Student Peer Assessment

Authors

  • Chenhua Gu Department of Early Childhood, Shanghai Xingjian College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/ret.v3i2.1762

Abstract

This paper mainly focuses on advantages and challenges of student peer assessment, which is an effective approach for students to increase the confidence and curriculum engagement as well as formative assessment.

Keywords:

Peer assessment; Formative assessment; Curriculum engagement; Challenge

References

[1] Beaman, R. (1998). Alternative assessments for adult learners, Innovative Higher Education, 23(1), pp.47-59.

[2] Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment, London: King’s College London School of Education.

[3] Cartney, P. (2010). Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), pp.551-564.

[4] Cheng, W., & M. Warren. (2000). Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students’ contributions to a group project, Teaching in Higher Education, 5 (2), pp. 243–255.

[5] Clarke, S. (2005). Formative assessment in the secondary classroom, London: Hodder Murray, pp.1-9, 109-138.

[6] Denehy, G. E., & Fuller, J. L. (1974). Student peer evaluation: An adjunct to pre-clinical laboratory evaluation, Journal of Dental Education, 38(4), pp.200-203.

[7] Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks, Review of Educational Research, 70(3), pp.287-322.

[8] Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education, London: Routledge Falmer, pp.112-166.

[9] Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education, London: Kogan Page, pp.132.

[10] Hamilton, T. M. (2000). Chemistry and writing, College Teaching, 48(4), pp.136.

[11] Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1991). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity, Perspectives on socially shared cognition, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 331-348.

[12] Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research, Edina, MN: Interaction.

[13] Kearsley, G. (2000). Online education: Learning and teaching in the cyberspace, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

[14] Lapham, A., & Webseter, R. (1999). Peer assessment of undergraduate seminar presentations: Motivations, reflection and future directions, PA: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, pp.183-190.

[15] Lin, S. S. (2001). Web based peer assessment: Attitude and achievement, IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(2), pp.1-8.

[16] Magin, D. (2001). Reciprocity as a source of bias in multiple peer assessment of group work, Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), pp.53-63.

[17] Mathews, B. P. (1994). Assessing individual contributions: experience of peer evaluation in major group projects, British Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), pp.19-28.

[18] McConnell, D. (2000). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning, London: Kogan Page.

[19] McDowell, L. (1995). The impact of innovative assessment: Student perspectives, PA: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, pp.71-82.

[20] Purchase, H. C. (2000). Learning about interface design through peer assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), pp.341-352.

[21] Race, P. (2001). The lecturer’s toolkit, London: Kogan Page.

[22] Sitthiworachart, J., & Joy, M. (2003). Web-based peer assessment in learning computer programming, Department of Science, University of Warwick.

[23] Sivan, A. (2000). The implementation of peer assessment: An action research approach. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 7(2), pp. 193-213.

[24] Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

[25] Spiller, D. (2012). Assessment matters: Self-assessment and peer assessment, Teaching Development, University of Waikato.

[26] Strijbos, J. W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unraveling peer assessment: Methodological, functional and conceptual developments, Learning and Instruction, 20, pp.265-269.

[27] Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment, Educational Phycology, 25(6), pp.631-645.

[28] Wagner, L. (1982). Peer teaching: Historical perspectives, New York: Greenwood Press.

[29] Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom, Handbook of educational psychology, New York: Macmillan.

[30] Vickerman, P. (2009). Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: An attempt to deepen learning, Assessment and Education in Higher Education, 34(2), pp.221-230.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 3 , Iss. 2 (April 2020)

Article Type

Review Article

License

Copyright and Licensing

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

Review of Educational Theory publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by Review of Educational Theory agree to have the CC BY-NC 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for non-commercial use. As long as you follow the license terms and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material.

License Policy for Reuse of Third-Party Materials

If a manuscript submitted to the journal contains the materials which are held in copyright by a third-party, authors are responsible for obtaining permissions from the copyright holder to reuse or republish any previously published figures, illustrations, charts, tables, photographs, and text excerpts, etc. When submitting a manuscript, official written proof of permission must be provided and clearly stated in the cover letter.
The editorial office of the journal has the right to reject/retract articles that reuse third-party materials without permission.

Journal Policies on Data Sharing

We encourage authors to share articles published in our journal to other data platforms, but only if it is noted that it has been published in this journal.