Publication frequency changed
2024-04-18
A Framework for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Strategies Using Internet of Things and Machine Learning Techniques
Authors
-
Martin Kuradusenge
Department of Computer and software Engineering, School of ICT, College of Science and Technology, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda
-
Eric Hitimana
Department of Computer and software Engineering, School of ICT, College of Science and Technology, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda
-
Jean Baptiste Minani
Department of Computer Sciences and Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada
-
Zubeda Ukundimana
Department of Chemistry, School of Science, College of Science and Technology, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda
-
Florence Mukamanzi
Department of Business and Information Technology, School of Economics, College of Business and Economics, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda
-
Omar Janvier Sinayobye
Department of Computer and software Engineering, School of ICT, College of Science and Technology, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda
-
Aime Thierry Nizeyimana
Department of Computer and software Engineering, School of ICT, College of Science and Technology, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda
-
Nadege Gaju
Department of Computer and software Engineering, School of ICT, College of Science and Technology, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v6i3.6962Abstract
Climate change poses a threat to the global ecosystem. Many countries adopt various approaches, including ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA), to address this problem. However, the assessment of the effectiveness of the EbA interventions is conducted manually, is resource-intensive, and is focused on short-term outputs. These limitations underscore a critical gap: the need for a comprehensive, automated system that enables long-term monitoring and predictive analysis. This study aimed to address this gap by developing an innovative framework that integrates Internet of Things (IoT) devices and machine learning (ML) algorithms to continuously monitor weather, hydrological, environmental, and other variables. We conducted a thorough analysis to design an appropriate framework. In addition, to obtain the relevant information and data, we conducted interviews with the local community and collected secondary data from various sources. The proposed framework consists of five layers: (i) EbA interventions; (ii) IoT-based key performance indicators (KPI) for monitoring and evaluation (M&E); (iii) primary data collection; (iv) data storage; and (v) application. As a proof of concept, we developed a system that supports early flood and drought alerts while simultaneously providing long-term evaluations of the effectiveness of EbA strategies. The developed system consists of IoT devices and a web application integrated with machine learning (ML). We set up and tested the IoT devices before deploying them in the study area. The devices capture data for two primary purposes: (1) short-term: flood detection and alerting, and (2) long-term: drought prediction and evaluation of EbA effectiveness through continuous data analysis. This research represents a significant advancement in the automation and long-term assessment of climate adaptation measures, offering a scalable and effective solution to disaster risk reduction.
Keywords:
EbA; flood; drought; IoT; weather monitoring; machine learning; KPIReferences
[1] Vignola, R., Esquivel, M.J., Harvey, C., et al., 2022. Ecosystem-Based Practices for Smallholders’ Adaptation to Climate Extremes: Evidence of Benefits and Knowledge Gaps in Latin America. Agronomy. 12(10), 2535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102535
[2] Orimoloye, I.R., Zhou, L., Kalumba, A.M., 2021. Drought Disaster Risk Adaptation through Ecosystem Services-Based Solutions: Way Forward for South Africa. Sustainability. 13(8), 4132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084132
[3] Nashipay, M.L., Mabwoga, S., Konana, C., 2022. An Assessment of the Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Approach for Flood Risk Management in the Upper Suswa-Magadi Catchment. African Journal of Climate Change and Resource Sustainability. 1(1), 26–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37284/ajccrs.1.1.952
[4] Serra-Llobet, A., Jähnig, S.C., Geist, J., et al., 2022. Restoring Rivers and Floodplains for Habitat and Flood Risk Reduction: Experiences in Multi-Benefit Floodplain Management from California and Germany. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.778568
