AI-Enabled Digital Twin Framework for Real-Time Water Resource Management Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data

Authors

  • Yunyan Chang

    Chongqing Water Resources and Electric Power Vocational and Technical College, Chongqing 402160, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i4.12943
Received: 2 January 2026 | Revised: 25 February 2026 | Accepted: 1 March 2026 | Published Online: 20 April 2026

Abstract

Traditional water resource management relies on statically configured models and sparse in-situ networks, creating critical gaps in situational awareness that lead to operational failures during floods, droughts, and water quality incidents. This review synthesizes advancements in AI-enabled digital twins—constantly updated, stateful digital representations that synchronize with physical water systems through continuous assimilation of multi-source remote sensing data. Unlike conventional modeling workflows, these closed-loop systems integrate heterogeneous observations (optical, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), thermal, microwave, and altimetry) with in-situ Internet of Things (IoT) measurements to maintain real-time alignment with evolving conditions. We propose a unified reference architecture spanning data ingestion, AI-driven downscaling and retrieval, quality-aware multi-modal fusion, state synchronization via data assimilation, probabilistic forecasting using physics-AI hybrids, and decision support with continuous monitoring. The framework explicitly addresses operational constraints, including latency, missing data, and non-stationarity, while prioritizing uncertainty calibration over point accuracy. Our synthesis evaluates design trade-offs across flood response, reservoir operations, drought monitoring, irrigation management, and water quality applications. We conclude by identifying research priorities: standardized state schemas and uncertainty metrics, interoperable application programming interfaces (APIs), robust domain adaptation, and governance frameworks incorporating human-in-the-loop safeguards. This review provides a roadmap for transforming heterogeneous remote sensing streams into reliable, actionable intelligence for real-time water resource management.

Keywords:

Digital Twin; Water Resource Management; Multi-Source Remote Sensing; Data Fusion; Uncertainty Quantification

References

[1] Leonard, M., Westra, S., Phatak, A., et al., 2014. A Compound Event Framework for Understanding Extreme Impacts. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 5(1), 113–128.

[2] Hlal, M., Baraka Munyaka, J.-C., Chenal, J., et al., 2025. Digital Twin Technology for Urban Flood Risk Management: A Systematic Review of Remote Sensing Applications and Early Warning Systems. Remote Sensing. 17(17), 3104.

[3] Zou, S., Ju, H., Zhang, J., 2025. Water Quality Management in the Age of AI: Applications, Challenges, and Prospects. Water. 17(11), 1641.

[4] Schultz, G.A., Engman, E.T., 2012. Remote Sensing in Hydrology and Water Management. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany.

[5] Fekete, B.M., Andreu, A., Argent, R., et al., 2021. Observations, Monitoring and Data Management. In: Bogardi, J.J., Gupta, J., Nandalal, K.D.W., et al. (Eds.). Handbook of Water Resources Management: Discourses, Concepts and Examples. Springer: Berlin, Germany. pp. 385–442.

[6] Gacu, J.G., Monjardin, C.E.F., Mangulabnan, R.G.T., et al., 2025. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Surface Water Management: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Applications, and Challenges. Water. 17(11), 1707.

[7] Datta, S., 2022. Digital Twins: Digital Twin Meets Digital Cousin. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/140791 (cited 1 January 2026).

[8] Rai, N., Choi, D., Boyd, N.S., et al., 2025. Advancing Site-Specific Disease and Pest Management in Precision Agriculture: From Reasoning-Driven Foundation Models to Adaptive, Feedback-Based Learning. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2510.24650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.24650

[9] Qian, C., Liu, X., Ripley, C., et al., 2022. Digital Twin—Cyber Replica of Physical Things: Architecture, Applications and Future Research Directions. Future Internet. 14(2), 64.

[10] Zhang, K., Qu, T., Zhou, D., et al., 2020. Digital Twin-Based Opti-State Control Method for a Synchronized Production Operation System. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 63, 101892.

[11] Daneshgar, S., Polesel, F., Borzooei, S., et al., 2024. A Full-Scale Operational Digital Twin for a Water Resource Recovery Facility—A Case Study of Eindhoven Water Resource Recovery Facility. Water Environment Research. 96(3), e11016.

[12] Guo, M., Wu, X., Qi, H., et al., 2025. A Methodology for Sky-Space-Ground Integrated Remote Sensing Monitoring: A Digital Twin Framework for Multi-Source Data-BIM Integration in Residential Quality Monitoring. Journal of Building Engineering. 102, 111976.

[13] Ali, I., Greifeneder, F., Stamenkovic, J., et al., 2015. Review of Machine Learning Approaches for Biomass and Soil Moisture Retrievals from Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sensing. 7(12), 16398–16421.

[14] Schaffer, B.E., Nordbotten, J.M., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., 2015. Plant Biomass and Soil Moisture Dynamics: Analytical Results. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 471(2183), 20150179.

[15] Gupta, S., Modgil, S., Bhattacharyya, S., et al., 2022. Artificial Intelligence for Decision Support Systems in the Field of Operations Research: Review and Future Scope of Research. Annals of Operations Research. 308(1), 215–274.

[16] Kalusivalingam, A.K., Sharma, A., Patel, N., et al., 2020. Optimizing Decision-Making with AI-Enhanced Support Systems: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning and Bayesian Networks. International Journal of AI and ML. 1(2). Available from: https://www.cognitivecomputingjournal.com/index.php/IJAIML-V1/article/view/59

[17] Bhatt, G.D., Zaveri, J., 2002. The Enabling Role of Decision Support Systems in Organizational Learning. Decision Support Systems. 32(3), 297–309.

[18] Zhao, T., Song, C., Yu, J., et al., 2025. Leveraging Immersive Digital Twins and AI-Driven Decision Support Systems for Sustainable Water Reserves Management: A Conceptual Framework. Sustainability. 17(8), 3754.

[19] Ghafari, R., Samaei, S.R., 2025. An AI-Driven and Digital Twin-Based Framework for Holistic Risk and Green Project Management in Sustainable Urban Megaprojects: The Case of Tehran under Climate and Population Pressures. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mechanical, Construction, Industrial, and Civil Engineering, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 21 May 2025.

[20] Duan, H., Cao, Z., Luo, J., et al., 2025. AI-Driven Opportunities and Challenges in Lake Remote Sensing. Information Geography. 1(1), 100014.

[21] Wainwright, D.W., Oates, B.J., Edwards, H.M., et al., 2018. Evidence-Based Information Systems: A New Perspective and a Road Map for Research-Informed Practice. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 19(11), 1035–1063.

[22] Syed, T.A., Khan, M.Y., Jan, S., et al., 2024. Integrating Digital Twins and Artificial Intelligence Multi-Modal Transformers into Water Resource Management: Overview and Advanced Predictive Framework. AI. 5(4), 1977–2017.

[23] Hipel, K.W., Ben-Haim, Y., 2002. Decision Making in an Uncertain World: Information-Gap Modeling in Water Resources Management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews). 29(4), 506–517.

[24] Reed, P.M., Kasprzyk, J., 2009. Water Resources Management: The Myth, the Wicked, and the Future. American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA. pp. 411–413.

[25] VanDerHorn, E., Mahadevan, S., 2021. Digital Twin: Generalization, Characterization and Implementation. Decision Support Systems. 145, 113524.

[26] Keller, M.C., Coventry, W.L., 2005. Quantifying and Addressing Parameter Indeterminacy in the Classical Twin Design. Twin Research and Human Genetics. 8(3), 201–213.

[27] Tao, F., Sui, F., Liu, A., et al., 2019. Digital Twin-Driven Product Design Framework. International Journal of Production Research. 57(12), 3935–3953.

[28] Carlin, H.M., Goodall, P.A., Young, R.I.M., et al., 2024. An Interactive Framework to Support Decision-Making for Digital Twin Design. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 41, 100639.

[29] Li, X., Li, H., He, Y., et al., 2024. Towards Deterministic-Delay Data Delivery Using Multi-Criteria Routing over Satellite Networks. Electronics. 13(23), 4822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13234822

[30] Dixit, M.G., Ramesh, S., Dasgupta, P., 2014. Time-Budgeting: A Component Based Development Methodology for Real-Time Embedded Systems. Formal Aspects of Computing. 26(3), 591–621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00165-012-0273-0

[31] Najafi, M., Zhang, K., Sadoghi, M., et al., 2017. Hardware Acceleration Landscape for Distributed Real-Time Analytics: Virtues and Limitations. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), Atlanta, GA, USA, 5–8 June 2017; pp. 1938–1948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.2017.194

[32] Manure, A., Bengani, S., S, S., 2023. Robustness and Reliability. In Introduction to Responsible AI: Implement Ethical AI Using Python. Apress: Berkeley, CA, USA. pp. 133–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9982-1_5

[33] Johannesson, P., Bergman, B., Svensson, T., et al., 2013. A Robustness Approach to Reliability. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 29(1), 17–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1294

[34] Templ, M., 2023. Enhancing Precision in Large-Scale Data Analysis: An Innovative Robust Imputation Algorithm for Managing Outliers and Missing Values. Mathematics. 11(12), 2729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math11122729

[35] Grieves, M., Vickers, J., 2016. Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. In: Kahlen, J., Flumerfelt, S., Alves, A. (Eds.). Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems: New Findings and Approaches. Springer: Berlin, Germany. pp. 85–113.

[36] Alshammari, K., 2021. Access Management for Digital Twins in the Built Environment [PhD Thesis]. Cardiff University: Cardiff, UK.

[37] Grigg, N.S., 2025. Digital Transformation in Water Utilities: Status, Challenges, and Prospects. Smart Cities. 8(3), 99.

[38] Ferko, E., Bucaioni, A., Behnam, M., 2022. Architecting Digital Twins. IEEE Access. 10, 50335–50350.

[39] Islam, F.A.S., 2025. A Multi-Dimensional AI Framework for Sustainable Drinking Water Management: Integrating Federated Learning, Digital Twins, and Blockchain. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports. 27(6), 466–492.

[40] Alliance for IoT and Edge Computing Innovation (AIOTI), 2024. Edge Driven Digital Twins in Distributed Energy Systems: Role and Opportunities for Hybrid Data Driven Solutions. AIOTI: Brussels, Belgium.

[41] Movva, S.S., Devineni, S.K., Meitivyeki, M.M., et al., 2024. The Future of Digital-Physical Interactions. Journal of Technology and System. 6(3). Available from: https://carijournals.org/product/the-future-of-digital-physical-interactions/?srsltid=AfmBOooAkJxtTnWROSHuNPiB2Y0ZilfjiVFV6AiDAalLNAh0BY_lqMCR

[42] Ma, L., Xu, Z., Fan, L., et al., 2025. Multi-Source Data Integration and Model Coupling for Watershed Eco-Assessment Systems: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects. Processes. 13(9), 2998.

[43] Wu, X., Lu, G., Wu, Z., 2023. Remote Sensing Technology in the Construction of Digital Twin Basins: Applications and Prospects. Water. 15(11), 2040.

[44] Schimel, D.S., Asner, G.P., Moorcroft, P., 2013. Observing Changing Ecological Diversity in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 11(3), 129–137.

[45] Singh, R., Paramanik, S., Bhattacharya, B.K., et al., 2020. Modelling of Evapotranspiration Using Land Surface Energy Balance and Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing. Tropical Ecology. 61(1), 42–50.

[46] Liou, Y.-A., Kar, S.K., 2014. Evapotranspiration Estimation with Remote Sensing and Various Surface Energy Balance Algorithms—A Review. Energies. 7(5), 2821–2849.

[47] Friedl, M.A., 2002. Forward and Inverse Modeling of Land Surface Energy Balance Using Surface Temperature Measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment. 79(2–3), 344–354.

[48] de Sousa, G.P.B., Demattê, J.A.M., Chabrillat, S., et al., 2025. A Sustainable Agricultural Development Index (SADI): Bridging Soil Health, Management, and Socioeconomic Factors. Remote Sensing. 17, 4039.

[49] Russell, D.M., Swanson, D., 2019. Transforming Information into Supply Chain Agility: An Agility Adaptation Typology. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 30(1), 329–355.

[50] Fang, W., Qin, H., Liu, G., et al., 2023. A Method for Spatiotemporally Merging Multi-Source Precipitation Based on Deep Learning. Remote Sensing. 15(17), 4160.

[51] Ma, Y., Zhang, D., Zhang, Y., et al., 2023. Advancements and Challenges in Deep Learning-Driven Marine Data Assimilation: A Comprehensive Review. Computational Research Progress in Applied Science and Engineering: Transactions of Applied Sciences. 9(4), 2876.

[52] Kalogiannidis, S., Spinthiropoulos, K., Kalfas, D., et al., 2025. Integration of Remote Sensing and GIS for Urban Sprawl Monitoring in European Cities. European Journal of Geography. 16(2), 75–90.

[53] Senanayake, I.P., Pathira Arachchilage, K.R.L., Yeo, I.-Y., et al., 2024. Spatial Downscaling of Satellite-Based Soil Moisture Products Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Review. Remote Sensing. 16(12), 2067.

