From Mining to Mobility: Evaluating Environmental Challenges across the Critical Materials Supply Chain for New Energy Vehicles

Authors

  • Wei Hu

    School of Automotive Engineering, Hunan Financial & Industrial Vocational-Technical College, Hengyang 421002, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i3.13104
Received: 15 January 2026 | Revised: 5 March 2026 | Accepted: 8 March 2026 | Published Online: 13 March 2026

Abstract

This review sums up existing information on the environmental issues of critical materials in new energy vehicles (NEVs) on a combined mining to mobility approach. With the increase in the rate of NEV adoption, the environmental cost of operating vehicles will decline as the burden moves to upstream and downstream material life-cycle activities, such as extraction, beneficiation, refining, component manufacturing, use-phase performance, and end-of-life management. We focus on key material categories that provide electrified mobility, such as battery-related material (e.g., Li, Ni, Co, Mn, graphite), high-performance motor-related material (e.g., rare earth elements), conductive and lightweighting material (e.g., Cu and Al). In the supply chain, the prevailing environmental forces consist of high energy requirements and related greenhouse gas emissions, excessive water consumption and water pollution risks, toxicity and human health issues pertaining to chemical inputs and metal discharges, land-use shift, and ecosystem and biodiversity effects. The review notes that there is high regional heterogeneity, which is fueled by ore grades, processing technologies, electricity mixes, and governance capacity, and that when measurements are narrowed to carbon measures, there is a risk of shifting the problem across geographies and categories of impacts. Mitigation pathways are analyzed, such as cleaner extraction and refining, material substitution and dematerialization, battery design, longevity and recyclability, and also the strategies of the circular economy, such as recycling and second-life use. Lastly, we establish research gaps in important areas of supply-chain data disclosure, multi-impact life-cycle assessment approaches, and integrated environmental-social analysis to enable sound policy formulation that can be used to achieve sustainable electrified mobility.

Keywords:

Critical Materials; New Energy Vehicles; Life CycleAssessment; Circular Economy; Supply Chain Sustainability

References

[1] Erickson, L.E., 2017. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving air quality: Two global challenges. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy. 36(4), 982–988.

[2] Wang, M.Q., Huo, H., 2009. Transportation: Meeting the dual challenges of achieving energy security and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Frontiers of Energy and Power Engineering in China. 3(2), 212–225.

[3] Rajaeifar, M.A., Ghadimi, P., Raugei, M., et al., 2022. Challenges and recent developments in supply and value chains of electric vehicle batteries: A sustainability perspective. Conservation and Recycling. 180, 106144.

[4] Akhmat, G., Zaman, K., Shukui, T., et al., 2014. The challenges of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution through energy sources: Evidence from a panel of developed countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 21(12), 7425–7435.

[5] Erickson, L.E., Brase, G., 2020. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Improving Air Quality: Two Interrelated Global Challenges. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.

[6] Shafique, M., Luo, X., 2022. Environmental life cycle assessment of battery electric vehicles from the current and future energy mix perspective. Journal of Environmental Management. 303, 114050.

[7] Faria, R., Marques, P., Moura, P., et al., 2013. Impact of the electricity mix and use profile in the life-cycle assessment of electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 24, 271–287.

[8] Moss, R., Tzimas, E., Kara, H., et al., 2011. Critical Metals in Strategic Energy Technologies: Assessing rare Metals as Supply-Chain Bottlenecks in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

[9] Blagoeva, D., Alves Dias, P., Marmier, A., et al., 2016. Assessment of Potential Bottlenecks along the Materials Supply Chain for the Future Deployment of Low-Carbon Energy and Transport Technologies in the EU: Wind Power, Photovoltaic and Electric Vehicles Technologies, Time Frame: 2015–2030. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

[10] Liang, Y., Kleijn, R., Tukker, A., et al., 2022. Material requirements for low-carbon energy technologies: A quantitative review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 161, 112334.

[11] Wang, N., Tang, G., 2022. A review on environmental efficiency evaluation of new energy vehicles using life cycle analysis. Sustainability. 14(6), 3371.

