Community-Led Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Adaptation: Global Lessons and Governance Innovations

Authors

  • Yuze LI

    School of Humanities & Foreign Languages, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou 310015, China

  • Zhendong Ye

    School of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i2.12948
Received: 26 November 2025 | Revised: 5 February 2026 | Accepted: 8 February 2026 | Published Online: 24 February 2026

Abstract

Community-pioneered Nature-based Solutions (NbS) have become the main strategies in climate adaptation, although the evidence of their effectiveness and the governing conditions is still fragmented across hazards, ecosystems, and disciplines. The current review is a synthesis of the worldwide empirical research based on the concept of community-led NbS, meaning those interventions where communities have significant decision-making power and responsibility concerning the design, stewardship, sharing of benefits, and learning. On a taxonomy that differentiates between proximal ecosystem functionality and hazard modulation and distal human vulnerability reduction, and procedural, distributional, and recognition justice, we systematize the evidence-based findings according to hazard-ecosystem-intervention type (coastal storms and sea-level rise, flooding, drought and water insecurity, urban heat, and emerging compound risks) and we compare the outcomes. The results are reported to have the co-benefits of biodiversity gain, livelihood diversification, and better well-being, though they can be neutralized by elite capture, exclusion, tenure insecurity, as well as, in cities, green gentrification and displacement. The analysis of governance indicates repeating bundles related to longer-lasting and fairer results: hedge rights and tenure, community-enforceable and legitimizing representation institutions, financing institutions with longer horizons of maintenance and active adaptation, protection, and grievance, ethical supervision, and data governance. Our findings conclude that to scale community-led NbS, we need to switch the targets of areas to the target of governance quality and design of evaluation that would connect a change in the ecosystem to lived risk reduction and distributional change.

Keywords:

Nature-Based Solutions; Community-Led Governance; Climate Adaptation; Environmental Justice; Evidence Synthesis

References

[1] Tarolli, P., Liu, G., Castelli, G., et al., 2025. Nature-Based Solutions for Soil and Water Conservation in an Era of Climate Extremes: Limitations and Future Scenarios. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 100604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2025.12.004

[2] Anguelovski, I., Corbera, E., 2023. Integrating Justice in Nature-Based Solutions to Avoid Nature-Enabled Dispossession. Ambio. 52(1), 45–53.

[3] Kothari, A., Camill, P., Brown, J., 2013. Conservation as if People Also Mattered: Policy and Practice of Community-Based Conservation. Conservation and Society. 11(1), 1–15.

[4] Bradford, L.E., Ovsenek, N., Bharadwaj, L.A., 2016. Indigenizing Water Governance in Canada. In: Renzetti, S., Dupont, D. (Eds.). Water Policy and Governance in Canada. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 269–298.

[5] Ebi, K.L., Ziska, L.H., Yohe, G.W., 2016. The Shape of Impacts to Come: Lessons and Opportunities for Adaptation from Uneven Increases in Global and Regional Temperatures. Climatic Change. 139(3), 341–349.

[6] Bremer, L.L., Keeler, B., Pascua, P., et al., 2021. Nature-Based Solutions, Sustainable Development, and Equity. In: Cassin, J., Matthews, J.H., Gunn, E.L. (Eds.). Nature-Based Solutions and Water Security: An Action Agenda for the 21st Century. Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 81–105.

[7] Martin, J.G.C., Scolobig, A., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., et al., 2021. Catalyzing Innovation: Governance Enablers of Nature-Based Solutions. Sustainability. 13(4), 1971.

[8] Kiss, B., Sekulova, F., Hörschelmann, K., et al., 2022. Citizen Participation in the Governance of Nature-Based Solutions. Environmental Policy and Governance. 32(3), 247–272.

[9] Biermann, F., Abbott, K., Andresen, S., et al., 2012. Transforming Governance and Institutions for Global Sustainability: Key Insights from the Earth System Governance Project. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 4(1), 51–60.

