Autonomous Multi-Robot Systems for Real-Time Environmental Monitoring and Disaster Response

Authors

  • Xiaolan Li

    Lanzhou Petrochemical University of Vocational Technology, Lanzhou 730060, China
  • Xinrong Ma

    Qinghai Polytechnic University, Xining 810003, China
  • Yanwei Xu

    Qinghai Polytechnic University, Xining 810003, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i4.13213
Received: 11 January 2026| Revised: 9 March 2026 | Accepted: 13 March 2026 | Published Online: 17 April 2026

Abstract

Autonomous multi-robot systems (MRS) are revolutionizing environmental monitoring and disaster response by enabling real-time data collection, enhanced situational awareness, and efficient task execution in hazardous environments. They are made up of autonomous and collaborative groups of robots that are fitted with high-tech sensors, machine learning algorithms, and communication technologies that enable them to handle a host of tasks, including environmental surveillance and search and rescue missions. The MRS has major strengths compared to the conventional approaches, which are increased response rates, operation in hazardous or even inaccessible locations, and scalability when dealing with high-volume operations. This review examines the core technologies of MRS, which are sensor integration, autonomous navigation, and coordination algorithms, and how they are used in environmental monitoring and managing disasters. Such issues as environmental variability, power constraints, reliability of communication, scalability, and ethical issues are also analyzed. Nevertheless, the problems do not deter the further development of AI, energy systems, and communication standards, which support the functionality of MRS and allow more efficient, adaptable, and effective systems. The next generation of autonomous MRS has huge potential of enhancing disaster resilience, environmental conservation, and management of resources. MRS can be instrumental in reducing the impact of natural disasters, tracking ecosystems, and protecting human life by working around the current constraints.

Keywords:

Autonomous Robots; Multi-Robot Systems; Environmental Monitoring; Disaster Response; Coordination Algorithms

References

[1] Cüce, H., 2023. Climate change-related natural disasters: Environmental effects and sustainable monitoring. International Journal of Environmental Trends. 7(2), 113–125.

[2] Krichen, M., Abdalzaher, M.S., Elwekeil, M., et al., 2024. Managing natural disasters: An analysis of technological advancements, opportunities, and challenges. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems. 4, 99–109.

[3] Kwe, N.B., Priyadarshini, R., 2024. Emerging trends in mobile robots. In Robotics and Smart Autonomous Systems. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 77–117.

[4] Borah, S.S., Khanal, A., Sundaravadivel, P., 2024. Emerging technologies for automation in environmental sensing: A review. Applied Sciences. 14(8), 3531.

[5] Popescu, S.M., Mansoor, S., Wani, O.A., et al., 2024. Artificial intelligence and IoT driven technologies for environmental pollution monitoring and management. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 12, 1336088.

[6] Al Shafian, S., Hu, D., 2024. Integrating machine learning and remote sensing in disaster management: A decadal review of post-disaster building damage assessment. Buildings. 14(8), 2344.

[7] Chopra, M., 2025. AI and Robotics Applications in Disaster Response. Educohack Press: Delhi, India.

[8] Dunbabin, M., Marques, L., 2012. Robots for environmental monitoring: Significant advancements and applications. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine. 19(1), 24–39.

[9] Burian, F., Zalud, L., Kocmanova, P., et al., 2014. Multi-robot system for disaster area exploration. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. 184, 263–274.

[10] Preethichandra, D., Piyathilaka, L., Izhar, U., 2024. Review on robotic systems for environmental monitoring. IEEE Open Journal of Instrumentation and Measurement. 4, 1–17.

[11] Narouz, A.S., Ismail, A., Atef, A., et al., 2024. A review of features and characteristics of rescue robot with AI. Advanced Sciences and Technology Journal. 1(2), 1–18.

[12] Queralta, J.P., Taipalmaa, J., Can Pullinen, B., et al., 2020. Collaborative multi-robot search and rescue: Planning, coordination, perception, and active vision. IEEE Access. 8, 191617–191643.

