Conversation Breakdown and Institutional Discourse in Ghanaian ESL Classrooms: A Conversation Analytic Investigation

Authors

  • Francis Bukari

    Communication Technology Department
    Takoradi Technical University
    P. O. Box 256
    Takoradi
  • Samuel Obeng
  • Emmanuel Lauren Oblie

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jiep.v9i1.12407
Received: 10 November 2025 | Revised: 31 December 2025 | Accepted: 8 January 2026 | Published Online: 15 January 2026

Abstract

This study responds to the growing pedagogical interest in optimizing communicative competence within English as a Second Language (ESL) classroom interaction by investigating a critical, yet under-explored, domain, the interactional trouble sources that initiate conversation breakdown. Grounded in a Conversation Analytical (CA) framework, the research methodology utilizes a hybrid approach: CA modeling for the micro-analysis of recorded data and content analysis for the qualitative interview data. The empirical base consists of 52 h of recorded ESL classroom discourse extracted from the Ghana Senior High School corpus of academic spoken English database collected by the researchers and research assistants, and augmented by interviews with practicing ESL teachers. A systematic analysis of the interactional sequences showed a pronounced presence of both etic (analyst-defined) and emic (participant-oriented) conversational trouble sources. The findings delineate six salient categories of trouble sources, namely, mishearing/non-hearing, vagueness, topic transition, information deficit, and lexical inappropriacy. These trouble sources demonstrably impeded interactional flow. Notably, the research establishes that the origins of these trouble sources are multi-layered, transcending mere surface-level linguistic (phonology, syntax, lexis) deficiencies to include institutional factors such as instructional ambiguity, procedural misalignments, disciplinary actions, and culturally situated vocabulary choices. This evidence mandates that future ESL research accord greater significance to the impact of institutional discourse (especially, classroom discourse) features as a primary generator of interactional trouble.

Keywords:

Conversation Breakdown; Repair; Trouble Source; Conversation Analysis; ESL Classroom; Ghana

References

[1] Aleksius, M., 2021. Repair practice in the classroom conversations of Indonesian EFL students. Journal of Language Education. 7(2), 10–24.

[2] Liddicoat, A.J., 2022. An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. Bloomsbury: London, UK.

[3] Belgrimet, S., 2020. A Conversation Analysis of Repair Strategies in Communication Breakdowns: A Case Study of Algerian Bilingual Students. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences. 5(2), 459–468.

[4] Betti, M.J., Mahdi, M.A., 2020. A conversation analysis of repair trouble sources in Iraqi university viva discussions in English. International Linguistics Research. 3(4), 1–14.

[5] O'Neal, G., 2015. Segmental repair and interactional intelligibility: The relationship between consonant deletion, consonant insertion, and pronunciation intelligibility in English as a Lingua Franca in Japan. Journal of Pragmatics. 85, 122–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.013

[6] Beshir, M., Yigzaw, A., 2022. Students' selfrepair in EFL classroom interactions: Implications for classroom dynamics. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. 7, 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00153-6

[7] Atar, C., Seedhouse, P., 2018. A Conversation-Analytic Perspective on the Organization of Teacher-Led Clarification and Its Implications for L2 Teacher Training. International Journal of Instruction. 11(2), 145–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11211a

[8] Estaji, M., Rajabi, M., 2019. The Use of Self-Repair Strategies in Classroom Conversations: Does the Teacher's Level of Reflection Make a Difference?. Applied Research on English Language. 8(3), 423–448.

[9] Emrani, F., Hooshmand, M., 2019. A conversation analysis of self-initiated self-repair structures in advanced Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Language Studies. 13(1), 57–76.

[10] Pietikäinen, K.S., 2018. Misunderstandings and Ensuring Understanding in Private ELF Talk. Applied Linguistics. 39(2), 188–212.

[11] Walsh, S., 2011. Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. Routledge: London, UK.

[12] Mokeira, S.T., 2015. Effects of Conversation Repair Strategies on Counselling Discourse [Master's Thesis]. Maseno University: Maseno, Kenya.

[13] Sert, O., Balaman, U., 2018. Orientations to negotiated language in online L2 interaction. ReCALL. 30(3), 355–374.

[14] Obeng, S.G., Campbell, A.A., 2024. Repair in Ghanaian judicial discourse. International Journal of Legal Discourse. 9(1), 33–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2024-2002

[15] Obeng, S.G., 1992. A phonetic description of repair sequences in Akan conversation. Text. 12(1), 59–80.

[16] Obeng, S.G., 1990. On a Morphosyntactic Description of Repair Sequences. Linguistics Department Colloquium Series. University of Ghana: Accra, Ghana.

[17] Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language. 53(2), 361–382.

[18] Schegloff, E.A., 2013. Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair. In: Hayashi, M., Raymond, G., Sidnell, J. (Eds.). Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 71–94.

[19] Hutchby, I., 2019. Conversation Analysis. Sage: London, UK.

[20] Hutchby, I., Wooffitt, R., 2021. Conversation Analysis, 2nd ed. Polity: Cambridge, UK.

[21] Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language. 50(4), 696–735.

[22] Jefferson, G., 2018. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: Lerner, G.H. (Ed.). Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

[23] Campbell, A.A., Obeng, S.G., 2024. Interactional repair in institutional discourse. Journal of Pragmatics. 215, 1–15.

[24] Schegloff, E.A., 1992. Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology. 97(5), 1295–1345.

[25] Kenworthy, O.T., 1986. Caregiver–child interaction and language acquisition. Topics in Language Disorders. 6(6), 123–133.

[26] Brewer, J., 2000. Ethnography. Open University Press: Buckingham, UK.

[27] Sarantakos, S., 2012. Social Research. Macmillan International Higher Education: London, UK.

[28] Rymes, B., 2008. Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Tool for Critical Reflection. Hampton Press: Cresskill, NJ, USA.

[29] ten Have, P., 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide, 2nd ed. Sage: London, UK.

[30] Seedhouse, P., 2022. Transitioning from conversation analysis to mixed methods. Language Teaching. 57(1), 101–112.

[31] Tetnowski, J.T., Tetnowski, J.A., Damico, J.S., 2021. Patterns of Conversation Trouble Source and Repair as Indices of Improved Conversation in Aphasia: A Multiple-Case Study Using Conversation Analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 30, 326–343.

[32] Jefferson, G., 1984. Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgment tokens “yeah” and “mm hm”. Papers in Linguistics. 17(2), 197–216.

[33] Garcia, A., Martinez, B., 2022. Exploring the Effectiveness of Replacement Strategies in Addressing Communication Breakdowns. Journal of Applied Linguistics. 14(2), 123–140.

[34] Lee, K., 2021. The Role of Other-Repair in English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) Communications. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics. 21, 392–413.

[35] Manuaba, B., Putra, N.A.J., 2021. The Types of Communication Accommodation Strategies in English as Foreign Language (EFL) Classrooms. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation. 5(1), 17–23.

[36] Wijayanto, A., Hastuti, D.M., 2021. Communication Strategies by Indonesian EFL Learners in English Conversation Class. Jurnal Arbitrer. 8(1), 72–81.

Downloads

How to Cite

Bukari, F., Obeng, S., & Lauren Oblie, E. (2026). Conversation Breakdown and Institutional Discourse in Ghanaian ESL Classrooms: A Conversation Analytic Investigation. Journal of International Education and Practice, 9(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.30564/jiep.v9i1.12407

Issue

Vol. 9 , Iss. 1 (June 2026): In Progress

Article Type

ARTICLE

License

Copyright © 2026 Francis Bukari, Samuel Obeng, Emmanuel Lauren Oblie

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.