Promoting Green Choices: Vietnamese Students’ Intentions to Use Electric Taxi Services and Sustainability Factors

Authors

  • Dan Thi Thanh Nguyen

    School of Economics and Management, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi 11615, Vietnam
  • Ngoc Thi Kim Pham

    School of Economics and Management, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi 11615, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i6.9209
Received: 24 March 2025 | Revised: 15 April 2025 | Accepted: 22 April 2025 | Published Online: 6 June 2025

Abstract

Sustainable development has become a critical global priority, and green transportation solutions, such as electric taxis, play a vital role in achieving this goal. This study examines the factors influencing students' intentions to adopt electric taxi services in Hanoi, Vietnam, as a step toward sustainable urban mobility. We surveyed 573 students and analyzed key determinants using reliability tests, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and linear regression. The results indicate that four factors significantly influence adoption intentions: Perceived Usefulness and Sustainability, Price, Brand Awareness, and Service Quality. Among these, Perceived Usefulness and Sustainability had the strongest positive impact, while Service Quality exerted the weakest influence. Notably, Habit and Ease of Use & Transaction Convenience were found to be statistically insignificant in the final model. These findings provide practical implications for businesses and policymakers aiming to use electric taxi adoption. To enhance appeal, stakeholders should emphasize environmental benefits, competitive pricing, and brand recognition while improving service reliability. By addressing these factors, electric taxi services can accelerate the transition to sustainable transportation, aligning with global climate goals and transforming urban mobility. This study offers actionable insights for encouraging greener travel behaviors among students, a key demographic for long-term sustainability impact.

Keywords:

Intention to Use; Electric Taxi; Student; Hanoi; Vietnam

References

[1] Hanh, H., 2023. State budget spending over 21,000 billion VND per year for environmental causes. Available from: https://www.tinnhanhchungkhoan.vn/chi-ngan-sach-nha-nuoc-tren-21000-ty-dong-moi-nam-cho-su-nghiep-moi-truong-post324697.html#:~:text=Th%E1%BB%9Di%20s%E1%BB%B1-,Chi%20ng%C3%A2n%20s%C3%A1ch%20nh%C3%A0%20n%C6%B0%E1%BB%9Bc%20tr%C3%AAn%2021.000%20t%E1%BB%B7%20%C4%91%E1%BB%93ng,cho%20s%E1%BB%B1%20nghi%E1%BB%87p%20m%C3%B4i%20tr%C6%B0%E1%BB%9Dng&text=%E2%80%9CB%C3%ACnh%20qu%C3%A2n%205%20n%C4%83m%20tr%E1%BB%9F,L%E1%BB%A3i%20th%E1%BA%BF%20ng%C6%B0%E1%BB%9Di%20d%E1%BA%ABn%20%C4%91%E1%BA%A7u%22 (cited 27 June 2023).

[2] Shi, X.Q., Li, X.N., Yang, J.X., 2013. Research on carbon reduction potential of electric vehicles for low- carbon transportation and its influencing factors. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science. 2013, 34(1), 385–394.

[3] Gao, Y., 2017. China's response to climate change issues after Paris_Climate Change Conference. Climate Change Research. 13(1), 89–94.

[4] Wu, H.Y., Huang, R., You, L., et al., 2019. Recent progress in taxi trajectory data mining. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica. 48(11), 1341–1356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11947/j.AGCS.2019.20190210

[5] Li, D., Li, Q.Q., Yang, B.S., et al., 2008. Techniques of GIS, GPS and RS for the development of intelligent transportation. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University. 33(4), 331–336.

[6] Vazifeh, M.M., Santi, P., Resta, G., et al., 2018. Addressing the minimum fleet problem in on-demand urban mobility. Nature. 557(7706), 534–538.

[7] World’s Most Polluted Cities in 2022. Available from: https://wisevoter.com/country-rankings/most-polluted-countries/#vietnam .

