Enhancing Smallholder Aquaculture in Philippine Peatlands: Challenges, Opportunities, and Nature-Based Solutions in the Leyte Sab-a Basin

Authors

  • Libertine Agatha Densing

    Department of Environmental Science, Visayas State University Alangalang, Binongtoan, Alangalang, Leyte 6517 Philippines

  • Heremerose E. Matutes

    Department of Environmental Science, Visayas State University Alangalang, Binongtoan, Alangalang, Leyte 6517 Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i8.10047
Received: 16 May 2025 | Revised: 26 June 2025 | Accepted: 3 July 2025 | Published Online: 19 August 2025

Abstract

This study explores the status, challenges, and opportunities of smallholder aquaculture in the Leyte Sab-a Basin Peatland (LSBP), with a particular focus on the application of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) for sustainable management. Using a mixed-methods approach that combines a comprehensive literature review with a focus group discussion (FGD) involving 22 local practitioners, the study identifies both traditional practices—such as bamboo pond structures and the use of Kangkong (Ipomoea aquatica) and Azolla as fish feed—and key constraints to productivity. These include environmental vulnerabilities (e.g., declining water quality, climate variability), technical limitations (e.g., disease risks, lack of fingerlings), and socio-economic barriers (e.g., limited market access, financial insecurity, and gender inequality). While most smallholders are unfamiliar with formal NbS frameworks, their current practices already reflect ecological principles aligned with NbS. The study further highlights the socio-economic significance of aquaculture as both a livelihood resource and a contributor to food security in rural peatland communities. Linking traditional knowledge with scientifically guided NbS—such as Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA), aquaponics, and biofiltration systems—can enhance ecosystem resilience and livelihood security. In addition, strengthening gender-inclusive participation and providing equitable access to training and financial support are critical to improving resilience. This study concludes that targeted capacity-building, financial support mechanisms, and multi-stakeholder partnerships are needed to facilitate inclusive, sustainable, and climate-resilient aquaculture systems in peatland environments. Beyond addressing immediate livelihood changes, these strategies also contribute to biodiversity conservation, ecosystem restoration, and climate adaptation in fragile wetland landscapes.

Keywords:

Smallholder Aquaculture; Peatland Sustainability; Nature-Based Solutions (NbS); Leyte Sab-a Basin Peatland (LSBP)

References

[1] Dargie, G.C., Lewis, S.L., Lawson, I.T., et al., 2017. Age, Extent and Carbon Storage of the Central Congo Basin Peatland Complex. Nature. 542(1), 86–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21048

[2] Page, S.E., Rieley, J.O., Banks, C.J., 2010. Global and Regional Importance of the Tropical Peatland Carbon Pool. Global Change Biology. 17(2), 798–818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02279.x

[3] Osaki, M., Tsuji, N. (eds.), 2016. Tropical Peatland Ecosystems. Springer: Tokyo, Japan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55681-7

[4] Department of Environment and Natural Resources – Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau (DENR-PAWB), 2005. National Action Plan for the Sustainable Use and Protection of Philippine Peatlands. Available from: https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/phi211388.pdf (cited 18 August 2025)

[5] Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (PAWB-DENR), 2020. National action plan for the sustainable use and protection of Philippine peatlands: under the ASEAN Peatland Management Strategy (APMS). Available from: https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/gdc/gdcovop/2013341761/2013341761.pdf (cited 01 June 2024)

[6] Orella, J., Africa, D.R., Bustillo, C.H., et al., 2022. Above-and-Belowground Carbon Stocks in Two Contrasting Peatlands in the Philippines. Forests. 13(2), 303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020303

[7] Alibo, V.L.B., Lasco, R.D., 2012. Carbon Storage of Caimpugan Peatland in Agusan Marsh, Philippines and its Role in Greenhouse Gas Mitigation. Journal of Environmental Science and Management. 15(2), 50–58

[8] Bobon-Carnice, P.A., Chanton, J.P., Migo, V.P., et al., 2023. Carbon Storage of Leyte Sab-a Basin Peatland, Philippines. Environmental and Natural Resources Journal. 21(5), 402–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32526/ennrj/21/20230015

[9] Xu, J., Morris, P.J., Liu, J., et al., 2018. PEATMAP: Refining Estimates of Global Peatland Distribution Based on a Meta-Analysis. Catena. 160, 134–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.09.010

[10] Harrison, M., Rieley, J., 2018. Tropical Peatland Biodiversity and Conservation in Southeast Asia. Mires and Peat. 22, 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19189/MaP.2018.OMB.382

[11] Jomadiao, J.B., Ambida, M.A.J., n.d. Community Dependence on the Leyte Sab-a Basin Peatland Resources, Leyte. Unpublished report.

