Engineering Resilience: Novel Approaches in Ecosystem Restoration

Authors

  • Shuofeng Qi

    Shanxi Zhonglian Venture Capital Ecological Environment Technology Co., Ltd., Taiyuan 030032, China

  • Lamei Zhao

    Shanxi Shunshizhen Project Management Consulting Co., Ltd., Taiyuan 030027, China

  • Xiaomei Hui

    Department of Building Environment and Energy Engineering, College of Equipment Engineering, Shanxi Vocational University of Engineering Science and Technology, Jinzhong 030600, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i5.13234
Received: 13 January 2026 | Revised: 27 February 2026 | Accepted: 9 March 2026 | Published Online: 7 May 2026

Abstract

Climate nonstationary and exacerbated disturbance regimes, as well as ubiquitous human alteration of landscapes and seascapes, are increasingly challenging ecosystem restoration. In this scenario, restoration strategies based on static reference states, or short-term structural goals, tend to provide delicate results that fail when subjected to extreme events, new stress factors, or changing baselines. The current essay is a synthesis of the new paradigm of engineering resiliency towards ecosystem restoration that combines the principles of design-oriented engineering and theories of ecology of complexity, thresholds, and adaptive capacity. We explain conceptual differences and complement between ecological and engineering resilience, as well as highlighting resistance, recovery trajectories, and adaptability as aspects of the operation of performance. We also study fresh resilience-enabling strategies, such as nature-based solutions and gray-green systems, ecological engineering and system-level design, digital technologies of monitoring and prediction, and adaptive management based on the concept of feedback-control. In the land, freshwater, coastal, and urban systems, we evaluate such strategies underway to increase the integration of persistence of functions and provide ecosystem-vitality despite disturbance, as well as the inescapable problems related to scaling, governance, equity, and long-term sustainability. Last but not least, we define the areas of priority in research, such as the standardized measures of resilience, long-term monitoring, uncertainty-aware models, and responsible innovation to reduce unintentional ecological and social effects. Reconceptualizing restoration as a performance-based design challenge that is enshrined in coupled human-natural systems, engineering resilience provides a transdisciplinary, rigorously grounded approach to creating ecosystems that survive and adapt in a fast-changing world.

Keywords:

Engineering Resilience; Ecosystem Restoration; Nature-Based Solutions; Adaptive Management; Gray-Green Infrastructure

References

[1] Philp, R.B., 2012. Environmental Issues for the Twenty-First Century and Their Impact on Human Health. Bentham Science Publishers: Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

[2] Drotianko, L., Sydorenko, S., Кleshnia, H., et al., 2022. New Environmental Challenges of the 21st Century. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer: Cham, Switzerland.

[3] Ren, J.W.F., Coffman, G.C., 2023. Integrating the resilience concept into ecosystem restoration. Restoration Ecology. 31(5), e13907.

[4] Collier, M.J., 2015. Novel ecosystems and social-ecological resilience. Landscape Ecology. 30(8), 1363–1369.

[5] Abhilash, P.C., 2021. Restoring the unrestored: Strategies for restoring global land during the UN decade on ecosystem restoration (UN-DER). Land. 10(2), 201.

[6] Linkov, I., Trump, B.D., 2019. The Science and Practice of Resilience. Springer: Cham, Switzerland.

[7] Tullos, D., Baker, D.W., Curran, J.C., et al., 2021. Enhancing resilience of river restoration design in systems undergoing change. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 147(3), 03121001.

[8] Timpane-Padgham, B.L., Beechie, T., Klinger, T., 2017. A systematic review of ecological attributes that confer resilience to climate change in environmental restoration. PLoS One. 12(3), e0173812.

[9] Chambers, J.C., Allen, C.R., Cushman, S.A., 2019. Operationalizing ecological resilience concepts for managing species and ecosystems at risk. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 7, 241.

[10] Eriksson, O., 2021. The importance of traditional agricultural landscapes for preventing species extinctions. Biodiversity and Conservation. 30(5), 1341–1357.

[11] Mitsch, W.J., Jørgensen, S.E., 2003. Ecological Engineering and Ecosystem Restoration. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA.

[12] Krievins, K., Plummer, R., Baird, J., 2018. Building resilience in ecological restoration processes: A social-ecological perspective. Ecological Restoration. 36(3), 195–207.

[13] Holling, C.S., 1996. Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. Engineering within Ecological Constraints. 31, 32.

[14] Waryszak, P., Gavoille, A., Whitt, A.A., et al., 2021. Combining gray and green infrastructure to improve coastal resilience: Lessons learnt from hybrid flood defenses. Coastal Engineering Journal. 63(3), 335–350.

