Transformer Fault Diagnosis: A Shallow Learning Approach for DGA-Based Incipient Fault Detection

Authors

  • Deepika Bhalla

    Department of Electrical Engineering, IKG Punjab Technical University, Kapurthala 144603, India

  • Avnesh Verma

    Department of Instrumentation (formerly USIC), Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra 136119, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jeis.v8i1.11972
Received: 3 November 2025 | Revised: 25 December 2025 | Accepted: 2 January 2026 | Published Online: 7 January 2026

Abstract

Power transformers are exposed to electrical, thermal, and mechanical stresses during operation, leading to the degradation of insulation and the generation of dissolved gases. Utilities use IEEE and IEC standards use dissolved gas analysis (DGA) to detect incipient faults in oil-filled in-service transformers. Traditional gas ratio-based DGA methods, at times inconclusive diagnoses, limiting their effectiveness in scheduling preventive maintenance. This study presents the application of a shallow learning Backpropagation Neural Network (BP-NN) for assessing the condition of normal ageing and classification of incipient faults in oil-immersed power transformers. The model is trained using the concentrations (ppm) of five key gases—H₂, CH₄, C₂H₂, C₂H₄, and C₂H₆—as input features. The classified condition of a transformer is normal ageing and five fault type, namely partial discharge, low-energy and high-energy discharges, and thermal faults across two varying temperature ranges. The data set used for the classification of incipient faults within transformers is that where the fault type is confirmed by physical inspection. The 256 samples used in this work are from published sources, including the IEC TC10 database. The results achieved by the BP-NN demonstrate its capability to accurately classify normal ageing and diagnose five types of faults. For evaluating the performance of the trained NN, the IEEE/IEC method of classification, the benchmark used is the actual fault type. The shallow network of pattern recognition successfully identified the presence of normal ageing and the five fault types. The performance of the test set is 94.73%. The results highlight the potential of BP-NNs for enhanced transformer condition monitoring and early fault detection. As more high-quality labelled data become available, the diagnostic accuracy and robustness of the model are expected to improve further.

Keywords:

Artificial Neural Networks; Backpropagation; Dissolved Gas Analysis; Power Transformer Diagnostics; Incipient Fault Detection

References

[1] Farag, A.S., Mohandes, M., Al-Shaikh, A., 2001. Diagnosing Failed Distribution Transformers Using Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 16(4), 631–636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/61.956749

[2] Verma, A., Vishnu, A.T., 2013. Optimum Fuzzy Based Approach to Improve the Instrument’s Performance Affected by Environmental Conditions. Serbian Journal of Electrical Engineering. 10(2), 309–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/SJEE121219006V

[3] Genc, S., Karagol, S., 2020 Fuzzy Logic Application in DGA Methods to Classify Fault Type in Power Transformer. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications, Ankara, Turkey, 26–28 June 2020; pp. 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HORA49412.2020.9152896

[4] Malik, I.M., Sharma, A., Naayagi, R.T., 2023. A Comprehensive and Practical Method for Transformer Fault Analysis With Historical Data Trend Using Fuzzy Logic. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation. 30(5), 2277–2284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2023.3286795

[5] Verma, A., Tiwari, V.A., 2019. A Fuzzy Logic Controller to Minimize the Effect of Input Temperature Fluctuations on the Deviation of Relative Humidity to Avoid Instrument’s Deterioration. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology. 7(6), 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32622/ijrat.76201948

[6] Thang, K.F., Aggarwal, R.K., Esp, D.G., et al., 2000. Statistical and Neural Analysis of Dissolved Gases in Power Transformers. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Dielectric Materials, Measurements and Applications, Edinburgh, UK, 17–21 September 2000; pp. 324–329.

[7] Guardado, J.L., Naredo, J.L., Moreno, P., et al., 2001. A Comparative Study of Neural Network Efficiency in Power Transformer Diagnosis Using Dissolved Gas Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 16(4), 643–647.

[8] Souahlia, S., Bacha, K., Chaari, A., 2012. MLP Neural Network-Based Decision for Power Transformers Fault Diagnosis Using an Improved Combination of Rogers and Doernenburg Ratios DGA. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems. 43(1), 1346–1353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.05.067

[9] Bhalla, D., Bansal, R.K., Gupta, H.O., 2012. Function Analysis Based Rule Extraction from Artificial Neural Networks for Transformer Incipient Fault Diagnosis. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems. 33, 1196–1203.

[10] Zou, D., Li, Z., Quan, H., et al., 2023. Transformer Fault Classification for Diagnosis Based on DGA and Deep Belief Network. Energy Reports. 9(Suppl. 12), 250–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.183

[11] Wang, N., Li, W., Li, J., et al., 2024. Prediction of Dissolved Gas Content in Transformer Oil Using the Improved SVR Model. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 34(8), 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2024.3463256

[12] Wu, Y., Sun, X., Zhang, Y., et al., 2022. A Power Transformer Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Hybrid Improved Seagull Optimization Algorithm and Support Vector Machine. IEEE Access. 10, 17268–17286.

[13] Taha, I.B.M., Hoballah, A., Ghoneim, S.S.M., 2020. Optimal Ratio Limits of Rogers’ Four-Ratios and IEC 60599 Code Methods Using Particle Swarm Optimization Fuzzy-Logic Approach. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation. 27(1), 222–230.

[14] Moradi, E., Elsisi, M., Mahmoud, K., et al., 2025. Robust Deep Neural Network-Based Internet of Things for Power Transformer Fault Diagnosis Under Imbalanced Data and Uncertainties. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems. 168, 110731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110731

[15] Jin, L., Kim, D., Chan, K.Y., et al., 2024. Deep Machine Learning-Based Asset Management Approach for Oil-Immersed Power Transformers Using Dissolved Gas Analysis. IEEE Access. 12, 27794–27809.

[16] Saroja, S., Haseena, S., Madavan, R., 2023. Dissolved Gas Analysis of Transformer: An Approach Based on Machine Learning and Multi-Criteria Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation. 30(5), 2429–2438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2023.3271609

[17] Rao, U.M., Fofana, I., Rajesh, K.N.V.P.S., et al., 2021. Identification and Application of Machine Learning Algorithms for Transformer Dissolved Gas Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation. 28(5), 1828–1835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2021.009770

[18] Nanfak, S., Eke, F., Meghnefi, F., et al., 2023. Hybrid DGA Method for Power Transformer Faults Diagnosis Based on Evolutionary k-Means Clustering and Dissolved Gas Subsets Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation. 30(5), 2421–2428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2023.3275119

[19] Vidal, J.F., Castro, A.R.G., 2023. Diagnosing Faults in Power Transformers With Variational Autoencoder, Genetic Programming, and Neural Network. IEEE Access. 11, 30529–30545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3258544

[20] Abdo, A., Liu, H., Mahmoud, Y., et al., 2024. Hybrid Model of Power Transformer Fault Classification Using C-Set and MFCM–MCSVM. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems. 10(2), 672–685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17775/CSEEJPES.2020.04010

[21] Mashifane, L.D., Mendu, B., Monchusi, B.B., 2025. State-of-the-Art Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Power Transformers: A Review of Machine Learning and Hybrid Methods. IEEE Access. 13, 48156–48172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3546861

[22] Butler-Purry, K.L., Bagriyanik, M., 2003. Identifying Transformer Incipient Events for Maintaining Distribution System Reliability. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, USA, 6–9 January 2003; pp. 1–8.

[23] Izzularab, M.A., Aly, G.E.M., Mansour, D.A., 2004. On-line Diagnosis of Incipient Faults and Cellulose Degradation Based on Artificial Intelligence Methods. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Solid Dielectrics, Toulouse, France, 5–9 July 2004; pp. 767–770.

[24] Chen, H.C., Zhang, Y., 2025. Rethinking Shallow and Deep Learnings for Transformer Dissolved Gas Analysis: A Review. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation. 32(1), 3–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2025.3526080

[25] Duval, M., DePabla, A., 2001. Interpretation of Gas-in-Oil Analysis Using New IEC Publication 60599 and IEC TC 10 Databases. IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine. 17(2), 31–41.

[26] Yang, H.T., Liou, C.C., Chow, J.H., 2001. Fuzzy Learning Vector Quantization Networks for Power Transformer Condition Assessment. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation. 8(1), 143–149.

[27] Lin, C.E., Ling, J.M., Huang, C.L., 1993. An Expert System for Transformers Fault Diagnosis Using Dissolved Gas Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 8(1), 231–238.

[28] Tomsovic, K., Tapper, M., Ingvarsson, T., 1993. A Fuzzy Information Approach to Integrate Different Transformer Diagnostic Methods. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 8(3), 1638–1646.

[29] IEEE SA Standards Board, 2019. ANSI/IEEE Standard C57.104-2019: IEEE Guide for the Interpretation of Gases Generated in Oil-Immersed Transformers. IEEE Standards Association: Piscataway, NJ, USA.

[30] IEC, 2022. IEC 60599-2022: Mineral Oil-Impregnated Electrical Equipment in Service: Guide to the Interpretation of Dissolved Free Gas Analysis. IEC: Geneva, Switzerland.

Downloads

How to Cite

Bhalla, D., & Verma, A. (2026). Transformer Fault Diagnosis: A Shallow Learning Approach for DGA-Based Incipient Fault Detection. Journal of Electronic & Information Systems, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30564/jeis.v8i1.11972