[10] Roggema, R., 2009. Adaptation to Climate Change: A Spatial Challenge. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

[11] Augenstein, K., Bachmann, B., Egermann, M., et al., 2020. From Niche to Mainstream: The Dilemmas of Scaling Up Sustainable Alternatives. GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society. 29(3), 143–147.

[12] Akamani, K., 2021. An Ecosystem-Based Approach to Climate-Smart Agriculture with Some Considerations for Social Equity. Agronomy. 11(8), 1564.

[13] Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., et al., 2020. Understanding the Value and Limits of Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change and Other Global Challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 375(1794), 20190120.

[14] Jennings, V., San Antonio, K.M., Brown, M.J., et al., 2024. Place-Based Conservation in Coastal and Marine Ecosystems: The Importance of Engagement with Underrepresented Communities. Sustainability. 16(22), 9965.

[15] Kirk, P., Shutte, A.M., 2004. Community Leadership Development. Community Development Journal. 39(3), 234–251.

[16] Bennett, N.J., Whitty, T.S., Finkbeiner, E., et al., 2018. Environmental Stewardship: A Conceptual Review and Analytical Framework. Environmental Management. 61(4), 597–614.

[17] McLeod, L.J., Kitson, J.C., Dorner, Z., et al., 2024. Environmental Stewardship: A Systematic Scoping Review. PLoS One. 19(5), e0284255.

[18] Chausson, A., Turner, B., Seddon, D., et al., 2020. Mapping the Effectiveness of Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Change Adaptation. Global Change Biology. 26(11), 6134–6155.

[19] Piggott, J.J., Niyogi, D.K., Townsend, C.R., et al., 2015. Multiple Stressors and Stream Ecosystem Functioning: Climate Warming and Agricultural Stressors Interact to Affect Processing of Organic Matter. Journal of Applied Ecology. 52(5), 1126–1134.

[20] Niezen, R., 2009. Rediscovered Self: Indigenous Identity and Cultural Justice. McGill-Queen's University Press: Montreal, QC, Canada.

[21] Martin, A., Coolsaet, B., Corbera, E., et al., 2016. Justice and Conservation: The Need to Incorporate Recognition. Biological Conservation. 197, 254–261.

[22] Danso, E.K., Opoku, R.A., 2025. The Effect of Leadership and Adaptive Capacities on Local Government Performance: The Moderating Role of Management Innovation. Public Administration and Development. 45(4), 344–360.

[23] Heuer, M., 2012. Sustainability Governance across Time and Space: Connecting Environmental Stewardship in the Firm with the Global Community. Business Strategy and the Environment. 21(2), 86–97.

[24] Rawsthorne, M., Howard, A., Joseph, P., 2022. Normalising Community-Led, Empowered, Disaster Planning: Reshaping Norms of Power and Knowledge. Oñati Socio-Legal Series. 12(3), 506–521.

[25] Costanza-Chock, S., 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[26] Bavikatte, K.S., Bennett, T., 2015. Community Stewardship: The Foundation of Biocultural Rights. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment. 6(1), 7–29.

[27] Bennett, N.J., Satterfield, T., 2018. Environmental Governance: A Practical Framework to Guide Design, Evaluation, and Analysis. Conservation Letters. 11(6), e12600.

[28] Feiock, R.C., 2013. The Institutional Collective Action Framework. Policy Studies Journal. 41(3), 397–425.

[29] Berke, P.R., 1995. Natural-Hazard Reduction and Sustainable Development: A Global Assessment. Journal of Planning Literature. 9(4), 370–382.

[30] Thomas, D.S., Twyman, C., 2005. Equity and Justice in Climate Change Adaptation amongst Natural-Resource-Dependent Societies. Global Environmental Change. 15(2), 115–124.

[31] Biesbroek, R., Dupuis, J., Wellstead, A., 2017. Explaining through Causal Mechanisms: Resilience and Governance of Social–Ecological Systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 28, 64–70.

[32] Beck, D., Mitkiewicz, J., 2025. A Systematic Literature Review of Citizen Science in Urban Studies and Regional Urban Planning: Policy, Practical, and Research Implications. Urban Ecosystems. 28(2), 1–21.