[13] Bozhinoski, D., 2017. Managing safety and run-time adaptability in mission-critical mobile multi-robot system. In Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures, Montréal, QC, Canada, 4–8 May 2015; pp. 135–140.

[14] Proia, S., 2024. Control techniques for collaborative and cooperative robotic systems. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/works/276499540/ (cited 20 December 2025).

[15] Drew, D.S., 2021. Multi-agent systems for search and rescue applications. Current Robotics Reports. 2(2), 189–200.

[16] Garcia, S., Menghi, C., Pelliccione, P., et al., 2018. An architecture for decentralized, collaborative, and autonomous robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture, Seattle, WA, USA, 30 April–4 May 2018.

[17] Farinelli, A., Iocchi, L., Nardi, D., 2004. Multirobot systems: A classification focused on coordination. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics. 34(5), 2015–2028.

[18] Yan, Z., Jouandeau, N., Cherif, A.A., 2013. A survey and analysis of multi-robot coordination. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems. 10(12), 399.

[19] Rizk, Y., Awad, M., Tunstel, E.W., 2019. Cooperative heterogeneous multi-robot systems: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys. 52(2), 1–31.

[20] Hussain, M.D., Rahman, M.H., Ali, N.M., 2024. Artificial intelligence and machine learning enhance robot decision-making adaptability and learning capabilities across various domains. International Journal of Science and Engineering. 1(3), 14–27.

[21] Orr, J., Dutta, A., 2023. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for multi-robot applications: A survey. Sensors. 23(7), 3625.

[22] Bachelder, I.A., Waxman, A.M., 1994. Mobile robot visual mapping and localization: A view-based neurocomputational architecture that emulates hippocampal place learning. Neural Networks. 7(6–7), 1083–1099.

[23] Rone, W., Ben-Tzvi, P., 2013. Mapping, localization and motion planning in mobile multi-robotic systems. Robotica. 31(1), 1–23.

[24] Jawhar, I., Mohamed, N., Al-Jaroodi, J., 2020. Secure communication in multi-robot systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Systems Security Symposium, Crystal City, VA, USA, 1 July–1 August 2020.

[25] Habib, M.K., Baudoin, Y., 2010. Robot-assisted risky intervention, search, rescue and environmental surveillance. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems. 7(1), 10.

[26] Gregory, J., Fink, J., Stump, E., et al., 2016. Application of multi-robot systems to disaster-relief scenarios with limited communication. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Field and Service Robotics, Toronto, ON, Canada, 22–26 June 2015; pp. 1–15.

[27] Watanobe, Y., Kabir, R., Aoba, R., et al., 2023. Disaster rescue via multi-robot collaboration: Development, control, and deployment. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics. 35(1), 85–98.

[28] Pillai, B.M., Suthakorn, J., Sivaraman, D., et al., 2024. A heterogeneous robots collaboration for safety, security, and rescue robotics: e-ASIA joint research program for disaster risk and reduction management. Advanced Robotics. 38(3), 129–151.

[29] Zlot, R., Stentz, A., 2005. Complex task allocation for multiple robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, 18–22 April 2005; pp. 1515–1522.

[30] Ota, J., 2006. Multi-agent robot systems as distributed autonomous systems. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 20(1), 59–70.

[31] Khamis, A., Hussein, A., Elmogy, A., 2015. Multi-robot task allocation: A review of the state-of-the-art. In Cooperative Robots and Sensor Networks. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 31–51.

[32] De Hoog, J., Cameron, S., Visser, A., 2010. Autonomous multi-robot exploration in communication-limited environments. In Proceedings of the Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems Conference, Plymouth, UK, 26–28 July 2010.

[33] Tan, J., 2023. A method to plan the path of a robot utilizing deep reinforcement learning and multi-sensory information fusion. Applied Artificial Intelligence. 37(1), 2224996.