[12] Yang, Z., Huang, H., Lin, F., 2022. Sustainable electric vehicle batteries for a sustainable world: Perspectives on battery cathodes, environment, supply chain, manufacturing, life cycle, and policy. Advanced Energy Materials. 12(26), 2200383.

[13] Das, P.K., Bhat, M.Y., Sajith, S., 2024. Life cycle assessment of electric vehicles: A systematic review of literature. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 31(1), 73–89.

[14] Omer, A.M., 2009. Energy use and environmental impacts: A general review. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy. 1(5), 053101.

[15] Dugoua, E., Noailly, J., 2025. Critical Minerals and the Clean Energy Transition: The Role of Innovation across the Supply Chain. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics: London, UK.

[16] Güz, Ş., Murakami, S., 2025. A systematic literature review of simulation models for flows, markets, and sustainability of critical energy transition minerals. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances. 27, 200271.

[17] Jones, B., Nguyen-Tien, V., Elliott, R.J., 2023. The electric vehicle revolution: Critical material supply chains, trade and development. The World Economy. 46(1), 2–26.

[18] Andrade-Arias, A.S., Kabir, G., Khan, S.A., 2025. From mine to motor: A literature review on environmental assessments of electric vehicle battery supply chains. Cambridge Prisms: Energy Transitions. 1, e9.

[19] Kendall, M., 2018. Fuel cell development for New Energy Vehicles (NEVs) and clean air in China. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International. 28(2), 113–120.

[20] Ortego, A., Valero, A., Valero, A., et al., 2018. Vehicles and critical raw materials: A sustainability assessment using thermodynamic rarity. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 22(5), 1005–1015.

[21] Sun, X., Wang, F., Wang, P., et al., 2025. Risk analysis and eco-design strategies for critical mineral resources in China's vehicle electrification process. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 216, 108156.

[22] Cullbrand, K., Magnusson, O., 2011. Report No. 2012:13: The Use of Potentially Critical Materials in Passenger Cars. Chalmers University of Technology: Gothenburg, Sweden.

[23] Gielen, D., Lyons, M., 2022. Critical Materials for the Energy Transition: Rare Earth Elements. International Renewable Energy Agency: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. pp. 1–48.

[24] Dent, P.C., 2012. Rare earth elements and permanent magnets. Journal of Applied Physics. 111(7), 07A721.

[25] Leader, A., Gaustad, G., 2019. Critical material applications and intensities in clean energy technologies. Clean Technologies. 1(1), 164–184.

[26] Klimenko, V.V., Ratner, S.V., Tereshin, A.G., 2021. Constraints imposed by key-material resources on renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 144, 111011.

[27] He, P., Pan, Y., Peng, Y., et al., 2025. Exploring the Development Potential of Critical Metals in New Energy Vehicles: Evidence from Megacity Shanghai, China. Sustainability. 17(18), 8388.

[28] Czerwinski, F., 2022. Critical minerals for zero-emission transportation. Materials. 15(16), 5539.

[29] Leader, A., Gaustad, G., Babbitt, C., 2019. The effect of critical material prices on the competitiveness of clean energy technologies. Materials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy. 8(2), 8.

[30] Deng, J., Bae, C., Denlinger, A., et al., 2020. Electric vehicles batteries: Requirements and challenges. Joule. 4(3), 511–515.

[31] Gemechu, E.D., Sonnemann, G., Young, S.B., 2017. Geopolitical-related supply risk assessment as a complement to environmental impact assessment: The case of electric vehicles. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 22(1), 31–39.

[32] Pěnkavová, M., 2023. The Impacts of Battery Electric Vehicles Production on Material Use [Master's Thesis]. Charles University: Prague, Czech Republic.

[33] Mikayilov, E., 2021. The Environmental Impacts of the World Energy Transition: The Role of Raw Materials Mining [Master's Thesis]. Politecnico di Torino: Turin, Italy.

[34] Chopra, J., Rangarajan, V., Rathnasamy, S., et al., 2024. Life cycle assessment as a key decision tool for emerging pretreatment technologies of biomass-to-biofuel: Unveiling challenges, advances, and future potential. BioEnergy Research. 17(2), 857–876.

[35] Grosso, M., Rigamonti, L., 2025. Waste Flows Generated by the Energy Transition: Regulatory Framework, Recovery Technologies and Plant Infrastructures. Springer: Cham, Switzerland.