[33] Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Martin, J., Fresolone-Caparrós, A., et al., 2023. Learning from NBS Implementation Barriers. Available from: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/19283/ (cited 25 November 2025).

[34] Bustamante, M.M.C., Silva, J.S., Scariot, A., et al., 2019. Ecological Restoration as a Strategy for Mitigating and Adapting to Climate Change: Lessons and Challenges from Brazil. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 24(7), 1249–1270.

[35] Rambau, N., Policar, S., Sharp, A.R., et al., 2024. Power, Data and Social Accountability: Defining a Community-Led Monitoring Model for Strengthened Health Service Delivery. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 27(11), e26374.

[36] Awio, G., Lawrence, S., Northcott, D., 2007. Community-Led Initiatives: Reforms for Better Accountability? Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change. 3(3), 209–226.

[37] Zscheischler, J., Westra, S., van den Hurk, B.J.J.M., et al., 2018. Future Climate Risk from Compound Events. Nature Climate Change. 8(6), 469–477.

[38] Sowińska-Świerkosz, B., García, J., 2021. A New Evaluation Framework for Nature-Based Solutions Projects Based on the Application of Performance Questions and Indicators Approach. Science of the Total Environment. 787, 147615.

[39] Suter, G., Nichols, J., Lavoie, E., et al., 2020. Systematic Review and Weight of Evidence Are Integral to Ecological and Human Health Assessments: They Need an Integrated Framework. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 16(5), 718–728.

[40] Meijer, A., ’t Hart, P., Worthy, B., 2018. Assessing Government Transparency: An Interpretive Framework. Administration & Society. 50(4), 501–526.

[41] Amarnath, G., Amarasinghe, U.A., Alahacoon, N., 2021. Disaster Risk Mapping: A Desk Review of Global Best Practices and Evidence for South Asia. Sustainability. 13(22), 12779.

[42] Sieber, I.M., Biesbroek, R., de Block, D., 2018. Mechanism-Based Explanations of Impasses in the Governance of Ecosystem-Based Adaptation. Regional Environmental Change. 18(8), 2379–2390.

[43] Atkinson, K.M., Koenka, A.C., Sanchez, C.E., et al., 2015. Reporting Standards for Literature Searches and Report Inclusion Criteria: Making Research Syntheses More Transparent and Easy to Replicate. Research Synthesis Methods. 6(1), 87–95.

[44] Cerasoli, S., Porporato, A., 2025. Mitigating the Risk of Natural Climate Solutions Failure through Diversified Portfolios. One Earth. 8(11), 101421.

[45] Smith, K., Fearnley, C.J., Dixon, D., et al., 2023. Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster. Routledge: London, UK.

[46] King, C., Lewis, R., Clifton, J., 2024. Unlocking the Potential of Seagrass Ecosystems Through Locally-Led Valuation Approaches. SSRN. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4714562 (cited 25 November 2025).

[47] Hilmi, N., Crisóstomo, M., Bermudo, A., et al., 2024. Resilience of Small Islands: Unveiling Nature-Based Solutions for Sustainable Futures. In: Arora, A., Belaïd, F., Lechtenberg-Kasten, S. (Eds.). Climate-Resilient Cities: Priorities for the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 257–280.

[48] Dizon, T., 2025. Assessing Community-Based Mangrove Conservation: Lessons and Insights from Local Stakeholders in the Municipality of San Enrique, Negros Occidental, Philippines [Master’s Thesis]. Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden.

[49] Marino, M., Baptist, M.J., Alkharoubi, A.I.K., et al., 2025. Nature-Based Solutions as Building Blocks for Coastal Flood Risk Reduction: A Model-Based Ecosystem Service Assessment. Scientific Reports. 15(1), 12070.

[50] Cheshmehzangi, A., 2025. Resourceful Urbanism: Designing Regenerative Cities through Adaptive Reuse and Circular Innovation. Springer: Singapore.

