No Single English: How a History of the English Language Course Reshapes Student Attitudes toward Grammar, Variation, and Standard English

Authors

  • David O'Neil

    English Department, English Faculty, University of Southern Indiana, Evansville, IN 47712, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jler.v8i2.13538
Received: 22 September 2025 | Revised: 6 November 2025 | Accepted: 13 November 2025 | Published Online: 21 November 2025

Abstract

This study examines the impact of a History of English course on student attitudes toward grammar, language variation, and Standard English. Using a mixed-methods design, the study draws on pre- and post-course survey data alongside qualitative data from student reflections and group discussions. Participants were undergraduate English majors at a public U.S. university, many preparing to become English Language Arts (ELA) teachers. The course emphasized the historical development of English, including processes of language change, alongside sociocultural perspectives on language use. Findings indicate a shift toward more flexible and descriptivist perspectives, including acceptance of language variation and recognition of the legitimacy of diverse dialects. Students attributed these changes to their understanding of English as a historically evolving system. Meanwhile, many participants still valued Standard English in formal and academic contexts, developing a more context-dependent view of language use. Qualitative analysis reveals increased awareness of the social and cultural dimensions of language, as well as a move away from rule-based approaches to grammar. Students expressed support for teaching practices that emphasize communication, context, and audience, rather than isolated correctness. A central insight of the study is that students come to see that there is no single English. These findings suggest that integrating historical linguistics into English teaching programs can support more flexible, inclusive, and effective approaches to grammar instruction. The study has implications for teacher education, particularly in preparing future teachers to address language variation and Standard English in academically rigorous and socially responsive ways.

Keywords:

English Teaching; Prescriptivism; Standard English; Language Variation; Grammar Pedagogy; History of English

References

[1] Curzan, A., 2014. Fixing English: Prescriptivism and Language History. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[2] Delpit, L., 2006. Other People’s Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom, 2nd ed. The New Press: New York, NY, USA.

[3] Weaver, C., Bush, J., 2008. Grammar to Enrich and Enhance Writing. Heinemann: Portsmouth, NH, USA.

[4] Lippi-Green, R., 2012. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States, 2nd ed. Routledge: London, UK.

[5] Milroy, J., 2001. Language Ideologies and the Consequences of Standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 5(4), 530–555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00163

[6] O’Neil, D., 2025. Standardization, Power, and Purity: Ideological Tensions in Language and Scientific Discourse. Education Sciences. 15(4), 489.

[7] Baker-Bell, A., 2020. Linguistic Justice: Black Language, Literacy, Identity, and Pedagogy. Routledge: New York, NY, USA.

[8] Charity Hudley, A.H., Mallinson, C., 2011. Understanding English Language Variation in U.S. Schools. Teachers College Press: New York, NY, USA.

[9] Godley, A.J., Sweetland, J., Wheeler, R.S., et al., 2006. Preparing Teachers for Dialectally Diverse Classrooms. Educational Researcher. 35(8), 30–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035008030

[10] Wolfram, W., 2011. Changing Misconceptions about Dialect Diversity: The Role of Public Education. CAL Digest: Washington, DC, USA.

[11] Irvine, J.T., Gal, S., 2000. Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation. In: Kroskrity, P.V. (Ed.). Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. School of American Research Press: Santa Fe, NM, USA.

[12] Silverstein, M., 1979. Language structure and linguistic ideology. In: Clyne, P.R., Hanks, W.F., Hofbauer, C.L. (Eds.). The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels. Chicago Linguistic Society: Chicago, IL, USA. pp. 193–247.

[13] Charity Hudley, A.H., Mallinson, C., Bucholtz, M., 2022. Talking College: Making Space for Black Language Practices in Higher Education. Teachers College Press: New York, NY, USA.

[14] Godley, A.J., Minnici, A., 2008. Critical Language Pedagogy in an Urban High School English Class. Urban Education. 43(3), 319–346.

[15] Burgess, J., Etherington, S., 2002. Focus on Grammatical Form: Explicit or Implicit? System. 30(4), 433–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00048-9

[16] Barnard, R., Scampton, D., 2008. Teaching Grammar: A Survey of EAP Teachers in New Zealand. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics. 14(2), 59–82.

[17] Bäckström, A.-M., 2006. Prescriptivism and Descriptivism: A Study on Attitudes towards Language [Bachelor’s Thesis]. Luleå University of Technology: Luleå, Sweden.

[18] Andrews, S., 2007. Teacher Language Awareness. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge,UK.

[19] Hudson, R., 2004. Why Education Needs Linguistics (and Vice Versa). Journal of Linguistics. 40(1), 105–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226703002342

[20] Myhill, D., 2010. Ways of Knowing: Writing with Grammar in Mind. English Teaching: Practice and Critique. 4(3), 77–96.

[21] Myhill, D., Watson, A., 2014. The Role of Grammar in the Writing Curriculum: A Review. Child Language Teaching and Therapy. 30(1), 41–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659013514070

[22] Dill, A., O’Neil, D., 2026. Grammar and Writing Instruction in Indiana Public Schools: An Evaluation of the IDOE ELA Academic Standards (6–12). Innovative Pedagogy and Technology. 2(1), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63385/ipt.v2i1.67

[23] Hayes, M., Burkette, A. (Eds.), 2017. Approaches to Teaching the History of the English Language: Pedagogy in Practice. Oxford University Press New York, NY, USA.

[24] O’Neil, D., 2019. The Middle English Creolization Hypothesis: Persistence, Implications, and Language Ideology. English Language and Linguistics. 54(1), 113–132.

[25] Smith, K.A., Kim, S.M., 2018. This Language, a River: A History of English. Broadview Press: Peterborough, ON, Canada.

[26] Smith, K.A., Kim, S.M., 2026. This Language, a River: A History of English, 2nd ed. Broadview Press: Peterborough, ON, Canada.

[27] Mallinson, C., 2024. Linguistic Variation and Linguistic Inclusion in the US Educational Context. Annual Review of Linguistics. 10, 37–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-121546

[28] Wang, W., Yan, Y., 2024. A Review of Teacher Language Awareness (2015–2024): Current Trends and Future Directions. Journal of Language Teaching. 4(4), 10–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2024.023

[29] Kagan, S., 1994. Kagan Cooperative Learning. Kagan Publishing: San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA.

[30] Lyman, F., 1981. The Responsive Classroom Discussion: The Inclusion of All Students. In: Anderson, A. (Ed.). Mainstreaming Digest. University of Maryland Press: College Park, MD, USA. pp. 109–113.

[31] Sah, P., Li, G., 2024. Toward linguistic justice and inclusion for multilingual learners: Implications of selective translanguaging in English-medium instruction classrooms. Learning and Instruction. 92, 101904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101904

[32] Shapiro, S., 2022. Cultivating Critical Language Awareness in the Writing Classroom. Routledge: New York, NY, USA.

[33] Meighan, P.J., 2023. Colonialingualism: Colonial legacies, imperial mindsets, and inequitable practices in English language education. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education. 17(2), 146–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15595692.2022.2082406

Downloads

How to Cite

O’Neil , D. (2025). No Single English: How a History of the English Language Course Reshapes Student Attitudes toward Grammar, Variation, and Standard English. Journal of Linguistics and Education Research, 8(2), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.30564/jler.v8i2.13538

Issue

Article Type

Articles

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.