[36] Delucchi, M., Yang, C., Burke, A.F., et al., 2014. An assessment of electric vehicles: Technology, infrastructure requirements, greenhouse-gas emissions, petroleum use, material use, lifetime cost, consumer acceptance and policy initiatives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 372(2006), 20120325.

[37] Hertwich, E.G., Ali, S., Ciacci, L., et al., 2019. Material efficiency strategies to reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with buildings, vehicles, and electronics—A review. Environmental Research Letters. 14(4), 043004.

[38] Zhu, J., Mathews, I., Ren, D., et al., 2021. End-of-life or second-life options for retired electric vehicle batteries. Cell Reports Physical Science. 2(8), 100537.

[39] Azizighalehsari, S., Venugopal, P., Pratap Singh, D., et al., 2024. Empowering Electric Vehicles Batteries: A Comprehensive Look at the Application and Challenges of Second-Life Batteries. Batteries. 10(5), 161.

[40] Lin, J., Silfvenius, C., 2024. Some Critical Thinking on EV Battery Reliability: From enhancement to optimization—Comprehensive perspectives, lifecycle innovation, system cognation, and strategic insights. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2401.04998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.04998

[41] Lehtimäki, H., Karhu, M., Kotilainen, J.M., et al., 2024. Sustainability of the use of critical raw materials in electric vehicle batteries: A transdisciplinary review. Environmental Challenges. 16, 100966.

[42] Babbitt, C.W., Althaf, S., Cruz Rios, F., et al., 2021. The role of design in circular economy solutions for critical materials. One Earth. 4(3), 353–362.

[43] Lausselet, C., Brattebø, H., 2021. Environmental co-benefits and trade-offs of climate mitigation strategies applied to net-zero-emission neighbourhoods. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 26(11), 2263–2277.

[44] Ma, S., Sharaai, A.H., He, Z., et al., 2025. Life Cycle Cost and Environmental Performance of Electric and Gasoline Vehicles in Cold Climate and Coal-Dependent Regions: A Case Study of Heilongjiang Province, China. Sustainability. 17(10), 4554.

[45] Amitabh, K., Majumder, S., De K., et al., 2024. Electric Vehicle Production: A Comprehensive study of Environmental and Water Resource Impacts. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Silchar Subsection Conference (SILCON 2024), Agartala, India, 15–17 November 2024; pp. 1–5.

[46] Sun, H., Meng, Z., Chen, L., et al., 2024. Water Footprint Flow and Vulnerability of China’s Provincial Energy Sector. Water Economics and Policy. 10(2), 2450002.

[47] Esiri, A.E., Kwakye, J.M., Ekechukwu, D.E., et al., 2023. Assessing the environmental footprint of the electric vehicle supply chain. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews. 8(2), 219–227.

[48] de Haes, S., Lucas, P., 2024. Environmental impacts of extraction and processing of raw materials for the energy transition. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency: The Hague, The Netherlands.

[49] Zhang, Z., Qu, J., Zeng, J., 2008. A quantitative comparison and analysis on the assessment indicators of greenhouse gases emission. Journal of Geographical Sciences. 18(4), 387–399.

[50] Bicer, Y., Dincer, I., 2018. Life cycle environmental impact assessments and comparisons of alternative fuels for clean vehicles. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 132, 141–157.

[51] Yuan, X., Liu, X., Zuo, J., 2015. The development of new energy vehicles for a sustainable future: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 42, 298–305.

[52] Liu, Z., Hao, H., Cheng, X., et al., 2018. Critical issues of energy efficient and new energy vehicles development in China. Energy Policy. 115, 92–97.

[53] Huang, P., Li, P., 2020. Politics of urban energy transitions: New energy vehicle (NEV) development in Shenzhen, China. Environmental Politics. 29(4), 524–545.

[54] Nilsson, M., Nykvist, B., 2016. Governing the electric vehicle transition—Near term interventions to support a green energy economy. Applied Energy. 179, 1360–1371.

[55] Hirlekar, O., Kolte, A., Vasa, L., 2025. Transition in the mining industry with green energy: Economic dynamics in mining demand. Resources Policy. 100, 105409.

