Assessing Carbon Sequestration and Biomass Distribution across Diverse Land Use Types in Ban Krang Subdistrict, Phitsanulok Province

Authors

  • Gitsada Panumonwatee

    Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Faculty of Agriculture Nature Resources and Environment, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok Province, 65000, Thailand

  • Rudklow Premprasit

    Faculty of Social Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok Province, 65000, Thailand

  • Savent Pampasit

    Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Faculty of Agriculture Nature Resources and Environment, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok Province, 65000, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i1.7169
Received: 30 August 2024 | Revised: 19 October 2024 | Accepted: 23 October 2024 | Published Online: 2 December 2024

Abstract

This study investigates carbon dioxide (CO₂) sequestration and biomass distribution across various plant components and land use types in Ban Krang Subdistrict, Mueang District, Phitsanulok Province, with the goal of enhancing carbon management strategies. Field surveys were conducted using 14 plots of 40x40 meters to quantify biomass and estimate CO₂ sequestration across different vegetation types. The findings reveal an average CO₂ sequestration of 122.81 Ton ha⁻¹, with aboveground biomass, particularly stems, contributing the most to carbon storage. Notably, abandoned perennial crops and mixed perennial crops demonstrated the highest sequestration rates, at 657.94 Ton ha⁻¹ and 613.00 Ton ha⁻¹, respectively. In contrast, agricultural lands such as rice paddies and cassava plantations exhibited the lowest sequestration rates, though rice paddies contributed the highest total CO₂ sequestration, amounting to 61,119.71 Tons, due to their extensive area. The study highlights the critical role of diverse and dense vegetation, particularly perennial crops, in maximizing carbon sequestration. It also underscores the potential for improving carbon storage in agricultural lands through better land management practices. The results suggest that targeted strategies should prioritize high-sequestration land use types while also enhancing carbon storage in low-sequestration areas. By optimizing land use and management practices, the region can significantly increase its carbon storage capacity, contributing to climate change mitigation and promoting long-term ecological sustainability. These insights are crucial for formulating effective carbon management strategies in Ban Krang Subdistrict, as well as in other comparable regions.

Keywords:

Carbon Sequestration; Biomass Distribution; Land Use

References

[1] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[2] Pan, Y., Birdsey, R.A., Fang, J., et al., 2011. A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World's Forests. Science. 333(6045), 988−993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609

[3] Don, A., Schumacher, J., Freibauer, A., 2011. Impact of Tropical Land-Use Change on Soil Organic Carbon Stocks – A Meta-Analysis. Global Change Biology. 17(4), 1658−1670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02336.x

[4] Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., et al., 2008. Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 363(1492), 789−813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2184

[5] Churkina, G., Organschi, A., Reyer, C.P.O., et al., 2020. Buildings as a global carbon sink. Nature Sustainability. 3(4), 269−276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0462-4

[6] Lal, R., 2008. Carbon Sequestration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 363(1492), 815−830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2185

[7] Nowak, D.J., Crane, D.E., 2002. Carbon Storage and Sequestration by Urban Trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution. 116(3), 381−389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00214-7

[8] Conant, R.T., Cerri, C.E.P., Osborne, B.B., et al., 2017. Grassland Management Impacts on Soil Carbon Stocks: A New Synthesis. Ecological Applications. 27(2), 662−668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1473

[9] Paustian, K., Lehmann, J., Ogle, S., et al., 2016. Climate-Smart Soils. Nature. 532(7597), 49−57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17174

[10] Pearson, T., Walker, S., Brown, S., 2007. Sourcebook for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry Projects. Winrock International and the World Bank Biocarbon Fund. World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA.

[11] MacDicken, K.G., 1997. A Guide to Monitoring Carbon Storage in Forestry and Agroforestry Projects. Winrock International Inst. for Agricultural Development, Forest Carbon Monitoring Program: Arlington, VA, USA.

[12] Lowman, M.D., Schowalter, T.D., Franklin, J.F., 2012. Methods in Forest Canopy Research. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA.

[13] Ravindranath, N.H., Ostwald, M., 2008. Carbon Inventory Methods: Handbook for Greenhouse Gas Inventory, Carbon Mitigation and Roundwood Production Projects. Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA.

[14] Nelson, D.W., Sommers, L.E., 1996. Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods. 5, 961−1010.

[15] Chave, J., Réjou-Méchain, M., Búrquez, A., et al., 2014. Improved Allometric Models to Estimate the Aboveground Biomass of Tropical Trees. Global Change Biology. 20(10), 3177−3190.

[16] Cairns, M.A., Brown, S., Helmer, E.H., et al., 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia. 111(1), 1−11.

[17] Picard, N., Saint-André, L., Henry, M., 2012. Manual for building tree volume and biomass allometric equations: from field measurement to prediction. FAO, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: Roma, Italy.

[18] Roshetko, J.M., Lasco, R.D., Angeleas, M.S.D., 2007. Smallholder agroforestry systems for carbon storage. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 12, 219−242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9010-9

[19] Nair, P.K.R., Kumar, B.M., Nair, V.D., 2009. Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 172, 10−23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200800030

[20] Ogawa, H., Yoda, K., Ogino, K., 1965. Comparative ecological studies on three main types of forest vegetation in Thailand. II plant Biomass. Nature and life in southeast Asia. 4, 49−80.

[21] Suwannapinunt, W., 1983. A study on the biomass of Thyrsostachys siamensis Gamble Forest at Hin-Lap, Kanchanaburi. Journal of Bamboo Research. 2(2), 82−101.

[22] Zheng, D., Yang, Q.Y., Wu, S.H., et al., 2008. China’s Ecogeographical Regionalization Research. The Commercial Press: Beijing, China.

[23] Treepatanasuwan, P., Diloksumpun, S., Sathaporn, D., et al., 2008. Carbon Sequestration in Biomass of Some Tree Species Planted at Phu Phan Royal Development Study Center, Sakon Nakhon Province. Research Report. Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation: Bangkok, Thailand.

[24] Viriyabuncha, C., Rattanapornjaroe, W., Mangklararat, J., et al., 2004. Biomass and Growth of Some Economic Tree Species for Carbon Storage Estimation in Forest Plantation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Climate Change in Forestry: Forests and Climate Change, Bangkok, Thailand, 16−17 August 2004.

[25] Arifin J., 2001. Estimasicadangan C pada berbagaisistem penggunaan lahan di Kecamatan Ngantang, Malang. Skripsi-S1. Unibraw: Malang, Indonesia.

[26] Pearson, T., Brown, S., 2005. Guide de mesure et de suivi du carbone dans les forêts et prairies herbeuses. Winrock International. 11−35.

[27] Ketterings, Q.M., Wibowo, T.T., van Noordwijk, M., et al., 2001. Farmers' Perspectives on Slash-and-Burn as a Land Clearing Method for Small-Scale Rubber Producers in Sepunggur, Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia. Forest Ecology and Management. 146(1−3), 145−158.

[28] Crews, T.E., Rumsey, B.E., 2017. What Agriculture Can Learn from Native Ecosystems in Building Soil Organic Matter: A Review. Sustainability. 9(4), 578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040578

[29] Monti, A., Zatta, A., 2009. Root Distribution and Soil Carbon Sequestration of Different Perennial and Annual Bioenergy Crops. Agricultural Ecosystems & Environment. 132(3−4), 329−339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.007

[30] De Deyn, G.B., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Bardgett, R.D., 2008. Plant Functional Traits and Soil Carbon Sequestration in Contrasting Biomes. Ecology Letters. 11(5), 516−531.

[31] Lal, R., 2004. Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security. Science. 304(5677), 1623−1627.

Downloads

How to Cite

Gitsada Panumonwatee, Rudklow Premprasit, & Savent Pampasit. (2025). Assessing Carbon Sequestration and Biomass Distribution across Diverse Land Use Types in Ban Krang Subdistrict, Phitsanulok Province. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 7(1), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i1.7169