[34] Gielis, J., Shankar, A., Prorok, A., 2022. A critical review of communications in multi-robot systems. Current Robotics Reports. 3(4), 213–225.

[35] Kondratyev, K.Y., Krapivin, V.F., Phillipe, G.W., 2002. Global Environmental Change: Modelling and Monitoring. Springer: Berlin, Germany.

[36] Roldan, J.J., Garcia-Aunon, P., Garzón, M., et al., 2016. Heterogeneous multi-robot system for mapping environmental variables of greenhouses. Sensors. 16(7), 1018.

[37] Aguiar, A.S., dos Santos, F.N., Cunha, J.B., et al., 2020. Localization and mapping for robots in agriculture and forestry: A survey. Robotics. 9(4), 97.

[38] Bogue, R., 2023. The role of robots in environmental monitoring. Industrial Robot: The International Journal of Robotics Research and Application. 50(3), 369–375.

[39] Abidi, M.A., Gonzalez, R.C., 1992. Data Fusion in Robotics and Machine Intelligence. Academic Press: New York, NY, USA.

[40] Nagatani, K., Yoshida, K., Kiyokawa, K., et al., 2008. Development of a networked robotic system for disaster mitigation: System description of multi-robot system and performance tests of the robots. In Field and Service Robotics. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany. pp. 453–462.

[41] Allison, R.S., Johnston, J., Craig, G., et al., 2016. Airborne optical and thermal remote sensing for wildfire detection and monitoring. Sensors. 16(8), 1310.

[42] Shao, X., Liu, C., Lu, P., et al., 2025. Landslide robotics: A prototype for interactive and sustainable geohazard investigation. Landslides. 22(4), 1291–1308.

[43] Al-Rawas, G., Nikoo, M.R., Al-Wardy, M., et al., 2024. A critical review of emerging technologies for flash flood prediction: Examining artificial intelligence, machine learning, internet of things, cloud computing, and robotics techniques. Water. 16(14), 2069.

[44] Pashna, M., Yusof, R., Ismail, Z.H., et al., 2020. Autonomous multi-robot tracking system for oil spills on sea surface based on hybrid fuzzy distribution and potential field approach. Ocean Engineering. 207, 107238.

[45] Bakirci, M., 2024. Smart city air quality management through leveraging drones for precision monitoring. Sustainable Cities and Society. 106, 105390.

[46] Villa, T.F., Gonzalez, F., Miljievic, B., et al., 2016. An overview of small unmanned aerial vehicles for air quality measurements: Present applications and future prospectives. Sensors. 16(7), 1072.

[47] Oliveira, L.F., Moreira, A.P., Silva, M.F., 2021. Advances in forest robotics: A state-of-the-art survey. Robotics. 10(2), 53.

[48] Tejada, J.C., Toro-Ossaba, A., López-Gonzalez, A., et al., 2025. A review of multi-robot systems and soft robotics: Challenges and opportunities. Sensors. 25(5), 1353.

[49] Jawhar, I., Mohamed, N., Wu, J., et al., 2018. Networking of multi-robot systems: Architectures and requirements. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks. 7(4), 52.

[50] Mansfield, D., Montazeri, A., 2024. A survey on autonomous environmental monitoring approaches: Towards unifying active sensing and reinforcement learning. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 11, 1336612.

[51] Gautam, A., Mohan, S., 2012. A review of research in multi-robot systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems, Chennai, India, 6–9 August 2012.

[52] Velasco, J.A.H., Guevara, H.S.D., 2024. Development of UAVs/drones equipped with thermal sensors for the search of individuals lost under rubble due to earthquake collapses or any eventuality requiring such capabilities. In Proceedings of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences Congress, Florence, Italy, 9–13 September 2024.

[53] Trevelyan, J., Hamel, W.R., Kang, S.C., 2016. Robotics in hazardous applications. In Springer Handbook of Robotics. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 1521–1548.

[54] Dabass, V., Sangwan, S., 2025. Strategic allocation: Exploring optimization techniques in multi-robot systems. International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications. 9(4), 1279–1301.