[12] Matutes, H., Densing, L.A., 2022. Avifauna Composition and Communities in Leyte Sab-a Basin Peatland and its Vicinity in Northeastern Leyte, Philippines. Philippine Journal of Natural History. 6(1), 35–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6569636

[13] Densing, L.A.F., Matutes, H.E.M., 2024. Assessment of Herpetofauna and Mammals in Leyte Sab-a Basin Peatland, Philippines. Mires and Peat. 31, 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19189/MaP.2022.OMB.Sc.2440611

[14] Roshetko, J.M., Lasco, R.D., Angeles, M.S.D., 2007. Smallholder Agroforestry Systems for Carbon Storage. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 12(2), 219–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9010-9

[15] Naylor, R.L., Hardy, R.W., Buschmann, A.H., et al., 2021. A 20-Year Retrospective Review of Global Aquaculture. Nature. 591, 551–563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6

[16] Nguyen, H.M., Ho, H.L., Babel, M.S., et al., 2024. Nature-Based Solutions for Improving Food Security: A Systematic Global Review. Heliyon. 10(16), e36082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36082

[17] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2023. Ecosystem services & biodiversity (ESB). Available from: https://www.fao.org/ecosystem-services-biodiversity/en/ (cited 01 June 2024).

[18] Pradeepkiran, J.A., 2019. Aquaculture Role in Global Food Security with Nutritional Value: A Review. Translational Animal Science. 3(2), 903–910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz012

[19] Miralles-Wilhelm, F., 2021. Nature-Based Solutions in Agriculture – Sustainable Management and Conservation of Land, Water, and Biodiversity. FAO and The Nature Conservancy: Rome, Italy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cb3140en

[20] Dewi, S., Belcher, B., Puntodewo, A., 2013. Village Economic Opportunity, Forest Dependence, and Rural Livelihoods in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. World Development. 41, 75–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.06.016

[21] Irz, X., Stevenson, J.R., Tanoy, A., et al., 2007. The Equity and Poverty Impacts of Aquaculture: Insights from the Philippines. Development Policy Review. 25(4), 495–516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00382.x

[22] Gephart, J.A., Golden, C.D., Asche, F., et al., 2020. Scenarios for Global Aquaculture and Its Role in Human Nutrition. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture. 29(1), 122–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1782342

[23] Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR), 2022. Philippine Fisheries Profile 2022. PCA Compound, Elliptical Road, Quezon City, Philippines. Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources: Quezon City, Philippines.

[24] Aypa, S.M., Baconguis, S.R., 2000. Philippines: Mangrove-Friendly Aquaculture. Proceedings of The Workshop on Mangrove-Friendly Aquaculture; January 11–15, 1999; Iloilo City, Philippines. pp. 41–56

[25] Andrada, M., 2015. The Dynamics of Philippine Aquaculture. Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal. 6(2), e121.

[26] Cruz, R.A.L., Kumar, V., Ragaza, J.A., 2019. Some current trends and challenges in Philippine aquaculture, with an emphasis on synergies with biodiversity initiative. Available from: https://archium.ateneo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=biology-faculty-pubs (cited 01 August 2024).

[27] Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR), 2019. Philippine fisheries profile 2019. Available from: https://www.bfar.da.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Philippine-Fisheries-Profile-2019.pdf (cited 25 May 2024).

[28] Bergquist, D.A., 2007. Sustainability and Local People's Participation in Coastal Aquaculture: Regional Differences and Historical Experiences in Sri Lanka and the Philippines. Environmental Management. 40(5), 787–802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0108-y

[29] Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR), 2019. Philippine Fisheries Profile 2018. Available from: https://www.bfar.da.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Philippine-Fisheries-Profile-2018.pdf (cited 18 August 2025).