[51] Symington, M.M., 2015. Community-Based Conservation and Development: The Case of the Mori Kunda Community Forest in Tujereng, the Gambia [Master’s Thesis]. Saint Mary’s University: Halifax, NS, Canada.

[52] Marfai, M.A., Sekaranom, A.B., Ward, P., 2015. Community Responses and Adaptation Strategies toward Flood Hazard in Jakarta, Indonesia. Natural Hazards. 75(2), 1127–1144.

[53] Schröder, N.J.S., 2018. The Lens of Polycentricity: Identifying Polycentric Governance Systems Illustrated through Examples from the Field of Water Governance. Environmental Policy and Governance. 28(4), 236–251.

[54] Gorain, S., Malakar, A., Dutta, S., 2025. Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) for Restoration and Management of Dryland Ecosystems. In: Khan, Y.D.I., Purohit, S., Jibrin, J.M., et al. (Eds.). Land Restoration through Ecosystem-Based Approach: Contexts from Drylands of the Global South. Springer: Singapore. pp. 33–54.

[55] Dickson, S., Schuster-Wallace, C., Newton, J., 2016. Water Security Assessment Indicators: The Rural Context. Water Resources Management. 30(5), 1567–1604.

[56] Infield, M., Mugisha, A., 2013. Culture, Values and Conservation: A Review of Perspectives, Policies and Practices. Fauna & Flora International: Cambridge, UK.

[57] Arnold, C.A., Resilience Justice Project Researchers, 2020. Resilience Justice and Community-Based Green and Blue Infrastructure. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review. 45, 665.

[58] Pathak, A., Glick, P., Hansen, L.J., et al., 2022. Incorporating Nature-Based Solutions in Community Climate Adaptation Planning. National Wildlife Federation: Reston, VA, USA.

[59] Mohamed Abdelrahman Mohamed, L., 2024. Participatory Approaches in Nature-Based Solution Planning: A Lesson-Learned Approach [Master’s Thesis]. Politecnico di Torino: Torino, Italy.

[60] Nilsson, C., Aradottir, A.L., Hagen, D., et al., 2016. Evaluating the Process of Ecological Restoration. Ecology and Society. 21(1), 41.

[61] Lowe, J.S., Thaden, E., 2016. Deepening Stewardship: Resident Engagement in Community Land Trusts. Urban Geography. 37(4), 611–628.

[62] Agrawal, A., Agrawal, A., 2008. The Role of Local Institutions in Adaptation to Climate Change. World Bank: Washington, DC, USA.

[63] Friberg, J., 2022. When the Poor Lose Even More: A Framework of Normalized Measures for Disaster Impacts and Household Economic Vulnerability. World Development Sustainability. 1, 100022.

[64] Zheng, Y., Meng, H., Xie, X., et al., 2017. Dynamics of Climate Change, Drought and Migration: A Mixed Method Research in Ningxia. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies. 5(3), 1750021.

[65] Owen, G., 2020. What Makes Climate Change Adaptation Effective? A Systematic Review of the Literature. Global Environmental Change. 62, 102071.

[66] Sudmeier-Rieux, K., Arce-Mojica, T., Boehmer, H.J., et al., 2021. Scientific Evidence for Ecosystem-Based Disaster Risk Reduction. Nature Sustainability. 4(9), 803–810.

[67] Naumann, S., Burgos Cuevas, N., Davies, C., et al., 2023. Harnessing the Power of Collaboration for Nature-Based Solutions: New Ideas and Insights for Local Decision-Makers. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, Luxembourg. pp. 6–25.

[68] Morrison, K., 2025. Nature-Based Climate Change Solutions through Empowering Community-Led Adaptation Using Local Ecological Knowledge: South Pacific Examples of Collaborative Transformation of Social-Ecological Systems. In: Nagy, G.J., Ayal, D.Y. (Eds.). Handbook of Nature-Based Solutions to Mitigation and Adaptation to Climate Change. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 1325–1346.

[69] Castelo, S., Amado, M., Ferreira, F., 2023. Challenges and Opportunities in the Use of Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Adaptation. Sustainability. 15(9), 7243.

