N., 2012. Effects of Urbanization on the Occurrence of Anura Assemblages in the City of Szeged (Hungary). Tiscia. 39, 3-8.

[42] Valkanova, M.V., Mollov. I.A., Nikolov. B.N., 2009. Mortalities of the Green Toad, Epidalea viridis (Laurenti, 1768) in Urban Environment: A Case Study from the City of Plovdiv. Ecologia Balkanica. 1, 21-26.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 4 , Iss. 1 (January 2022)

Article Type

Articles

License

Copyright and Licensing

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

Journal of Zoological Research publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by Journal of Zoological Research agree to have the CC BY-NC 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for non-commercial use. As long as you follow the license terms and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material.

License Policy for Reuse of Third-Party Materials

If a manuscript submitted to the journal contains the materials which are held in copyright by a third-party, authors are responsible for obtaining permissions from the copyright holder to reuse or republish any previously published figures, illustrations, charts, tables, photographs, and text excerpts, etc. When submitting a manuscript, official written proof of permission must be provided and clearly stated in the cover letter.
The editorial office of the journal has the right to reject/retract articles that reuse third-party materials without permission.

Journal Policies on Data Sharing

We encourage authors to share articles published in our journal to other data platforms, but only if it is noted that it has been published in this journal.