Are Environmental Vanguard Firms More Proactive Towards Environmental Conservation? An Empirical Study of Power Sector Firms in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v1i2.905Abstract
Environmental protection is a crucial issue for environmentalists and researchers. Almost every stakeholder in the industrial production process of a product is concerned about the detrimental effects on the environment due to emissions. Though environmental regulations are in place, some firms across diverse industrial sectors are considered as the environmental vanguard, i.e., leaders in environmental protection. Does being environmental vanguard result in environmental proactivity? This paper, through an empirical study of Indian power sector firms, studies the environmental proactivity of the firms who are known to be leaders in the adoption of environmental protection norms. A questionnaire-based survey method is used to analyse the responses statistically. The study uses 280 responses for the analysis of the data. Eight hypotheses are proposed and tested statistically through Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). The statistical analysis reveals that the firms who are environmental vanguard are more proactive towards environmental protection. The findings of the study can be useful for the policymakers and environmental managers in the formulation of policies which can be considered as a benchmark for the firms for the protection of the environment.
Keywords:
Proactive environmental strategies; Environmental vanguard; Statistical analysis; Power sector; Structural equation modellingReferences
[1] Reid, A., Miedzinski, M.. Eco-innovation: Final Report for Sectoral Innovation Watch. Technopolis Group, Brighton, 2008.
[2] OECD.. Sustainable manufacturing and eco-innovation: framework. Practices and Measurement–Synthesis Report. OECD, Paris, 2009.
[3] Liu, X., Liu, B., Tomohiro, S., Yu, Q., Bi, J., Fujitsuka, T.. An empirical study on the driving mechanism of proactive corporate environmental mangement in China. J. Environ. Manage, 2010, 91: 1707-1717.
[4] Prajogo, D., Tang, A.K.Y., Lai, K.. Do firms get what they want from ISO 14001 adoption? : An Australian perspective. J. Clean. Prod, 2012, 33: 117-126.
[5] Carruthers, G., Vanclay, F.. The intrinsic features of Environmental Management Systems that facilitate adoption and encourage innovation in primary industries. J. Environ. Manage, 2012, 110: 125-134.
[6] Bansal, P., Roth., K.. Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad. Manage. J., 2000, 43(4): 717-736.
[7] Banerjee, S.B., Iyer, E.S., Kashyap, R.K. Corporate environmentalism: antecedents and influence of industry type. J. Marketing, 2003, 67 (2): 106-122.
[8] Rennings, K.. Redefining innovation-eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol. Econ., 2000, 32 (2): 319–332.
[9] OECD and Eurostat.. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data-Oslo-Manual. OECD/Eurostat, Paris, 1997.
[10] Rehfeld, K.M., Rennings, K., Ziegler, A.. Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: an empirical analysis. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61 (1): 91–100.
[11] Ziegler, A., Rennings, K.. Determinants of environmental innovations in Germany: do organizational measures matter? Discussion Paper No. 04-30. ZEW, Mannheim, 2004.
[12] de Oliveira, O.J., Serra, J.R., Salgado, M.H.. Does ISO 14001 work in Brazil? J. Clean. Prod., 2010, 18: 1797-1806.
[13] Chan-Fishel, M.. Survey of climate change disclosure in SEC filings of automobile, insurance, oil and gas, petrochemical and utilities companies. Friends of the Earth-U.S., September, 2002.
[14] Christmann, P.. Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Acad. Manage. J., 2000, 43 (4): 663-680.
[15] Clarkson, P.M., Li. Y., Richardson G.D., Vasvanri, V.P.. Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. J. Account. Public Pol., 2011, 30: 122-144.
[16] Porter, M., van der Linde, C.. Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect., 1995, 9 (4): 97–118.
[17] Hart, S. L.. A natural resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Manage. Rev., 1995, 20(4): 986-1014.
[18] Hart, S. L., Ahuja, G.. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus. Strateg. Environ., 1996, 5: 30-37.
[19] Repetto, R.. Jobs, Competitiveness, and Environmental Regulation: What Are the Real Issues? World Resources Institute, Washington, 1995.
[20] Smart, B. (Ed.).. Beyond Compliance: a New Industry View of the Environment, World Resources Institute, Washington, 1992.
[21] Willig, J. (Eds.). Environmental TQM, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994.
[22] Bonifant, B., Arnold, M. and Long, D.. Gaining competitive advantage through environmental investments, Bus. Horiz., 1995, 38: 37-47.
[23] Frosch, R., Gallopoulos, N.. Strategies for manufacturing, Scientific American, Sep, 1989, 144-152.
[24] Cairncross, F.. Costing the Earth, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1991.
[25] Gunarathne, N., Lee, K. H.. Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) for environmental management and organizational change. J. Account. Organ. Change, 2015, 11 (3): 362-383.
[26] Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S.. The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitive and economic performance: an empirical study of EU manufacturing. Eur. Manage. J., 2004, 22 (5): 557-572.
[27] Spencer, S. Y., Adams, C., Yapa, P. W. S.. The mediating effects of the adoption of an environmental information system on top management’s commitment and environmental performance. Sustain. Acc. Manage. J., 2013, 4 (1): 75-102.
[28] Buysse, K., Verbeke, A.. PES: A stakeholder management perspective. Strat. Manage. J. , 2003, 24: 453- 470.
[29] Aragón-Correa, J.A.. Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Acad. Manage. J., 1998, 41 (5): 556–567.
[30] Prakash, A.. Why do firms adopt 'beyond compliance' environmental policies? Bus. Strateg. Environ. , 2001, 10: 286-299.
[31] Ramus, C.A., Steger, U.. The Roles of Supervisory Support Behaviors and Environmental Policy in Employee “Eco-initiatives” at Leading-Edge European Companies. Acad. Manage. J., 2000, 43 (4): 605-626.
[32] Sharma, S.. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Acad. Manage. J., 2000, 43: 681- 697.
[33] Sharma, S., Pablo, A.L., Vredenburg, H.. Corporate environmental responsiveness strategies: the importance of issue interpretation and organizational context. J. Appl. Behav. Sci., 1999, 35: 87-108.
[34] Marcus, A.A., Nichols, M. L.. On the edge: heeding the warnings of unusual events. Organ. Sci., 1999, 10: 482–499.
[35] Egri, C., Herman, S.. Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Acad. Manage. J., 2000, 43: 571-604.
[36] Delmas, M.A., Toffel M.W.. Institutional pressure and environmental management practices. In S Sharma, M Starik (Eds.), Stakeholders, the Environment, and Society, Edward Elgar Publishing: Northhampton, MA, 2004: 230-245.
[37] Graedel, T.E., Allenby, B.R.. Industrial Ecology. Prentice Hall, Englewood, 1995.
[38] Ehrlich, P.E., Holdren, J.P.. Impact of population growth. In: Ridker RG (ed) Population, resources and the environment. US Government Printing Office, Washington, 1972, 365–377.
[39] Chapin III, F.S., Kofinas, G.P., Folke, C., (Eds.). Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World, Springer, 2009.
[40] Turner II, B.L.. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2003, 100: 8074–8079.
[41] Smit, B., Wandel, J.. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environ. Chang, 2006, 16: 282–292.
[42] Adger, W.N.. Vulnerability. Global Environ. Chang, 2006, 16: 268–281.
[43] Folke, C.. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social– ecological systems analysis. Global Environ. Chang, 2006, 16: 253–267.
[44] Walker, B. et al.. Resilience, adaptability, and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol. Soc., 2004, 9. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5.
[45] Kareiva, P., Chang, A., Marvier, M.. Development and conservation goals in World Bank projects. Science, 2008, 321: 1638–1639.
[46] Hart, S. L.. Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world. Har. Bus. Rev., 1996, 75 (1): 66-77.
[47] Dahlstrom, K., Howes, C., Leinster, P., Skea, J.. Environmental management systems and company performance: assessing the case for extending risk-based regulation. Eur. Environ., 2003, 13: 187–203.
[48] ISO.. Environmental management systems–general guidelines on principles, systems and supporting techniques, 2004. (ISO 14004:2004).
[49] Rondinelli, D.A., Berry, M.A.. Industry's Role in Air Quality Improvement: Environmental Management Opportunities for the 21st Century. Enviro. Qual. Manage, 1997, 7: 31-44.
[50] Makower, J.. The E-Factor: The Bottom Line Approach to Environmentally Responsible Business, New York: Tilden Press, 1993.
[51] Sullivan, T.F.P., (Eds.). The Greening of American Business-Making Bottom Line Sense of Environmental Responsibility, Rockville, MD: Government Institutes, Inc, 1992.
[52] Mudambi, S. M., Doyle, P., Wong, V.. An Exploration of Branding in Industrial Markets. Ind. Market. Manage, 1997, 26 (5): 433–446.
[53] Chen, Y.S., Lai, S.B., Wen, C.T.. The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan. J. Bus. Ethics., 2006, 67 (4): 331–339.
[54] Peattie, K.. Environmental Marketing Management (Pitman Publishing Corp., London, UK), 1995.
[55] Schmidt, S.T., Schneider, M., Hoffman, V.. Decarbonising the power sector via technological change – differing contributions from heterogeneous firms. Energy Policy, 2012, 43: 466-479.
[56] Ghemawat, P.. Commitment, Free Press, New York, 1991.
[57] Khanna, M.. Non-mandatory approaches to environmental regulation: a survey. J. Econ. Surv., 2001, 15 (3), 291-324.
[58] Khanna, M., Speir, M.. Motivations for Proactive Environmental Management. Sustainability, 2013, 5: 2664-2692.
[59] Koh, S. C. L., Demirbag, M., Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E., Zaim, S.. The impact of supply chain management practices on performance of SMEs. Ind. Manage. Data Syst., 2007, 107(1): 103-124.
[60] Wisner, J.D., Tan, K.C., Leong, G.K.. Supply chain management: a balanced approach. 3rd ed. Canada: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2012.
[61] Flammer, G.. Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: the environmental awareness of investors. Acad. Manage. J., 2013, 56 (3): 758-781.
[62] Churchill Jr., G.A.. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. Market. Res., 1979, 16 (1): 64-73.
[63] Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W.. Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull, 1988, 103 (3): 411- 423.
[64] Kelloway, E.K.. Structural Equation Modelling in Perspective. J. Organ. Behav., 1995, 16 (3): 215-224.
[65] Kaynak, H.. The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. J. Operations Manage, 2003, 21: 405–435.
[66] Tran, V. M., Perry, J. A.. Challenges to using neem (Azadirachtaindica var. Sinensis Valenton) in Thailand. Econ. Bot., 2003, 57 (1): 93-102.
[67] Tabachnick, B., Linda, S.. Using multivariate statistics: Pearson Education, Limited, 2012.
[68] Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B, Anderson, R., Tatham, R.. Multivariate Data Analysis. A Global Perspective: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2010.
[69] Chen, F. F.. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct. Equ. Model., 2007, 14 (3): 464-504.
[70] Liu, J. et al.. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 2007, 317: 1513–1516.