[15] Guo, Y., Liu, S., Dong, Y., et al., 2024. Research progress and prospects of nature-based solutions in green infrastructure: A bibliometric analysis. Ecological Frontiers. 45(3), 561–571.

[16] Das Malakar, K., Kumar, M., Anand, S., et al., 2023. Climate, climate change ecology, and socio-ecological environments. In Climate Change and Socio-Ecological Transformation: Vulnerability and Sustainability. Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore. pp. 29–116.

[17] Elsawah, S., Filatova, T., Jakeman, A.J., et al., 2020. Eight grand challenges in socio-environmental systems modeling. Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling. 2, 16226.

[18] Masarei, M.I., Erickson, T.E., Merritt, D.J., et al., 2021. Engineering restoration for the future. Ecological Engineering. 159, 106103.

[19] Miller, B.P., Sinclair, E.A., Menz, M.H.M., et al., 2017. A framework for the practical science necessary to restore sustainable, resilient, and biodiverse ecosystems. Restoration Ecology. 25(4), 605–617.

[20] Simonson, W.D., Miller, E., Jones, A., et al., 2021. Enhancing climate change resilience of ecological restoration—A framework for action. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation. 19(3), 300–310.

[21] Ungar, M., 2018. Systemic resilience: principles and processes for a science of change in contexts of adversity. Ecology and Society. 23(4), 34.

[22] Wang, X., Mazumder, R.K., Salarieh, B., et al., 2022. Machine learning for risk and resilience assessment in structural engineering: Progress and future trends. Journal of Structural Engineering. 148(8), 03122003.

[23] Lake, P.S., 2013. Resistance, resilience and restoration. Ecological Management & Restoration. 14(1), 20–24.

[24] Mori, A.S., 2011. Ecosystem management based on natural disturbances: Hierarchical context and non-equilibrium paradigm. Journal of Applied Ecology. 48(2), 280–292.

[25] Battisti, C., Poeta, G., Fanelli, G., 2016. An Introduction to Disturbance Ecology. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 13–29.

[26] Naghshbandi, S.N., Varga, L., Purvis, A., et al., 2020. A review of methods to study resilience of complex engineering and engineered systems. IEEE Access. 8, 87775–87799.

[27] Yodo, N., Wang, P., 2016. Engineering resilience quantification and system design implications: A literature survey. Journal of Mechanical Design. 138(11), 111408.

[28] Oliver, T.H., Heard, M.S., Isaac, N.J.B., et al., 2015. Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 30(11), 673–684.

[29] Tedesco, A.M., López-Cubillos, S., Chazdon, R., et al., 2023. Beyond ecology: Ecosystem restoration as a process for social-ecological transformation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 38(7), 643–653.

[30] Chirwa, P.W., Kozanayi, W., Uisso, A.J., et al., 2024. Socio-economic factors, policy and governance systems influencing multifunctional landscapes. In Trees in a Sub-Saharan Multi-Functional Landscape: Research, Management, and Policy. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 305–327.

[31] Nelson, D.R., Bledsoe, B.P., Ferreira, S., et al., 2020. Challenges to realizing the potential of nature-based solutions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 45, 49–55.

[32] O’Hogain, S., McCarton, L., 2018. Nature-based solutions. In A Technology Portfolio of Nature-Based Solutions: Innovations in Water Management. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 1–9.

[33] Welden, E., Chausson, A., Melanidis, M.S., 2021. Leveraging nature-based solutions for transformation: Reconnecting people and nature. People and Nature. 3(5), 966–977.

[34] Cheng, C., Li, F., 2024. Ecosystem restoration and management based on nature-based solutions in China: Research progress and representative practices. Nature-Based Solutions. 6, 100176.

[35] Wang, X., Wang, J., Wang, B., et al., 2022. The nature-based ecological engineering paradigm: Symbiosis, coupling, and coordination. Engineering. 19, 14–21.

[36] Ghazian, N., Lortie, C.J., 2024. A review of the roots of ecological engineering and its principles. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 25(1), 345–357.

[37] Hu, K., Xu, Q., Zhu, K., et al., 2026. Recent advances of artificial intelligence in aquatic bioindicators and ecological assessment. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 237(5), 306.

[38] Reddy, T.A., 2020. Resilience of complex adaptive systems: a pedagogical framework for engineering education and research. Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities. 1(2), 021004.

[39] Park, J., Seager, T.P., Rao, P.S.C., et al., 2013. Integrating risk and resilience approaches to catastrophe management in engineering systems. Risk Analysis. 33(3), 356–367.

[40] Aslam, M.A., Abbas, M.S., Mustaqeem, M., et al., 2024. Comprehensive assessment of heavy metal contamination in soil-plant systems and health risks from wastewater-irrigated vegetables. Colloids and Surfaces C: Environmental Aspects. 2, 100044.