[8] Labbe, D., 2021. Urban Transition in Hanoi: Huge Challenges Ahead. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute: Singapore. pp 1-26.

[9] Yen Chi, 2024. What is the total number of fixed interprovincial passenger transport routes operating across the country? Available from: https://baoxaydung.vn/ca-nuoc-co-bao-nhieu-tuyen-van-tai-hanh-khach-co-dinh-lien-tinh-192240422235604454.htm (cited 23 April 2024).

[10] Thanh Trung, 2023. Every 8 Persons in Hanoi Has One Car. Available from: https://kinhtedothi.vn/ha-noi-trung-binh-cu-8-nguoi-co-1-nguoi-so-huu-o-to.html (cited 3 April 2023).

[11] Sumasto, F., Imansuri, F., Agus, M., et al., 2020. Sustainable development impact of implementing electric taxis in Jakarta: A cost-benefit analysis. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 885, 012027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/885/1/012027

[12] Chiang, S., 2023. Vietnamese EV Maker VinFast Remains Optimistic despite Challenging Entry to U.S. Auto Market. Available from: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/08/vietnam-ev-maker-vinfast-us-auto-market.html (cited 29 March 2023).

[13] Coffman, M., Bernstein, P., Wee, S., 2017. Electric Vehicles Revisited: A Review of Factors That Affect Adoption. Transport Reviews. 37, 79–93.

[14] Liao, F., Molin, E., van Wee, B., 2017. Consumer Preferences for Electric Vehicles: A Literature Review. Transport Reviews. 37, 252–275.

[15] Nho, T.T., Vy, N., 2024. Factors Affecting the Students’ Usage Intention towards Electric Transportation in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 1403, 012006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1403/1/012006

[16] Ahmadi, P., 2019. Environmental Impacts and Behavioral Drivers of Deep Decarbonization for Transportation through Electric Vehicles. Journal of Cleaner Production. 225, 1209–1219.

[17] Yan, S., 2018. The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Tax Incentives for Battery Electric Vehicles in Europe. Energy Policy. 123, 53–63.

[18] Hardman, S., Chandan, A., Tal, G., et al., 2017. The Effectiveness of Financial Purchase Incentives for Battery Electric Vehicles—A Review of the Evidence. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 80, 1100–1111.

[19] Zhang, X., Xie, J., Rao, R., et al., 2014. Policy Incentives for the Adoption of Electric Vehicles across Countries. Sustainability. 6, 8056–8078.

[20] Chen, T., Zhang, X.-P., Wang, J., et al., 2020. A Review on Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Development in the UK. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy. 8, 193–205.

[21] Singh, V., Singh, V., Vaibhav, S., 2020. A Review and Simple Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing Adoption of Electric Vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 86, 102436.

[22] Kumar, R.R., Alok, K., 2020. Adoption of Electric Vehicle: A Literature Review and Prospects for Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production. 253, 119911.

[23] Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., Bodin, J., 2015. Advances in Consumer Electric Vehicle Adoption Research: A Review and Research Agenda. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 34, 122–136.

[24] Hagman, J., Langbroek, J.H.M., 2019. Conditions for electric vehicle taxi: A case study in the Greater Stockholm region. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 13(6), 450–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1481547

[25] Tanwir, N., Hamzah, M., 2020. Predicting Purchase Intention of Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 11(2), 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj11020035

[26] Nguyen, V., Lam, V., Binh, P., et al., 2024. Research on factors affecting customers' intention to purchase electric vehicles in Ho Chi Minh City. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378658145_NGHIEN_CUU_CAC_YEU_TO_ANH_HUONG_DEN_Y_DINH_MUA_XE_DIEN_CUA_KHACH_HANG_TAI_THANH_PHO_HO_CHI_MINH (cited March 2024).

[27] Newmotion, 2020. EV Driver Survey 2020. Newmotion: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 3-5.

[28] Kotler, P., Keller, K., 2006. Marketing Management, 12th Edition. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. p.414.

