Recent Advances in Groundwater Vulnerability and Risk Assessment Using Hydrogeochemical Parameters

Authors

  • Majang Irene Mokgadi

    Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa

  • Saheed Adeyinka Oke

    Department of Civil Engineering, Centre for Sustainable Smart Cities, Faculty of Engineering Built Environment and Information Technology, Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa

  • Leana Esterhuizen

    Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa

  • Innocent Mugudamani

    Department of Civil Engineering, Centre for Sustainable Smart Cities, Faculty of Engineering Built Environment and Information Technology, Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i8.10467
Received: 11 June 2025 | Revised: 10 July 2025 | Accepted: 21 July 2025 | Published Online: 22 August 2025

Abstract

Groundwater is critical for supplying drinking water to billions of people worldwide. However, their excessive permeability makes them more vulnerable to retaining and spreading contamination. Assessing groundwater vulnerability is crucial for sustainable management, as it aids in reducing the risks associated with contamination of this valuable resource. As a result, the primary aim of this paper is to critically review and synthesize recent advances in groundwater vulnerability and risk assessment using hydrogeochemical parameters. A summary of groundwater contamination, sources, and consequences is presented. Information on hydrogeochemical factors and groundwater vulnerability is summarised. A review of the most commonly used groundwater vulnerability assessment methods is covered. It also covers the assessment of groundwater vulnerability using hydrogeochemical parameters and statistical approaches. Furthermore, these approaches are supported by global case studies. Finally, the limitations, conclusion, and future recommendations are presented. It can be concluded that integrating hydrogeochemical parameters with groundwater vulnerability models is an effective method for assessing the risk of groundwater contamination and developing management plans. Researchers in the fields of health, earth sciences, environmental studies, and water sciences will find this comprehensive review to be a valuable reference, as it offers an in-depth understanding of the current knowledge on the integration of hydrogeochemical parameters in groundwater vulnerability and risk assessment studies.

Keywords:

Water Resources; Pollution; Groundwater Vulnerability; Risk Assessment; Logistic and Linear Regression; Chemical Parameters

References

[1] Yuan, W., Wang, Z., Zhang, T., et al., 2024. Assessment and Prediction of Groundwater Vulnerability Based on Land Use Change—A Case Study of the Central Urban Area of Zhengzhou. Water. 16, 3716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243716

[2] Choudhary, S., Rao, N.S., Chaudhary, M., et al., 2024. Assessing Sources of Groundwater Quality and Health Risks Using Graphical, Multivariate, and Index Techniques From a Part of Rajasthan, India. Groundwater for Sustainable Development. 27, 101356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101356

[3] Saha, A., Pal, S.C., Islam, A.R.T., et al., 2024. Hydro-Chemical Based Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability in the Holocene Multi-Aquifers of Ganges Delta. Scientific Reports. 14, 1265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51917-8

[4] Behailu, T.W., Badessa, T.S., Tewodros, B., 2017. Analysis of Physical and Chemical Parameters in Groundwater Consumed Within Konso Area, Southwestern Ethiopia. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 12(3), 106–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST2017.2419

[5] Gao, S., Li, C., Jia, C., et al., 2020. Health Risk Assessment of Groundwater Nitrate Contamination: A Case Study of a Typical Karst Hydrogeological Unit in East China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27(9), 9274–9287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07075-w

[6] Aweto, K.E., Ohwohere-Asuma, O., Ovwamuedo, G., et al., 2023. Hydro-Geochemical Characterization and Groundwater Modelling of the Subsurface Around Ughelli West Engineered Dumpsite in the Western Niger Delta, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Technological Development. 20(2), 62–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/njtd.v18i4.1393

[7] Mgbenu, C.N., Egbueri, J.C., 2019. The Hydrogeochemical Signatures, Quality Indices, and Health Risk Assessment of Water Resources in Umunya District, Southeast Nigeria. Applied Water Science. 9, 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-0900-5

[8] Rao, N.S., Sunitha, B., Das, R., et al., 2022. Monitoring the Causes of Pollution Using Groundwater Quality and Chemistry Before and After the Monsoon. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. 128, 103228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2022.103228

[9] Kurakalva, R.M., Kuna, G., Vaiphei, S.P., et al., 2021. Evaluation of Hydrogeochemical Profile, Potential Health Risk and Groundwater Quality in Rapidly Growing Urban Region of Hyderabad, South India. Environmental Earth Sciences. 80, 383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09661-z

[10] Amiri, V., Li, P., Bhattacharya, P., et al., 2021. Mercury Pollution in the Coastal Urmia Aquifer in Northwestern Iran: Potential Sources, Mobility, and Toxicity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(14), 17546–17562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11865-y

[11] Samadi, J., 2022. Modelling Hydrogeological Parameters to Assess Groundwater Pollution and Vulnerability in Kashan Aquifer: Novel Calibration-Validation of Multivariate Statistical Methods and Human Health Risk Considerations. Environmental Research. 211, 113028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113028

[12] Barzegar, R., Moghaddam, A.A., Norallahi, S., et al., 2020. Modification of the DRASTIC Framework for Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability Zones. Groundwater. 58(3), 441–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12919

[13] Oke, S.A., 2020. Regional Aquifer Vulnerability and Pollution Sensitivity Analysis of DRASTIC Application to Dahomey Basin of Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17, 2609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072609

[14] Banerjee, A., Creedon, L., Jones, N., et al., 2023. Dynamic Groundwater Contamination Vulnerability Assessment Techniques: A Systematic Review. Hydrology. 10, 182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10090182

[15] Moges, S.S., Dinka, M.O., 2022. Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping Methods for Sustainable Water Resource Management: An Overview. Journal of Water and Land Development. 52(I–III), 186–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2022.140389

[16] Jarray, H., Zammouri, M., Ouessar, M., et al., 2017. Groundwater Vulnerability Based on GIS Approach: Case Study of Zeuss-Koutine Aquifer, South-Eastern Tunisia. Geofísica Internacional. 56(2), 157–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2017.56.2.1763 (in Spanish)

[17] Duda, R., Klebert, I., Zdechlik, R., 2019. Groundwater Pollution Risk Assessment Based on Vulnerability to Pollution and Potential Impact of Land Use Forms. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 29(1), 87–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/104362

[18] Oke, S.A., Vermeulen, D., Gomo, M., 2018. Intrinsic Vulnerability Assessment of Shallow Aquifers of the Sedimentary Basin of Southwestern Nigeria. Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies. 10(1), 333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v10i1.333

[19] Udosen, N.I., George, N.I., Ekanem, A.M., 2024. Aquifer Vulnerability Valorization via DRASTIC Index-Based Assessment Within Litho-Facies of a Coastal Environment. Results in Earth Sciences. 2, 100033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rines.2024.100033

[20] Arya, S., Subramani, T., Vennila, G., et al., 2020. Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution in the Semi-Arid Vattamalaikarai River Basin of South India Through DRASTIC Index Evaluation. Geochemistry. 80(4), 125635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2020.125635

[21] Ikpe, E.O., Ekanem, A.M., George, N.J., 2022. Modelling and Assessing the Protectivity of Hydrogeological Units Using Primary and Secondary Geoelectric Indices: A Case Study of Ikot Ekpene Urban and Its Environs, Southern Nigeria. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. 8(4), 4373–4387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01366-x

[22] Ekanem, A.M., Udosen, N.I., 2023. Hydrogeochemical–Geophysical Investigations of Groundwater Quality and Susceptibility Potential in Ikot Ekpene–Obot Akara Local Government Areas, Southern Nigeria. Water Practice and Technology. 18(11), 2675–2704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2023.187

[23] Geng, C., Lu, D., Qian, J., et al., 2023. A Review on Process-Based Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Methods. Processes. 11, 1610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11061610

[24] Pal, S.C., Saha, A., Jaydhar, A.K., 2024. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment of Elevated Heavy Metal Contamination Related Health Hazard in Coastal Multi-Aquifers of Sundarban Biosphere Reserve, India. Journal of Hydrology. 637, 131353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131353

[25] Hansen, B., Sonnenborg, T.O., Møller, I., et al., 2016. Nitrate Vulnerability Assessment of Aquifers. Environmental Earth Sciences. 75, 999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5767-2

[26] Li, P., Tian, R., Xue, C., et al., 2017. Progress, Opportunities and Key Fields for Groundwater Quality Research Under the Impacts of Human Activities in China With a Special Focus on Western China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 24, 13224–13234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8753-7

[27] Li, P., Karunanidhi, D., Subramani, T., et al., 2021. Sources and Consequences of Groundwater Contamination. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 80, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-020-00805-z

[28] Pandey, H.K., Duggal, S.K., Jamatia, A., 2016. Fluoride Contamination of Groundwater and Its Hydrological Evolution in District Sonbhadra (U.P.), India. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences. 86, 81–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-015-0216-2

[29] He, X., Li, P., Wu, J., et al., 2020. Poor Groundwater Quality and High Potential Health Risks in the Datong Basin, Northern China: Research From Published Data. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 43(2), 791–812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-020-00520-7

[30] Wang, D., Wu, J., Wang, Y., et al., 2020. Finding High-Quality Groundwater Resources to Reduce the Hydatidosis Incidence in the Shiqu County of Sichuan Province, China: Analysis, Assessment, and Management. Exposure and Health. 12, 307–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-019-00314-y

[31] Li, P., 2020. To Make the Water Safer. Exposure and Health. 12, 337–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-020-00370-9

[32] Li, P., Wu, J., 2019. Sustainable Living With Risks: Meeting the Challenges. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. 25, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2019.1584030

[33] Su, Z., Wu, J., He, X., et al., 2020. Temporal Changes of Groundwater Quality Within the Groundwater Depression Cone and Prediction of Confined Groundwater Salinity Using Grey Markov Model in Yinchuan Area of Northwest China. Exposure and Health. 12, 447–468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-019-00334-8

[34] Tatti, F., Papini, M.P., Torretta, V., et al., 2019. Experimental and Numerical Evaluation of Groundwater Circulation Wells as a Remediation Technology for Persistent, Low Permeability Contaminant Source Zones. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 222, 89–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2019.03.001

[35] Mthembu, P.P., Elumalai, V., Brindha, K., et al., 2020. Hydrogeochemical Processes and Trace Metal Contamination in Groundwater: Impact on Human Health in the Maputaland Coastal Aquifer, South Africa. Exposure and Health. 12, 403–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-020-00369-2

[36] Teng, Y., Hu, B., Zheng, J., et al., 2018. Water Quality Responses to the Interaction Between Surface Water and Groundwater Along the Songhua River, NE China. Hydrogeology Journal. 26, 1591–1607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1738-x

[37] Wu, J., Li, P., Qian, H., et al., 2014. Assessment of Soil Salinization Based on a Low-Cost Method and Its Influencing Factors in a Semi-Arid Agricultural Area, Northwest China. Environmental Earth Sciences. 71(8), 3465–3475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2736-x

[38] Schillinger, J., Özerol, G., Güven-Griemert, Ş., et al., 2020. Water in War: Understanding the Impacts of Armed Conflict on Water Resources and Their Management. WIREs Water. 7, e1480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1480

[39] Adewumi, A.J., Anifowose, A.Y.B., Olabode, F.O., et al., 2018. Hydrogeochemical Characterization and Vulnerability Assessment of Shallow Groundwater in Basement Complex Area, Southwest Nigeria. Contemporary Trends in Geoscience. 7(1), 72–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ctg-2018-0005

[40] Igboama, W.N., Hammed, O.S., Fatoba, J.O., et al., 2022. Impact of Groundwater Contamination Due to Dumpsites Using Geophysical and Physicochemical Methods: A Review. Applied Water Science. 12, 130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01653-z

[41] Shube, H., Kebede, S., Azagegn, T., et al., 2023. Estimating Groundwater Flow Velocity in Shallow Volcanic Aquifers of the Ethiopian Highlands Using a Geospatial Technique. Sustainability. 15(19), 14490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914490

[42] Yang, T., Chen, J., Li, X., et al., 2019. Ecological Risk by Heavy Metal Contents in Sediments Within the Wei River Basin. Environmental Earth Sciences. 78(3), 01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8080-z

[43] Molekoa, M.D., Avtar, R., Kumar, P., et al., 2019. Hydrogeochemical Assessment of Groundwater Quality of Mokopane Area, Limpopo, South Africa Using Statistical Approach. Water. 11, 1891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091891

[44] Antunes, M., Teixeira, R., Albuquerque, T., et al., 2021. Water–Rock Interaction and Potential Contamination Risk in a U-Enriched Area. Geosciences. 11, 217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11050217

[45] Akpoborie, I.A., Aweto, K.E., Ohwoghere–Asuma, O., 2015. Urbanization and Major Ion Hydrogeochemistry of the Shallow Aquifer at Effurun–Warri Metropolis, Nigeria. Environment and Pollution. 4(1), 37–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ep.v4n1p37

[46] Shahabudin, M.M., Musa, S., 2018. Occurrence of Surface Water Contaminations: An Overview. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 140, 012058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/140/1/012058

[47] Akhtar, N., Ishak, M.I.S., Bhawani, S.A., et al., 2021. Various Natural and Anthropogenic Factors Responsible for Water Quality Degradation: A Review. Water. 13, 2660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192660

[48] Davamani, V., John, J.E., Poornachandhra, C., et al., 2024. A Critical Review of Climate Change Impacts on Groundwater Resources: A Focus on the Current Status, Future Possibilities, and Role of Simulation Models. Atmosphere. 15, 122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15010122

[49] Kumar, P., Kumar, A., Singh, C.K., et al., 2016. Hydrogeochemical Evolution and Appraisal of Groundwater Quality in Panna District, Central India. Exposure and Health. 8, 19–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-015-0179-1

[50] Muneer, M., Khan, M.A., Shinwari, F.U., et al., 2025. Assessment of Groundwater Intrinsic Vulnerability Using GIS-Based DRASTIC Method in District Karak, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Frontiers in Water. 7, 1540703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2025.1540703

[51] Moges, S.S., Dinka, M.O., 2022. Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping Methods for Sustainable Water Resource Management: An Overview. Journal of Water and Land Development. 52, 186–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2022.140389

[52] Oke, S.A., 2017. An Overview of Aquifer Vulnerability. In: Bailey, H. (ed.). Aquifers. Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–20.

[53] Aduck, J.N., Mufur, A.M., Fonteh, M.F., 2024. A Review of Methods to Assess Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution. American Journal of Environmental Protection. 13(4), 93–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20241304.12

[54] Busico, G., Kazakis, N., Mastrocicco, M., et al., 2017. A Modified SINTACS Method for Groundwater Vulnerability and Pollution Risk Assessment in Highly Anthropized Regions Based on NO3– and SO4 2– Concentrations. Science of the Total Environment. 609, 512–523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.257

[55] Yang, J.S., Jeong, Y.W., Agossou, A., et al., 2022. GALDIT Modification for Seasonal Seawater Intrusion Mapping Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods. Water. 14(14), 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w14142258

[56] Aboulouafa, M., Taouil, H., Ahmed, S., et al., 2017. SINTACS and DRASTIC Models for Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping Using a GIS and Remote Sensing Techniques: A Case Study on Berrechid Plain. IOSR Journal of Engineering. 7(5), 23–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/3021-0705012330

[57] Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J., et al., 1987. DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Groundwater Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings. Journal of the Geological Society of India. 26(1), 23–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17491/jgsi/1987/290112

[58] Barbulescu, A.J.W., 2020. Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability: DRASTIC and DRASTIC Like Methods: A Review. Water. 12(5), 1356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051356

[59] Panagopoulos, G.P., Lambrakis, N.J., Antonakos, A.K., 2006. Optimization of the DRASTIC Method for Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment via the Use of Simple Statistical Methods and GIS. Hydrogeology Journal. 14, 894–911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-005-0008-x

[60] Sakala, E., Fourie, F., Gomo, M., et al., 2016. Specific Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping: Case Study of Acid Mine Drainage in the Witbank Coalfield, South Africa. Proceedings of The 6th IASTED International Conference on Environment and Water Resource Management; April 4–6, 2016; Gaborone, Botswana. pp. 93–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2316/P.2016.836-010

[61] Taghavi, N., Niven, R.K., Kramer, M., et al., 2023. Comparison of DRASTIC and DRASTICL Groundwater Vulnerability Assessments of the Burdekin Basin, Queensland, Australia. Science of the Total Environment. 858, 159945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159945

[62] Niedbalska, K., 2022. Parametric Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution Within an Open Pit Reclaimed by Gangue. Applied Water Science. 12, 261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01783-4

[63] Foster, S.S.D., 1987. Fundamental Concepts in Aquifer Vulnerability, Pollution Risk and Protection Strategy. Proceedings of The International Conference on the Vulnerability of Soil and Groundwater to Pollutants; March 30, 1987; Noordwijk, The Netherlands. pp. 69–86.

[64] Van Stempvoort, D., Ewert, L., Wassenaar, L., 1993. Aquifer Vulnerability Index: A GIS Compatible Method for Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping. Canadian Water Resources Journal. 18, 25–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4296/cwrj1801025

[65] McLay, C.D.A., Dragden, R., Sparling, G., et al., 2001. Predicting Groundwater Nitrate Concentrations in a Region of Mixed Agricultural Land Use: A Comparison of Three Approaches. Environmental Pollution. 115, 191–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00111-7

[66] Connell, L.D., Van Daele, G., 2003. A Quantitative Approach to Aquifer Vulnerability Mapping. Journal of Hydrology. 276(1–4), 71–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00038-6

[67] Kuisi, M.A., El-Naqa, A., Hammouri, N., 2006. Vulnerability Mapping of Shallow Groundwater Aquifer Using SINTACS Model in the Jordan Valley Area, Jordan. Environmental Geology. 50(5), 651–667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0239-8

[68] Kumar, P., Bansod, B.K.S., Debnath, S.K., et al., 2015. Index-Based Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping Models Using Hydrogeological Settings: A Critical Evaluation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 51, 38–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.02.001

[69] Pavlis, M., Cummins, E., McDonnell, K., 2010. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment of Plant Protection Products: A Review. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal. 16(3), 621–650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10807031003788881

[70] Chachadi, A., Ferreira, J.L., 2001. Seawater Intrusion Vulnerability Mapping of Aquifers Using the GALDIT Method. Proceedings of The Workshop on Modelling in Hydrogeology; December 3–7, 2001; Chennai, India. pp. 143–156.

[71] Mirzavand, M., Ghasemieh, H., Sadatinejad, S.J., et al., 2018. Saltwater Intrusion Vulnerability Assessment Using AHP-GALDIT Model in Kashan Plain Aquifer as Critical Aquifer in a Semi-Arid Region. Desert. 23(2), 255–264.

[72] Sujitha, V., Purandara, B.K., Shivapur, A.V., et al., 2020. Assessment of Aquifer Vulnerability Using GALDIT Model — A Case Study. Journal of the Geological Society of India. 95(5), 507–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-020-1469-1

[73] Bordbar, M., Neshat, A., Javadi, S. 2019. Modification of the GALDIT framework using statistical and entropy models to assess coastal aquifer vulnerability. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 64(9), 1117–1128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1620951

[74] Ikpe, E.O., Ekanem, A.M., George, N.J. 2022. Modelling and assessing the protectivity of hydrogeological units using primary and secondary geoelectric indices: a case study of Ikot Ekpene Urban and its environs, southern Nigeria. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. 8, 4373–4387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01366-x

[75] Mendieta-Mendoza, A., Hanson, R.T., Renteria-Villalobos, M. 2021. Potential adverse impacts on vulnerability and availability of groundwater from climate-change and land use. Journal of Hydrology. 594, 125978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.125978

[76] Pinasseau, L., Mermillod-Blondin, F., Fildier, A., et al., 2023. Determination of Groundwater Origins and Vulnerability Based on Multi-Tracer Investigations: New Contributions From Passive Sampling and Suspect Screening Approach. Science of the Total Environment. 876, 162750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162750

[77] Heiß, L., Bouchaou, L., Tadoumant, S., et al., 2020. Index-Based Groundwater Vulnerability and Water Quality Assessment in the Arid Region of Tata City (Morocco). Groundwater for Sustainable Development. 10, 100344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100344

[78] Sakala, E., Fourie, F., Gomo, M., et al., 2018. GIS-Based Groundwater Vulnerability Modelling: A Case Study of the Witbank, Ermelo and Highveld Coalfields in South Africa. Journal of African Earth Sciences. 137, 46–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.09.012

[79] Ouedraogo, I., Defourny, P., Vanclooster, M., 2016. Mapping the Groundwater Vulnerability for Pollution at the Pan-African Scale. Science of the Total Environment. 544, 939–953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.135

[80] Etuk, M., Viaroli, S., Igwe, O., et al., 2022. Vulnerability Mapping as a Tool to Foster Groundwater Protection in Areas Subject to Rapid Population Expansion: The Case Study of Abuja Federal Capital Territory (Nigeria). Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 42, 101158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101158

[81] Rani, N.N.V.S., Satyanarayana, A.N.V., Bhaskaran, P.K., et al., 2021. Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability Using Integrated Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques for the West Bengal Coast, India. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 238, 103760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2020.103760

[82] Biswas, P., Hossain, M., Patra, P.K., 2023. Arsenic Hydrogeochemistry, Quality Assessment, and Associated Health Risks of Groundwater Through the Novel Water Pollution Index (WPI) and GIS Approach. Groundwater for Sustainable Development. 21, 100944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2023.100944

[83] George, N.J., Ekanem, A.M., Thomas, J.E., et al., 2024. Electro-Sequence Valorization of Specific Enablers of Aquifer Vulnerability and Contamination: A Case of Index-Based Model Approach for Ascertaining the Threats to Quality Groundwater in Sedimentary Beds. HydroResearch. 7, 71–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2023.11.006

[84] Barzegar, R., Razzagh, S., Quilty, J., et al., 2021. Improving GALDIT-Based Groundwater Vulnerability Predictive Mapping Using Coupled Resampling Algorithms and Machine Learning Models. Journal of Hydrology. 598, 126370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126370

[85] Zhang, Q., Li, P., Lyu, Q., et al., 2021. Groundwater Contamination Risk Assessment Using a Modified DRATICL Model and Pollution Loading: A Case Study in the Guanzhong Basin of China. Chemosphere. 291, 132695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132695

[86] Shanmuharajan, M.B., Aparna, S.B., Vivek, S., 2023. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Phenomenon Using DRASTIC and Modified DRASTIC Modeling Validated With Nitrate Concentration. Global NEST Journal. 25(3), 153–163.

[87] Machiwal, D., Jha, M.K., Singh, V.P., et al., 2018. Assessment and Mapping of Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution: Current Status and Challenges. Earth-Science Reviews. 185, 901–927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.08.009

[88] Fannakh, A., Farsang, A., 2022. DRASTIC, GOD, and SI Approaches for Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution: A Review. Environmental Sciences Europe. 34, 77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00646-8

[89] Taghavi, N., Niven, R.K., Paull, D.J., et al., 2022. Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment: A Review Including New Statistical and Hybrid Methods. Science of the Total Environment. 822, 153486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153486

[90] Phan, T.D., Smart, J.C.R., Capon, S.J., et al., 2016. Applications of Bayesian Belief Networks in Water Resource Management: A Systematic Review. Environmental Modelling and Software. 85, 98–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.08.006

[91] Zeng, L., Li, J., 2019. A Bayesian Belief Network Approach for Mapping Water Conservation Ecosystem Service Optimization Region. Journal of Geographical Sciences. 29, 1021–1038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1642-x

[92] Duhalde, D.J., Arumí, J.L., Oyarzún, R.A., et al., 2018. Fuzzy-Based Assessment of Groundwater Intrinsic Vulnerability of a Volcanic Aquifer in the Chilean Andean Valley. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 190, 675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6758-4

[93] Dixon, B., 2004. Prediction of Groundwater Vulnerability Using an Integrated GIS-Based Neuro-Fuzzy Technique. Journal of Spatial Hydrology. 4(2), 8.

[94] Sagi, O., Rokach, L., 2018. Ensemble Learning: A Survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 8(4), e1249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1249

[95] Tesoriero, A.J., Voss, F.D., 1997. Predicting the Probability of Elevated Nitrate Concentrations in the Puget Sound Basin: Implications for Aquifer Susceptibility and Vulnerability. Groundwater. 35(6), 1029–1039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1997.tb00175.x

[96] Twarakavi, N.K.C., Kaluarachchi, J.J., 2005. Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment to Heavy Metals Using Ordinal Logistic Regression. Groundwater. 43(2), 200–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.0001.x

[97] Nolan, B.T., Hitt, K.J., Ruddy, B.C., 2002. Probability of Nitrate Contamination of Recently Recharged Groundwaters in the Conterminous United States. Environmental Science and Technology. 36(10), 2138–2145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es0113854

[98] Frans, L.M., Rupert, M.G., Hunt, C.D., et al., 2012. Groundwater Quality in the Columbia Plateau, Snake River Plain, and Oahu Basaltic-Rock and Basin-Fill Aquifers in the Northwestern United States and Hawaii, 1992–2010. U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20125123

[99] Nolan, B.T., Hitt, K.J., 2006. Vulnerability of Shallow Groundwater and Drinking Water Wells to Nitrate in the United States. Environmental Science and Technology. 40(24), 7834–7840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es060911u

[100] Andrade, A.I.A.S.S., Stigter, T.Y., 2013. The Distribution of Arsenic in Shallow Alluvial Groundwater Under Agricultural Land in Central Portugal: Insights From Multivariate Geostatistical Modeling. Science of the Total Environment. 449, 37–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.033

[101] Nadiri, A.A., Gharekhani, M., Khatibi, R., et al., 2017. Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability Using Supervised Committee to Combine Fuzzy Logic Models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 24, 8562–8577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8489-4

[102] Rodriguez-Galiano, V., Mendes, M.P., Garcia-Soldado, M.J., et al., 2014. Predictive Modeling of Groundwater Nitrate Pollution Using Random Forest and Multisource Variables Related to Intrinsic and Specific Vulnerability: A Case Study in an Agricultural Setting (Southern Spain). Science of the Total Environment. 476, 189–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.001

[103] Tyralis, H., Papacharalampous, G., Langousis, A., 2019. A Brief Review of Random Forests for Water Scientists and Practitioners and Their Recent History in Water Resources. Water. 11(5), 910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050910

[104] Sirat, M., 2013. Neural Network Assessment of Groundwater Contamination of US Midcontinent. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 6(8), 3149–3160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0570-1

Downloads

How to Cite

Mokgadi, M. I., Oke, S. A., Leana Esterhuizen, & Mugudamani, I. (2025). Recent Advances in Groundwater Vulnerability and Risk Assessment Using Hydrogeochemical Parameters. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 7(8), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i8.10467

Issue

Article Type

Review