[5] Atkinson, C.L., Atkinson, A.M., 2023. Impacts of Climate Change on Rural Communities: Vulnerability and Adaptation in the Global South. Encyclopedia. 3(2), 721–729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3020052
[6] Zeleňáková, M., Purcz, P., Hlavatá, H., et al., 2015. Climate Change in Urban Versus Rural Areas. Procedia Engineering. 119, 1171–1180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.968
[7] Zhong, B., Wu, S., Sun, G., et al., 2022. Farmers’ Strategies to Climate Change and Urbanization: Potential of Ecosystem-Based Adaptation in Rural Chengdu, Southwest China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(2), 952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020952
[8] Su, Q., Chang, H.-S., Pai, S.-E., 2022. A Comparative Study of the Resilience of Urban and Rural Areas under Climate Change. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(15), 8911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19158911
[9] Melece, L., Shena. I., 2020. Adaptation to climate change in agriculture: ecosystem based options. Engineering for Rural Development. 19, 1883–1891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22616/erdev.2020.19.tf523
[10] Çakmakçı, R., Salık, M.A., Çakmakçı, S., 2023. Assessment and Principles of Environmentally Sustainable Food and Agriculture Systems. Agriculture. 13(5), 1073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13051073
[11] Bhusal, K., Udas, E., Bhatta, L.D., 2022. Ecosystem-based adaptation for increased agricultural productivity by smallholder farmers in Nepal. PLOS ONE. 17(6), e0269586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269586
[12] Furtak, K., Wolińska, A., 2023. The impact of extreme weather events as a consequence of climate change on the soil moisture and on the quality of the soil environment and agriculture---A review. CATENA. 231, 107378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107378
[13] Busayo, E.T., Kalumba, A.M., Afuye, G.A., et al., 2022. Rediscovering South Africa: Flood disaster risk management through ecosystem-based adaptation. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 14, 100175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100175
[14] Busayo, E.T., Kalumba, A.M., Afuye, G.A., et al., 2022. Rediscovering South Africa: Flood disaster risk management through ecosystem-based adaptation. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 14, 100175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100175
[15] Bouaziz, L.J.E., Aalbers, E.E., Weerts, A.H., et al., 2021. The importance of ecosystem adaptation on hydrological model predictions in response to climate change. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions. 2021, 1--39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-204
[16] Bhattarai, S., Regmi, B.R., Pant, B., et al., 2021. Sustaining ecosystem based adaptation: The lessons from policy and practices in Nepal. Land Use Policy. 104, 105391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105391
[17] IUCN, 2024. EbA approaches for attracting country climate financing: Building linkages and mainstreaming EbA successes in Nepal | IUCN, n.d. Available from: https://www.iucn.org/news/ecosystem-management/202010/eba-approaches-attracting-country-climate-financing-building-linkages-and-mainstreaming-eba-successes-nepal (cited 11 April 2024).
[18] How to Save Our Earth From Climate Change in 2023? Available from: https://bestdiplomats.org/how-to-save-earth-from-climate-change/ (cited 12 April 2024).
[19] Verdonschot, P.F.M., Verdonschot, R.C.M., 2022. The role of stream restoration in enhancing ecosystem services. Hydrobiologia. 850(12–13), 2537–2562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-04918-5
[20] Adla, K., Dejan, K., Neira, D., et al., 2022. Degradation of ecosystems and loss of ecosystem services. One Health, 281–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822794-7.00008-3
[21] Khaniya, B., Gunathilake, M.B., Rathnayake, U., 2021. Ecosystem-Based Adaptation for the Impact of Climate Change and Variation in the Water Management Sector of Sri Lanka. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2021, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8821329
[22] Agol, D., Reid, H., Crick, F., et al., 2021. Ecosystem-based adaptation in Lake Victoria Basin; synergies and trade-offs. Royal Society Open Science. 8(6), 201847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201847
[23] Davis, M., Naumann, S., 2017. Making the Case for Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems as a Nature-Based Solution to Urban Flooding. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_8.
[24] Lo, V., Qi, J., Jang, N., 2022. Seeking Clarity on Nature-Based Climate Solutions for Adaptation---GUIDANCE NOTE. 21p.
[25] Tiwari, A., Rodrigues, L.C., Lucy, F.E., et al., 2022. Building Climate Resilience in Coastal City Living Labs Using Ecosystem-Based Adaptation: A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 14(17), 10863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710863
[26] Penning, E., Peñailillo Burgos, R., Mens, M., et al., 2023. Nature-based solutions for floods AND droughts AND biodiversity: Do we have sufficient proof of their functioning? Cambridge Prisms: Water. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/wat.2023.12
[27] Earth restoration in your back yard: Harnessing the hydrological cycle in dry places---Ecosystem Restoration Communities. Available from: https://www.ecosystemrestorationcommunities.org/2024/02/07/water-retention-in-dry-places-harnessing-the-hydrological-cycle-in-your-backyard/ (cited 12 April 2024).
[28] Why are Wetlands Important? | US EPA. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/wetlands/why-are-wetlands-important (cited 12 April 2024).
[29] Hou, J., Zhang, Z., Zhang, D., et al., 2021. Study on the influence of infiltration on flood propagation with different peak shape coefficients and duration. Water Policy. 23(4), 1059–1074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2021.193
[30] Sanjrani Manzoor, A., Wajidi, A., Wagan, S.A., et al., 2022. Disaster risk management: Focused to flood hazard and its impact in Pakistan. Global NEST Journal. 24, 234–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.004223
[31] Meng, M., Dabrowski, M., Stead, D., 2020. Enhancing Flood Resilience and Climate Adaptation: The State of the Art and New Directions for Spatial Planning. Sustainability. 12(19), 7864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197864
[32] MOE, UNDP, 2023. Rwanda_2023_Green_Growth_and_Climate_Resilience_Strategy_Overview. 1--8.
[33] Kuradusenge, M., Kumaran, S., Zennaro, M., 2020. Rainfall-Induced Landslide Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: The Case of Ngororero District, Rwanda. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(11), 4147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114147
[34] Richerzhagen, C., Rodríguez de Francisco, J., Weinsheimer, F., et al., 2019. Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Projects, More than just Adaptation: Analysis of Social Benefits and Costs in Colombia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 16(21), 4248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214248
[35] Gauthier, S., May, B., Vasseur, L., 2021. Ecosystem-Based Adaptation to Protect Avian Species in Coastal Communities in the Greater Niagara Region, Canada. Climate. 9(6), 91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9060091
[36] Pearce-Higgins, J.W., Antão, L.H., Bates, R.E., et al., 2022. A framework for climate change adaptation indicators for the natural environment. Ecological Indicators. 136, 108690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108690
[37] Donatti, C.I., Harvey, C.A., Hole, D., et al., 2019. Indicators to measure the climate change adaptation outcomes of ecosystem-based adaptation. Climatic Change. 158(3–4), 413–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02565-9
[38] GIZ, UNEP-WCMC, FEBA, 2020. Guidebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Ecosystem-based Adaptation Interventions, Dtsch. Gesellschaft Für Int. Zusammenar-Beit GmbH. 84.
[39] Pluye, P., Hong, Q.N., 2014. Combining the Power of Stories and the Power of Numbers: Mixed Methods Research and Mixed Studies Reviews. Annual Review of Public Health. 35(1), 29–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440
[40] Key Performance Indicators KPIs: Definition and Examples | Indeed.com. Available from: https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/key-performance-indicators (cited 26 April 2024).
[41] Zall, J., Ray, K., Rist, C. PART 2 Results-Based M&E-A Powerful Public Management Tool, 2004. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/derec/worldbankgroup/35281194.pdf.
[42] Gilruth, P., Duguma, L.A., Minang, P.A., et al., 2021. A Framework for Monitoring Ecosystems-Based Adaptation to Climate Change: Experience from The Gambia. Sustainability. 13(19), 10959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910959
[43] Step 6. Monitoring and evaluating adaptation. Available from: https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/en/mission/knowledge-and-data/regional-adaptation-support-tool/step-6-monitoring-and-evaluating-adaptation (cited 29 April 2024).
[44] Raymond, C.M., Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., et al., 2017. A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environmental Science & Policy. 77, 15–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008
[45] Rogers, P.J., 2007. Theory-Based Evaluation: Reflections Ten Years On. 63--81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.225
[46] van R., K., Ali Raza Rizvi, E.Z., 2014. ECOSYSTEM BASED ADAPTATION MONITORING & EVALUATION INDICATORS.
[47] Harley, M., Horrocks, L., Hodgson, N., et al., 2008. Climate change.
[48] Smithers, R., Kent, N., Miller, K., et al., 2011. Climate change adaptation indicators for biodiversity. Eur. Environ.
[49] Samadi, S., 2022. The convergence of AI, IoT. and big data for advancing flood analytics research. Frontiers in Water. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.786040
[50] Baycheva-Merger, T., Selter, A., Seijger, C., et al., 2024. Digital Opportunity or a Threat? Adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) Monitoring Systems for Natural Resources in Germany. Environments. 11(3), 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11030039
[51] Education, M.O.F., 2017. Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Education.
[52] REMA. Rwanda Environment Management Authority REMA: LAFREC. Available from: https://www.rema.gov.rw/our-work/projects/lafrec (cited 2 July 2024).
[53] M. of E. Republic of Rwanda. Strengthening Climate Resilience for Rural Communities in northern Rwanda GREEN GICUMBI. Available from: https://www.environment.gov.rw/1/strengthening-climate-resilience-for-rural-communities-in-northern-rwanda-green-gicumbi (cited 2 July 2024).
[54] REMA. Rwanda Environment Management Authority REMA: Green Amayaga. Available from: https://www.rema.gov.rw/our-work/projects/green-amayaga (cited 2 July 2024).
[55] Autority, R.F. Transforming the Eastern Province through Adaption to Climate change TREPA. Available from: https://www.rfa.rw/1/projects/trepa (cited 2 July 2024).
[56] Minani, J.B., Sabir, F., Moha, N., et al., 2024. A Systematic Review of IoT Systems Testing: Objectives, Approaches, Tools, and Challenges. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 50(4), 785–815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2024.3363611
[57] GIZ, 2017. Learning Brief---Monitoring and evaluation EbA. Available from: https://www.adaptationcommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/giz2017-en-learning-brief-measuring-success-eba-low-res.pdf.
[58] Donatti, C.I., Harvey, C.A., Martinez-Rodriguez, M.R., et al., 2018. Vulnerability of smallholder farmers to climate change in Central America and Mexico: current knowledge and research gaps. Climate and Development. 11(3), 264–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1442796
[59] Nsengimana, V., William, A., Nyarubuye, J., et al., 2021. Building Community Resilience through the Ecosystem-based Adaptation Approach in Rwanda: A Policy brief. 1--14.[60] ICT Systems and Sustainability, 2022. In Tuba, M., Akashe, S., Joshi, A. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5987-4
[60] ICT Systems and Sustainability, 2022. In Tuba, M., Akashe, S., Joshi, A. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5987-4
Downloads
How to Cite
Kuradusenge, M., Hitimana, E., Minani, J. B., Ukundimana, Z., Mukamanzi, F., Sinayobye, O. J., Nizeyimana, A. T., & Gaju, N. (2024). A Framework for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Strategies Using Internet of Things and Machine Learning Techniques. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 6(3), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v6i3.6962
Issue
Article Type
Article
License
Copyright © 2024 Martin Kuradusenge, Eric Hitimana, Jean Baptiste Minani, Zubeda Ukundimana, Florence Mukamanzi, Omar Janvier Sinayobye, Aime Thierry Nizeyimana, Nadege Gaju
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