[29] Kotler, P., Keller, K.L., 2009. Marketing Management. Erlangga: Jakarta, Indonesia. pp. 166-167.

[30] He, F., Shen, Z.-J.M., 2015. Modeling taxi services with smartphone-based e-hailing applications. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 58, 93–106.

[31] Pham, A., Dacosta, I., Jacot-Guillarmod, B., et al., 2017. PrivateRide: A Privacy-Enhanced Ride-Hailing Service. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. 2017(2), 38–56.

[32] Tuyen, D., Vu, C., 2023. Green taxi experience: What's so great about electric technology cars? Available from: https://thanhnien.vn/trai-nghiem-taxi-xanh-xe-cong-nghe-chay-bang-dien-co-gi-hay-185230429091444205.htm (cited 29 April 2023).

[33] Ajzen I., Fishbein M., 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. pp. 41-44.

[34] Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 13, 319–340.

[35] Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Tondeur, J., 2019. The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education. 128, 13–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009

[36] Robles-Gómez, A., Tobarra, L., Pastor-Vargas, R., et al., 2021. Analyzing the users’ acceptance of an IoT Cloud Platform using the UTAUT/TAM model. IEEE Access. 9, 150004–150020.

[37] Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., 2003. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly. 27(1), 51–90.

[38] Sleiman, K.A.A., Juanli, L., Lei, H., et al., 2021. User trust levels and adoption of mobile payment systems in China: An empirical analysis. Sage Open. 11(4), 215824402110565.

[39] Lee, K., Oh, S., 2022. The users’ intention to participate in a VR/AR sports experience by applying the extended technology acceptance model (ETAM). Healthcare. 10(6), 1117.

[40] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., et al., 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 27(3), 425–478.

[41] Ghandriz, T., Jacobson, B., Laine, L., et al., 2020. Impact of automated driving systems on road freight transport and electrified propulsion of heavy vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 115, 102610.

[42] Guo, C., Sentouh, C., Popieul, J.C., et al., 2019. Cooperation between driver and automated driving system: Implementation and evaluation. Transportation research part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 61, 314–325.

[43] Wu, Z., Zhou, H., Xi, H., et al., 2021. Analysing public acceptance of autonomous buses based on an extended TAM model. IET Intelligent Transport Systems. 15(10), 1318–1330.

[44] Yu, Z., Jiang, K., Huang, Z., et al., 2022. Will I start an automated driving system? Report on the emotions, cognition, and intention of drivers who experienced real-world conditional automated driving. Cognition, Technology & Work. 24(4), 641–666.

[45] Liu, X., Yao, X., Bian, Y., et al., 2021. Drivers’ acceptance of mobile navigation applications: An extended technology acceptance model considering drivers’ sense of direction, navigation application affinity and distraction perception. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 145, 102507.

[46] Vörös, F., Gartner, G., Peterson, M.P., et al., 2022. What does the ideal built-in car navigation system look like? An investigation in the central European region. Applied Sciences. 12(8), 3716.

[47] Schipor, O.A., Vatavu, R.D., 2021. Empirical results for high-definition video and augmented reality content delivery in hyper-connected cars. Interacting with Computers. 33(1), 3–16.

[48] Cooley, E.H., Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Strayer, D.L., et al., 2022. On-Road vehicle study of the experience of automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 87, 444– 453.

[49] Hartwich, F., Witzlack, C., Beggiato, M., et al., 2019. The first impression counts: A combined driving simulator and test track study on the development of trust and acceptance of highly automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 65, 522–535.

[50] Chen, H.K., Yan, D.W., 2019. Interrelationships between influential factors and behavioral intention with regard to autonomous vehicles. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 13(7), 511–527.

[51] Dos Santos, F.L.M., Duboz, A., Grosso, M., et al., 2022. An acceptance divergence? Media, citizens and policy perspectives on autonomous cars in the European Union. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 158, 224–238.

[52] Leicht, T., Chtourou, A., Youssef, K.B., 2018. Consumer innovativeness and intentioned autonomous car adoption. The Journal of High Technology Management Research. 29(1), 1–11.

[53] Ro, Y., Ha, Y., 2019. A factor analysis of consumer expectations for autonomous cars. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 59(1), 52–60.

[54] Van den Berg, V.A., Verhoef, E.T., 2016. Autonomous cars and dynamic bottleneck congestion: The effects on capacity, value of time and preference heterogeneity. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 94, 43–60.

[55] Curtale, R., Liao, F., van der Waerden, P., 2021. User acceptance of electric car-sharing services: The case of the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 149, 266–282.

[56] Kapser, S., Abdelrahman, M., 2020. Acceptance of autonomous delivery vehicles for last-mile delivery in Germany: Extending UTAUT2 with risk perceptions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 111, 210–225.

[57] Tran, V., Zhao, S., Diop, E.B., et al., 2019. Travelers’ acceptance of electric carsharing systems in developing countries: The case of China. Sustainability. 11(19), 5348.

[58] Curtale, R., Liao, F., Rebalski, E., 2022. Transitional BI to use autonomous electric car-sharing services: Evidence from four European countries. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 135, 103516.

[59] Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., Xu, X., 2012. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 36(1), 157–178.

[60] Foroughi, B., Nhan, P.V., Iranmanesh, M., et al., 2023. Determinants of intention to use autonomous vehicles: Findings from PLS-SEM and ANFIS. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 70, 103158.

[61] Sheth, J.N., Newman, B.I., Gross, B.L., 1991. Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research. 22(2), 159–170.

[62] Acheampong, R.A., Siiba, A., 2020. Modelling the determinants of car-sharing adoption intentions among young adults: The role of attitude, perceived benefits, travel expectations and socio-demographic factors. Transportation. 47(5), 2557–2580.

[63] Kim, H., Jan, I.U., 2021. Consumption value factors as determinants of use intention and behavior of car-sharing services in the Republic of Korea. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. 37(2), 462–480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1890551

[64] Li, H., Wen, H., 2019. How is motivation generated in collaborative consumption: Mediation effect in extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Sustainability. 11(3), 640.

[65] Zhu, Y., Wei, Y., Zhou, Z., et al., 2022. Consumers’ continuous use intention of O2O e-commerce platform on community: A value co-creation perspective. Sustainability. 14(3), 1666.

[66] Bhattacharyya, J., Balaji, M.S., Jiang, Y., 2023. Causal complexity of sustainable consumption: Unveiling the equifinal causes of purchase intentions of plant-based meat alternatives. Journal of Business Research. 156, 113511.

[67] Hwang, H., Yeo, H., 2022. Inconsistency between subjective propensity and practice of sustainable consumption: Impact of the consumers’ values-in-behavior and social participation. Sustainable Development. 30(6), 1796–1810.

[68] Jiang, X., Ding, Z., Liu, R., 2019. Can Chinese residential low-carbon consumption behavior intention be better explained? The role of cultural values. Natural Hazards. 95(1–2), 155–171.

[69] Liang, J., Li, J., Lei, Q., 2022. Exploring the influence of environmental values on green consumption behavior of apparel: A chain multiple mediation model among Chinese generation Z. Sustainability. 14(19), 12850.

[70] Roos, D., Hahn, R., 2017. Does shared consumption affect consumers’ values, attitudes, and norms? A panel study. Journal of Business Research. 77, 113–123.

[71] Tandon, A., Kaur, P., Bhatt, Y., et al., 2021. Why do people purchase from food delivery apps? A consumer value perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 63, 102667.

[72] Cronin, J.J., Taylor, S.A., 1992. Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journalof Marketing. 56, 55–68.

[73] Zeithaml, V.A., Bitner, M.J., 2000. Services Marketing. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA. pp. 85-120.

