
Effect of Scattered Solar Radiation on the Informativeness of Polarization Lidar Studies of High-Level Clouds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i6.8139Abstract
During daylight laser polarization sensing of high-level clouds (HLCs), the lidar receiving system generates a signal caused by not only backscattered laser radiation, but also scattered solar radiation, the intensity and polarization of which depends on the Sun’s location. If a cloud contains spatially oriented ice particles, then it becomes anisotropic, that is, the coefficients of directional light scattering of such a cloud depend on the Sun’s zenith and azimuth angles. In this work, the possibility of using the effect of anisotropic scattering of solar radiation on the predictive ability of machine learning algorithms in solving the problem of predicting the HLC backscattering phase matrix (BSPM) was evaluated. The hypothesis that solar radiation scattered on HLCs has no effect on the BSPM elements of such clouds determined with a polarization lidar was tested. The operation of two algorithms for predicting the BSPM elements is evaluated. To train the first one, meteorological data were used as input parameters; for the second algorithm, the azimuthal and zenith angles of the Sun's position were added to the meteorological parameters. It is shown that there is no significant improvement in the predictive ability of the algorithm.
Keywords:
High-Level Clouds (HLCs); Polarization Lidar; Backscattering Phase Matrix (BSPM); Sun’s Azimuthal and Zenith Angles; Scattered Solar Radiation; Cloud Microphysics; Machine Learning (ML); Random ForestReferences
[1] Wilson, L., Goh, T.T., Wang, C., 2020. Big Data in Climate Change Research: opportunities and Challenges. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Management (ICIEM); London, UK, 17-19 June 2020; Volume 4, pp. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEM48762.2020.9160174
[2] Isaksen, I.S.A., Granier, C., Myhre, G., et al., 2009. Atmospheric composition change: Climate–Chemistry interactions. Atmospheric Environment. 43, 5138–5192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.003
[3] Wilks, D.S., 2006. Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, 2nd ed.; Academic Press, International Geophysics Series, USA. 627p.
[4] Lapčák, M., Ovseník, Ľ., Oravec, J., et al., 2022. Investigation of Machine Learning Methods for Prediction of Measured Values of Atmospheric Channel for Hybrid FSO/RF System. Photonics. 9(8), 524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9080524
[5] Ukkonen, P., 2022. Exploring Pathways to More Accurate Machine Learning Emulation of Atmospheric Radiative Transfer. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. 14, e2021MS002875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002875
[6] Veerman, M.A., Robert, P., Robin, S., et al., 2021. Predicting atmospheric optical properties for radiative transfer computations using neural networks. Philosophical Transaction A. 379, 20200095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0095
[7] Guide on actinometric observations for hydrometeorological stations, 3rd ed.; Gidrometeoizdat: Leningrad, Russia, 1973. (In Russian)
[8] Andrews, E., Ogren, J.A., Bonasoni, P., et al., 2011. Climatology of aerosol radiative properties in the free troposphere. Atmospheric Research. 102(4), 365–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.08.017
[9] Abakumova, G.M., Gorbarenko, E.V., 2008. Transparency of the atmosphere in Moscow over the past 50 years and its changes in Russia, LKI Publishing House: Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
[10] Liepert, B.G., 2002. Observed reductions of surface solar radiation at sites in the United States and worldwide from 1961 to 1990. Geophysical Research Letters. 29(10), Article No. 61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL014910
[11] Luo, H., Han, Y., Lu, C., et al., 2019. Characteristics of Surface Solar Radiation under Different Air Pollution Conditions over Nanjing, China: Observation and Simulation. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences. 36, 1047–1059. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00376-019-9010-4
[12] Haverkort, A.J., Uenk, D., Veroude, H., et al., 1991. Relationships between ground cover, intercepted solar radiation, leaf area index and infrared reflectance of potato crops. Potato Research. 34, 113–121. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02358105
[13] Feigelson, E.M. (Ed.), 1989. Radiation Properties of Perispheric Clouds; Nauka: Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
[14] Dmitrieva-Arrago, L.R., Trubina, M.A., Tolstyh, M.A., 2017. Role of Phase Composition of Clouds in Forming High and Low Frequency Radiation. Trudy Gidromettsentra Rossii. 363, 19–34. (In Russian)
[15] Rozenberg, G.V., 1955. Stokes vector parameter (matrix methods for accounting radiation polarization in the ray optics approximation). Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk. 56, 79–110. (In Russian)
[16] Kaul, B.V., 2004. Optical-Location Method of Polarization Studies of Anisotropic Aerosol Media [Doctor’s Dissertation]. Physical-Mathematical Sciences: Tomsk, Russia. (In Russian)
[17] Kuchinskaia, O., Penzin, M., Bordulev, I., et al., 2024. Artificial Neural Networks for Determining the Empirical Relationship between Meteorological Parameters and High-Level Cloud Characteristics. Applied Sciences. 14(5), 1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14051782
[18] Bryukhanov, I.D., Kuchinskaia, O.I., Ni, E.V., et al., 2024. Optical and Geometrical Characteristics of High-Level Clouds from the 2009–2023 Data on Laser Polarization Sensing in Tomsk. Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics. 37, 343–351. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1024856024700441
[19] Kuchinskaia, O., Bryukhanov, I., Penzin, M., et al., 2023. ERA5 Reanalysis for the Data Interpretation on Polarization Laser Sensing of High-Level Clouds, Remote Sensing. 15(1), 109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010109
[20] ECMWF Reanalysis v5 (ERA5). Available from: https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/dataset/ecmwf-reanalysis-v5 (cited 19 September 2024).
[21] ECMWF Confluence Wiki. ERA5: data documentation. Available from: https://confluence.ecmwf.int/display/CKB/ERA5%3A+data+documentation#ERA5:datadocumentation-Introduction (cited 19 November 2024).
[22] Rizvi, A.A., Addoweesh, K., El-Leathy, A., et al., 2014. Sun position algorithm for sun tracking applications. In Proceedings of the IECON 2014 – 40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. Dallas, TX, USA. 5595–5598.
[23] Copernicus Climate Data Store. Available from: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu (cited 19 November 2024).
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Ignatii Samokhvalov, Ilia Bryukhanov, Ivan Akimov, Olesia Kuchinskaia, Maxim Penzin, Denis Romanov, Evgeny Ni, Ivan Zhivotenyuk

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.