Innovative Approaches in Water Decontamination: A Critical Analysis of Biomaterials, Nanocomposites, and Stimuli-Responsive Polymers for Effective Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i1.7476Abstract
In recent years, smart materials have emerged as a groundbreaking innovation in the field of water filtration, offering sustainable, efficient, and environmentally friendly solutions to address the growing global water crisis. This review explores the latest advancements in the application of smart materials—including biomaterials, nanocomposites, and stimuli-responsive polymers—specifically for water treatment. It examines their effectiveness in detecting and removing various types of pollutants, including organic contaminants, heavy metals, and microbial infections, while adapting to dynamic environmental conditions such as fluctuations in temperature, pH, and pressure. The review highlights the remarkable versatility of these materials, emphasizing their multifunctionality, which allows them to address a wide range of water quality issues with high efficiency and low environmental impact. Moreover, it explores the potential of smart materials to overcome significant challenges in water purification, such as the need for real-time pollutant detection and targeted removal processes. The research also discusses the scalability and future development of these materials, considering their cost-effectiveness and potential for large-scale application. By aligning with the principles of sustainable development, smart materials represent a promising direction for ensuring global water security, offering both innovative solutions for current water pollution issues and long-term benefits for the environment and public health.
Keywords:
Smart Materials; Water Purification; Nanocomposites; Stimuli-Responsive Polymers; Sustainable Water TreatmentReferences
[1] Goh, P.S., Ismail, A.F., 2018, A review on inorganic membranes for desalination and wastewater treatment. Desalination. 434, 60–80.
[2] Elimelech, M., 2006. The global challenge for adequate and safe water. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua. 55(1), 3–10.
[3] Esfahani, M.R., Aktij, S.A., Dabaghian, Z., et al., 2019. Nanocomposite membranes for water separation and purification: Fabrication, modification, and applications. Separation and Purification Technology. 213, 465–499.
[4] Agboola, O., Fayomi, O.S.I., Ayodeji, A., et al., 2021. A review on polymer nanocomposites and their effective applications in membranes and adsorbents for water treatment and gas separation. Membranes. 11(2), 139.
[5] Beyene, H.D., Ambaye, T.G., 2019. Application of sustainable nanocomposites for water purification process. In: Inamuddin, Thomas, S., Mishra, R.K., et al. (Eds.). Sustainable Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites. Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany. pp. 387–412.
[6] Arman, N.Z., Salmiati, S., Aris, A., et al., 2021. A review on emerging pollutants in the water environment: Existences, health effects and treatment processes. Water. 13(22), 3258.
[7] Wang, Y., Kim, J., Huang, C.H., et al., 2022. Occurrence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in water: A review. Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology. 8, 1136–1151.
[8] Kurwadkar, S., Dane, J., Kanel, S.R., et al., 2022. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in water and wastewater: A critical review of their global occurrence and distribution. Science of the Total Environment. 809, 151003.
[9] Sharma, S., Bhattacharya, A., 2017. Drinking water contamination and treatment techniques. Applied Water Science. 7, 1043–1067.
[10] Wei, M.L., Gao, Y.F., Li, X., et al., 2017. Stimuli-responsive polymers and their applications. Polymer Chemistry. 8, 127–143.
[11] Babich, R., Craig, E., Muscat, A., et al., 2021. Defining drinking water metal contaminant mixture risk by coupling zebrafish behavioral analysis with citizen science. Scientific Reports. 11, 17303.
[12] Acrylamide, O., 2009. National primary drinking water regulations. Kidney. 2, 7.
[13] USEPA, 2006. Inorganic contaminant accumulation in potable water distribution systems. 815-R-06-009, June 2006.
[14] Mohammed, N., Grishkewich, N., Tam, K.C., 2018. Cellulose nanomaterials: Promising sustainable nanomaterials for application in water/wastewater treatment processes. Environmental Science: Nano. 5, 623–658.
[15] Pal, A., He, Y., Jekel, M., et al., 2014. Emerging contaminants of public health significance as water quality indicator compounds in the urban water cycle. Environment International. 71, 46–62.
[16] Tsiourtis, N.X., 2001. Desalination and the environment. Desalination. 141, 223–236
[17] National Research Council, Assembly of Life Sciences. 1981. Drinking water and health. National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA. p. 311.
[18] National Research Council, 2010. Review of the Environmental Protection Agency's draft IRIS assessment of tetrachloroethylene. National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA. pp. 1–212.
[19] Shelton, T.B., 1991. Interpreting drinking water quality analysis: What do the number mean?. Cook College-Rutgers University: New Brunswick, NJ, USA. pp. 1–95.
[20] Fawell, J.K., 1993. The impact of inorganic chemicals on water quality and health. Annali Dell'istituto Superiore di Sanita. 29(2), 293–303.
[21] Ashbolt, N.J., 2015. Microbial contamination of drinking water and human health from community water systems. Current Environmental Health Reports. 2, 95–106.
[22] Owoseni, M.C., Olaniran, A.O., Okoh, A.I., 2017. Chlorine tolerance and inactivation of Escherichia coli recovered from wastewater treatment plants in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Applied Science. 7, 810.
[23] Canu, I.G., Laurent, O., Pires, N., et al., 2011. Health effects of naturally radioactive water ingestion: The need for enhanced studies. Environmental Health Perspectives. 119(12), 1676–1680.
[24] Castro-Muñoz, R., Yáñez-Fernández, J., Fíla, V., 2016. Phenolic compounds recovered from agro-food by-products using membrane technologies: An overview. Food Chemistry. 213, 753–762.
[25] Buonomenna, M.G., 2013. Membrane processes for a sustainable industrial growth. RSC Advances. 3(17), 5694–5740.
[26] Van der Bruggen, B., Curcio, E., Drioli, E., 2004. Process intensification in the textile industry: The role of membrane technology. Journal of Environmental Management. 73, 267–274.
[27] Radcliff, R., Zarnadze, A., 2004. Application of membrane technology to the production of drinking water. 04-123, March 2004.
[28] Jhaveri, J.H., Murthy, Z.V.P., 2016. A comprehensive review on anti-fouling nanocomposite membranes for pressure driven membrane separation processes. Desalination. 379, 137–154.
[29] Shin, W.-K., Lee, Y.-S., Kim, D.-W., 2013. Hybrid composite membranes based on polyethylene separator and Al2O3 nanoparticles for lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 13, 3705–3710.
[30] Salahshoori, I., Yazdanbakhsh, A., Jorabchi, M.N., et al., 2024. Recent advances and applications of stimuli-responsive nanomaterials for water treatment: A comprehensive review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 333, 103304.
[31] Li, X.H., Yu, Y.F., Meng, Y.Z., 2013. Novel quaternized poly(arylene ether sulfone)/Nano-ZrO2 composite anion exchange membranes for alkaline fuel cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 5, 1414–1422.
[32] Karkhanechi, H., Kazemian, H., Nazockdast, H., et al., 2012. Fabrication of homogenous polymer-zeolite nanocomposites as mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. Chemical Engineering Technology. 35, 885–892.
[33] Rabajczyk, A., Zielecka, M., Cygańczuk, K., et al., 2021. Nanometals-containing polymeric membranes for purification processes. Materials. 14, 513.
[34] Wen, Y., Yuan, J., Ma, X., et al., 2019. Polymeric nanocomposite membranes for water treatment: A review. EnvironMental Chemistry Letters. 17, 1539–1551.
[35] Yin, K., Chu, D., Dong, X., et al., 2017. Femtosecond laser induced robust periodic nanoripple structured mesh for highly efficient oil-water separation. Nanoscale. 9, 14229–14235.
[36] Bassyouni, M., Abdel-Aziz, M.H., Zoromba, M.S., et al., 2019. A review of polymeric nanocomposite membranes for water purification. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 73, 19–46.
[37] Wankat, P.C., 2006. Separation process engineering. Pearson Education: London, UK. pp. 1–992.
[38] Pendergast, M.M., Hoek, E.M.V., 2011. A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies. Energy & Environmental Science. 4, 1946–1971.
[39] Hofs, B., Ogier, J., Vries, D., et al., 2011. Comparison of ceramic and polymeric membrane permeability and fouling using surface water. Separation and Purification Technology. 79, 365–374.
[40] Zahid, M., Rashid, A., Akram, S., et al., 2018. A comprehensive review on polymeric nano-composite membranes for water treatment. Journal of Membrane Science & Technology. 8(01), 179.
[41] Saleem, H., Zaidi, S.J., 2020. Nanoparticles in reverse osmosis membranes for desalination: A state of the art review. Desalination. 475, 114171.
[42] Ursino, C., Castro-Muñoz, R., Drioli, E., et al., 2018. Progress of nanocomposite membranes for water treatment. Membranes. 8, 18.
[43] Ulbricht, M., 2006. Advanced functional polymer membranes. Polymer. 47, 2217–2262.
[44] Xu, Y.T., Hu, J.F., Zhang, X.Q., et al., 2022. Robust and multifunctional natural polyphenolic composites for water remediation. Materials Horizons. 9, 2496–2517.
[45] Ng, L.Y., Mohammad, A.W., Leo, C.P., et al., 2013. Polymeric membranes incorporated with metal/metal oxide nanoparticles: A comprehensive review. Desalination. 308, 15–33.
[46] Labbez, C., Fievet, P., Szymczyk, A., et al., 2002. Analysis of the salt retention of a titania membrane using the “DSPM” model: Effect of pH, salt concentration and nature. Journal of Membrane Science. 208, 315–329.
[47] Bernardo, P., Drioli, E., Golemme, G., 2009. Membrane gas separation: A review/state of the art. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 48, 4638–4663.
[48] Jain, H., Garg, M.C., 2021. Fabrication of polymeric nanocomposite forward osmosis membranes for water desalination—A review. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 23, 101561.
[49] Ismail, A.F., Padaki, M., Hilal, N., et al., 2015. Thin film composite membrane—Recent development and future potential. Desalination. 356, 140–148.
[50] Greenlee, L.F., Lawler, D.F., Freeman, B.D., et al., 2009, Reverse osmosis desalination: Water sources, technology, and today's challenges. Water Research. 43, 2317–2348.
[51] Zhao, D.L., Japip, S., Zhang, Y., et al., 2020, Emerging thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes for reverse osmosis: A review. Water Research. 173, 115557.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Rakesh Namdeti, Gaddala Babu Rao, Nageswara Rao Lakkimsetty, Muayad Abdullah Ahmed Qatan, Doaa Salim Musallam Samhan Al-Kathiri, Lakhayar Amer Al Amri, Noor Mohammed Said Qahoor, Arlene Abuda Joaquin
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.