[41] Khan, M.N., Aslam, M.A., Bin Muhsinah, A., et al., 2023. Heavy metals in vegetables: Screening health risks of irrigation with wastewater in peri-urban areas of Bhakkar, Pakistan. Toxics. 11(5), 460.

[42] Khan, M.N., Aslam, M.A., Zada, I., et al., 2023. Statistical analysis and health risk assessment: Vegetables irrigated with wastewater in Kirri Shamozai, Pakistan. Toxics. 11(11), 899.

[43] Chang, Z., Chunni, H., Wanghua, S., 2025. Resilience of rock engineering: concept, mechanism, evaluation and enhancement. Geoenvironmental Disasters. 12(1), 21.

[44] Wu, X., Lü, Y., Zhang, J., et al., 2023. Adapting ecosystem restoration for sustainable development in a changing world. The Innovation. 4(1), 100375.

[45] Coleman, M.A., Wood, G., Filbee-Dexter, K., et al., 2020. Restore or redefine: Future trajectories for restoration. Frontiers in Marine Science. 7, 237.

[46] Newton, A.C., Cantarello, E., 2015. Restoration of forest resilience: An achievable goal? New Forests. 46(5), 645–668.

[47] Shackelford, N., Dudney, J., Stueber, M.M., et al., 2024. Measuring at all scales: Sourcing data for more flexible restoration references. Restoration Ecology. 32(8), e13541.

[48] Wu, P.P.-Y., Mengersen, K., McMahon, K., et al., 2017. Timing anthropogenic stressors to mitigate their impact on marine ecosystem resilience. Nature Communications. 8(1), 1263.

[49] Nemeth, C.P., Hollnagel, E., Dekker, S., 2009. Resilience Engineering Perspectives, Volume 2: Preparation and Restoration. Ashgate Publishing: Farnham, UK.

[50] Falk, D.A., 2017. Restoration ecology, resilience, and the axes of change. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 102(2), 201–216.

[51] Li, W., Fang, W., Hu, Y., 2025. Integrating climate resilience into sustainable land management: A strategy to combat land degradation. Land Degradation & Development. 37(7), 2835–2853.

[52] Li, Y., Pan, Z., Shen, Y., 2025. Regional integration policies and ecological resilience: A case study of urban agglomeration planning policies in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 13, 1636479.

[53] Wyss, R., Luthe, T., Pedoth, L., et al., 2022. Mountain resilience: A systematic literature review and paths to the future. Mountain Research and Development. 42(2), A23–A36.

[54] Nielsen, L., Faber, M.H., 2021. Impacts of sustainability and resilience research on risk governance, management and education. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure. 6(6), 339–384.

[55] Pandey, B., Ghosh, A., 2023. Urban ecosystem services and climate change: A dynamic interplay. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. 5, 1281430.

[56] Hirsch, S.L., 2018. Adaptive Epistemologies: Scientific Practice and Environmental Restoration in a Changing Climate [PhD Thesis]. University of Idaho: Moscow, ID, USA.

[57] Righi, A.W., Saurin, T.A., Wachs, P., 2015. A systematic literature review of resilience engineering: Research areas and a research agenda proposal. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 141, 142–152.

[58] Teague, W.R., 2017. Bridging the research management gap to restore ecosystem function and social resilience. In Global Soil Security. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 341–350.

[59] Cowan, E.L., Standish, R.J., Miller, B.P., et al., 2021. A framework for measuring the effects of disturbance in restoration projects. Restoration Ecology. 29(4), e13379.

[60] Rong, J., Zhou, M., Li, G., 2023. Resilience-oriented restoration strategy by offshore wind power considering risk. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems. 9(6), 2052–2065.

[61] Khan, N., 2024. Unlocking innovation in crop resilience and productivity: breakthroughs in biotechnology and sustainable farming. Innovation Discovery. 1(4), 28.

[62] Lea-Smith, D.J., Hassard, F., Coulon, F., et al., 2025. Engineering biology applications for environmental solutions: potential and challenges. Nature Communications. 16(1), 3538.

[63] Brandl, E., 2025. Applied Genetics and Biotechnology in Environmental Engineering: Challenges and Opportunities in Coastal Regions. Available from: https://books.google.com.hk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=loZpEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA4&dq=info:5tRGaQHbRdkJ:scholar.google.com&ots=AYc4mMzeZB&sig=X7C2Kggw8shFRRUfPvJHpnyPy9A&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false (cited 13 December 2025).

Downloads

How to Cite

Qi, S., Zhao, L., & Hui, X. (2026). Engineering Resilience: Novel Approaches in Ecosystem Restoration. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 8(5), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i5.13234