Editors of Journal of Environmental &Earth Sciences: Prof. Jin Shuanggen and Dr. Guo Jianping Named 2024 Highly Cited Chinese Researchers
2025-03-27
Materiality in Environmental Information Disclosure: A Comparative Analysis of the Securities Law of the United States and China
Authors
-
Wu Huihui
Faculty of Law, National University of Malaysia, UKM, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
-
Hasani Mohd Ali
Faculty of Law, National University of Malaysia, UKM, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
-
Hazlina Shaik Md Noor Alam
Faculty of Law, National University of Malaysia, UKM, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i5.8143Abstract
The purpose of this study lies in exploring the role of materiality in environmental information disclosures under the securities laws of the United States and China, discussing the differences in the regulatory mechanism, limits of enforcement, and challenges of seeking global harmonization. The paper does a comparative legal analysis of statutory provisions, judicial interpretations, and regulatory frameworks of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). Furthermore, it provides frameworks of global sustainability reporting such as the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The findings show that U.S. securities law uses a financial materiality standard with respect to what companies must disclose to investors. On the other hand, China’s regulatory approach has a double materiality in considering not only financial impacts but also wider environmental and social factors. Although there are these distinctions, both of these jurisdictions face issues of common obstruction such as ambiguities in materiality determination, inconsistent enforcement, and fear of greenwashing. This paper asserts that the U.S. and China regulatory frameworks need to converge more to promote greater corporate transparency and ESG disclosures. Regulators can even align disclosure practices with internationally recognized standards of work to add confidence for investors, fight off misleading sustainability claims and ensure accountable reporting in pertinent environments. The study concludes that the green challenges of global markets can only be tackled by regulating cooperative actions and using standardized reporting guidelines.
Keywords:
Securities Law; Environmental Information Disclosure; ESG; Materiality; SEC; CSRC; MEEReferences
[1] Jinga, P., 2021. The increasing importance of environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing in combating climate change. Environmental Management-Pollution, Habitat, Ecology, and Sustainability. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98345
[2] Dafermos, Y., Nikolaidi, M., Galanis, G., 2018. Climate change, financial stability and monetary policy. Ecological Economics. 152, 219–234.
[3] Puroila, J., Mäkelä, H., 2019. Matter of opinion: Exploring the socio-political nature of materiality disclosures in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 32(4), 1043–1072.
[4] Turner, L., Weirich, T.R., 2023. Expanding the concept of materiality to environmental, social, and governance: Audit issues and implications. Current Issues in Auditing. 17(1), A50–A58.
[5] Williams, C., 2016. Comment Letter to the SEC in response to its Concept Release on Business and Financial Disclosure Required by Regulation SK, 81 FR 23915. Commissioned Reports, Studies and Public Policy Documents Paper 209, 21 July 2016.
[6] Jones, R., 2024. The cost of non-convergence: The US climate disclosure rule in the context of emerging global standards. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law. 26(4), 1109.
[7] Tice, P., 2024. The SEC's climate rules will wreak havoc on US financial markets. Available from: https://energyanalytics.org/the-secs-climate-rules-will-wreakhavoc-on-us-financial-markets (cited 9 September 2024).
[8] Xi, C., 2018. CSRC enforcement of securities laws: Preliminary empirical findings. In: Thomas R.S., Beasley J.S. (eds.) Research Handbook on Representative Shareholder Litigation. Edward Elgar Publishing: Northampton, MA, USA. pp. 513–528.
[9] Ye, Y., Yang, X., Shi, L., 2023. Environmental information disclosure and corporate performance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Heliyon. 9(12), 1–12.
[10] Phang, R., Chia, Y., 2024. Sustainability and the sunlight of disclosure: ESG disclosure in three Asian financial centres. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law. 33(2), 209–223.
[11] Matsumura, E.M., Prakash, R., Vera-Muñoz, S.C., 2017. To disclose or not to disclose climate-change risk in form 10-K: Does materiality lie in the eyes of the beholder? WRDS Paper.
[12] Yu, L., Wang, Y., Zhuang, J., 2023. Materiality Judgements: Research on Listed Companies' Judgements on Material Joint Ventures and Associates in China. SSRN Electronic Journal.
[13] Edmans, A., 2023. The end of ESG. Financial Management. 52(1), 3–17.
[14] Ameli, N., Drummond, P., Bisaro, A., et al., 2020. Climate finance and disclosure for institutional investors: Why transparency is not enough. Climatic Change. 160, 565–589.
[15] Condon, M., Ladin, S., Lienke, J., et al., 2020. Mandating disclosure of climate-related financial risk. New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy. 23, 745.
[16] de Freitas Netto, S.V., Falcão Sobral, M.F., Bezerra Ribeiro, A.G., et al., 2020. Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe. 32, 1–12.
[17] Abate, R.S., 2023. Fool Me Once, Shame On You: Promoting Corporate Accountability for the Human Rights Impacts of Climate Washing. Intercultural Human Rights Law Review Symposium. 18, 1–51.
[18] Georgiev, G.S., 2017. Too big to disclose: Firm size and materiality blindspots in securities regulation. UCLA Law Review. 64, 602.
[19] Bernstein, A., Hanawalt, C., Sachs, L., et al., 2024. Shedding light on climate risk in 2025: upcoming debates about the SEC's climate disclosure rule. Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law: New York, NY, USA. Available from: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/sabin_climate_change/236 (3 November 2024).
[20] Li, X., 2023. Environmental Information Disclosure in China--Empirical Research based on Listed Companies in Mining Industry [Master's thesis]. Università Ca' Foscari Venezia: Venice, Italy. pp. 1–124.
[21] Hess, D., 2012. Combating corruption through corporate transparency: Using enforcement discretion to improve disclosure. Minnesota Journal of International Law. 21, 42.
[22] Saad, A.I., Strauss, D., 2020. A new reasonable investor and changing frontiers of materiality: Increasing investor reliance on ESG disclosures and implications for securities litigation. Berkeley Business Law Journal. 17, 391.
[23] TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. 426 U.S. 438 (1976). Available from: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/426/438/
[24] Ortega, M., 2023. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting from an environmentalist's (not investor's) lens. Environs Environmental Law and Policy Journal. 47, 52.
[25] Labovitz, D.M., Kontoleon, A., 2023. Materiality in the long now: Navigating the intersection of decision-making, time, and strategy. Dickinson Law Review. 128, 649.
[26] Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988). Available from: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/485/224/
[27] Innes-Gawn, S., 2010. The Significance of It All: Corporate Disclosure Obligations in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano. Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar. 6, 174.
[28] Ballan, B., Czarnezki, J.J., 2024. Disclosure, Greenwashing, and the Future of ESG Litigation. Washington and Lee Law Review. 81(2), 545.
[29] Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano, 563 U.S. 27 (2011). Available from: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/563/27/
[30] S.E.C. v. Bank of America Corp. United States District Court, S.D. New York. Jan 4, 2010. 667 F. Supp. 2d 717 (S.D.N.Y. 2010).
[31] Mezzanotte, F.E., 2023. Corporate sustainability reporting: Double materiality, impacts, and legal risk. Journal of Corporate Law Studies. 23(2), 633–663.
[32] Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Regulation S-K.
[33] Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Regulation S-K, Item 101.
[34] Gutterman, A.S., 2023. Sustainability Reporting and Communications: Legal and Regulatory Considerations. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370124718_Sustainability_Reporting_and_Communications_Legal_and_Regulatory_Considerations
[35] Howard, E.R., 2023. Environmental (non) disclosure and the SEC's proposed solution. THE GEORGETOWN JOURNAL OF LEGAL ETHICS. 36, 661.
[36] Diller, M., Berger, M., Buell, S.W., et al., 2024. A major question for the SEC: Analyzing constitutional limits on regulatory authority. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law. 29(2), 427.
[37] Langevoort, D.C., 2018. Disasters and disclosures: Securities fraud liability in the shadow of a corporate catastrophe. THE GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL. 107, 967.
[38] Morreale, M., 2014. Corporate disclosure considerations related to climate change. Global Climate Change and US Law. 2, 205–238.
[39] Park, S.K., 2021. Legal strategy disrupted: managing climate change and regulatory transformation. American Business Law Journal. 58(4), 711–749.
[40] Benjamin, L., 2022. The SEC and climate risk. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy. 40(1), 1–60.
[41] SEC, 2024. SEC Adopts Rules to Enhance and Standardize Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors. Available from: https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024-31 (cited 6 March 2024).
[42] LoPucki, L.M., 2022. Corporate greenhouse gas disclosures. UC Davis Law Review. 56, 405.
[43] Wilson, D., 2023. The SEC Climate Rule and Carbon Emission Disclosure Regulations-A Comparative Analysis. Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper. (252).
[44] Benjamin, L., 2022. The SEC and climate risk. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy. 40, 1.
[45] Meyer, C.S., 2024. Legitimacy and Transparency: Building Trust Through The SEC's Climate Disclosure Rule.
[46] Chen, W., Tian, Y., 2024. The unintended consequence of environmental regulations on earnings management: Evidence from emissions trading scheme in China. Sustainability. 16, 7092.
[47] Liu, W., Research on the materiality standard of inside information. Modern Economy. 13(8), 1115–1125.
[48] Zhou, D., Qiu, Y., Wang, M., 2021. Does environmental regulation promote enterprise profitability? Evidence from the implementation of China's newly revised Environmental Protection Law. Economic Modelling. 102, 105585.
[49] Wong, C.W., Miao, X., Cui, S., et al., 2018. Impact of corporate environmental responsibility on operating income: Moderating role of regional disparities in China. Journal of Business Ethics. 149, 363–382.
[50] China Briefing News, 2022. China ESG Reporting - Disclosing Enterprise Environmental Information. Available from: https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-esg-reporting-disclosing-enterprise-environmental-information/#:~:text=On%20December%2018%2C%202021%2C%20China's,)%20(link%20in%20Chinese) (cited 23 February 2022).
[51] Wang, A.L., 2018. Explaining environmental information disclosure in China. Ecology Law Quarterly. 44(4), 865–924.
[52] Kang, Y., Schmulow, A., Godwin, A., 2021. China's long march towards the twin peaks model of financial regulation. Law and Financial Markets Review. 15(1–2), 116–147.
[53] Xie, L., Xu, L., 2021. Environmental public interest litigation in China: A critical examination. Transnational Environmental Law. 10(3), 441–465.
[54] Wu, X., 2022. Corporate Governance Structure's Impacts on the Level of Environmental Disclosure. Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Financial Management and Economic Transition AEBMR, 14 December 2022; Atlantis Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 641–648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-054-1_70
[55] Chen, J.Z., Li, Z., Mao, T., et al., 2022. Global vs. local ESG ratings: Evidence from China. Local ESG Ratings: Evidence from China. 1–53.
[56] Liu, X., Guo, M., Wang, Y., et al., 2016. Assessing pollution-related effects of oil spills from ships in the Chinese Bohai Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 110(1), 194–202.
[57] Li, Q., Ruan, W., Shao, W., et al., 2017. Information disclosure in an environmental emergency. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal. 26(2), 134–147.
[58] Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, 2023. China: Jiangxi High Court to Hear Appeal in Environmental Group's Lawsuit Alleging Pollution by Jiangxi Copper's Dexing Mine. Available from: https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/china-jiangxi-high-court-to-hear-appeal-in-environmental-groups-lawsuit-alleging-pollution-by-jiangxi-coppers-dexing-mine/?utm_source=mosaic&utm_medium=api (cited 3 November 2023).
[59] Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China of April 9, 1991 (promulgated by the Presidential Order No.44; as amended by the Presidential Order No. 59 of Decision of October 28, 2007, on Amending the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China), arts. 55 and 58.
[60] He, X., 2024. Judicialisation for environmental public interest protection in China: the faces of court in different forms of environmental litigation. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law. 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2024.2365070.
[61] Bi, M., 2023. Compliance with and through the Rules of Corporate Governance in China [Doctoral thesis]. Durham University: Durham, UK.
[62] Ho, V.H., 2017. Capital market disclosure regimes: advancing accountability for Chinese TNCs. In Research Handbook on Transnational Corporations. Edward Elgar Publishing: Northampton, MA, USA. pp. 313–338.
[63] Lei, X., Wang, H., Deng, F., et al., 2024. Sustainability Through Scrutiny: Enhancing Transparency in Chinese Corporations via Environmental Audits. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 1–70.
[64] Wang, W., Sun, Z., Dong, Y., et al., 2024. Cost of debt financing, stock returns, and corporate strategic ESG disclosure: Evidence from China. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12741.
[65] Zhou, T., 2015. Is the CSRC protecting a “level playing field” in China's capital markets: Public enforcement, fragmented authoritarianism and corporatism. Journal of Corporate Law Studies. 15(2), 377–406.
[66] Zhang, L., Saydaliev, H.B., Ma, X., 2022. Does green finance investment and technological innovation improve renewable energy efficiency and sustainable development goals. Renewable Energy. 193, 991–1000.
[67] Environmental Protection Law of the People's Republic of China. (Adopted at the 11th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Seventh National People's Congress and promulgated by Order No.22 of the President of the People's Republic of China on December, art. 53.
[68] Couture, W.G., 2014. Materiality and a Theory of Legal Circularity. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law. 17, 453.
[69] McFarland, M.H., 1988. tered the total mix of information available. Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 US 224, 231-32 (1988). To violate Section 17 (aX1) of the Securities Act and Section 10 (b) of the Exchange Act and.
[70] Price, L.J., 2021. The Governance Effect of Environmental CSR Reporting in China: State and Non-State Facilitation. Non-state Actors in China and Global Environmental Governance. 93–124.
[71] Bai, L.L., 2024. The SEC's (Ill-Fated) Stock Repurchase Transparency Reform: For Investor Protection.
[72] Palma, A., 2025. The path to sustainable growth: assessing the role of financial and non-financial players under a double materiality perspective.
[73] Environmental Protection Law of the People's Republic of China. (Adopted at the 11th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Seventh National People's Congress and promulgated by Order No.22 of the President of the People's Republic of China on December , art. 53.
[74] Ngo, T., Le, T., Ullah, S., et al., 2023. Climate risk disclosures and global sustainability initiatives: A conceptual analysis and agenda for future research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 3705–3720.
[75] Jebe, R., 2019. The convergence of financial and ESG materiality: Taking sustainability mainstream. American Business Law Journal. 56(3), 645–702.
[76] Choi, M.M., Barsa, M., 2023. Can we talk climate? the sec disclosure rule and compelled commercial speech. Environmental Law Reporter. 53, 10934.
[77] Clark, C.E., 2021. How do standard setters define materiality and why does it matter?. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility. 30(3), 378–391.
[78] Mio, C., Agostini, M., Scarpa, F., 2024. Sustainability Reporting: Conception, International Approaches and Double Materiality in Action. Palgrave Macmillan Springer Nature: Switzerland.
[79] Zhang, X., 2024. ESG in China: A critical review from a legal perspective. In Research Handbook on Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing: Northampton, MA, USA. pp. 421–438. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802202533.00032
[80] Bouniol, M., 2024. An in-depth examination of the international climate regime: Spotlight on nationally determined contributions and Paris agreement compliance. Edinburgh Student Law Review. 5(1), 56.
[81] Jernnäs, M., Nilsson, J., Linnér, B.O., et al., 2019. Cross-national patterns of governance mechanisms in nationally determined contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. Climate policy. 19(10), 1239–1249.
[82] Zhang, L., 2020. China's corporate governance development and ESG evaluation. An updated version of this working paper has been submitted and is under review for the EMI report.
[83] Liu, Z., Zheng, R., Qiu, Z., et al., 2022. Stakeholders and ESG disclosure strategies adoption: The role of goals compatibility and resources dependence. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene. 10(1), 1–12.
[84] Minnis, M., Shroff, N., 2017. Why regulate private firm disclosure and auditing?. Accounting and Business Research, 47(5), 473–502.
[85] Interesse, G., 2024. China Releases ESG Reporting Standards for Businesses. Available from: www.china-briefing.com/news/china-releases-esg-reporting-standards-for-businesses/ (cited 20 June 2024).
[86] Cai, W., 2022. Corporate environmental transparency in China [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Waikato: Hamilton, New Zealand.
[87] Zhang, L., Mol, A.P., He, G., 2016. Transparency and information disclosure in China's environmental governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 18, 17–24.
[88] Duan, P., Eccles, R.G., 2014. The state of sustainability in China. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 26(3), 76–84.
[89] Cui, L., 2022. How China is Going Green: Pollution Controls, Green Investment and Policy Implications[Doctoral dissertation]. University of Bath: Bath, UK.
[90] Ho, V.H., 2022. Modernizing ESG disclosure. University of Illinois Law Review. 277–356.
[91] Eccles, R.G., Youmans, T., 2016. Materiality in corporate governance: The statement of significant audiences and materiality. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 28(2), 39–46.
[92] Palma, A., 2025. The path to sustainable growth: assessing the role of financial and non-financial players under a double materiality perspective. Available from:https://iris.uniroma1.it/handle/11573/1733561
[93] Shen, J., Wei, Y.D., Yang, Z., 2017. The impact of environmental regulations on the location of pollution-intensive industries in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 148, 785–794.
[94] Shan, J., Luo, Z., Pei, L., et al., 2024. Impact Study of Environment Public Interests Litigation on Carbon Emissions: Taking Pilot Policy of Procuratorial Public Interest Litigation as a Quasi-Natural Experiment. Sustainability. 16(19), 8688.
[95] Boumaiza, A., Maher, K., 2024. Leveraging blockchain technology to enhance transparency and efficiency in carbon trading markets. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 162, 110225.
Downloads
How to Cite
Wu Huihui, Ali , H. M., & Hazlina Shaik Md Noor Alam. (2025). Materiality in Environmental Information Disclosure: A Comparative Analysis of the Securities Law of the United States and China. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 7(5), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i5.8143
Issue
Article Type
Article
License
Copyright © 2025 Wu Huihui, Hasani Mohd Ali , Hazlina Shaik Md Noor Alam
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
