
Instructional Modules for Constructivist Environmental Learning in Science, Technology and Society (STS) Subject
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i4.8127Abstract
Modules enable students to engage with content at their own pace, fostering autonomy and deeper understanding. The modular approach ensures clarity in presenting objectives, instructions, and concepts, while having illustrations, activities, and assessments could enhance comprehension and retention. This paper was a developmental study on STS module for college students using the ADDIE Model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). Sampled 673 first-year students from Northwest Samar State University participated in the study, with 299 participating in a test try-out and 374 in the students’ performance evaluation. Three expert evaluators with backgrounds in science, English, and psychology, each with over four years of experience, assessed the modules to ensure alignment with the study’s constructivist learning goals and instructional integrity. The findings revealed that both students and experts had rated the instructional module positively, indicating its effectiveness in facilitating learning and completing lessons. Key aspects such as the style of illustrations and written expressions, the usefulness of learning activities, and the guidance provided by illustrations and captions were especially well-received. The module was praised for its clear objectives, understandable instructions, and engaging tasks like trivia and puzzles. Expert evaluations highlighted relevance, simplicity, and balanced emphasis on topics in the module content. Furthermore, students in test group demonstrated significant improvement in performance, with post-test scores notably higher than pre-test scores, confirming the module’s effectiveness in enhancing learning outcomes. Consequently, this paper provides an opportunity to integrate science learning with initiatives aimed at promoting environmental preservation and driving social change.
Keywords:
Instructional Module; Environmental Topics; Higher Education; Curriculum Development; Environmental EducationReferences
[1] Salindao, N.A., Salindao, N., Mohamad, H., et al., 2022. Modular Distance Learning Gaps: Relationship between teachers' and students' performances in Grade 9 science. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6968798
[2] Chavez, J., Lamorinas, D.D., 2023. Reconfiguring assessment practices and strategies in online education during the pandemic. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 10(1), 160–174.
[3] Dagar, V., Yadav, A., 2016. Constructivism: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. Arts and Social Sciences Journal. 7(4), 1000200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2151-6200.1000200
[4] Danielraja, R., 2019. A study of environmental awareness of students at higher secondary level. Shanlax International Journal of Education. 7(3), 6–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i3.480
[5] Yaki, A.A., Midat, C.Y., Bawa, S., 2020. Development and Evaluation of Innovative Instructional Module for Teaching and Learning of Biology in Senior Secondary Schools. Journal of Library, Science Education and Learning Technology. 2(1), 1–15.
[6] Demir-Yildiz, C., Tatik, R.S., 2019. Imp act of flexible and non-flexible classroom environments on Learning of undergraduate students. European Journal of Educational Research. 8(4), 1159–1173.
[7] Chavez, J.V., 2023. Assessing Online Academic Integrity and Humanized Teaching in Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences. 19(1), 9–17.
[8] Zydney, J., Hai-Jew, S., Renninger, K., et al., 2012. Self-Directed Learning. Springer: Boston, MA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_5610
[9] Tekkol, İ.A., Demirel, M., 2018. An investigation of Self-Directed Learning Skills of Undergraduate students. Frontiers in Psychology. 9, 2324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02324
[10] Cronin-Golomb, L.M., Bauer, P.J., 2023. Self-motivated and directed learning across the lifespan. Acta Psychologica. 232, 103816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103816
[11] Lasmawan, I., Budiarta, I., 2020. Vygotsky's Zone Of Proximal Development and The Students' Progress in Learning (A Heutagogcal Bibliographical Review). JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia). 9, 545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i4.29915.
[12] Rogayan, D.V., Jr., Nebrida, E.E.D., 2019. Environmental Awareness and Practices of Science Students: Input for Ecological Management Plan. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education. 9(2), 106–119. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1219420.pdf
[13] Schwab, K., 2019. The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. World Economic Forum. Available from: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf
[14] Zajda, J., 2021. Constructivist Learning Theory and Creating Effective Learning Environments. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3
[15] Chand, S., 2024. Constructivism in Education: Exploring the Contributions of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). 12, 274–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21275/SR23630021800
[16] Pokhrel, M., Sharma, L., Poudel, M.P., et al., 2024 Empowering Students through a Self-Directed Learning Pedagogy in Mathematics Education. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis. 31(1), 238–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52783/cana.v31.409
[17] Dejene, W., 2019. The practice of modularized curriculum in higher education institution: Active learning and continuous assessment in focus. Cogent Education. 6(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2019.1611052
[18] McLeod, S., 2024. Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development. Simply Psychology. Available from: https://www.simplypsychology.org/zone-of-proximal-development.html (accessed 14 January 2025)
[19] Mamun, M.A.A., Lawrie, G., Wright, T., 2020. Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments. Computers & Education. 144, 103695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103695
[20] Fiel'ardh, K., Fardhani, I., Fujii, H., 2023. Integrating Perspectives from Education for Sustainable Development to Foster Plant Awareness among Trainee Science Teachers: A Mixed Methods Study. Sustainability. 15(9), 7395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097395
[21] Misbah, M., Sasmita, F.D., Dinata, P. A.C., et al., 2021. The validity of introduction to nuclear physics e-module as a teaching material during covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Physics. 1796(1), 012070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012070
[22] Chowdhury, M.A., 2016. The integration of Science-Technology-Society Science-Technology-Society- Environment and Socio-Scientific-Issues for effective science education and science teaching. The Electronic Journal of Science Education. 20(5), 19–38. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1188220.pdf
[23] Adams, W., Wieman, C., 2011. Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert‐Like Thinking. International Journal of Science Education. 33. 1289–1312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.512369.
