Chaotic Dynamics and Key Drivers in the Evolution of Tibetan Village Systems: A Case Study in Western Sichuan

Authors

  • Ding Fan

    1. School of Art and Design, Leshan Normal University, Leshan 614000, China; 2. School of Housing, Building, and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
  • Nor Zarifah Binti Maliki

    School of Housing, Building, and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
  • Siwei Yu

    School of Art and Design, Leshan Normal University, Leshan 614000, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i3.7973
Received: 4 December 2024 | Revised: 19 December 2024 | Accepted: 26 December 2024 | Published Online: 26 February 2025

Abstract

This study examines the spatiotemporal evolution of Tibetan villages in western Sichuan through state transition models and predictive simulations to understand their complex dynamics and key driving factors.  Using a combination of multivariate time-series analysis and chaotic attractor identification, the research identifies forest cover, economic growth, employment rates, road density, and communication network coverage as critical determinants of village trajectories. For instance, Molo Village recovers rapidly with a 10% increase in regional economic growth, while Xisuo Village becomes unstable with employment rate fluctuations above 2%. Shenzuo Village benefits from improved road density, and Minzu Village’s stability depends on forest cover. Jiangba Village relies on the growth of irrigated farmland and communication network coverage, whereas Kegeyi Village exhibits periodic dynamics and high sensitivity to employment variations. The findings underscore the inherent complexity and nonlinearity of rural systems, revealed through chaotic attractor analysis, which highlights the system’s sensitivity to initial conditions and external shocks. The article provides actionable insights into resilience mechanisms and offers practical recommendations for the sustainable development of culturally and ecologically sensitive regions. Emphasis on tailored management strategies is essential to meet the challenges faced by these unique systems in the face of modernization and environmental change.

Keywords:

Nonlinear Analysis; Chaotic Attractors; Tibetan Villages; Complex Systems; Dynamic Behavior

References

[1] Li, Y., Fan, W., Yuan, X., et al., 2024. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of traditional villages based on geodetector: Jiarong Tibetan in Western Sichuan, China. Scientific Reports. 14(1), 11700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62666-z

[2] Xu, X., Zhang, J., Liu, S., et al., 2023. Entropy change of historical and cultural heritage in traditional Tibetan area of china based on spatial-temporal distribution pattern. Buildings. 13(12), 2995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13122995

[3] Drobnjaković, M., Steinfürer, A., 2024. Re-thinking rurality: Towards a new research approach and rural-urban spatial gradient establishment in Serbia. Applied Geography. 163, 103195.

[4] Li, S., Song, Y., Xu, H., et al., 2023. Spatial distribution characteristics and driving factors for traditional villages in areas of China based on GWR modeling and Geodetector: A case study of the Awa Mountain area. Sustainability. 15(4), 3443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043443

[5] Ma, K., Cui, T., Wu, Y., et al., 2024. Spatial evolution investigation and analysis of traditional dwellings in Dongzhu Island village of Jiaodong region. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 23(2), 582–594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2246548

[6] Zhao, Y., Ni, Z., Zhang, Y., et al., 2024. Exploring the spatiotemporal evolution patterns and determinants of construction land in mianning county on the eastern edge of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Land. 13(7), 993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13070993

[7] Somvanshi, S.S., Kumari, M., Sharma, R., 2024. Spatio-temporal analysis of rural–urban transitions and transformations in Gautam Buddha Nagar, India. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 21(5), 5079–5088.

[8] Yang, M., Jiao, M., Zhang, J., 2022. Spatio-temporal analysis and influencing factors of rural resilience from the perspective of sustainable rural development. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(19), 12294.

[9] Wang, L., Li, N., Xie, Q., 2024. Dynamic evolution and obstacle factor analysis of green development in China's agriculture and rural areas based on entropy-based TOPSIS model. Heliyon. 10(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27248

[10] Fernández Martínez, P., de Castro-Pardo, M., Barroso, V.M., et al., 2020. Assessing sustainable rural development based on ecosystem services vulnerability. Land. 9(7), 222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land9070222

[11] Fan, S., Li, P., He, Q., et al., 2022. Study on the spatial-temporal evolution of land use ecosystem service value and its zoning management and control in the typical alpine valley area of Southeast Tibet—empirical analysis based on panel data of 97 villages in Chayu County. Sustainability. 14(16), 10057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610057

[12] Biłozor, A., Cieślak, I., Czyża, S., et al., 2024. Land-use change dynamics in areas subjected to direct urbanization pressure: A case study of the City of Olsztyn. Sustainability. 16(7), 2923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072923

[13] Zehang, W. E. I., Jianwei, S.U.N., Liu, Y.A.N.G., et al., 2024. Vulnerability and influencing factors for rural settlements land use in karst mountains of China: Case study on Qixingguan District. Journal of Resources and Ecology. 15(3), 720–732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2024.03.018

[14] Medeiros, L., Song, C., Saavedra, S., 2021. Merging dynamical and structural indicators to measure resilience in multispecies systems. The Journal of Animal Ecology. 90(9), page range. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13421

[15] Delage, R., Nakata, T., 2022. A variable threshold for recurrence based on local attractor density. Chaos. 32(9), 093146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0114797

[16] Petrosillo, I., Valente, D., Mulder, C., et al., 2021. The resilient recurrent behavior of mediterranean semi-arid complex adaptive landscapes. Land. 10, 296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND10030296

[17] Buscema, M., Ferilli, G., Gustafsson, C., et al., 2022. A nonlinear, data-driven, ANNs-based approach to culture-led development policies in rural areas: The case of Gjakove and Peć districts, Western Kosovo. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 162, 112439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112439

[18] Kaur, K., Kaur, M., 2023. Rural infrastructure ant its impact on agricultural growth in India: An empirical analysis. European Scientific Journal (ESJ).14, 333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esipreprint.2.2023p333

[19] Zang, Y., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., 2021. Understanding rural system with a social-ecological framework: Evaluating sustainability of rural evolution in Jiangsu province, South China. Journal of Rural Studies. 86, 171–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2021.05.008

[20] Liu, R., Zhang, L., Tang, Y., et al., 2024. Understanding and evaluating the resilience of rural human settlements with a social-ecological system framework: The case of Chongqing municipality, China. Land Use Policy. 136, 106966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106966

[21] Rajendran, L.P., Raúl, L., Chen, M., et al., 2024. The ‘peri-urban turn': A systems thinking approach for a paradigm shift in reconceptualizing urban-rural futures in the Global South. Habitat International. 146, 103041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103041

[22] Guo, N., Wu, F., Sun, D., et al., 2024. Mechanisms of resilience in cities at different development phases: A system dynamics approach. Urban Climate. 53, 101793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101793

[23] Chen, L., Wang, Q., 2021. Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of land use in Tibetan region: 1995–2025. Earth Science Informatics. 14(4), 1821–1832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00627-0

[24] Wang, Z., Li, J., Liang, L., 2022. Ecological risk in the Tibetan Plateau and influencing urbanization factors. Environmental Challenges. 6, 100445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100445

[25] Xiao, H., Xue, C., Yu, J., et al., 2023. Spatial morphological characteristics of ethnic villages in the Dadu River Basin, a Sino-Tibetan area of Sichuan, China. Land, 12(9), 1662. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12091662

[26] Heßler, M., Kamps, O., 2023. Quantifying resilience and the risk of regime shifts under strong correlated noise. PNAS nexus. 2(2), pgac296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac296

[27] Christensen, A.A., Van Eetvelde, V., 2024. Decision making in complex land systems: Outline of a holistic theory of agency. Landscape Ecology. 39(3), 72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01822-2

[28] Schmidt, P.G., Díaz-Puente, J.M., Bettoni, M., 2022. How rurality influences interactive innovation processes: Lessons learnt from 15 case studies in 12 countries. European Planning Studies. 30(12), 2595–2617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2043832

[29] Peng, Y., Peng, X., Li, X., et al., 2023. Effectiveness in rural governance: influencing factors and driving pathways—based on 20 typical cases of rural governance in China. Land. 12(7), 1452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12071452

[30] Yang, L., Yang, H., Zhao, X., et al., 2022. Study on urban resilience from the perspective of the complex adaptive system theory: A case study of the Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(20), 13667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013667

[31] Rahman, M.M., Tabash, M.I., Salamzadeh, A., et al., 2022. Sampling techniques (probability) for quantitative social science researchers: A conceptual guidelines with examples. SEEU Review. 17(1), 42–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2022-0023

[32] Senaweera, O., Haddela, P.S., Dharmarathne, G., 2021. Effects of random sampling methods on maximum likelihood estimates of a simple logistic regression model. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 9(1), 28–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-5

[33] Nanjundeswaraswamy, T.S., Divakar, S., 2021. Determination of sample size and sampling methods in applied research. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences. 3(1), 25–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24874/PES03.01.003

[34] Kaszás, B., Cenedese, M., Haller, G., 2022. Dynamics-based machine learning of transitions in Couette flow. Physical Review Fluids. 7(8), L082402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.L082402

[35] Naik, K., Pandey, M.D., Panda, A., et al., 2021. Data driven modelling of nuclear power plant performance data as finite state machines. Modelling. 2(1), 43–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/modelling2010003

[36] Lin, Q., Li, C., 2021. Nonstationary wind speed data reconstruction based on secondary correction of statistical characteristics. Structural Control and Health Monitoring. 28(9), e2783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2783

[37] Smith, T., Zotta, R.M., Boulton, C.A., et al., 2023. Reliability of resilience estimation based on multi-instrument time series. Earth System Dynamics. 14(1), 173–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-173-2023

[38] Li, D., Cao, M., Manoach, E., et al., 2021. A novel embedding method for characterization of low-dimensional nonlinear dynamical systems. Nonlinear Dynamics. 104, 125–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-021-06229-1

[39] Mukherjee, S., 2021. Nonlinear recurrence quantification of the monsoon-season heavy rainy-days over northwest Himalaya for the baseline and future periods. Science of The Total Environment. 789, 147754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147754

[40] Khosla, A., Khandnor, P., Chand, T., 2022. A novel method for EEG-based automated eyes state classification using recurrence plots and machine learning approach. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. 34(13), e6912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.6912

[41] Di Mari, R., Rocci, R., Gattone, S.A., 2023. LASSO–penalized clusterwise linear regression modelling: A two–step approach. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 93(18), 3235–3258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2023.2220058

[42] Qiu, P., Yang, K., 2023. Spatio-temporal process monitoring using exponentially weighted spatial LASSO. Journal of Quality Technology. 55(2), 163–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2022.2081104

[43] Benmebarek, S., Chettih, M., 2024. Chaotic analysis of daily runoff time series using dynamic, metric, and topological approaches. Acta Geophysica. 72(4), 2633–2651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01150-0

[44] Fan, D., Maliki, N.Z.B., Yu, S., 2023. Fractal characteristics and influencing factors of landscape space of Tibetan rural in Western Sichuan: A case study of three traditional villages. Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning. 1(1), 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44243-023-00022-x

[45] Liu, J., Hu, C., Kang, X., et al., 2023. A loosely coupled model for simulating and predicting land use changes. Land. 12(1), 189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010189

[46] Braun, T., Unni, V.R., Sujith, R.I., et al., 2021. Detection of dynamical regime transitions with lacunarity as a multiscale recurrence quantification measure. Nonlinear Dynamics. 104(4), 3955–3973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-021-06457-5

[47] Chiang, S., Zito, J., Rao, V.R., et al., 2024. Time-series analysis. In Statistical Methods in Epilepsy. Chapman and Hall/CRC. pp. 166–200. ISBN:9781003254515

[48] Zang, Y., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., 2021. Understanding rural system with a social-ecological framework: Evaluating sustainability of rural evolution in Jiangsu province, South China. Journal of Rural Studies. 86, 171–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2021.05.008

[49] Ge, D., Zheng, Y., Zhang, S., et al., 2022. Spatio-temporal pattern and influence mechanism of rural human settlements system resilience: Case from China. Sustainability. 14(21), 14533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114533

[50] Ma, Y., Qiao, J., Han, D., 2022. Simulation and prediction of evolution of specialized villages agglomeration based on system dynamics. Land. 11(8), 1177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081177

[51] Hetzler, H., Bäuerle, S., 2023. Stationary solutions in applied dynamics: A unified framework for the numerical calculation and stability assessment of periodic and quasi‐periodic solutions based on invariant manifolds. GAMM‐Mitteilungen. 46(2), e202300006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gamm.202300006

[52] Chong, M.S., 2022. Entropy for incremental stability of nonlinear systems under disturbances. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC); (06-09 December 2022); Cancun, Mexico. pp. 4740–4745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC51059.2022.9992341

[53] Bian, J., Ma, Z., Wang, C., et al., 2024. Early warning for spatial ecological system: Fractal dimension and deep learning. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications. 633, 129401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.129401

[54] Chen, Y., 2024. Derivation of correlation dimension from spatial autocorrelation functions. Plos ONE. 19(5), e0303212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303212

[55] Tavakoli, S.K., Longtin, A., 2024. Boosting reservoir computer performance with multiple delays. Physical Review E. 109(5), 054203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.109.054203

[56] Mayar, K., Carmichael, D.G., Shen, X., 2022. Stability and resilience—a systematic approach. Buildings. 12(8), 1242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081242

[57] Medeiros, L., Song, C., Saavedra, S., 2021. Merging dynamical and structural indicators to measure resilience in multispecies systems. The Journal of Animal Ecology. 90(9), page range. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13421

[58] Pons, F., Messori, G., Faranda, D., 2023. Statistical performance of local attractor dimension estimators in non-Axiom A dynamical systems. Chaos. 33, 073143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0152370

[59] Zhu, H., Huang, J., 2022. A new method for determining the embedding dimension of financial time series based on Manhattan distance and recurrence quantification analysis. Entropy. 24(9), 1298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/e24091298

[60] Cao, H., Leykam, D., Angelakis, D., 2022. Unraveling quantum chaos using persistent homology. Physical Review E. 107(4-1), 044204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.15100

[61] Munoz-Pacheco JM, Volos C, Serrano FE, Jafari S, Kengne J, Rajagopal K. Stabilization and Synchronization of a Complex Hidden Attractor Chaotic System by Backstepping Technique. Entropy. 2021,23(7):921. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23070921

[62] Metzner, C., Krauss, P., 2022. Dynamics and information import in recurrent neural networks. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 16, 876315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2022.876315

[63] Ivan, C., Arva, M., 2021. Nonlinear time series analysis in unstable periodic orbits identification control methods of nonlinear systems. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI); (01-03 July 2021); Pitesti, Romania. pp. 1–6, IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ECAI52376.2021.9515073

[64] Bella, G., Mattana, P., Venturi, B., 2024. Stabilization of chaotic dynamics emerging in an economy with international labor migration. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 10, 101067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101067

[65] Hirata, Y., 2021. Recurrence plots for characterizing random dynamical systems. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 94, 105552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105552

[66] Delage, R., Nakata, T., 2022. A variable threshold for recurrence based on local attractor density. Chaos. 32(9), 093146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0114797

[67] Antary, N., Trauth, M., Marwan, N., 2023. Interpolation and sampling effects on recurrence quantification measures. Chaos. 33, 103105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0167413

[68] Ziaei-Halimejani, H., Kouzbour, S., Zarghami, R., et al., 2021. Monitoring of the bubble columns hydrodynamics by recurrence quantification data analysis. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 171, 100–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHERD.2021.05.002

[69] Ambily, P., Chithra, N.R., Firoz, M., 2024. A framework for urban pluvial flood resilient spatial planning through blue-green infrastructure. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 103, 104342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104342

[70] Córdoba, M., Carranza, J.P., Piumetto, M., et al., 2021. A spatially based quantile regression forest model for mapping rural land values. Journal of Environmental Management. 112509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112509

[71] Zeng, S., Qi, B., Wang, M., 2022. Agricultural insurance and agricultural economic growth: The case of Zhejiang Province in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013062

[72] Küçüker, D.M., Sari, B., 2021. Determining the spatio-temporal dynamics of land cover along with some socio-economic factors in the Olur planning unit (Turkey). European Scientific Journal (ESJ). 3, 926–940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24011/barofd.972438

[73] Oktafianto, S.P.A.R., Lestari, T.E., 2024. Lasso regression method in overcoming Huarity in factors affecting HDI in Papua. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference On Mathematics and Its Applications (Icomathapp) 2022: The Latest Trends and Opportunities of Research on Mathematics and Mathematics Education; August 23–24, 2022; Malang, Indonesia. 3049,020020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0194414

[74] Iparragirre, A., Lumley, T., Barrio, I., et al., 2023. Variable selection with LASSO regression for complex survey data. Stat. 12(1), e578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.578

[75] Zhang, X., Zhu, Y., Gan, W., et al., 2024. Mapping heterogeneity: Spatially explicit machine learning approaches for urban value uplift characterization and prediction. Sustainable Cities and Society. 105742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105742

[76] Sinha, J., 2023. Economies of the factors affecting crop production in India: Analysis based on Cobb-Douglas production function. Sumerianz Journal of Economics and Finance. 6(1), 10-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47752/sjef.61.10.18

[77] Uisso, A., Tanrıvermiş, H., 2021. Driving factors and assessment of changes in the use of arable land in Tanzania. Land Use Policy. 104, 105359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2021.105359

[78] Eidin, E., Bielik, T., Touitou, I., et al., 2024. Thinking in terms of change over time: Opportunities and challenges of using system dynamics models. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 33(1), 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10047-y

[79] Calderon‐Tellez, J.A., Bell, G., Herrera, M.M., et al., 2024. Project management and system dynamics modelling: Time to connect with innovation and sustainability. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 41(1), 3–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2926

[80] Desharnais, R.A., Henson, S.M., Costantino, R.F., et al., 2024. Capturing chaos: A multidisciplinary approach to nonlinear population dynamics. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications. 30(8), 1002–1039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10236198.2023.2260013

[81] Spash, C.L., 2024. Integration of social, ecological and economic knowledge. In Foundations of Social Ecological Economics. Manchester University Press. pp. 141–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526185143.00014

Downloads

How to Cite

Fan, D., Binti Maliki, N. Z., & Yu, S. (2025). Chaotic Dynamics and Key Drivers in the Evolution of Tibetan Village Systems: A Case Study in Western Sichuan. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 7(3), 112–132. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i3.7973

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 3 (March 2025): In Progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Ding Fan, Nor Zarifah Binti Maliki, siwei Yu

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC