
Computing the Planet: Integrating Machine Learning, Remote Sensing, and Sensor Data Fusion for Environmental Insights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i1.12946Abstract
Indeed, a range of systems in the environment requires timely, spatially explicit, and credible information to support its environmental decision-making, but no one observing system can give the complete and reliable measures of the Earth system across scales. This review summarizes how the realization of the Compute the Planet is underway in the form of machine learning, remote sensing, and sensor data fusion to generate decision-ready environmental insights. We use the application-first approach, which considers remote sensing, in situ and Internet of Things (IoT) sensing, and physics-based models as complementary streams of evidence with similar strengths and failures. We look critically at how an integrated system can convert heterogeneous observations to action products across three high impact application areas: atmosphere and air quality, water–land–ecosystem dynamics, and hazards. Rapid-response situational awareness, ecosystem condition metrics, drought and flood indicators, exposure maps, and hazard/extreme indicators are key products. The integrated systems to environment interface in three high impact application areas: atmosphere and air quality, water-land-ecosystem dynamics, and hazard Examine Our operational requirements can often determine real-life value such as latency, time stability, smooth degradation in the presence of missing or degraded inputs, and calibrated uncertainty usable in threshold-based decisions. These pitfalls are common across fields: mismatch in the scale between a point sensor and a gridded product, objectives on proxies in remotely sensed measurements, domain shift in the extremes and changing baselines, and evaluation aspects, which overestimate generalization because of spatiotemporal autocorrelation. Based on these lessons, we present cross-domain proposals for strong validation, uncertainty quantification, provenance, and versioning, as well as fair performance evaluation. We conclude that the next era of environmental intelligence will see a reduction in average accuracy improvement and an increase in terms of robustness, transparency, and operational responsibility, thus allowing the integrated environmental intelligence system to be deployed, which may be relied on to monitor human health, resource allocation, and survival in a more climate-adapted world.
Keywords:
Machine Learning; Remote Sensing; Sensor Data Fusion;; Environmental Monitoring;; Uncertainty QuantificationReferences
[1] Gössling, S., Scott, D., 2025. Tourist Demand and Destination Development under Climate Change: Complexities and Perspectives. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2025.2543953
[2] Aguado, E., Burt, J.E., 2015. Understanding Weather and Climate. Pearson: Boston, MA, USA.
[3] Gettelman, A., Geer, A.J., Forbes, R.M., et al., 2022. The Future of Earth System Prediction: Advances in Model–Data Fusion. Science Advances. 8(14), eabn3488.
[4] Han, H., Liu, Z., Li, J., et al., 2024. Challenges in Remote Sensing Based Climate and Crop Monitoring: Navigating the Complexities Using AI. Journal of Cloud Computing. 13(1), 34.
[5] Chuvieco, E., 2020. Fundamentals of Satellite Remote Sensing: An Environmental Approach, 3rd ed. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.
[6] Fascista, A., 2022. Toward Integrated Large-Scale Environmental Monitoring Using WSN/UAV/Crowdsensing: A Review of Applications, Signal Processing, and Future Perspectives. Sensors. 22(5), 1824.
[7] Kreinovich, V., Ouncharoen, R., 2015. Fuzzy (and Interval) Techniques in the Age of Big Data: An Overview with Applications to Environmental Science, Geosciences, Engineering, and Medicine. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems. 23(Suppl. 1), 75–89.
[8] Tao, Y., Tian, B., Adhikari, B.R., et al., 2024. A Review of Cutting-Edge Sensor Technologies for Improved Flood Monitoring and Damage Assessment. Sensors. 24(21), 7090.
[9] Salazar, J.J., Garland, L., Ochoa, J., et al., 2022. Fair Train–Test Split in Machine Learning: Mitigating Spatial Autocorrelation for Improved Prediction Accuracy. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 209, 109885.
[10] Welsh, M., 2014. Resilience and Responsibility: Governing Uncertainty in a Complex World. The Geographical Journal. 180(1), 15–26.
[11] Layode, O., Naiho, H.N.N., Adeleke, G.S., et al., 2024. Data Privacy and Security Challenges in Environmental Research: Approaches to Safeguarding Sensitive Information. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences. 6(6), 1193–1214.
[12] Li, X., Feng, M., Ran, Y., et al., 2023. Big Data in Earth System Science and Progress Towards a Digital Twin. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 4(5), 319–332.
[13] Wu, X., Lu, G., Wu, Z., 2023. Remote Sensing Technology in the Construction of Digital Twin Basins: Applications and Prospects. Water. 15(11), 2040.
[14] Nica, E., Popescu, G.H., Poliak, M., et al., 2023. Digital Twin Simulation Tools, Spatial Cognition Algorithms, and Multi-Sensor Fusion Technology in Sustainable Urban Governance Networks. Mathematics. 11(9), 1981.
[15] Poliak, M., Poliakova, A., Crîșmariu, O.-D., et al., 2023. Visual Analytics and Digital Twin Modeling Tools, Spatio-Temporal Fusion and Predictive Modeling Algorithms, and Deep Learning-Based Sensing and Image Recognition Technologies in Data-Driven Smart Sustainable Cities and Immersive Multisensory Virtual Spaces. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations. 15(1), 91–105.
[16] Rundel, P.W., Graham, E.A., Allen, M.F., et al., 2009. Environmental Sensor Networks in Ecological Research. New Phytologist. 182(3), 589–607.
[17] Lein, J.K., 2011. Environmental Sensing. In Environmental Sensing: Analytical Techniques for Earth Observation. Springer: New York, NY, USA. pp. 23–49.
[18] Dixon, B., McHan, C.R., 2025. Geographic Problem Solving: A Summary of Key Environmental Problems that Need Integrative Approaches and the Notion of Uncertainty Associated with ‘Ways of Knowing’. In Interdisciplinary Environmental Solutions: Using Geospatial Technologies for Bridging Disciplines, Scale and Data. Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 381–444.
[19] Dash, J., Ogutu, B.O., 2016. Recent Advances in Space-Borne Optical Remote Sensing Systems for Monitoring Global Terrestrial Ecosystems. Progress in Physical Geography. 40(2), 322–351.
[20] Thomas, Z.A., 2016. Using Natural Archives to Detect Climate and Environmental Tipping Points in the Earth System. Quaternary Science Reviews. 152, 60–71.
[21] De Leeuw, J., Georgiadou, Y., Kerle, N., et al., 2010. The Function of Remote Sensing in Support of Environmental Policy. Remote Sensing. 2(7), 1731–1750.
[22] Aplin, P., 2006. On Scales and Dynamics in Observing the Environment. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 27(11), 2123–2140.
[23] Zhang, J., Atkinson, P., Goodchild, M.F., 2014. Scale in Spatial Information and Analysis. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.
[24] Balsamo, G., Agusti-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., et al., 2018. Satellite and In Situ Observations for Advancing Global Earth Surface Modelling: A Review. Remote Sensing. 10(12), 2038.
[25] Crespi, M., Ferrari, G., 2020. Reanalysis, or Retrospective Analysis, in Meteorology. Open Meteorology Notebook. 2. Available from: https://www.hypermeteo.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/2-Reanalysis-or-retrospective-analysis-in-meteorology.pdf
[26] Gibbs, D.A., Flotemersch, J., 2019. How Environmental Futures Can Inform Decision Making: A Review. Futures. 108, 37–52.
[27] Sillmann, J., Thorarinsdottir, T., Keenlyside, N., et al., 2017. Understanding, Modeling and Predicting Weather and Climate Extremes: Challenges and Opportunities. Weather and Climate Extremes. 18, 65–74.
[28] Zhang, P., Martonosi, M., 2008. Locale: Collaborative Localization Estimation for Sparse Mobile Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2008), St. Louis, MO, USA, 22–24 April 2008; pp. 195–206.
[29] Scheffran, J., 2015. Complexity and Stability in Human–Environment Interaction: The Transformation from Climate Risk Cascades to Viable Adaptive Networks. In: Kavalski, E. (Ed.). World Politics at the Edge of Chaos: Reflections on Complexity and Global Life. State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, USA. pp. 229–252.
[30] Wu, Y., 2003. Mechanism Analysis of Hazards Caused by the Interaction between Groundwater and Geo-Environment. Environmental Geology. 44(7), 811–819.
[31] Malakar, N., 2022. Environmental Intelligence Using Machine Learning Applications. Journal of Nepal Physical Society. 8(2), 42–47.
[32] Chandler, R., Scott, M., 2011. Statistical Methods for Trend Detection and Analysis in the Environmental Sciences. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA.
[33] Wang, J.-F., Stein, A., Gao, B., et al., 2012. A Review of Spatial Sampling. Spatial Statistics. 2, 1–14.
[34] Kumar, P., Debele, S.E., Sahani, J., et al., 2021. An Overview of Monitoring Methods for Assessing the Performance of Nature-Based Solutions against Natural Hazards. Earth-Science Reviews. 217, 103603.
[35] Bagkis, E., Debele, S.E., Sahani, J., et al., 2025. Evolving Trends in Application of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Networks: Challenges and Future Directions. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science. 8(1), 335.
[36] Javan, F.D., Samadzadegan, F., Toosi, A., 2025. Air Pollution Observation—Bridging Spaceborne to Unmanned Airborne Remote Sensing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health. 18(8), 2481–2549.
[37] Mashala, M.J., Dube, T., Mudereri, B.T., et al., 2023. A Systematic Review on Advancements in Remote Sensing for Assessing and Monitoring Land Use and Land Cover Changes Impacts on Surface Water Resources in Semi-Arid Tropical Environments. Remote Sensing. 15(16), 3926.
[38] World Health Organization, 2021. WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines: Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10), Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland.
[39] Stratoulias, D., Nuthammachot, N., Dejchanchaiwong, R., et al., 2024. Recent Developments in Satellite Remote Sensing for Air Pollution Surveillance in Support of Sustainable Development Goals. Remote Sensing. 16(16), 2932.
[40] Fawole, O.G., Ogunjo, S.T., Olabode, A., et al., 2026. Estimation of Surface PM2.5 Concentration from Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth Using a Constrained Observation-Based Model. Climate. 14(1), 1.
[41] Lolli, S., 2025. Urban PM2.5 Concentration Monitoring: A Review of Recent Advances in Ground-Based, Satellite, Model, and Machine Learning Integration. Urban Climate. 63, 102566.
[42] Krecl, P., Akutagawa, G., Targino, A.C., et al., 2026. Integrating Low-Cost Sensors, Fixed and Mobile Monitoring with Satellite Data to Assess the Impact of Biomass Burning on Fine, Ultrafine and Black Carbon Particle Concentrations. Atmospheric Environment. 372, 121838.
[43] Duncan, B.N., Prados, A.I., Lamsal, L.N., et al., 2014. Satellite Data of Atmospheric Pollution for U.S. Air Quality Applications: Examples of Applications, Summary of Data End-User Resources, Answers to FAQs, and Common Mistakes to Avoid. Atmospheric Environment. 94, 647–662.
[44] Gonzalez Abad, G., Souri, A.H., Bak, J., et al., 2019. Five Decades Observing Earth’s Atmospheric Trace Gases Using Ultraviolet and Visible Backscatter Solar Radiation from Space. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer. 238, 106478.
[45] Alvarez, C.I., Ulloa Vaca, C.A., Echeverria Llumipanta, N.A., 2025. Machine Learning for Urban Air Quality Prediction Using Google AlphaEarth Foundations Satellite Embeddings: A Case Study of Quito, Ecuador. Remote Sensing. 17(20), 3472.
[46] Karmoude, M., Munhungewarwa, B., Chiraira, I., et al., 2025. Machine Learning for Air Quality Prediction and Data Analysis: Review on Recent Advancements, Challenges, and Outlooks. Science of the Total Environment. 1002, 180593.
[47] Mujtaba, M.A., Munir, M.A., Ali, S., et al., 2025. Using Machine Learning for Air Quality Prediction and Sustainable Urban Planning. Sustainable Futures. 10, 100981.
[48] Bernacki, J., Scherer, R., 2025. A Comprehensive Review of Data-Driven Techniques for Air Pollution Concentration Forecasting. Sensors. 25(19), 6044.
[49] Anggraini, T.S., Irie, H., Sakti, A.D., et al., 2025. Global Air Quality Index Prediction Using Integrated Spatial Observation Data and Geographic Machine Learning. Science of Remote Sensing. 11, 100197.
[50] Imam, M., Adam, S., Dev, S., et al., 2024. Air Quality Monitoring Using Statistical Learning Models for Sustainable Environment. Intelligent Systems with Applications. 22, 200333.
[51] Alsamrai, O., Redel-Macias, M.D., Dorado, M.P., 2025. Real-Time Intelligent Monitoring of Outdoor Air Quality in an Urban Environment Using IoT and Machine Learning Algorithms. Applied Sciences. 15(16), 9088.
[52] Chang, H., Ye, T., Xie, Z., et al., 2025. Application of Environmental DNA in Aquatic Ecosystem Monitoring: Opportunities, Challenges and Prospects. Water. 17(5), 661.
[53] Torres López, S., Barrionuevo, M.d.l.A., Rodríguez-Labajos, B., 2023. A New Operational Approach for Understanding Water-Related Interactions to Achieve Water Sustainability in Growing Cities. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 25(1), 122–137.
[54] Bianconi, A., Furlan, E., Vascon, S., et al., 2026. Harnessing AI for Smarter Water Management under a Changing Climate: A Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications within EU Water Framework Directive and Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Ocean & Coastal Management. 274, 108093.
[55] Pacetti, T., 2018. Investigating Water–Land–Ecosystems Nexus for Watershed Integrated Management [PhD Thesis]. Technische Universität Braunschweig: Braunschweig, Germany.
[56] Arrighi, C., De Simone, M., Checcucci, G., et al., 2025. Development of an Eco-Hydrological Distance Index and Improved Environmental Flow Assessment by Integrating Ecological Monitoring and Hydrological Modeling. Science of the Total Environment. 969, 178961.
[57] Albuhaisi, Y.A.Y., van der Velde, Y., Pandey, S., et al., 2024. Integrating Satellite Observations and Hydrological Models to Unravel Large TROPOMI Methane Emissions in South Sudan Wetlands. Remote Sensing. 16(24), 4744.
[58] Martínez-Fernández, J., González-Zamora, A., Sánchez, N., et al., 2016. Satellite Soil Moisture for Agricultural Drought Monitoring: Assessment of the SMOS Derived Soil Water Deficit Index. Remote Sensing of Environment. 177, 277–286.
[59] Farahani, A., Moradikhaneghahi, M., Ghayoomi, M., et al., 2022. Application of Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Satellite Data in Seismic Response Assessment. Remote Sensing. 14(17), 4375.
[60] Xu, L., Abbaszadeh, P., Moradkhani, H., et al., 2020. Continental Drought Monitoring Using Satellite Soil Moisture, Data Assimilation and an Integrated Drought Index. Remote Sensing of Environment. 250, 112028.
[61] Olawade, D.B., Wada, O.Z., Ige, A.O., et al., 2024. Artificial Intelligence in Environmental Monitoring: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions. Hygiene and Environmental Health Advances. 12, 100114.
[62] Thies, B., Bendix, J., 2011. Satellite-Based Remote Sensing of Weather and Climate: Recent Achievements and Future Perspectives. Meteorological Applications. 18(3), 262–295.
[63] Hipsey, M.R., Hamilton, D.P., Hanson, P.C., et al., 2015. Predicting the Resilience and Recovery of Aquatic Systems: A Framework for Model Evolution within Environmental Observatories. Water Resources Research. 51(9), 7023–7043.
[64] Zografos, K.G., Vasilakis, G.M., Giannouli, I.M., 2000. Methodological Framework for Developing Decision Support Systems (DSS) for Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Operations. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 71(1–3), 503–521.
[65] Joyce, K.E., Belliss, S.E., Samsonov, S.V., et al., 2009. A Review of the Status of Satellite Remote Sensing and Image Processing Techniques for Mapping Natural Hazards and Disasters. Progress in Physical Geography. 33(2), 183–207.
[66] Mubeen, A., Saeed, S., 2023. GeoAI-Driven Flood Susceptibility Mapping and Exposure Assessment in Pakistan Using Multi-Source Geospatial Big Data and Deep Learning Models. Frontiers in Computational Spatial Intelligence. 1(2), 87–97.
[67] Harder, C., Sutler, J., Sawaryn, S., et al., 2015. Real Time Data Monitoring Experience Results in Enhanced Safety and Efficiency. In Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, London, UK, 17–19 March 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/173090-MS
[68] Tsatsaris, A., Kalogeropoulos, K., Stathopoulos, N., et al., 2021. Geoinformation Technologies in Support of Environmental Hazards Monitoring under Climate Change: An Extensive Review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 10(2), 94.
[69] Sarker, S., 2025. Role of Management Information Systems in Environmental Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review of Geographic and Ecological Applications. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 6(1), 95–126.
[70] Silva Villanueva, P., 2011. Learning to ADAPT: Monitoring and Evaluation Approaches in Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction—Challenges, Gaps and Ways Forward. The Institute of Development Studies and Partner Organisations, University of Sussex: Brighton, UK.
[71] Aslam, M.A., Abbas, M.S., Mustaqeem, M., et al., 2024. Comprehensive Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination in Soil–Plant Systems and Health Risks from Wastewater-Irrigated Vegetables. Colloids and Surfaces C: Environmental Aspects. 2, 100044.
[72] Khan, M.N., Aslam, M.A., Muhsinah, A.B., et al., 2023. Heavy Metals in Vegetables: Screening Health Risks of Irrigation with Wastewater in Peri-Urban Areas of Bhakkar, Pakistan. Toxics. 11(5), 460.
[73] Yazdi, M., 2024. Reliability-Centered Design and System Resilience. In Advances in Computational Mathematics for Industrial System Reliability and Maintainability. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 79–103.
[74] Zheng, H., Wang, R., Yang, Y., et al., 2019. Cross-Domain Fault Diagnosis Using Knowledge Transfer Strategy: A Review. IEEE Access. 7, 129260–129290.
[75] Baustert, P., Othoniel, B., Rugani, B., et al., 2018. Uncertainty Analysis in Integrated Environmental Models for Ecosystem Service Assessments: Frameworks, Challenges and Gaps. Ecosystem Services. 33, 110–123.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2026 Kai Mao

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.




Kai Mao