
Soil Biological Characteristics in the Al-Haidariyya Sub-District, Iraq
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i3.7384Abstract
Finding microorganism-rich soils has become popular in recent years. Through natural mechanisms, these bacteria can protect plants from diseases and give critical nutrients. Ecologically and economically sustainable food production is essential to meet global demand. This article highlights soil microorganisms' function in the global carbon cycle and their principal identification methods. Identifying and assessing soil ecosystems based on land use is crucial. This study examined soil microbiology in Al-Haydariyya sub-district. Although new study reveals that soil populations of Escherichia coli can also be found in tropical, subtropical, and temperate locations, their presence in water is usually used to indicate feces contamination. The results of the study showed that by examining a total of 16 soil samples taken from a depth ranging from 0–30 cm, the research encompassed three distinct soil types: riverbank soil, river basin soil, and plateau soil. The number of E. coli bacteria in the overlapping soil was recorded at 21 × 105 cells ml–1. Regarding the minimum occurrence, it pertained to Staphylococcus bacteria found in the shoulder soil during January. The bacterial count for sample 1 was noted at 1 × 105 cell ml–1, while samples 2 and 3 did not exhibit noteworthy bacterial activity. This knowledge is necessary to guide the logical modification of the plant-soil system in order to favor the organisms or physiologies that are most crucial for encouraging the storage of carbon in agricultural soil.
Keywords:
Soil Microbiology; Biodiversity; Sustainability of the Plant EnvironmentReferences
[1] Kim, K., Byrne, L., 2006. Biodiversity loss and the taxonomic bottleneck: Emerging biodiversity science. Ecological Research . 21, 794–810.
[2] Bardgett, R., 2005. The biology of soil: A community and ecosystem approach. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp..
[3] Hartemink, A.E., 2008. Sugarcane for bioethanol: Soil and environmental issues. Advances in Agronomy. 99, 125–182.
[4] Nannipieri, P., 1994. The potential use of soil enzymes as indicators of productivity, sustainability and pollution, soil biota management in sustainable farming systems. In: Pankhurst, C.E., Double, B.M., Gupta, V.V.S.R., et al. (eds.). CSIRO: East Melbourne, Austrilia. pp. 238–244.
[5] Nicholls, E., Ely, A., Birkin, L., et al., 2020. The contribution of small scale food production in urban areas to the sustainable development goals: A review and case study. Sustainability Science. 15, 1585–1599.
[6] Sahrawat, K.L., Wani, S.P., Pathak, P., et al., 2010. Managing natural resources of watersheds in the semi-arid tropics for improved soil and water quality: A review. Agricultural Water Management. 97(3), 375–381.
[7] Wani, S.P., Piara Singh, P.S., Dwivedi, R.S., et al., 2005. Biophysical indicators of agro-ecosystem services and methods for monitoring the impacts of NRM technologies at different scales. In: Natural Resource Management in Agriculture: Methods for Assessing Economic and Environmental impacts. CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK. pp. 97–124.
[8] Twomlow, S., Shiferaw, B., Cooper, P., et al., 2008. Integrating genetics and natural resource management for technology targeting and greater impact of agricultural research in the semi-arid tropics. Experimental Agriculture. 44(2), 235–256.
[9] Bationo, A., Kihara, J., Vanlauwe, B., et al., 2008. Integrated nutrient management: Concepts and experience from Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Aulakh, M.S., Grant, C.A. (eds.). Integrated Nutrient Management for Sustainable Crop Production. The Haworth Press, Taylor and Francis Group: New York, U.S. pp.467–521.
[10] Biggelaar, C.D., Lal, R., Wiebe, K., et al., 2003. The global impact of soil erosion on productivity: I: Absolute and relative erosion-induced yield losses. Advances in Agronomy. 81,.
[11] Poch, R.M., Martinez-Casanovas, J.A., 2006. Degradation. In: Lal, R. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Soil Science, 2nd ed. Taylor and Francis: Philadelphia, PA, USA. pp. 375–378.
[12] Smith, P., Cotrufo, M.F., Rumpel, C., et al., 2015. Biogeochemical cycles and biodiversity as key drivers of ecosystem services provided by soils. Soil. 1(2), 665–685.
[13] Busari, M.A., Kukal, S.S., Kaur, A., et al., 2015. Conservation tillage impacts on soil, crop and the environment. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 3(2), 119–129.
[14] Chaudhary, P., Singh, S., Chaudhary, A., et al., 2022. Overview of biofertilizers in crop production and stress management for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13, 930340.
[15] Cavicchioli, R., Ripple, W.J., Timmis, K.N., et al., 2019. Scientists' warning to humanity: Microorganisms and climate change. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 17, 569–586.
[16] Gougoulias, C., Clark, J.M., Shaw, L.J., 2014. The role of soil microbes in the global carbon cycle: Tracking the below‐ground microbial processing of plant‐derived carbon for manipulating carbon dynamics in agricultural systems. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 94(12), 2362–2371.
[17] Dong, Z., Yang, N., Yeo, S.Y., et al., 2012. Intralineage directional notch signaling regulates self-renewal and differentiation of asymmetrically dividing radial glia. Neuron. 74(1), 65–78.
[18] Al-Taweel, L.S., Abo-Tabikh, M.M., 2019. Ureaand ammonium sulfate fertilizers and humic acid effect on urease enzyme activity in and out the rhizosphere of Zea mays L. crop. Plant Archives. 19(1), 1905–1914.
[19] Kumar, S., Kumar, S., Mohapatra, T., 2021. Interaction between macro- and micro-nutrients in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 12, 665583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.665583.
[20] Mikanová, O., Šimon, T., Kopecký, J., et al., 2015. Soil biological characteristics and microbial community structure in a field experiment. Open Life Sciences, 10(1),.
[21] Vishwakarma, K., Kumar, N., Shandilya, C., et al., 2020. Revisiting plant–microbe interactions and microbial consortia application for enhancing sustainable agriculture: A review. Frontiers in Microbiology. 11, 560406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.560406
[22] Chaudhary, A., Parveen, H., Chaudhary, P., et al., 2021. Rhizospheric microbes and their mechanism. In: Bhatt, P., Gangola, S., Udayanga, D., et al. (eds.). Microbial Technology for Sustainable Environment. Springer: Singapore. pp.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3840-4_6
[23] Gu, Y., Zhang, X., Tu, S., et al., 2009. Soil microbial biomass, crop yields, and bacterial community structure as affected by long-term fertilizer treatments under wheat-rice cropping. European Journal of Soil Biology . 45, 239–246.
[24] Sessitsch, A., Weilharter, A., Gerzabek, M.H., et al., 2001. Microbial population structures in soil particle size fractions of a long-term fertilizer field experiment. Applied and environmental microbiology. 67, 4215–4224.
[25] Jangid, K., Williams, M.A., Franzluebbers, A.J., et al., 2008. Relative impacts of land-use, management intensity and fertilization upon soil microbial community structure in agricultural systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry . 40, 2843–2853.
[26] Chandra, L.R., Gupta, S., Pande, V., et al., 2016. Impact of forest vegetation on soil characteristics: A correlation between soil biological and physico-chemical properties. 3 Biotech. 6, 188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0510-y
[27] Dwevedi, A., Kumar, P., Kumar, Y., et al., 2017. Soil sensors: Detailedinsight in to research updates, significance, and future prospects. In:. New Pesticides and Soil Sensors..
[28] Doran, J.W., Zeiss, M.R., 2000. Soil health and sustainability: managing the bioticcomponent of soil quality. Applied soil ecology. 15, 3–11.
[29] Chibuike, G.U., Obiora, S.C., 2014. Heavy metal polluted soils: Effect on plants and bioremediation methods. Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 1, 752708.
[30] Wang, C., Fu, B., Zhang, L., et al., 2019. Soil moisture–plant interactions: An ecohydrological review. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 19, 1–9.
[31] Leclerc, H.D.A.A., Mossel, D.A.A., Edberg, S.C., et al., 2001. Advances in the bacteriology of the coliform group: Their suitability as markers of microbial water safety. Annual Reviews in Microbiology. 55(1), 201–234.
[32] Winfield, M.D., Groisman, E.A., 2003. Role of nonhost environments in the lifestyles of Salmonella and Escherichia coli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 69(7), 3687–3694.
[33] Barron-Gafford, G.A., Scott, R.L., Jenerette, G.D., et al., 2011. The relativecontrols of temperature, soil moisture, and plant functional group on soil CO2efflux at diel, seasonal, and annual scales. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. 116, 1–16.
[34] Xu1, Z., Mai-He, L., Niklaus, E.Z., et al., 2018. Plant functional diversity modulates global environmentalchange effects on grassland productivity. Journal of Ecology. 106, 1941–1951.
[35] Pooja, K., Sharma, K., 2019. Climate change and soil dynamics: Effects on soil microbes and fertility of soil. Climate change and agricultural. pp. 43–64.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Bahaa Hussein Fadhil, Muntadher Mahmood Abo-Hailah Abo-Tabikh, Hasanain Mohammad Abdulhssein Aboshabbaa, Sahar Mohammed Jawad, Luma Salih Jabbar Al-Taweel

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.