[30] Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR), 2023. Philippine Fisheries Profile 2022. Available from: https://www.bfar.da.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2022-Philippine-Fisheries-Profile.pdf (cited 18 August 2025).

[31] Smith, I.R., Pullin, R.S.V., 1984. Tilapia Production Booms in the Philippines. ICLARM Newsletter. 7(1), 7–9.

[32] Guerrero, R.D. III, 1979. Cage Culture of Tilapia in the Philippines. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Pen Cage Culture of Fish; February 11–22, 1979; Iloilo City, Philippines. pp. 105–106.

[33] Romana-Eguia, M.R.R., Eguia, R.V., Pakingking, R.V. Jr., 2020. Tilapia Culture: The Basics. Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center: Iloilo City, Philippines.

[34] Guerrero, R.D. III, 2019. Farmed Tilapia Production in the Philippines Is Declining: What Has Happened and What Can Be Done. Philippine Journal of Science. 148(2), 11–15.

[35] Acosta, B.O., Gupta, M.V., 2010. The Genetic Improvement of Farmed Tilapia s Project: Impact and Lessons Learned. In: De Silva, S.S., Davy F.B. (eds.). Success Stories in Asian Aquaculture. Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands. pp. 149–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3087-0_8

[36] El-Sayed, A.F.M., 2019. Tilapia Culture, 2nd ed. Academic Press: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-04085-5

[37] Kajungiro, R., Mapenzi, L., Nyinondi, C., et al., 2019. The Need of a Structured Tilapia Breeding Program in Tanzania to Enhance Aquaculture Production: A Review. Tanzania Journal of Science. 45, 355–371

[38] Rosario, W.R., Tayamen, M., 2007. Giant Freshwater Prawn Farming in the Philippines. In: Eguia, M.R.R., Aralar, M.L.C. (Comps.). Recent Developments in the Genetic Improvement of the Giant Freshwater Prawn (Macrobrachium sp.). Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center: Iloilo City, Philippines. pp. 57–62.

[39] Rosario, W.R., Lopez, N.A., 2005. Status of P. vannamei Aquaculture in the Philippines. In: Regional Technical Consultation on the Aquaculture of P. vannamei and Other Exotic Shrimps in Southeast Asia, Manila, Philippines. SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department: Iloilo City, Philippines. pp. 62–68.

[40] Duremdez, R.C., Lio-Po, G.D., 1988. Isolation and Identification of Pseudomonas fluorescens from Hatchery-Reared Tilapia Fry (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus). SEAFDEC Asian Aquaculture. 10(2), 9.

[41] Legario, F.S., Choresca Jr., C.H., Turnbull, J.F., et al., 2020. Isolation and Molecular Characterization of Streptococcal Species Recovered from Clinical Infections in Farmed Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in the Philippines. Journal of Fish Diseases. 43(11), 1431–1442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.13247

[42] Limbauan, J., 2018. Pathogenicity and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacteria Isolated from Kidney, Liver, and Brain of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Stocked in Intensive Cage Farming Systems in Taal Lake, Batangas [Master thesis] Manila, Philippines: De La Salle University.

[43] Hays, L., 2020. Aquaculture in the Philippines: the top 10 diseases shrimp farmers should be aware of. Available from: https://www.qb-labs.com/blog/2020/05/25/top-10-diseases-shrimp-farmers-should-be-aware-of (cited 28 May 2024).

[44] Berg, H., 2002. Rice Monoculture and Integrated Rice–Fish Farming in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam—Economic and Ecological Considerations. Ecological Economics. 41, 95–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00027-7

[45] Nhan, D., Phong, L., Verdegem, M., et al., 2007. Integrated Freshwater Aquaculture, Crop and Livestock Production in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: Determinants and the Role of the Pond. Agricultural Systems. 94(2), 445–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.11.017

[46] Lu, J., Li, X., 2006. Review of Rice–Fish–Farming Systems in China—One of the Globally Important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS). Aquaculture. 260(1–4), 106–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.05.059

[47] Brummett, R., Williams, M., 2000. The Evolution of Aquaculture in African Rural and Economic Development. Ecological Economics. 33(2), 193–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00142-1

[48] Prein, M., Ahmed, M., 2000. Integration of Aquaculture into Smallholder Farming Systems for Improved Food Security and Household Nutrition. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. 21(4), 466–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650002100424

[49] Filipski, M., Belton, B., 2018. Give a Man a Fishpond: Modeling the Impacts of Aquaculture in the Rural Economy. World Development. 110, 205–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.023

[50] Tahiluddin, A.B., Terzi, E., 2021. An Overview of Fisheries and Aquaculture in the Philippines. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences. 6(4), 475–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.944292

[51] Dagar, J.C., Gupta, S.R., Teketay, D., 2020. Agroforestry for Degraded Landscapes: Recent Advances and Emerging Challenges. Springer: Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4136-0_1

[52] FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), ICLARM (International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, now known as WorldFish), and IIRR (International Institute of Rural Reconstruction), 2001. Integrated Agriculture–Aquaculture: A Primer (FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 407). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy.

[53] Baticados, D., Agbayani, R., Quinitio, E., 2014. Community-Based Technology Transfer in Rural Aquaculture: The Case of Mudcrab Scylla serrata Nursery in Ponds in Northern Samar, Central Philippines. AMBIO: A Journal of Environment and Society. 43, 1047–1058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0528-5

[54] Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center (SEAFDEC), 2022. The Southeast Asian State of Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center (SEAFDEC): Bangkok, Thailand.

[55] Barel, J., Moulia, V., Hamard, S., et al., 2021. Come Rain, Come Shine: Peatland Carbon Dynamics Shift Under Extreme Precipitation. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 9, 659953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.659953

[56] Mramba, R.P., Kahindi, E.J., 2023. The Status and Challenges of Aquaculture Development in Dodoma, a Semi-Arid Region in Tanzania. Aquaculture International. 31, 1551–1568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-022-01041-z

[57] Rukanda, J.J., Sigurgeirsson, O., 2018. Evaluation of aquaculture development in Tanzania, vol. 19. Available from: http://www.unuftp.is/static/fellows/document/janeth16aprf.pdf (cited 5 June 2024).

[58] Hughes, A.D., 2021. Defining Nature-Based Solutions Within the Blue Economy: The Example of Aquaculture. Frontiers in Marine Science. 8, 711443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.711443

[59] Radu, D., Duval, T., 2018. Precipitation Frequency Alters Peatland Ecosystem Structure and CO₂ Exchange: Contrasting Effects on Moss, Sedge, and Shrub Communities. Global Change Biology. 24(5), 2051–2065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14057

[60] Decena, S.C.P., Arribado, A.O., Villacorta-Parilla, S., et al., 2021. Effects of Land Use Conversion on Selected Physico-Chemical Properties of Peat in the Leyte Sab-a Basin Peatland, Philippines. Mires and Peat. 27, 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19189/MaP.2021.BG.StA.2287

[61] Decena, S.C.P., Villacorta-Parilla, S., Arribado, A.O., et al., 2022. Impact of Land Use Conversion on Carbon Stocks and Selected Peat Physico-Chemical Properties in the Leyte Sab-a Basin Peatland, Philippines. Wetlands. 42, 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-021-01520-8

[62] Hooijer, A., Page, S., Canadell, J., et al., 2009. Current and Future CO₂ Emissions from Drained Peatlands in Southeast Asia. Biogeosciences. 7(5), 1505–1514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1505-2010

[63] Miettinen, J., Shi, C., Liew, S., 2012. Two Decades of Destruction in Southeast Asia's Peat Swamp Forests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 10(3), 124–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/100236

[64] Baldoza, B.J.S., Montojo, U.M., Perelonia, K.B., et al., 2020. Status of Water Quality in Fishponds Surrounding Manila Bay. The Philippine Journal of Fisheries. 27(2), 111–118.

[65] Gopal, B., 2012. Future of Wetlands in Tropical and Subtropical Asia, Especially in the Face of Climate Change. Aquatic Sciences. 75, 39–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-011-0247-y

[66] Yamamoto, K., Sayama, T., Apip, 2021. Impact of Climate Change on Flood Inundation in a Tropical River Basin in Indonesia. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science. 8, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00386-4

[67] Nhan, D.K., Trung, N.H., Van Sanh, N., 2011. The Impact of Weather Variability on Rice and Aquaculture Production in the Mekong Delta. In: Stewart, M., Coclanis, P. (eds.). Environmental Change and Agricultural Sustainability in the Mekong Delta. Advances in Global Change Research. Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands. pp. 437–451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0934-8_24

[68] Reiche, M., Hädrich, A., Lischeid, G., et al., 2009. Impact of Manipulated Drought and Heavy Rainfall Events on Peat Mineralization Processes and Source–Sink Functions of an Acidic Fen. Journal of Geophysical Research. 114(G2), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000853

[69] Dadap, N., Cobb, A., Hoyt, A., et al., 2022. Climate Change-Induced Peatland Drying in Southeast Asia. Environmental Research Letters. 17(7), 074026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac7969

[70] Bragazza, L., Buttler, A., Robroek, B., et al., 2016. Persistent High Temperature and Low Precipitation Reduce Peat Carbon Accumulation. Global Change Biology. 22(12), 4114–4123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13319

[71] Mzula, A., Wambura, P.N., Mdegela, R.H., et al., 2021. Present Status of Aquaculture and the Challenge of Bacterial Diseases in Freshwater Farmed Fish in Tanzania: A Call for Sustainable Strategies. AquacFish. 6(3), 247–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2020.05.003

[72] Taufik, M., Veldhuizen, A., Wösten, J., et al., 2019. Exploration of the Importance of Physical Properties of Indonesian Peatlands to Assess Critical Groundwater Table Depths, Associated Drought and Fire Hazard. Geoderma. 347, 160–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.04.001

[73] Lund, M., Christensen, T., Lindroth, A., et al., 2012. Effects of Drought Conditions on the Carbon Dioxide Dynamics in a Temperate Peatland. Environmental Research Letters. 7(4), 045704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/045704

[74] Ruiz-Mallén, I., Corbera, E., 2013. Community-Based Conservation and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Implications for Social–Ecological Resilience. Ecology and Society. 18(4), 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05867-180412

[75] Querijero, B.L., Mercurio, A.L., 2016. Water Quality in Aquaculture and Non-Aquaculture Sites in Taal Lake, Batangas, Philippines. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agriculture Sciences. 4(1), 109–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18006/2016.4(1).109.115

[76] Wanja, D.W., Mbuthia, P.G., Waruiru, R.M., et al., 2020. Fish Husbandry Practices and Water Quality in Central Kenya: Potential Risk Factors for Fish Mortality and Infectious Diseases. Veterinary Medicine International. 2020(1), 6839354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6839354

[77] Yep, B., Zheng, Y., 2019. Aquaponic Trends and Challenges – A Review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 228, 1586–1599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.290

[78] Aich, N., Paul, A., Choudhury, T.G., et al., 2022. Tilapia Lake Virus (TiLV) Disease: Current Status of Understanding. Aquaculture and Fisheries. 7(1), 7–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2021.04.007

[79] World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), 2017. Immediate notification report. Report Reference: REF OIE 25278, 23 November 2017.

[80] World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH), formerly the Office International des Epizooties (OIE), 2017. Final report. Available from: https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/eng/About_us/docs/pdf/Session/2017/A_FR_2017_public.pdf (cited 5 June 2024).

[81] Yambot, A.V., 1998. Isolation of Aeromonas hydrophila from Oreochromis niloticus During Fish Disease Outbreaks in the Philippines. Asian Fisheries Science. 10, 347–354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33997/j.afs.1998.10.4.008

[82] Reyes, A.T., Fajardo, L.J., Abando, A.K.Y., 2019. Antibiotic Susceptibility of Streptococcus agalactiae Isolated from Tilapia Pond Sediment in Lubao, Pampanga, Philippines. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 7(9), 1702–1716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31032/IJBPAS/2018/7.9.4527

[83] Iqbal, M., Hafsari, T.A., Agustin, T., et al., 2023. Food Self-Sufficiency at the Local Level: A Case Study in Peatlands of South Sumatra. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research. 10(2), 207–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59465/ijfr.2023.10.2.207-219

[84] O'Neill, E.A., Stejskal, V., Clifford, E., et al., 2019. Novel Use of Peatlands as Future Locations for the Sustainable Intensification of Freshwater Aquaculture Production – A Case Study from the Republic of Ireland. Science of the Total Environment. 706, 136044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136044

[85] Oakeshott, J.A., 2018. Sustainable Smallholder Farming Clusters in the Philippines. Acta Hortic. 1128, 339–346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1205.12

[86] Diedrich, A., Blythe, J., Petersen, E., et al., 2019. Socio-Economic Drivers of Adoption of Small-Scale Aquaculture in Indonesia. Sustainability. 11(6), 1543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061543

[87] Yamamoto, K., 2013. Small-Scale Aquaculture in Thailand: Farmer Groups and Aquaculture Certification. In: Bondad-Reantaso, M.G., Subasinghe, R.P. (eds.). Enhancing the Contribution of Small-Scale Aquaculture to Food Security, Poverty Alleviation and Socio-Economic Development. FAO: Rome, Italy. (pp. 113–122).

[88] Hanh, L., Phan, V., Nghia, N., et al., 2017. Dependency on Aquaculture in Northern Vietnam. Aquaculture International. 25, 881–891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-0083-0

[89] Marschke, M., Betcherman, G., 2016. Vietnam’s Seafood Boom: Economic Growth with Impoverishment? Environment, Development and Sustainability. 18, 1129–1150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9692-4

[90] van der Heijden, P.G.M., Shoko, A.P., 2018. Review and Analysis of Small-Scale Aquaculture Production in East Africa; Part 3. Tanzania. Wageningen Centre for Development Innovation: Wageningen, Netherlands.

[91] Snelder, D.J., Lasco, R.D., 2008. Smallholder Tree Growing in South and Southeast Asia. In: Snelder, D.J., Lasco, R.D. (eds.). Smallholder Tree Growing for Rural Development and Environmental Services. Advances in Agroforestry, vol 5. Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands. pp. 3–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8261-0_1

[92] Beveridge, M.C.M., Thilsted, S.H., Phillips, M.J., et al., 2013. Meeting the Food and Nutrition Needs of the Poor: The Role of Fish and the Opportunities and Challenges Emerging from the Rise of Aquaculture. Journal of Fish Biology. 83(4), 1067–1084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12187

[93] Kusakabe, K., 2003. Women's Involvement in Small-Scale Aquaculture in Northeast Thailand. Development in Practice. 13(4), 333–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452032000112392

[94] Weeratunge, N., Snyder, K., Sze, C., 2010. Gleaner, Fisher, Trader, Processor: Understanding Gendered Employment in Fisheries and Aquaculture. Fish and Fisheries. 11(4), 405–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00368.x

[95] Kruijssen, F., McDougall, C., Asseldonk, I., 2017. Gender and Aquaculture Value Chains: A Review of Key Issues and Implications for Research. Aquaculture. 493, 328–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.12.038

[96] Pandey, D., 2014. Constraints to Women’s Involvement in Small Scale Aquaculture: An Exploratory Study. International Journal of Agricultural Extension. 2(1), 81–88.

[97] Satapornvanit, A., Derun, Y., Gopal, N., et al., 2016. NACA/USAID Thematic Studies on Gender in Aquaculture in Cambodia, Lao PDR, Thailand and Vietnam. Asian Fisheries Science. 29, 127–145.

[98] Gopal, N., Williams, M., Porter, M., et al., 2014. Guest Editorial: Gender in Aquaculture and Fisheries – Navigating Change. Asian Fisheries Science. 27, 1–14.

[99] Bosma, R.H., Nguyen, T., Calumpang, L., et al., 2018. Gender Action Plans in the Aquaculture Value Chain: What's Missing? Reviews in Aquaculture. 11(4), 1297–1307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12293

[100] Seila, C., Kwasek, K., Tsatsaros, J., et al., 2016. The Role of Gender in the Development and Adoption of Small-Scale Aquaculture: Case Study from Northeast Cambodia. Asian Fisheries Science Special Issue. 29S, 111–126.

[101] Farnworth, C., Kantor, P., Choudhury, A., et al., 2016. Gender Relations and Improved Technologies in Small Household Ponds in Bangladesh: Rolling Out Novel Learning Approaches. Asian Fisheries Science Special Issue. 29S, 111–126.

[102] Cole, S., Kaminski, A., McDougall, C., et al., 2020. Gender Accommodative Versus Transformative Approaches: A Comparative Assessment Within a Post-Harvest Fish Loss Reduction Intervention. Gender, Technology and Development. 24(1), 48–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2020.1729480

[103] Kantor, P., Morgan, M., Choudhury, A., 2015. Amplifying Outcomes by Addressing Inequality: The Role of Gender-Transformative Approaches in Agricultural Research for Development. Gender, Technology and Development. 19(3), 292–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852415596863

[104] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2017. Gender in fisheries and aquaculture. Available from: https://www.fao.org/gender/learning-center/thematic-areas/gender-in-fisheries-and-aquaculture/en (cited 22 July 2024).

[105] Chan, C.Y., Tran, N., Pethiyagoda, S., et al., 2019. Prospects and Challenges of Fish for Food Security in Africa. Global Food Security. 20, 17–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.12.002

[106] Mitra, S., Khan, M., Nielsen, R., 2019. Credit Constraints and Aquaculture Productivity. Aquaculture Economics & Management. 23(4), 410–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2019.1641571

[107] Kefa, C., Ng’ang’a, S., Ogada, J., et al., 2012. Socio-Economic and Institutional Constraints to Accessing Credit Among Smallholder Farmers in Nyandarua District, Kenya. European Journal of Business and Management. 4, 159–170.

[108] Kleih, U., Linton, J., Marr, A., et al., 2013. Financial Services for Small and Medium-Scale Aquaculture and Fisheries Producers. Marine Policy. 37, 106–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.04.006

[109] Ward, C., Stringer, L.C., Warren-Thomas, E., et al., 2020. Smallholder Perceptions of Land Restoration Activities: Rewetting Tropical Peatland Oil Palm Areas in Sumatra, Indonesia. Regional Environmental Change. 21(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01737-z

[110] Montiflor, M., 2008. Cluster Farming as a Vegetable Marketing Strategy: The Case of Smallholder Farmers in Southern and Northern Mindanao. Acta Horticulturae. 794, 229–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.794.28

[111] Montiflor, M.O., Batt, P.J., Murray-Prior, R., 2009. Socio-Economic Impact of Cluster Farming for Smallholder Farmers in Southern Philippines. Acta Horticulturae. 809, 193–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.809.19

[112] Predo, C.D., Francisco, H.A., 2012. Tree Growing Objectives of Smallholder Farmers in Claveria, Northern Mindanao, Philippines. Journal of Environmental Science and Management. 15(1), 72–85.

[113] Jauhiainen, J., Silvennoinen, H., Hämäläinen, R., et al., 2016. Heterotrophic Respiration in Drained Tropical Peat Is Greatly Affected by Temperature—A Passive Ecosystem Cooling Experiment. Environmental Research Letters. 11(10), 105004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/10/105004

[114] Troell, M., Joyce, A., Chopin, T., et al., 2009. Ecological Engineering in Aquaculture: Potential for Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) in Marine Offshore Systems. Aquaculture. 297(1–4), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.09.010

[115] Chopin, T., 2013. Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture: Ancient, Adaptable Concept Focuses on Ecological Integration. Global Aquaculture Advocate. 16(2), 16–19.

[116] Primavera, J.H., 2000. Development and Conservation of Philippine Mangroves: Institutional Issues. Ecological Economics. 35(1), 91–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00170-1

[117] Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Jayatissa, L.P., Di Nitto, D., et al., 2005. How Effective Were Mangroves as a Defense Against the Recent Tsunami? Current Biology. 15(12), R443–R447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.008

[118] Budiman, I., Bastoni, S., Sari, E., et al., 2020. Progress of Paludiculture Projects in Supporting Peatland Ecosystem Restoration in Indonesia. Global Ecology and Conservation. 23, e01084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01084

[119] Ahmed, N., Garnett, S.T., 2011. Integrated Rice-Fish Farming in Bangladesh: Meeting the Challenges of Food Security. Food Security. 3, 81–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-011-0113-8

[120] Love, D.C., Fry, J.P., Li, X., et al., 2015. Commercial Aquaponics Production and Profitability: Findings from an International Survey. Aquaculture. 435, 67–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.09.023

[121] Goddek, S., Joyce, A., Kotzen, B., et al., 2019. Aquaponics and Global Food Challenges. In: Goddek, S., Joyce, A., Kotzen, B., et al. (eds.). Aquaponics Food Production Systems: Combined Aquaculture and Hydroponic Production Technologies for the Future. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15943-6

[122] Salmayenti, R., Sugihartono, M., Sumarga, E., et al., 2022. Feasibility of Local Commodities on Peatlands. Indonesian Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability. 6(2), 67–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26554/ijems.2022.6.2.67-75

[123] Gregorio, N., Herbohn, J., Harrison, S., 2004. Small-Scale Forestry Development in Leyte, Philippines: The Central Role of Nurseries. Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 3(3), 337–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-004-0024-z

[124] Gregorio, N., Herbohn, J., Harrison, S., 2008. Enhancing Tree Seedling Supply to Smallholders in Leyte Province, Philippines: An Evaluation of the Production System of Government Nursery Sector and Support to Smallholder Tree Farmers. Small-Scale Forestry, 7, 245–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-008-9053-3

[125] Le Gouvello, R., Brugere, C., Simard, F., 2022. Aquaculture and Nature-Based Solutions: Identifying Synergies Between Sustainable Development of Coastal Communities, Aquaculture, and Marine and Coastal Conservation. IUCN: Gland, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2022.02.en

[126] Zingraff-Hamed, A., Hüesker, F., Lupp, G., et al., 2020. Stakeholder Mapping to Co-Create Nature-Based Solutions: Who Is on Board? Sustainability. 12(20), 8625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208625

[127] Faivre, N., Fritz, M., Freitas, T., et al., 2017. Nature-Based Solutions in the EU: Innovating with Nature to Address Social, Economic and Environmental Challenges. Environmental Research, 159, 509–518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.032

[128] Hart, D., Bell, K., Lindenfeld, L., et al., 2015. Strengthening the Role of Universities in Addressing Sustainability Challenges: The Mitchell Center for Sustainability Solutions as an Institutional Experiment. Ecology and Society, 20(2), 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07283-200204

[129] Terzano, D., Attorre, F., Parish, F., et al., 2002. Community-Led Peatland Restoration in Southeast Asia: 5Rs Approach. Restoration Ecology, 30(8), e13642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13642

[130] Mangaoang, E., Cedamon, E., 2004. Building-Up Partnerships for Community Forestry: The ACIAR Smallholder Forestry Project Experience. Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 3, 353–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-004-0025-y

[131] Taufik, M., Minasny, B., McBratney, A.B., et al., 2020. Human-Induced Changes in Indonesian Peatlands Increase Drought Amplification. Environmental Research Letters, 15(8), 084013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab96d4

[132] Mander, Ü., Espenberg, M., Melling, L., et al., 2024. Peatland Restoration Pathways to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Retain Peat Carbon. Biogeochemistry, 167, 523–543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01103-1

[133] Yang, H., Chae, J., Song, C., et al., 2024. Research Trends of Nature-Based Solutions: From Urban to Climate Change. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 7, 1351189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1351189

[134] Mutea, F.G., Nelson, H.K., Au, H.V., et al., 2021. Assessment of Water Quality for Aquaculture in Hau River, Mekong Delta, Vietnam Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Water, 13(22), 3307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13223307

Downloads

How to Cite

Libertine Agatha Densing, & Heremerose E. Matutes. (2025). Enhancing Smallholder Aquaculture in Philippine Peatlands: Challenges, Opportunities, and Nature-Based Solutions in the Leyte Sab-a Basin. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 7(8), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i8.10047