Application of Orthophoto Maps Created from UAV Aerial Images for Monitoring Historical and Cultural Heritage Lands

Authors

  • Boris Chetverikov

    Department of Photogrammetry and Geoinformatics, Lviv Polytechnic National University , Lviv 79013, Ukraine

  • Sebastian Różycki

    Department of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Systems, Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw 00-661, Poland

  • Andrii Malitskyy

    Institute of Geodesy, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv 79013, Ukraine

  • Luybov Babiy

    Department of Photogrammetry and Geoinformatics, Lviv Polytechnic National University , Lviv 79013, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v6i2.6360
Received: 18 April 2024 | Revised: 22 May 2024 | Accepted: 28 May 2024 | Published Online: 10 July 2024

Abstract

The study investigates the methodology of creating orthophotoplans for immovable historical and cultural heritage sites, beginning from aerial surveys using various UAVs to object vectorization and plan creation. This issue is highly relevant in Ukraine due to rapid reforms in all ministries, including the Ministry of Culture. The reforms are creating a constant need for updated graphical documentation. As immovable historical and cultural heritage sites are in tourist areas with changing infrastructure, traditional surveying methods are impractical due to time constraints. Additionally, the application of UAV aerial imaging for delineating object boundaries and protective zones is more cost-effective. Existing boundaries of heritage lands and those determined from archival materials were overlaid on the created pflans. Orthophotoplans were produced and vectorized at a scale of 1:500 for two research zones: the Holy Trinity Church in Liuboml and the New Jewish Cemetery in Lviv. For the New Jewish Cemetery, boundaries were delineated to assess alignment with the current protective zone. Protective buffer zones around heritage sites were outlined according to both historical and contemporary recommendations in Ukraine. For buffer zones measured from the centroid, development is permitted up to 300 meters for undeveloped areas, with negotiated distances for developed regions, using the 300-meter protective zone as a baseline. The study's uniqueness lies in using a known methodology for creating orthophotoplans based on UAV data to explore options for modeling protective zones based on varying legislative norms over time, incorporating specific nuances. This approach can benefit not only Ukraine but also other countries undergoing reforms in this field.

Keywords:

Lands of historical purpose; Aerial survey; Orthophotoplans; Historical boundaries; Protective zone; Cultural heritage; Monitoring of lands

References

[1] Constitution of Ukraine, 1996 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/constitution

[2] Law of Ukraine 'On Protection of Cultural Heritage' [Internet]. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1805-14#Text

[3] Land Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine dated 10/25/2001 No. 2768 III. [Internet]. Available from: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2768-14

[4] Kościuk, J., Ćmielewski, B., 2022. Possibilities of using LiDAR Systems in architectural and archaeological research in the National Archaeological Park of Machu Picchu. Machu Picchu in Context. Springer: Switzerland. pp. 301–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92766-0_8

[5] Mligo, C., 2015. Plant species composition and distribution in relation to land use patterns in serengeti ecosystem Tanzania. Open Journal of Forestry. 5(6), 607–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2015.56054

[6] Ling, H., Wang, G., Wu, W., et al., 2023. Grassland resilience to woody encroachment in North America and the effectiveness of using fire in national parks. Climate. 11(11), 219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11110219

[7] Bioresita, F., Hidayat, H., Kurniawan, J., et al., (editors), 2023. 3D modelling of sanggrahan temple using UAV imagery and terrestrial photogrammetry method. Proceedings of The Geomatics International Conference 2023; July 27, 2023; Surabaya, Indonesia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1276/1/012043

[8] Bevz, O., 2020. Legal aspects of the executive bodies system formation in the area of the use and protection of historical and cultural lands in Ukraine. Przegląd Prawa Administracyjne. 3, 31–41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/ppa.2020.3.31-41

[9] Danylevskyi, A., Danylevska, Yu., 2021. Criminal-legal protection of lands on which immovable cultural heritage objects are located: analysis of separate legislative initiatives. Legal Journal of Donbas. 2(75), 60–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7946-9_2

[10] Gulkevich, O., 2020. Legal regime of lands of historical and cultural purpose. Legal bulletin. 2, 297–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32837/yuv.v0i2.1736

[11] Lytvynenko, O.M., Directions of improvement of legal and institutional mechanisms of cultural heritage protection; 2020 [Internet] [cited 2020 Nov 28]. Available from: https://niss.gov.ua/doslidzhennya/socialna-politika/napryami-vdoskonalennya-pravovikh-ta-instituciynikh-mekhanizmiv

[12] Varlamov, A., Gvozdeva, O., Zhdanova, R., 2019. Environmental requirements in land management of land use facilities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 350, 012059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/350/1/012059

[13] Novakovska, I., Skrypnyk, L., Novakovsky, D., 2022. Inventory of lands of historical and cultural purpose. Land Management, Cadastre and Land Monitoring. 1, 0–37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2022.01.03

[14] Kanun, E., Alptekin, A., Yakar, M., 2021. Cultural heritage modelling using UAV photogrammetric methods: a case study of Kanlıdivane archeological site. Advanced UAV. 1(1), 24–33. Available from: https://publish.mersin.edu.tr/index.php/uav/article/view/153

[15] Martínez-Carricondo, P., Carvajal-Ramírez, F., Yero-Paneque, L. et al., 2021. Combination of HBIM and UAV photogrammetry for modelling and documentation of forgotten heritage. Case study: Isabel II dam in Níjar (Almería, Spain). Heritage Science. 9(1), 95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00571-8

[16] Chetverikov, B., Babiy, L., 2016. Determination of boundaries of ancient burial places using the archived aerial and cartographic materials. Modern Achievements of Geodesic Science and Industry. (1), 111–114. Available from: https://ena.lpnu.ua:8443/server/api/core/bitstreams/f174d664-4765-46f3-baa7-505ab1d254c5/content

[17] Chetverikov, B., 2017. The method of determining the transfer of the boundaries of the New Jewish Cemetery in Lviv using geoinformation systems. Modern Achievements of Geodetic Science and Industry. 2(34), 98–101.