[54] Wei, Z., Fengping, W., Junfei, C., 2023. Methods, Progresses, and Challenges of Passive Microwave Soil Moisture Spatial Downscaling. National Remote Sensing Bulletin. 26(9), 1699–1722.

[55] Göppert, A., Grahn, L., Rachner, J., et al., 2023. Pipeline for Ontology-Based Modeling and Automated Deployment of Digital Twins for Planning and Control of Manufacturing Systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 34(5), 2133–2152.

[56] Coito, T., Martins, M.S., Firme, B., et al., 2022. Assessing the Impact of Automation in Pharmaceutical Quality Control Labs Using a Digital Twin. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 62, 270–285.

[57] Eriksson, K., Markussen, C., 2023. Quality Assurance of Digital Twins. In Proceedings of the ASME 2023 42nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Melbourne, Australia, 11–16 June 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2023-105285

[58] Curl, J.M., Nading, T., Hegger, K., et al., 2019. Digital Twins: The Next Generation of Water Treatment Technology. Journal of the American Water Works Association. 111(12), 44–50.

[59] Song, P., Wang, C., Zhang, W., et al., 2020. Urban Multi-Source Water Supply in China: Variation Tendency, Modeling Methods and Challenges. Water. 12(4), 1199.

[60] Rahman, M.A., Shahrior, M.F., Iqbal, K., et al., 2025. Enabling Intelligent Industrial Automation: A Review of Machine Learning Applications with Digital Twin and Edge AI Integration. Automation. 6(3), 37.

[61] Sheraz, M., Chuah, T.C., Lee, Y.L., et al., 2024. A Comprehensive Survey on Revolutionizing Connectivity through Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Digital Twin Network in 6G. IEEE Access. 12, 49184–49215.

[62] Vidyalakshmi, G., Gopikrishnan, S., Boulila, W., et al., 2025. Digital Twins and Cyber-Physical Systems: A New Frontier in Computer Modeling. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences. 143(1), 51.

[63] Abu-Elkheir, M., Hayajneh, M., Ali, N.A., 2013. Data Management for the Internet of Things: Design Primitives and Solution. Sensors. 13(11), 15582–15612.

[64] Shi, F., Li, Q., Zhu, T., et al., 2018. A Survey of Data Semantization in Internet of Things. Sensors. 18(1), 313.

[65] Bao, J., Guo, D., Li, J., et al., 2019. The Modelling and Operations for the Digital Twin in the Context of Manufacturing. Enterprise Information Systems. 13(4), 534–556.

[66] Fantozzi, I.C., Santolamazza, A., Loy, G., et al., 2025. Digital Twins: Strategic Guide to Utilize Digital Twins to Improve Operational Efficiency in Industry 4.0. Future Internet. 17(1), 41.

[67] Wang, Q., Wu, W., Qian, L., et al., 2023. Design and Implementation of Secure and Reliable Information Interaction Architecture for Digital Twins. China Communications. 20(2), 79–93.

[68] Song, J., Kim, J., Lee, M.J., et al., 2022. Differential Diagnosis between Parkinson's Disease and Atypical Parkinsonism Based on Gait and Postural Instability: Artificial Intelligence Using an Enhanced Weight Voting Ensemble Model. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 98, 32–37.

[69] Li, S., Cheng, W., Liu, Z., et al., 2025. Key Technologies and Applications of Digital Twin Hydraulic Engineering. Digital Twin. 2(1), 2486862.

[70] Brocca, L., Barbetta, S., Camici, S., et al., 2024. A Digital Twin of the Terrestrial Water Cycle: A Glimpse into the Future through High-Resolution Earth Observations. Frontiers in Science. 1, 1190191.

[71] Jiang, Y., Li, M., Li, M., et al., 2022. Digital Twin-Enabled Real-Time Synchronization for Planning, Scheduling, and Execution in Precast On-Site Assembly. Automation in Construction. 141, 104397.

[72] Pan, Y., Qu, T., Wu, N., et al., 2021. Digital Twin-Based Real-Time Production Logistics Synchronization System in a Multi-Level Computing Architecture. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 58, 246–260.

[73] Tan, B., Matta, A., 2024. The Digital Twin Synchronization Problem: Framework, Formulations, and Analysis. IISE Transactions. 56(6), 652–665.

[74] Thelen, A., Zhang, X., Fink, O., et al., 2023. A Comprehensive Review of Digital Twin—Part 2: Roles of Uncertainty Quantification and Optimization, a Battery Digital Twin, and Perspectives. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 66(1), 23.