[56] Guliyeva, N.R., 2024. Sustainable mining for clean tech materials: Environmental and economic impacts. Scientific Bulletin. 3, 211–212.

[57] Wu, Y., Li, X., Zhang, C., et al., 2024. The impact of government subsidies on technological innovation of new energy vehicle enterprises: From the perspective of industry chain. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 26(10), 25589–25607.

[58] Gaustad, G., Krystofik, M., Bustamante, M., et al., 2018. Circular economy strategies for mitigating critical material supply issues. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 135, 24–33.

[59] Hagelüken, C., Goldmann, D., 2022. Recycling and circular economy—Towards a closed loop for metals in emerging clean technologies. Mineral Economics. 35(3–4), 539–562.

[60] Pinegar, H., Smith, Y.R., 2019. Recycling of end-of-life lithium ion batteries, Part I: Commercial processes. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy. 5(3), 402–416.

[61] Terwilliger, J., Christie, I., 2025. Cities and governance for net-zero: Assessing procedures and tools for innovative design of urban climate governance in Europe. Sustainability. 17(6), 2698.

[62] Kuipers, D., 2021. Modes of Governance to Accelerate the Transition towards a Circular Construction Sector: A Critical Assessment [Master's Thesis]. Utrecht University: Utrecht, The Netherlands.

[63] Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., et al., 2004. Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment International. 30(5), 701–720.

[64] Liu, Q., Li, J., Gao, Q., et al., 2025. Enhancing Sustainability of the New Energy Vehicle Industry in Stages: A Multi-Objective Policy Optimization Approach Driven by Big Data for Economic, Ecological, and Social Objectives. Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

[65] Bisinella, V., Christensen, T.H., Astrup, T.F., 2021. Future scenarios and life cycle assessment: Systematic review and recommendations. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 26(11), 2143–2170.

[66] Singh, R.K.S., 2017. Environmental Cooperation within the SAARC Framework [Master's Thesis]. Sikkim University: Gangtok, India.

[67] Onat, N.C., Kucukvar, M., 2022. A systematic review on sustainability assessment of electric vehicles: Knowledge gaps and future perspectives. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 97, 106867.

[68] Bauer, C., Hofer, J., Althaus, H., et al., 2015. The environmental performance of current and future passenger vehicles: Life cycle assessment based on a novel scenario analysis framework. Applied Energy. 157, 871–883.

[69] Nordelöf, A., Messagie, M., Tillman, A.M., et al., 2014. Environmental impacts of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and battery electric vehicles—What can we learn from life cycle assessment? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 19(11), 1866–1890.

[70] Tsou, C.-T., 2025. Analysis of Sustainable Socio-Technical Transition-Unpacking the Development of the NEV Sector from the Early 2000s through an Innovative Conceptual Framework [PhD Thesis]. University of Glasgow: Glasgow, UK.

[71] Pollok, L., Spierling, S., Endres, H.J., et al., 2021. Social life cycle assessments: A review on past development, advances and methodological challenges. Sustainability. 13(18), 10286.

[72] Tokede, O., Traverso, M., 2020. Implementing the guidelines for social life cycle assessment: Past, present, and future. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 25(2), 1910–1929.

[73] Huertas-Valdivia, I., Ferrari, A.M., Settembre-Blundo, D., et al., 2020. Social life-cycle assessment: A review by bibliometric analysis. Sustainability. 12(15), 6211.

[74] Liu, J., Wu, Y., Liu, L., 2023. Impact of Environmental Uncertainties and Strategic Flexibility in Innovation Activities on NEV Battery Recycling Firms in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(4), 3497.

[75] Chen, Y., 2022. Research on collaborative innovation of key common technologies in new energy vehicle industry based on digital twin technology. Energy Reports. 8, 15399–15407.

[76] Sun, X., Li, Z., Wang, X., et al., 2019. Technology development of electric vehicles: A review. Energies. 13(1), 90.

Downloads

How to Cite

Hu, W. (2026). From Mining to Mobility: Evaluating Environmental Challenges across the Critical Materials Supply Chain for New Energy Vehicles. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 8(3), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i3.13104

Issue

Article Type

Review