[18] Chetverikov, B., Babiy, L., Protsyk, M., et al., 2019. Error estimation of DEM of orthotransformation of aerial images obtained from UAVs on the mountainous local site in the Village Shidnytsya. Geodesy, Cartography and aerial Photography. 90, 65–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23939/istcgcap2019.90.065

[19] Hlotov, V., Hunina А., Kniaziev, S., et al., 2019. Analysis of application of the UAVs for military tasks. Modern Achievements of Geodesic Science and Industry. 37, 69–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33841/1819-1339-2019-1-37-69-77

[20] Papakonstantinou, A., Kavroudakis, D., Kourtzellis, Y., et al., 2019. Mapping cultural heritage in coastal areas with UAS: the case study of Lesvos Island. Heritage. 2(2), 1404–1422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2020089

[21] Baranwal, E., Raghvendra, S., Tiwari, P.S., et al., 2021. Health monitoring and assessment of the cultural monument through unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) image processing. Advances in systems engineering: select proceedings of NSC 2019. Springer: Singapore. p. 145–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8025-3_16

[22] Chumak, O., Gorkovchuk, J., 2023. Prior calculation of the accuracy of monitoring of cultural heritage objects using UAVs and laser scanning. Geodesy and Cartography. 49(3), 133–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2023.18008

[23] Ergun, B., Sahin, C., Bilucan, F., 2023. Level of detail (LoD) geometric analysis of relief mapping employing 3D modeling via UAV Images in cultural heritage studies. Heritage Science. 11(1), 194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01041-z

[24] Knippschild, R., Zöllter, C., 2021. Urban regeneration between cultural heritage preservation and revitalization: experiences with a decision support tool in eastern Germany. Land. 10(6), 547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060547

[25] Gil-Docampo, M., Peña-Villasenín, S., Bettencourt, A.M., et al., 2023. 3D geometric survey of cultural heritage by UAV in inaccessible coastal or shallow aquatic environments. Archaeological Prospection. 15, 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1901

[26] Khelifi, A., Ciccone, G., Altaweel, M., et al., 2021. Autonomous service drones for multimodal detection and monitoring of archaeological sites. Applied Sciences. 11(21), 10424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110424

[27] Kaamin, M., Azmidi, M.I., Faisal, M.H.A., et al., 2023. Production and evaluation of orthophoto map using UAV photogrammetry. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology. 33(1), 187–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.33.1.187196

[28] Themistocleous, K., 2020. The use of UAVs for cultural heritage and archaeology. Remote Sensing for Archaeology and Cultural Landscapes. Springer: Switzerland. pp. 241–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10979-0_14

[29] Silwal, A., Tamang, S., Adhikari, R., 2022. Use of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for mapping, and accuracy assessment of the orthophoto with and without using GCPs: A Case Study in Nepal. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal. 4(2), 45–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53093/mephoj.1176847

[30] Green, D.R., Hagon, J.J., Gómez, C., et al., 2019. Using low-cost UAVs for environmental monitoring, mapping, and modelling: examples from the coastal zone. Coastal Management. Global Challenges and Innovations. Academic Press: UK. pp. 465–501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-810473-6.00022-4

[31] Linchant, J., Lisein, J., Semeki, J., et al., 2015. Are unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) the future of wildlife monitoring? A review of accomplishments and challenges. Mammal Review. 45(4), 239–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12046

[32] Immerzeel, W.W., Kraaijenbrink, P.D., Shea, J.M., et al., 2014. High-resolution monitoring of Himalayan glacier dynamics using unmanned aerial vehicles. Remote Sensing of Environment. 150, 93–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.04.025

[33] Laliberte, A.S., Herrick, J.E., Rango, A., et al., 2010. Acquisition, orthorectification, and object-based classification of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery for rangeland monitoring. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 76(6), 661–672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.76.6.661

[34] Pérez, M., Agüera, F., Carvajal, F., 2013. Low cost surveying using an unmanned aerial vehicle. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 40, 311–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W2-311-2013

[35] State Archives of Lviv Oblast [Internet] [cited 2009 May 27]. Available from: https://old.archives.gov.ua/Eng/Archives/ra13.php

[36] Hlоtоv, V.М., Fіs, М.М., Kоlеsnіchеnkо, V.В., et al., 2022. Application of unmаnnеd aеrіаl vеhісlеs in mіlitаry affairs and aеrіаl surveying. Mоnоgrарh. Lvіv Polytechnic Publіshіng Hоusе: Ukraine. Available from: https://vlp.com.ua/files/220445_zmist.pdf

[37] DJI MAVIC 2 PRO [Internet] [cited 2024 May 27]. Available from: https://ek.ua/en/DJI-MAVIC-2-PRO.htm

[38] DJI PHANTOM 3 PRO [Internet] [cited 2024 May 27]. Available from: https://www.dji.com/global/support/product/phantom-3-pro

[39] National Archives and Records Administration (NARA, USA) [Internet] [cited 2024 May 27]. Available from: https://www.house.gov/the-house-explained/legislative-branch-partners/national-archive

Downloads

How to Cite

Boris Chetverikov, Sebastian Różycki, Andrii Malitskyy, & Luybov Babiy. (2024). Application of Orthophoto Maps Created from UAV Aerial Images for Monitoring Historical and Cultural Heritage Lands. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 6(2), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v6i2.6360