A Comprehensive Overview of the ELECTRE Method in Multi Criteria Decision-Making

Authors

  • Hamed Taherdoost

    University Canada West, Vancouver, V6B1V9, Canada

  • Mitra Madanchian

    Hamta Group, Hamta Business Corporation, Vancouver, V6E1C9, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v6i2.5637

Abstract

The ELECTRE (ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalite) method has gained widespread recognition as one of the most effective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Its versatility allows it to be applied in a wide range of areas such as engineering, economics, business, environmental management and many others. This paper aims to provide an overview of the ELECTRE method, including its fundamental concepts, applications, advantages, and limitations. At its core, the ELECTRE method is an outranking family of MCDM techniques, which allows for the direct comparison of alternatives based on a set of criteria. The method takes into account the preferences and importance of decision-makers and generates a ranking of the alternatives based on their relative strengths and weaknesses. The ELECTRE method is a powerful tool for decision-making, and its applicability to a wide range of fields demonstrates its versatility and adaptability. By understanding its concepts, applications, merits, and demerits, decision-makers can use the ELECTRE method to make informed and effective decisions in a variety of contexts.

Keywords:

Decision making, Multi criteria decision making, ELECTRE method, ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalite method, Multi attribute decision making

References

[1] Taherdoost, H., Madanchian, M., 2023. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts. Encyclopedia. 3(1), 77-87.

[2] Taherdoost, H., 2023. Analysis of simple additive weighting method (SAW) as a multiattribute decision-making technique: A step-by-step guide. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research. 6(1), 21-24.

[3] Milani, A.S., Shanian, A., El-Lahham, C., 2006. Using different ELECTRE methods in strategic planning in the presence of human behavioral resistance. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences. 1-19.

[4] Banayoun, R., Roy, B., Sussman, N., 1966. Manual de Reference du Programme Electre (French) [Electre Program Reference Manual]. Note de Synthese et Formation 25. Direction Scientifique SEMA, Paris.

[5] Govindan, K., Jepsen, M.B., 2016. ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research. 250(1), 1-29.

[6] Huang, W.C., Chen, C.H., 2005. Using the ELECTRE II method to apply and analyze the differentiation theory. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies. 5, 2237-2249.

[7] Marzouk, M.M., 2011. ELECTRE III model for value engineering applications. Automation in Construction. 20(5), 596-600.

[8] Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K., 1981. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple attribute decision making. Springer: Berlin. pp. 58-191.

[9] Liu, X., Wan, S.P., 2019. A method to calculate the ranges of criteria weights in ELECTRE I and II methods. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 137, 106067.

[10] Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, T.M., Venkatesan, V.P., 2013. A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. American Journal of Information Systems. 1(1), 31-43.

[11] Tiwari, R., Agrawal, S., Kasdekar, D.K., 2020. Application of ELECTRE-I, II methods for EDM performance measures in manufacturing decision making. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 748(1), 012015.

[12] Collette, Y., Siarry, P., 2004. Multiobjective optimization: Principles and case studies. Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin.

[13] Duckstein, L., Gershon, M., 1983. Multicriterion analysis of a vegetation management problem using ELECTRE II. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 7(4), 254-261.

Downloads

How to Cite

Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). A Comprehensive Overview of the ELECTRE Method in Multi Criteria Decision-Making. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 6(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v6i2.5637

Issue

Article Type

Review