[75] Paredis, R., Vangheluwe, H., 2024. Modelling and Simulation-Based Evaluation of Twinning Architectures and Their Deployment. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications (SIMULTECH), Dijon, France, 2024; pp. 170–182.

[76] Mihai, S., Yaqoob, M., Hung, D.V., et al., 2022. Digital Twins: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Challenges, Trends and Future Prospects. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 24(4), 2255–2291.

[77] Rathore, M.M., Shah, S.A., Shukla, D., et al., 2021. The Role of AI, Machine Learning, and Big Data in Digital Twinning: A Systematic Literature Review, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Access. 9, 32030–32052.

[78] Bolbotinović, Ž., Milić, S.D., Janda, Ž., et al., 2025. AI-Powered Digital Twin in the Industrial IoT. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 167, 110656.

[79] Ciliberti, F.G., Berardi, L., Laucelli, D.B., et al., 2023. From Digital Twin Paradigm to Digital Water Services. Journal of Hydroinformatics. 25(6), 2444–2459.

[80] Wu, Z.Y., Chew, A., Meng, X., et al., 2023. High Fidelity Digital Twin-Based Anomaly Detection and Localization for Smart Water Grid Operation Management. Sustainable Cities and Society. 91, 104446.

[81] van der Valk, H., Haße, H., Möller, F., et al., 2022. Archetypes of Digital Twins. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 64(3), 375–391.

[82] Al Zami, M.B., Shaon, S., Quy, V.K., et al., 2025. Digital Twin in Industries: A Comprehensive Survey. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2412.00209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.00209

[83] Mayr, S., Kuenzer, C., Gessner, U., et al., 2019. Validation of Earth Observation Time-Series: A Review for Large-Area and Temporally Dense Land Surface Products. Remote Sensing. 11(22), 2616.

[84] Emerson, R.A., Hendry, D.F., 1996. An Evaluation of Forecasting Using Leading Indicators. Journal of Forecasting. 15(4), 271–291.

[85] Yusupov, R.M., Musaev, A.A., Grigoriev, D.A., 2021. Evaluation of Statistical Forecast Method Efficiency in the Conditions of Dynamic Chaos. In Proceedings of the 2021 IV International Conference on Control in Technical Systems (CTS), Saint Petersburg, Russia, 21–23 September 2021; pp. 178–180.

[86] Liu, Y., Ong, S., Nee, A., 2022. State-of-the-Art Survey on Digital Twin Implementations. Advances in Manufacturing. 10(1), 1–23.

[87] Minerva, R., Lee, G.M., Crespi, N., 2020. Digital Twin in the IoT Context: A Survey on Technical Features, Scenarios, and Architectural Models. Proceedings of the IEEE. 108(10), 1785–1824.

[88] Thelen, A., Zhang, X., Fink, O., et al., 2022. A Comprehensive Review of Digital Twin—Part 1: Modeling and Twinning Enabling Technologies. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 65(12), 354.

[89] Alsubaih, A.A.S., Sepehrnoori, K., Delshad, M., et al., 2025. A Comprehensive Review of Well Integrity Challenges and Digital Twin Applications across Conventional, Unconventional, and Storage Wells. Energies. 18(17), 4757.

[90] Uhlenkamp, J.-F., Hauge, J.B., Broda, E., et al., 2022. Digital Twins: A Maturity Model for Their Classification and Evaluation. IEEE Access. 10, 69605–69635.

[91] Klar, R., Arvidsson, N., Angelakis, V., 2023. Digital Twins' Maturity: The Need for Interoperability. IEEE Systems Journal. 18(1), 713–724.

[92] Dietrich, C.F., 2017. Uncertainty, Calibration and Probability: The Statistics of Scientific and Industrial Measurement. Routledge: London, UK.

[93] Byaruhanga, N., Kibirige, D., Gokool, S., et al., 2024. Evolution of Flood Prediction and Forecasting Models for Flood Early Warning Systems: A Scoping Review. Water. 16(13), 1763.

[94] Forouheshfar, Y., Ayadi, R., Moghadas, O., 2025. Enhancing System Resilience to Climate Change through Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Literature Review. Frontiers in Climate. 7, 1585331.

Downloads

How to Cite

Chang, Y. (2026). AI-Enabled Digital Twin Framework for Real-Time Water Resource Management Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 8(4), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i4.12943

Issue

Article Type

Article