[24] Hamora, L., Rabaya, M., Pentang, J., et al., 2022. Students' Evaluation of Faculty-Prepared Instructional Modules: Inferences for instructional materials review and revision. Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies. 2(2), 20–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52631/jemds.v2i2.109
[25] Seo, H., Yi, M., 2023. Development of instructional modules to create AHA moments in geotechnical engineering courses. Journal of Civil Engineering Education. 149(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/jceecd.eieng-1816
[26] Acut, D., Antonio, R., 2023. Effectiveness of Science-Technology-Society (STS) approach on students' learning outcomes in science education: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Technology and Science Education. 13(3), 718–739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2151
[27] Adora, A.L., 2019. Development and Validation of a Basic Drawing Workbook. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. Available from: https://ijisrt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/IJISRT19JU277.pdf
[28] Moore, M.G., 1973. Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. The Journal of Higher Education. 44(9), 661–679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1973.11776906
[29] Knowles, M.S., 1975. Self-directed learning. Available from: https://www.amazon.com/Self-directed-Learning-Malcolm-Knowles/dp/0842822151
[30] Fani, T., Ghaemi, F., 2011. Implications of Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) in Teacher Education: ZPTD and Self-scaffolding. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 29. 1549–1554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.396
[31] Boateng, G.O., Neilands, T.B., Frongillo, E.A., et al., 2018. Best Practices for developing and Validating scales for health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health. 6, 149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
[32] Torrefranca, E.C., 2017. Development and validation of instructional modules on rational expressions and variations. The Normal Lights. 11(1), 43–73.
[33] Commission on Higher Education, 2013. CHED Memorandum Order No. 20 Series of 2013. Available from: https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CMO-No.20-s2013.pdf
[34] Zhu, L., Atompag, S., 2023. The Application of the Constructivism Theory in Enhancing Classroom Teaching. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research. 7. 209–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v7i12.5792
[35] Blick, B., Nakabugo, S., Garabedian, L.F., et al., 2018. Evaluating inter-rater reliability of indicators to assess performance of medicines management in health facilities in Uganda. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice. 11(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-018-0137-y
[36] Murro, R.A., Lobo, J.G., Inso, A.R.C., et al., 2023. Difficulties of parents with low educational attainment in assisting their children in modular distance learning during pandemic. Environment and Social Psychology. 9(1), 1957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1957. Education
[37] Seco-Macarandan, R.M., (Ed.), 2014. Assessment of the AralingPanlipunan Modules in the K-12 Curriculum: Enhanced Instructional Materials Development. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing: Mitte Saarbrücken, Germany.
[38] Ancheta, R., Ancheta, H., 2020. The new normal in education: a challenge to the private basic education institutions in the Philippines? International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies. 1(1), 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/345960
[39] Hosseini, H., Chalak, A., Biria, R., 2019. Impact of backward design on improving Iranian advanced learners' writing ability: Teachers' practices and beliefs. International Journal of Instruction. 12(2), 33–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1223a
[40] Shivaraju, P.T., Manu, G., Vinaya, M., et al., 2017. Evaluating the effectiveness of pre- and post-test model of learning in a medical school. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 7(9), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2017.7.0412802052017
[41] Kay, K., 2010. 21st century skills: Why they matter, what they are, and how we get there. 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn. Solution Tree: Bloomington, IN, USA.
[42] Tamrongkunanan, T., Tanitteerapan, T., 2020. Development of Required Knowledge and Skills among Students through Applied Learning Modules. International Journal of Instruction. 13(4), 695–714.
[43] Ybañez, A., 2024. Exploring the Student-Centered Learning Practices: Junior High School Teachers in Focus. Nexus International Journal of Science and Education. 1(1).
[44] Lim, R.P.S., 2024. Development and Validation of an Interactive Learning Module in Grade 8 Earth Science. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences. 2(6), 395–402.
[45] Malik, A., Al-Hanafi, M.A., Chusni, M.M., et al., 2023. Development of CORE-based Electronic-modules to Improve Students' Problem-Solving Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. 9(8), 6415–6424.
[46] Houghton, J., 2023. Learning modules: problem-based learning, blended learning and flipping the classroom. The Law Teacher. 57(3), 271–294.
[47] De Pedro, C.J.G., Derasin, C.V.C., 2022. The development of English modules in senior high school: the teachers' journey. Journal of Positive School Psychology. 6(4), 2251–2264.
[48] Pulukadang, W. T., Uno, H. B., Panal, H., & Panjaitan, K. (2020). Integrated learning module development on department of PGSD students, Gorontalo state university, Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science, 6(7), 347-355.
[49] Utami, R.E., Nugroho, A.A., Dwijayanti, I., et al., 2018. Pengembangan e-modul berbasis etnomatematika untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika). 2(2), 268–283.
[50] Cobanbana, L.L.O., Pañaresb, N.C., 2023. Utilization of Self-Learning Modules and Pupils' Academic Performance during the Transition Period. International Journal of Research Publications. 125(1), 413–421.
[51] Maimad, M.T., Dupa, H.J.P., Villegas, J.P., 2023. Parental Involvement and Academic Achievement: Keys to Translating No Poverty and Quality Education SDGs in Philippine Peripheral Communities. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability. 25(2), 76–88.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Randy M. Ayong

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.