
A Systematic Review of the Space Industry’s Environmental Burden within Earth System Limits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i4.13010Abstract
The environmental impacts of the modern space industry have expanded rapidly with the rise of commercial launch services, satellite mega constellations, and reusable spacecraft. Despite growing global interest, these impacts remain poorly understood and largely unregulated. This paper systematically reviews the environmental footprint of contemporary space activities, synthesizing evidence across five domains: rocket emissions, orbital debris, atmospheric reentry, light pollution, and material resource use. Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology, over 80 peer-reviewed studies and international agency reports were analyzed. Findings reveal significant, yet underregulated, impacts on atmospheric chemistry, orbital sustainability, and terrestrial resources. While mitigation efforts, such as green propellants, debris removal technologies, and sustainability rating systems, are emerging, their adoption remains fragmented and largely voluntary. The review identifies persistent research and policy gaps, including the lack of transparent life cycle assessments and robust global standards. It further highlights the accelerating pace of space commercialization and the increasing involvement of private actors, which intensify governance challenges and complicate accountability mechanisms across jurisdictions. Additionally, disparities in technological capacity between nations raise concerns about unequal environmental burdens and access to orbital resources. It calls for the integration of space activities into comprehensive environmental governance frameworks and the advancement of interdisciplinary, systemic solutions to ensure the long-term sustainability of both orbital and terrestrial environments.
Keywords:
Space Industry; Satellite Constellations; Rocket Emissions; Space Debris; Orbital Pollution; Environmental Impact; Atmospheric ChemistryReferences
[1] Wilkinson, R., Mleczko, M.M., Brewin, R.J.W., et al., 2024. Environmental impacts of earth observation data in the constellation and cloud computing era. Science of The Total Environment. 909, 168584.
[2] MacDonald, F., 2007. Anti-Astropolitik—Outer space and the orbit of geography. Progress in Human Geography. 31(5), 592–615.
[3] Durrieu, S., Nelson, R.F., 2013. Earth observation from space—The issue of environmental sustainability. Space Policy. 29(4), 238–250.
[4] Petrov, M., Nikolaeva, Z., Dimitrov, A., 2023. The impact of anthropogenic activity on the global environment. Science. Business. Society. 8(2), 59–64.
[5] Chipperfield, M.P., Hossaini, R., Montzka, S.A., et al., 2020. Renewed and emerging concerns over the production and emission of ozone-depleting substances. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 1(5), 251–263.
[6] Wang, J., Zu, L., Zhang, S., et al., 2024. Recent advances and implications for aviation emission inventory compilation methods. Sustainability. 16(19), 8507.
[7] Adilov, N., Alexander, P.J., Cunningham, B.M., 2018. An economic “Kessler Syndrome”: A dynamic model of earth orbit debris. Economics Letters. 166, 79–82.
[8] Bahman, N., Naser, N., 2025. Digital planetary burden index: A framework for situating digital infrastructure within planetary boundaries. Decision Making and Analysis. 3(1), 57–71.
[9] Kessler, D.J., Johnson, N.L., Liou, J.-C., et al., 2010. The Kessler syndrome: Implications to future space operations. Advances in the Astronautical Sciences. 137(8), 9–11.
[10] Dallas, J.A., Raval, S., Alvarez Gaitan, J.P., et al., 2020. The environmental impact of emissions from space launches: A comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 255, 120209.
[11] Maury, T., Loubet, P., Trisolin, M., et al., 2019. Assessing the impact of space debris on orbital resource in life cycle assessment: A proposed method and case study. Science of the Total Environment. 667, 780–791.
[12] Wilson, A.R., Vasile, M., Maddock, C., et al., 2023. Implementing life cycle sustainability assessment for improved space mission design. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 19(4), 1002–1022.
[13] Bahman, N., Abahussain, A., Khan, E., et al., 2025. Integrated environmental assessment of aviation activities in the Kingdom of Bahrain. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration. 9(2), 239–247.
[14] Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J.M., et al., 2014. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Systematic Reviews. 18(3), 172–181.
[15] McQuaid, K., 2007. Sputnik reconsidered: Image and reality in the early space age. Canadian Review of American Studies. 37(3), 371–401.
[16] Leloglu, U., Kocaoglan, E., 2008. Establishing space industry in developing countries: Opportunities and difficulties. Advances in Space Research. 42(11), 1879–1886.
[17] Ross, M., Toohey, D., Peinemann, M., et al., 2009. Limits on the space launch market related to stratospheric ozone depletion. Astropolitics. 7(1), 50–82.
[18] Voigt, A., Albern, N., Ceppi, P., et al., 2021. Clouds, radiation, and atmospheric circulation in the present-day climate and under climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 12(2), e694.
[19] UCS, 2023. UCS Satellite Database. Available from: https://www.ucs.org/resources/satellite-database (cited 2 December 2025).
[20] ESA, 2025. Watch: MetOp-SG-A1 and Sentinel-5 launch. Available from: https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Meteorological_missions/MetOp_Second_Generation/Watch_MetOp-SG-A1_and_Sentinel-5_launch (cited 2 December 2025).
[21] Ferreira, J.P., Huang, Z., Nomura, K.-i., et al., 2024. Potential ozone depletion from satellite demise during atmospheric reentry in the era of mega-constellations. Geophysical Research Letters. 51(11), e2024GL109280.
[22] Ahmed, A.S., Ali, A., Gorgun, E., et al., 2025. Microalgae to biofuel: Cutting-edge harvesting and extraction methods for sustainable energy solution. Energy Science & Engineering. 13(7), 3525–3529.
[23] Caiardi, F., Azzaro-Pantel, C., Le-Boulch, D., 2024. Exploring carbon neutrality scenarios through the life cycle assessment lens: A review of literature and methodological challenges. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 1–24.
[24] Franklin, R.S., Delmelle, E.C., Andris, C., et al., 2023. Making space in geographical analysis. Geographical Analysis. 55(2), 325–341.
[25] Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., et al., 2009. Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society. 14(2), 32.
[26] Beery, J., 2016. Unearthing global natures: Outer space and scalar politics. Political Geography. 55, 92–101.
[27] Ross, M., Mills, M., Toohey, D., 2010. Potential climate impact of black carbon emitted by rockets. Geophysical Research Letters. 37(24).
[28] Kelesidis, G.A., Neubauer, D., Fan, L.-S., et al., 2022. Enhanced light absorption and radiative forcing by black carbon agglomerates. Environmental Science & Technology. 56(12), 8610–8618.
[29] Ross, M.N., Sheaffer, P.M., 2014. Radiative forcing caused by rocket engine emissions. Earth's Future. 2(4), 177–196.
[30] Sirieys, E., Gentgen, C., Jain, A., et al., 2022. Space sustainability isn’t just about space debris: On the atmospheric impact of space launches. MIT Science Policy Review. 3(29), 143–151.
[31] Virgili, B.B., Dolado, J.C., Lewis, H.G., et al., 2016. Risk to space sustainability from large constellations of satellites. Acta Astronautica. 126, 154–162.
[32] Zhao, Y., 2004. The 1972 liability convention: Time for revision? Space Policy. 20(2), 117–122.
[33] Kehrer, T., 2019. Closing the liability loophole: The liability convention and the future of conflict in space. Chicago Journal of International Law. 20, 5.
[34] Song, Y., Cao, Y., Hou, Y., et al., 2023. A channel perceiving-based handover management in space–ground integrated information network. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management. 21(1), 882–896.
[35] EPA, 2020. TEMPO: A New Era of Air Quality Monitoring from Space. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sciencematters/tempo-new-era-air-quality-monitoring-space (cited 2 December 2025).
[36] Janches, D., Bruzzone, J.S., Pokorný, P., et al., 2020. A comparative modeling study of the seasonal, temporal, and spatial distribution of meteoroids in the upper atmospheres of Venus, Earth, and Mars. The Planetary Science Journal. 1(3), 59.
[37] Peeters, E., Bauschlicher Jr, C.W., Allamandola, L.J., et al., 2017. The PAH emission characteristics of the reflection nebula NGC 2023. The Astrophysical Journal. 836(2), 198.
[38] Lawrence, A., Rawls, M.L., Jah, M., et al., 2022. The case for space environmentalism. Nature Astronomy. 6(4), 428–435.
[39] Tregloan-Reed, J., Otarola, A., Ortiz, E., et al., 2020. First observations and magnitude measurement of Starlink’s Darksat. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 637, L1.
[40] Chapman, B., 2018. The geopolitics of rare earth elements: Emerging challenge for US national security and economics. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics. 6(2), 50–91.
[41] Kasay, G.M., Bolarinwa, A.T., Aromolaran, O.K., et al., 2022. Rare earth element deposits and their prospects in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration. 39(2), 625–642.
[42] Lordos, G.C., Hoffman, J.A., de Weck, O.L., 2023. Lifetime embodied energy: A theory of value for the new space economy. In Handbook of Space Resources. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 1053–1107.
[43] Rockström, J., Donges, J.F., Fetzer, I., et al., 2024. Planetary boundaries guide humanity’s future on Earth. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 5(11), 773–788.
[44] Nikitaeva, D., Dale Thomas, L., 2023. Propulsion alternatives for Mars transportation architectures. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 60(2), 520–532.
[45] de Batz de Trenquelléon, B., Rosset, L., d'Ollone, J.V., et al., 2025. The New Titan planetary climate model. I. Seasonal variations of the thermal structure and circulation in the stratosphere. The Planetary Science Journal. 6(4), 78.
[46] Elsaesser, A., Burr, D.J., Mabey, P., et al., 2023. Future space experiment platforms for astrobiology and astrochemistry research. npj Microgravity. 9(1), 43.
[47] Santomartino, R., Averesch, N.J.H., Bhuiyan, M., et al., 2023. Toward sustainable space exploration: A roadmap for harnessing the power of microorganisms. Nature Communications. 14(1), 1391.
[48] Buchs, R., Bernauer, T., 2023. Market-based instruments to incentivize more sustainable practices in outer space. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 60, 101247.
[49] Lavers, J.L., Sharp, P.B., Stuckenbrock, S., et al., 2020. Entrapment in plastic debris endangers hermit crabs. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 387, 121703.
[50] Luna-Jorquera, G., Thiel, M., Portflitt-Toro, M., et al., 2019. Marine protected areas invaded by floating anthropogenic litter: An example from the South Pacific. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 29, 245–259.
[51] Waswa, P.M., Elliot, M., Hoffman, J.A., 2013. Spacecraft design-for-demise implementation strategy & decision-making methodology for low earth orbit missions. Advances in Space Research. 51(9), 1627–1637.
[52] Martinez, P., 2021. The UN COPUOS guidelines for the long-term sustainability of outer space activities. Journal of Space Safety Engineering. 8(1), 98–107.
[53] Freeland, S., Ireland-Piper, D., 2022. Space law, human rights and corporate accountability. UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs. 26, 1.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2026 Nahed Bahman, Naser Naser, Mohammad Shadab Hussain

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.




Nahed Bahman