[74] Hu, D.D., Huang, L., Liu, C., et al., 2022. Data driven optimization for electric vehicle charging station locating and sizing with charging satisfaction consideration in urban areas. IET Renewable Power Generation. 16(12), 2630–2643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12382

[75] Chen, C.F., Chen, Y.X., Mu, P.J., et al., 2021. Beyond adoption of shared bike: A case study on antecedents and consequences of brand attachment in Taiwan. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 40, 100574.

[76] Chakraborty, D., Siddiqui, M., Siddiqui, A., 2022. Can initial trust boost intention to purchase Ayurveda products? A theory of consumption value (TCV) perspective. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 46(6), 2521–2541.

[77] Sweeney, J.C., Soutar, G.N., 2001. Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing. 77(2), 203–220.

[78] Eboli, L., Mazzulla, G., 2010. How to capture the passengers’ point of view on a transit service through rating and choice options. Transport Reviews. 30(4), 435–450.

[79] Paundra, J., Rook, L., van Dalen, J., et al., 2017. Preferences for car sharing services: Effects of instrumental attributes and psychological ownership. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 53, 121–130.

[80] Berry, L.L., Seiders, K., Grewal, D., 2002. Understanding service convenience. Journal of Marketing. 66(3), 1–17.

[81] Cruz-Jesus, F., Figueira-Alves, H., Tam, C., et al., 2023. Pragmatic and idealistic reasons: What drives electric vehicle drivers’ satisfaction and continuance intention? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 170, 103626.

[82] Nijland, H., van Meerkerk, J., 2017. Mobility and environmental impacts of car sharing in the Netherlands. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 23, 84–91.

[83] Limayem, M., Hirt, S.G., Cheung, C.M.K., 2007. How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance. MIS Quarterly. 31(4), 705–737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25148817

[84] Sakunlertvattana, W., 2016. Factors influencing consumer brand choice of top 3 taxi booking mobile applications in Bangkok: Uber, Grabtaxi and Easy taxi [Master’s Thesis]. Bangkok: Bangkok University. pp. 42-45.

[85] Hoque, R., Sorwar, G., 2017. Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: An extension of the UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 101, 75–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.03.011

[86] Madigan, R., Louw, T., Wilbrink, M., et al., 2017. What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 50, 55–64.

[87] Simsekoglu, Ö., Klöckner, C., 2019. Factors related to the intention to buy an e-bike: A survey study from Norway. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 60, 573–581.

[88] Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U.M., Herrmann, A., 2005. The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing. 69(3), 19–34.

[89] Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., Ukkonen, A., 2016. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(9), 2047–2059.

[90] Fang, W.L., Xin, Y.R., Zhang, Z.H., 2023. Eco-label knowledge versus environmental concern toward consumer’s switching intentions for electric vehicles: A roadmap toward green innovation and environmental sustainability. Energy & Environment. 18, 12025.

[91] Lampo, A., Silva, S.C., Duarte, P., 2023. The role of environmental concern and technology show-off on electric vehicles adoption: The case of Macau. International Journal of Emerging Markets. 20(12), 561–583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-10-2021-1637

[92] Li, J., Zhang, A.O., He, H.N., et al., 2023. The effect of environmental concerns on electric vehicles adoption behavior in dual-Distribution channel under the background of platform economy. International Journal of Logistics-Research and Applications. 26(1), 1–19.

[93] Schultz, P.W, Shriver, C., Tabanico, J.J., et al., 2004. Implicit Connections with Nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 24, 31–42.

[94] Huong, P.T.L., 2014. Predicting young consumers' green purchase intention: The influence of cultural and psychological factors. Economics & Development. 200(2), 66–78.

[95] Cochran, W.G., 1977. Sampling Techniques, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA. pp. 75-76.

Downloads

How to Cite

Dan Thi Thanh Nguyen, & Ngoc Thi Kim Pham. (2025). Promoting Green Choices: Vietnamese Students’ Intentions to Use Electric Taxi Services and Sustainability Factors. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 7(6), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i6.9209

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 6 (June 2025): In Progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Dan Thi Thanh Nguyen, Ngoc Thi Kim Pham

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC