
Assessment and Driving Factors of Desertification Vulnerability in the Mu Us Sandy Land, China: A MEDALUS-Based Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i6.8974Abstract
As a major worldwide issue, desertification poses significant threats to ecosystem stability and long-term socio-economic growth. Within China, the Mu Us Sandy land represents a crucial region for studying desertification phenomena. Comprehending how desertification risks are distributed spatially and what mechanisms drive them remains fundamental for implementing effective strategies in land management and risk mitigation. Our research evaluated desertification vulnerability across the Mu Us Sandy land by applying the MEDALUS model, while investigating causal factors via geographical detector methodology. Findings indicated that territories with high desertification vulnerability extend across 71,401.7 km², constituting 76.87% of the entire region, while zones facing extreme desertification hazard cover 20,578.9 km² (22.16%), primarily concentrated in a band-like pattern along the western boundary of the Mu Us Sandy land. Among the four primary indicators, management quality emerged as the most significant driver of desertification susceptibility, followed by vegetation quality and soil quality. Additionally, drought resistance, land use intensity, and erosion protection were identified as the key factors driving desertification sensitivity. The investigation offers significant theoretical perspectives that can guide the formulation of enhanced strategies for controlling desertification and promoting sustainable land resource utilization within the Mu Us Sandy land region.
Keywords:
Desertification Risk; MEDALUS; Geographical Detector Method; Driving FactorsReferences
[1] Sivakumar, M.V., 2007. Interactions between climate and desertification. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 142(2–4), 143–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.025
[2] Briassoulis, H., 2019. Combating land degradation and desertification: The land-use planning quandary. Land. 8(2), 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land8020027
[3] Abuzaid, A.S., Abdelatif, A.D., 2022. Assessment of desertification using modified MEDALUS model in the north Nile Delta, Egypt. Geoderma. 405, 115400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115400
[4] Pravalie, R., Borrelli, P., Panagos, P., et al., 2024. A unifying modelling of multiple land degradation pathways in Europe. Nature Communications. 15, 3862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48252-x
[5] United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, 1994. United Nations convention to combat desertification in countries experiencing serious drought and/or desertification, particularly in Africa. A/AC. 241/27, Paris, 14 October 1994.
[6] United Nations, 2012. Zero Net Land Degradation: A Sustainable Development Goal for Rio+20. UNCCD Secretariat Policy Brief. 5. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification: Bonn, Germany; New York, USA.
[7] Bao, Y., Cheng, L., Bao, Y., et al., 2017. Desertification: China provides a solution to a global challenge. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering. 4(4), 402–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2017187
[8] Yang, X., Zhang, K., Jia, B., et al., 2005. Desertification assessment in China: An overview. Journal of Arid Environments. 63(2), 517–531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.03.032
[9] Zan, G., Wang, C., Li, F., et al., 2023. Key Data Results and Trend Analysis of the Sixth National Survey on Desertification and Sandification. Forest Resources Management. 1, 1–7. DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2023.01.001
[10] Lyu, Y., Shi, P., Han, G., et al., 2020. Desertification control practices in China. Sustainability. 12(8), 3258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083258
[11] Zhang, P., Yi, Y., Xu, J., 2021. Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Forest and Grassland Land Use Changes After the Implementation of Grain for Green Program in China. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis. 60(6), 1107–1122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13209/j.0479-8023.2024.081
[12] Zhai, J., Wang, L., Liu, Y., et al., 2023. Assessing the effects of China's three-north shelter forest program over 40 years. Science of the Total Environment. 857, 159354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159354
[13] Zhao, Y., Chi, W., Kuang, W., et al., 2020. Ecological and environmental consequences of ecological projects in the Beijing–Tianjin sand source region. Ecological Indicators. 112, 106111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106111
[14] Zheng, Y., Dong, L., Xia, Q., et al., 2020. Effects of revegetation on climate in the Mu Us Sandy Land of China. Science of The Total Environment. 739, 139958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139958
[15] Han, X., Jia, G., Yang, G., et al., 2020. Spatiotemporal dynamic evolution and driving factors of desertification in the Mu Us Sandy Land in 30 years. Scientific Reports. 10, 21734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78665-9
[16] Ji, X., Yang, J., Liu, J., et al., 2023. Analysis of Spatial-Temporal Changes and Driving Forces of Desertification in the Mu Us Sandy Land from 1991 to 2021. Sustainability. 15(13), 10399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310399
[17] Wang, X., Song, J., Xiao, Z., et al., 2022. Desertification in the Mu Us Sandy Land in China: Response to climate change and human activity from 2000 to 2020. Geography and Sustainability. 3(2), 177–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2022.06.001
[18] Li, Y., Cao, Z., Long, H., et al., 2017. Dynamic analysis of ecological environment combined with land cover and NDVI changes and implications for sustainable urban–rural development: The case of Mu Us Sandy Land, China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 142, 697–715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.011
[19] Li, J., Li, Y., Wang, X., et al., 2024. Exploring the Spatial-Temporal Patterns, Drivers, and Response Strategies of Desertification in the Mu Us Desert from Multiple Regional Perspectives. Sustainability. 16(21), 9154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219154
[20] Lin, M., Hou, L., Qi, Z., et al., 2022. Impacts of climate change and human activities on vegetation NDVI in China's Mu Us Sandy Land during 2000–2019. Ecological Indicators. 142, 109164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109164
[21] Karnieli, A., Qin, Z., Wu, B., et al., 2014. Spatio-temporal dynamics of land-use and land-cover in the Mu Us sandy land, China, using the change vector analysis technique. Remote Sensing. 6(10), 9316–9339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6109316
[22] Dai, Z., 2010. Intensive agropastoralism: dryland degradation, the Grain-to-Green Program and islands of sustainability in the Mu Us Sandy Land of China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 138(3–4), 249–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.05.006
[23] Wang, J., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., 2019. Impacts of land-use changes on soil erosion in water–wind crisscross erosion region of China. Remote Sensing. 11(14), 1732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11141732
[24] Chen, Y., Lu, H., Wu, H., et al., 2023. Global desert variation under climatic impact during 1982–2020. Science China Earth Sciences. 66, 1062–1071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-022-1052-1
[25] Kosmas, C., Kirkby, M., Geeson, N., 1999. The MEDALUS project: Mediterranean desertification and land use. Manual on key indicators of Desertification and mapping environmental sensitive areas to desertification. EUR 18882. Project ENV4 CT 95 0119. European Commission: Luxembourg.
[26] Ferrara, A., Kosmas, C., Salvati, L., et al., 2020. Updating the MEDALUS‐ESA Framework for Worldwide Land Degradation and Desertification Assessment. Land Degradation & Development. 31, 1593–1607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3559
[27] Ren, Y., Zhang, B., Chen, X., et al., 2024. Analysis of spatial-temporal patterns and driving mechanisms of land desertification in China. Science of The Total Environment. 909, 168429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168429
[28] Abdi, H., Williams, L.J., 2010. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics. 2(4), 433–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101
[29] Shafapourtehrany, M., Yariyan, P., Özener, H., et al., 2022. Evaluating the application of K-mean clustering in Earthquake vulnerability mapping of Istanbul, Turkey. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 79, 103154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103154
[30] Wang, J., Xu, C.D., 2017. Geodetector: Principle and prospective. Acta Geographica Sinica. 72, 116–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb201701010
[31] Ogbue, C., Igboeli, E., Ajaero, C., et al., 2024. Remote sensing analysis of desert sensitive areas using MEDALUS model and GIS in the Niger River Basin. Ecological Indicators. 158, 111404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111404
[32] Zhang, M., Wu, X., 2020. The rebound effects of recent vegetation restoration projects in Mu Us Sandy land of China. Ecological Indicators. 113, 106228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106228
[33] Lin, J., Bo, W., Dong, X., et al., 2024. Evolution of vegetation cover and impacts of climate change and human activities in arid regions of Northwest China: a Mu Us Sandy Land case. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04704-4
[34] Ren, Y., Liu, X., Zhang, B., et al., 2023. Sensitivity Assessment of Land Desertification in China Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing. 15(10), 2674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102674
[35] Bro, R., Smilde, A.K., 2014. Principal component analysis. Analytical Methods. 6, 2812–2831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C3AY41907J
[36] Wang, X., Hua, T., Lang, L., et al., 2017. Spatial differences of aeolian desertification responses to climate in arid Asia. Global and Planetary Change. 148, 22–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.11.008
[37] Wei, W., Guo, Z., Shi, P., et al., 2021. Spatiotemporal changes of land desertification sensitivity in northwest China from 2000 to 2017. Journal of Geographical Sciences. 31, 46–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1832-1
[38] Bai, L., Jiang, L., Yang, D.Y., et al., 2019. Quantifying the spatial heterogeneity influences of natural and socioeconomic factors and their interactions on air pollution using the geographical detector method: a case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 232, 692–704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.342
[39] Ding, Y., Zhang, M., Qian, X., et al., 2019. Using the geographical detector technique to explore the impact of socioeconomic factors on PM2.5 concentrations in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 211, 1480–1490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.159
[40] Ikotun, A.M., Ezugwu, A.E., Abualigah, L., et al., 2023. K-means clustering algorithms: A comprehensive review, variants analysis, and advances in the era of big data. Information Sciences. 622, 178–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.139
[41] Liu, Q., Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., et al., 2018. Spatiotemporal patterns of desertification dynamics and desertification effects on ecosystem Services in the Mu Us Desert in China. Sustainability. 10(3), 589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030589
[42] Qiu, K., Xie, Y., Xu, D., et al., 2018. Ecosystem functions including soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and available potassium are crucial for vegetation recovery. Scientific Reports. 8, 7607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25875-x
[43] Jenks, G.F., 1967. The data model concept in statistical mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography. 7, 186–190.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Yu Ren, Xidong Chen

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.