[70] Sack, H., Gajjar, S.P., Reid, H., et al., 2024. Community-Led Bioeconomy Development and Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) in the Global South: Recommendations to the G20. Revista Tempo do Mundo. 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38116/rtm34art13

[71] Newell, R., Dale, A., Roseland, M., 2018. Climate Action Co-Benefits and Integrated Community Planning: Uncovering the Synergies and Trade-Offs. International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses. 10(4), 1.

[72] Knight, A., 2025. Community-Led Design: Building Frameworks for Equity and Justice. In: Jiang, J., Tham, J.C.K. (Eds.). Designing for Social Justice: Community-Engaged Approaches in Technical and Professional Communication. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 17–33.

[73] Santarlacci, A.d.S., Angelo, H., Souza, Á.N.d., et al., 2024. Benefit Sharing Governance Framework: Pathways for Financial Benefit Sharing in Traditional Communities. Sustainability. 16(7), 2650.

[74] Hirsch, P.D., Adams, W.M., Brosius, J.P., et al., 2011. Acknowledging Conservation Trade-Offs and Embracing Complexity. Conservation Biology. 25(2), 259–264.

[75] Dell’Ovo, M., Datola, G., Maiullari, D., et al., 2025. Green Gentrification: A Literature Review of Trends, Challenges, and Research Opportunities. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Garau, C., et al. (Eds.). Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA 2025 Workshops. Springer: Cham, Switzerland.

[76] Meyer, J.R., Gudelj, I., Beardmore, R., 2015. Biophysical Mechanisms That Maintain Biodiversity through Trade-Offs. Nature Communications. 6(1), 6278.

[77] Drescher, M., Perera, A.H., Johnson, C.J., et al., 2013. Toward Rigorous Use of Expert Knowledge in Ecological Research. Ecosphere. 4(7), 1–26.

[78] Starmans, A., 2023. The Co-Management Model in the Integrated Mangrove-Aquaculture Farming in Ca Mau, the Vietnamese Mekong Delta [Master’s Thesis]. Utrecht University: Utrecht, The Netherlands.

[79] Calfucura, E., 2018. Governance, Land and Distribution: A Discussion on the Political Economy of Community-Based Conservation. Ecological Economics. 145, 18–26.

[80] Turner, B., Devisscher, T., Chabaneix, N., et al., 2022. The Role of Nature-Based Solutions in Supporting Social-Ecological Resilience for Climate Change Adaptation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 47(1), 123–148.

[81] Sibanda, N., 2024. Eco-Social Contracting for Environmental Justice: Assessing the Effectiveness of Community-Based Natural Resource Management. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD): Geneva, Switzerland.

[82] Carlsson, L., Berkes, F., 2005. Co-Management: Concepts and Methodological Implications. Journal of Environmental Management. 75(1), 65–76.

[83] Andrew, 2021. The Role of Institution Regime in Facilitating Cooperation and Resolving Conflict on Transboundary Water Resources Management [Master’s Thesis]. Seoul National University: Seoul, South Korea.

[84] Healey, P., 2017. Transforming Governance: Challenges of Institutional Adaptation and a New Politics of Space. In: Hillier, J., Metzger, J. (Eds.). Connections: Exploring Contemporary Planning Theory and Practice with Patsy Healey. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 357–374.

[85] Anguelovski, I., Carmin, J., 2011. Something Borrowed, Everything New: Innovation and Institutionalization in Urban Climate Governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 3(3), 169–175.

[86] Ballesteros, A., Nakhooda, S., Werksman, J., et al., 2010. Power, Responsibility, and Accountability: Rethinking the Legitimacy of Institutions for Climate Finance. Climate Law. 1, 261–312.

[87] Chausson, A., zu Ermgassen, S., Bull, J.W., et al., 2025. Balancing Bankability and Integrity: Fostering Investment-Ready Nature-Based Solutions. World Wide Fund: Woking, UK.