[55] RM, K.C., MM, R., Janardhanan, M.N., 2020. Review on state-of-the-art dynamic task allocation strategies for multiple-robot systems. Industrial Robot: The International Journal of Robotics Research and Application. 47(6), 929–942.

[56] Papyan, N., Kulhandjian, M., Kulhandjian, H., et al., 2024. AI-based drone assisted human rescue in disaster environments: Challenges and opportunities. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. 34(1), 169–186.

[57] Iqbal, U., Riaz, M.Z.B., Zhao, J., et al., 2023. Drones for flood monitoring, mapping and detection: A bibliometric review. Drones. 7(1), 32.

[58] Witkowski, U., El-Habbal, M., Herbrechtsmeier, S., et al., 2008. Ad-hoc network communication infrastructure for multi-robot systems in disaster scenarios. In Proceedings of the Robotics for Risky Interventions and Environmental Surveillance Workshop, Benicassim, Spain, 16–18 June 2008.

[59] Blasch, E., Pham, T., Chong, C.-Y., et al., 2021. Machine learning/artificial intelligence for sensor data fusion–opportunities and challenges. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine. 36(7), 80–93.

[60] Senthilkumar, K., Bharadwaj, K.K., 2012. Multi-robot exploration and terrain coverage in an unknown environment. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 60(1), 123–132.

[61] Wong, C., Yang, E., Yan, X.-T., et al., 2018. Autonomous robots for harsh environments: A holistic overview of current solutions and ongoing challenges. Systems Science and Control Engineering. 6(1), 213–219.

[62] Wong, C., Yang, E., Yan, X.-T., et al., 2017. An overview of robotics and autonomous systems for harsh environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Automation and Computing, Huddersfield, UK, 7–8 September 2017.

[63] Saffre, F., Hildmann, H., Karvonen, H., et al., 2021. Self-swarming for multi-robot systems deployed for situational awareness. In New Developments and Environmental Applications of Drones. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 51–72.

[64] Humann, J., Pollard, K.A., 2019. Human factors in the scalability of multirobot operation: A review and simulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Bari, Italy, 6–9 October 2019.

[65] Sugano, S., Huang, Q., Kato, I., 1993. Stability criteria in controlling mobile robotic systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Yokohama, Japan, 26–30 July 1993.

[66] Urrea, C., 2025. Hybrid fault-tolerant control in cooperative robotics: Advances in resilience and scalability. Actuators. 14(4), 177.

[67] Alyassi, R., Khonji, M., Karapetyan, A., et al., 2022. Autonomous recharging and flight mission planning for battery-operated autonomous drones. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering. 20(2), 1034–1046.

[68] Verstraten, T., Hosen, M.S., Berecibar, M., et al., 2023. Selecting suitable battery technologies for untethered robot. Energies. 16(13), 4904.

[69] Singh, R., Kurukuru, V.S.B., Khan, M.A., 2023. Advanced power converters and learning in diverse robotic innovation: A review. Energies. 16(20), 7156.

[70] Chitikena, H., Sanfilippo, F., Ma, S., 2023. Robotics in search and rescue operations: An ethical and design perspective framework for response phase. Applied Sciences. 13(3), 1800.

[71] Khan, M.M., Aslam, N., Fuzail, M., 2024. Navigating the emotional turmoil: Understanding the psychological impact of robotics-induced job displacement. Bulletin of Business and Economics. 13(3), 609–618.

[72] Calo, M.R., 2020. Robots and privacy. In Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 491–505.

Downloads

How to Cite

Li, X., Ma, X., & Xu, Y. (2026). Autonomous Multi-Robot Systems for Real-Time Environmental Monitoring and Disaster Response. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 8(4), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i4.13213

Issue

Vol. 8 , Iss. 4 (April 2026): In Progress

Article Type

Review

License

Copyright © 2026 Xiaolan Li, Xinrong Ma, Yanwei Xu

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC