Language Features in Educational Research Article Closings: International Q1 Journals vs. Turkish Local Non-Q-Rated Journals

Authors

  • Tanju Deveci

    Department of Translation and Interpretation, Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, Antalya Bilim University, Antalya 07190, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jler.v8i1.12699
Received: 10 April 2025 | Revised: 30 May 2025 | Accepted: 8 June 2025 | Published Online: 15 June 2025

Abstract

Scientific writing involves multiple dimensions, including epistemic, methodological, theoretical, and textual. Focusing on the last of these, this study examines selected linguistic features related to stance, authorial presence, voice and agency, framing expressions, and conditional structures in the closing sections of educational research articles (RAs) in internationally indexed Q1-rated journals and locally indexed non-Q-rated Turkish journals. It seeks to identify recurrent rhetorical tendencies across these publication contexts and offer linguistically grounded insights to support authors’ strategic choices when navigating different publication environments. The corpus comprised 60 empirical RAs: 30 RAs from SSCI/Scopus-indexed Q1 journals and 30 RAs from locally indexed Turkish journals. The two corpora were compared statistically using a log-likelihood test. Results indicated that international authors employed hedges, obligation modals, boosters, and subjunctive structures more frequently and with greater lexical variety, reflecting nuanced rhetorical positioning, while personal pronouns and active voice were more prevalent, signaling stronger authorial presence and agency; however, Turkish authors relied more on impersonal constructions and passive voice. Both groups used conventionalized expressions to frame recommendations, though international authors demonstrated slightly broader lexical and structural variation. These patterns highlight systematic differences in how stance and agency are realized across publication contexts. Making these patterns explicit through instruction may help authors develop greater rhetorical awareness and flexibility when engaging with the expectations of high-visibility journals, which are often shaped by recurrent editorial, review, and publication practices rather than fixed or universal norms. This, in turn, may support more informed and strategic positioning across different publication venues.

Keywords:

Academic Writing; Authorial Presence; Closing Section; International Journals; Voice and Agency

References

[1] Swargiary, K., 2025. Research Methodology: Evolution, Practice, and Prospects. ERA: New York, NY, USA.

[2] Thimmaraju, T., Manjunatha, B.K., 2024. Foundations of Educational Research: Methods and Applications. Laxmi Book Publication: Maharashtra, India.

[3] Garcia, D.R., 2018. Bridging the Research and Politics Gap to Set the Policy Agenda. In: Papa, R., Armfield, S.W.J. (Eds.). The Wiley Handbook of Educational Policy. Wiley: London, UK. pp. 73–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119218456.ch4

[4] Pierangelo, R., 2004. The Special Educator’s Survival Guide. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA.

[5] Deveci̇, T., 2020. The introduction section of research articles in English and Turkish: The case of educational sciences – A preliminary study. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 6(1), 119–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.710233

[6] Swales, J.M., Feak, C.B., 2012. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Skills and Tasks, 3rd ed. Michigan ELT: Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

[7] Samraj, B., 2002. Introductions in research articles: variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes. 21(1), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00023-5

[8] Hyland, K., 2004. Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied Linguistics. 25(2), 156–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156

[9] Adamson, J., Nunn, R., 2012. Editorial and Authorial Voices in EFL Academic Journal Publishing. Asian EFL Journal Press: Tortola, British Virgin Islands.

[10] Renkl, A., 2013. Why Practice Recommendations Are Important in Use-Inspired Basic Research and Why Too Much Caution Is Dysfunctional. Educational Psychology Review. 25(3), 317–324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9236-0

[11] Swales, J.M., 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[12] Asif, F., Tajuddin, A.A.J., Khan, I., 2020. Challenges faced by non-native writers in publishing papers in reputed English language journals. PJAEE: PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology. 17(4), 1576–1591.

[13] Englander, K., 2009. Transformation of the Identities of Nonnative English-Speaking Scientists as a Consequence of the Social Construction of Revision. Journal of Language, Identity & Education. 8(1), 35–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15348450802619979

[14] Flowerdew, J., 1999. Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing. 8(3), 243–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80116-7

[15] Deveci, T., Nunn, R., 2014. Use of first-person plural pronoun to refer to single authors: Analyses of postgraduate theses. The Journal of English as an International Language. 9(1), 1–16.

[16] Tognini-Bonelli, E., 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work, Studies in Corpus Linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6

[17] Rayson, P., Garside, R., 2000. Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora. 9, 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3115/1117729.1117730

[18] Zanina, E., 2016. Strategic Hedging: A Comparative Study of Methods, Results and Discussion (and Conclusion) Sections of Research Articles in English and Russian. Journal of Language and Education. 2(2), 52–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2016-2-2-52-60

[19] Ghahraman, V., Karlsson, M., Kazemi, A., et al., 2023. On the functions of hedging in research articles (RAs): A study on RA discussions. 17(1), 165–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7513381

[20] Warchal, K., 2008. Claiming authority: Modals of obligation and necessity in academic written English. The case of should. Linguistica e Filologia. 27, 21–37.

[21] Pearson, P.J., 2007. A corpus-based study of mandative subjunctive triggers in published research articles [Master’s Thesis]. Iowa State University: Ames, IA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-15723

[22] Mur-Dueñas, P., 2018. Promotional strategies in academic writing: Statements of contribution in Spanish and ELF research articles. In: Pelclová, J., Lu, W. (Eds.). Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 259–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.12mur

[23] Baratta, A.M., 2009. Revealing stance through passive voice. Journal of Pragmatics. 41(7), 1406–1421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.010

[24] Beason, L., Lester, M., 2003. A Commonsense Guide to Grammar and Usage. Bedford/St. Martin’s: Boston, MA, USA.

[25] Millar, N., Budgell, B., Fuller, K., 2013. ‘Use the active voice whenever possible’: The Impact of Style Guidelines in Medical Journals. Applied Linguistics. 34(4), 393–414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams059

[26] Xu, X., 2024. A Cross-Linguistic Study of Stance Strategies in Abstracts of Linguistics Articles. International Journal of Education and Humanities. 13(1), 120–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/64kery15

[27] Maňáková, M., 2021. Self-mention in the academic discourse of ELF writers. Topics in Linguistics. 22(2), 32–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2021-0009

[28] Kafes, H., 2018. Stance in Academic Writing. European Journal of Education Studies. 4(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1165088

[29] Gulec, N., Gulec, B.A., 2015. Lexical Collocations (Verb + Noun) Across Written Academic Genres in English. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 182, 433–440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.816

[30] Demir, C., 2017. Lexical collocations in English: A comparative study of native and non-native scholars of English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 13(1), 75–87.

[31] Hua, Y., Lu, X., Guo, Q., 2024. Independent corpus consultation for collocation use in academic writing by L2 graduate students. System. 127, 103515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103515

[32] Pinto, P.T., Rees, G.P., Frankenberg-Garcia, A., 2021. Identifying collocation issues in English L2 research article writing. In Corpora in ESP/EAP Writing Instruction: Preparation, Exploitation, Analysis. Routledge: New York, NY, USA.

[33] Lohaus, M., Wemheuer-Vogelaar, W., 2021. Who Publishes Where? Exploring the Geographic Diversity of Global IR Journals. International Studies Review. 23(3), 645–669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa062

Downloads

How to Cite

Deveci, T. (2025). Language Features in Educational Research Article Closings: International Q1 Journals vs. Turkish Local Non-Q-Rated Journals. Journal of Linguistics and Education Research, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30564/jler.v8i1.12699

Issue

Vol. 8 , Iss. 1 (June 2025): In Progress

Article Type

Articles

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

Copyright © 2025 Tanju Deveci

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.