[88] Lauermann, J., Mallak, K., 2023. Elite Capture and Urban Geography: Analyzing Geographies of Privilege. Progress in Human Geography. 47(5), 645–663.

[89] Shi, L., Chu, E., Anguelovski, I., et al., 2016. Roadmap toward Justice in Urban Climate Adaptation Research. Nature Climate Change. 6(2), 131–137.

[90] Armitage, D., 2005. Adaptive Capacity and Community-Based Natural Resource Management. Environmental Management. 35(6), 703–715.

[91] Anderson, C., Fox, J., Gaventa, J., 2020. How Do Donor-Led Empowerment and Accountability Activities Take Scale into Account? Evidence from DFID Programmes in Contexts of Fragility, Conflict and Violence. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12413/15211 (cited 20 November 2025).

[92] Hicks, J., 2023. The Future of Data Ownership: An Uncommon Research Agenda. The Sociological Review. 71(3), 544–560.

[93] Seddon, N., Smith, A., Smith, P., et al., 2021. Getting the Message Right on Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change. Global Change Biology. 27(8), 1518–1546.

[94] Dushkova, D., Ivlieva, O., 2024. Empowering Communities to Act for a Change: A Review of Community Empowerment Programs toward Sustainability and Resilience. Sustainability. 16(19), 8700.

[95] Creutzig, F., Goetzke, F., Ramakrishnan, A., et al., 2023. Designing a Virtuous Cycle: Quality of Governance, Effective Climate Change Mitigation, and Just Outcomes Support Each Other. Global Environmental Change. 82, 102726.

[96] Mechler, R., 2016. Reviewing Estimates of the Economic Efficiency of Disaster Risk Management: Opportunities and Limitations of Using Risk-Based Cost–Benefit Analysis. Natural Hazards. 81(3), 2121–2147.

[97] Alowais, A.A., Suliman, A., 2025. When Help Hurts: Moral Disengagement and the Myth of the Supportive Migrant Network. Social Sciences. 14(6), 386.

[98] Donatti, C.I., Harvey, C.A., Hole, D., et al., 2020. Indicators to Measure the Climate Change Adaptation Outcomes of Ecosystem-Based Adaptation. Climatic Change. 158(3), 413–433.

[99] Hodge, I., Adams, W.M., 2016. Short-Term Projects versus Adaptive Governance: Conflicting Demands in the Management of Ecological Restoration. Land. 5(4), 39.

[100] Morri, E., Santolini, R., 2021. Ecosystem Services Valuation for Sustainable Land Use Management by Nature-Based Solutions in Common Agricultural Policy Actions: A Case Study on the Foglia River Basin (Marche Region, Italy). Land. 11(1), 57.

[101] Maxwell, S.K., Meliker, J.R., Goovaerts, P., 2010. Use of Land Surface Remotely Sensed Satellite and Airborne Data for Environmental Exposure Assessment in Cancer Research. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 20(2), 176–185.

[102] Nadernezhad, Z., 2025. Assessing Urban Social Justice and Equality in Turin through Nature-Based Solutions: Insights from the GREEN-INC Project [Master’s Thesis]. Politecnico di Torino: Torino, Italy.

[103] Emery, M., Flora, C., 2020. Spiraling-Up: Mapping Community Transformation with Community Capitals Framework. In: Walzer, N., Phillips, R., Blair, R. (Eds.). 50 Years of Community Development Vol I: A History of its Evolution and Application in North America. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 163–179.

[104] Dolšak, N., Prakash, A., 2018. The Politics of Climate Change Adaptation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 43(1), 317–341.

[105] Woime, A.W., Dilebo, W.A., 2025. Innovation for Climate Change Adaptation: A Meta-Analysis. Authorea. in Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174949047.78157526/v1

[106] Chong, J., 2014. Ecosystem-Based Approaches to Climate Change Adaptation: Progress and Challenges. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 14(4), 391–405.

Downloads

How to Cite

LI, Y., & Ye, Z. (2026). Community-Led Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Adaptation: Global Lessons and Governance Innovations. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 8(2), 247–277. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i2.12948

Issue

Article Type

Review