
Bioengineered Materials for Soil and Water Remediation: Mechanisms, Effectiveness, and Global Applications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i6.13273Abstract
Bioengineered materials are becoming more accepted as sustainable and efficient remedies towards the reduction of soil and water pollution caused by industrialization, agriculture, and urban development. This review is a synthesis of recent discoveries in bioengineered remediation materials, which range from microbial-based materials, biopolymer-derived sorbents, bio-inspired and biomimetic materials, and plant/biomass-derived hybrids. It focuses on the mechanistic principle of contaminant removal, such as adsorption, ion exchange, chelation, precipitation, biodegradation, and redox-mediated transformation and synergistic pathways facilitated by multifunctional hybrid designs. Commonly used metrics in performance evaluation include removal efficacy, kinetics, capacity, selectivity, stability, and reusability, with a specific focus on the differences between laboratory demonstrations and field-scale results in complex environmental matrices. The review also explains major constraints to large scale application, such as material fouling and degradation, inconsistency in changing pH and redox environments, biosafety and ecotoxicity (in particular in the case of living or genetically modified materials), cost and scale-up, and regulatory guidance and standardization lapses. Lastly, the future directions are described, based on opportunities in synthetic biology, smart and stimuli-responsive materials, integrated sensing and monitoring, and circular-economy organizing coupled with remediation and resource recovery. In general, bioengineered materials provide an attractive direction for the use of adaptable, low-impact remediation strategies, yet their global realization will demand balanced improvements in the material design, risk analysis, and scaled implementations.
Keywords:
Bioengineered Materials; Soil Remediation; Water Treatment; Adsorption and Biodegradation; Environmental SafetyReferences
[1] Lal, R., 2010. Managing soils to address global issues of the twenty-first century. In Food Security and Soil Quality. Taylor and Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 5–22.
[2] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2019. Environmental Engineering for the 21st Century: Addressing Grand Challenges. National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA.
[3] Saxena, V., 2025. Water quality, air pollution, and climate change: investigating the environmental impacts of industrialization and urbanization. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 236(2), 73.
[4] Sarker, B., Keya, K.N., Mahir, F.I., et al., 2021. Surface and ground water pollution: Causes and effects of urbanization and industrialization in South Asia. Scientific Review. 7(3), 32–41.
[5] Liu, L., Li, W., Song, W., et al., 2018. Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability. Science of the Total Environment. 633, 206–219.
[6] Adekeye, D.K., Popoola, O.K., Asaolu, S.S., et al., 2019. Adsorption and conventional technologies for environmental remediation and decontamination of heavy metals: An overview. International Journal of Research and Review. 6(8), 505–516.
[7] Aslam, M.A., Abbas, M.S., Mustaqeem, M., et al., 2024. Comprehensive assessment of heavy metal contamination in soil-plant systems and health risks from wastewater-irrigated vegetables. Colloids and Surfaces C: Environmental Aspects. 2, 100044.
[8] Khan, M.N., Aslam, M.A., Muhsinah, A.B., et al., 2023. Heavy metals in vegetables: Screening health risks of irrigation with wastewater in peri-urban areas of Bhakkar, Pakistan. Toxics. 11(5), 460.
[9] Khan, M.N., Aslam, M.A., Zada, I., et al., 2023. Statistical analysis and health risk assessment: Vegetables irrigated with wastewater in Kirri Shamozai, Pakistan. Toxics. 11(11), 899.
[10] Eskandar, K., 2023. Revolutionizing biotechnology and bioengineering: Unleashing the power of innovation. Journal of Applied Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 10(3), 81–88.
[11] Chen, W., Mulchandani, A., Deshusses, M.A., 2005. Environmental biotechnology: Challenges and opportunities for chemical engineers. AIChE Journal. 51(3), 690–695.
[12] Smola-Dmochowska, A., Lewicka, K., Macyk, A., et al., 2023. Biodegradable polymers and polymer composites with antibacterial properties. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 24(8), 7473.
[13] Dhanola, A., Singh, Y., Shrivastava, P., 2025. Biomimetic and Bioinspired Materials: Design, Synthesis, and Emerging Applications. Routledge: London, UK.
[14] Cuong, D.V., Wu, J.-C., Khan, E., et al., 2023. Integrated 3D pore architecture design of bio-based engineered catalysts and adsorbents: Preparation, chemical doping, and environmental applications. Environmental Science: Advances. 2(9), 1167–1188.
[15] Joutey, N.T., Bahafid, W., Sayel, H., et al., 2013. Biodegradation: Involved microorganisms and genetically engineered microorganisms. Biodegradation-Life of Science. 1, 289–320.
[16] Markiewicz, M., Kumirska, J., Lynch, I., et al., 2018. Changing environments and biomolecule coronas: consequences and challenges for the design of environmentally acceptable engineered nanoparticles. Green Chemistry. 20(18), 4133–4168.
[17] Zhu, B., Chen, Y., Wei, N., 2019. Engineering biocatalytic and biosorptive materials for environmental applications. Trends in Biotechnology. 37(6), 661–676.
[18] Cheung, H.-Y., Ho, M.-P., Lau, K.-T., et al., 2009. Natural fibre-reinforced composites for bioengineering and environmental engineering applications. Composites Part B: Engineering. 40(7), 655–663.
[19] Singh, A., Ghosh, P., Rajpal, M., et al., 2025. Designing and technical feasibility of biohybrid system for scaling up treatment process. In Wastewater Treatment through Nature-Based Solutions: Achieving Sustainable Development Goal 6. Springer: Singapore. pp. 221–256.
[20] Asghar, N., Hussain, A., Nguyen, D.A., et al., 2024. Advancement in nanomaterials for environmental pollutants remediation: A systematic review on bibliometrics analysis, material types, synthesis pathways, and related mechanisms. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 22(1), 26.
[21] Lea-Smith, D.J., Hassard, F., Coulon, F., et al., 2025. Engineering biology applications for environmental solutions: Potential and challenges. Nature Communications. 16(1), 3538.
[22] Singh, V., Pandey, V.C., 2020. Bioremediation of Pollutants: From Genetic Engineering to Genome Engineering. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
[23] Suthersan, S.S., Horst, J., Schnobrich, M., et al., 2016. Remediation Engineering: Design Concepts. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.
[24] Sharma, M., Agarwal, S., Malik, R.A., et al., 2023. Recent advances in microbial engineering approaches for wastewater treatment: A review. Bioengineered. 14(1), 2184518.
[25] Liu, X., Inda, M.E., Lai, Y., et al., 2022. Engineered living hydrogels. Advanced Materials. 34(26), 2201326.
[26] Rodrigo-Navarro, A., Sankaran, S., Dalby, M., et al., 2021. Engineered living biomaterials. Nature Reviews Materials. 6(12), 1175–1190.
[27] Saiyad, M., Shah, N., Joshipura, M., et al., 2024. Modified biopolymers in wastewater treatment: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings. 124(18).
[28] Singha, A., Guleria, A., 2014. Chemical modification of cellulosic biopolymer and its use in removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 67, 409–417.
[29] Tadayoni, N.S., Dinari, M., Roy, A., 2024. Recent advances in porous bio-polymer composites for the remediation of organic pollutants. Polymers. 16(11), 1543.
[30] Chakraborty, S., Bera, D., Roy, L., et al., 2023. Biomimetic and bioinspired nanostructures: Recent developments and applications. In Bioinspired and Green Synthesis of Nanostructures: A Sustainable Approach. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 353–404.
[31] Suresh Kumar, N., Padma Suvarna, R., Chandra Babu Naidu, K., et al., 2020. A review on biological and biomimetic materials and their applications. Applied Physics A. 126(6), 445.
[32] Zhang, W., Zhang, P., Wang, H., et al., 2022. Design of biomass-based renewable materials for environmental remediation. Trends in Biotechnology. 40(12), 1519–1534.
[33] Das, L., Das, P., Bhowal, A., 2024. Recent advances in potential application of biomass waste and biomass-derived materials for bioremediation of pollutants from wastewater. Circular Economy. 127–139.
[34] Karim, R., Ramesh, R., Rafeeq, C.M., et al., 2024. Biomass-based materials for soil augmentation and remediation. In Handbook of Advanced Biomass Materials for Environmental Remediation. Springer: London, UK. pp. 249–272.
[35] Kumar, V., Yadav, A.K., Ahmad, T., et al., 2026. Emerging Challenges and Future Directions in Multiscale Modelling for Integration of Biology and Materials Design. In Smart Materials Engineering: Data-Driven Approaches and Multiscale Modelling. Springer: London, UK. pp. 187–212.
[36] Rey, F., Bifulco, C., Bischetti, G.B., et al., 2019. Soil and water bioengineering: Practice and research needs for reconciling natural hazard control and ecological restoration. Science of the Total Environment. 648, 1210–1218.
[37] Li, J., Yang, Z., Ding, T., et al., 2022. The role of surface functional groups of pectin and pectin-based materials on the adsorption of heavy metal ions and dyes. Carbohydrate Polymers. 276, 118789.
[38] Hubicki, Z., Kołodyńska, D., 2012. Selective removal of heavy metal ions from waters and waste waters using ion exchange methods. In Ion Exchange Technologies. IntechOpen: London, UK.
[39] Malik, S., Dhasmana, A., Preetam, S., et al., 2022. Exploring microbial-based green nanobiotechnology for wastewater remediation: A sustainable strategy. Nanomaterials. 12(23), 4187.
[40] Nidheesh, P.V., Couras, C., Karim, A.V., et al., 2022. A review of integrated advanced oxidation processes and biological processes for organic pollutant removal. Chemical Engineering Communications. 209(3), 390–432.
[41] Fujita, S., Sakairi, N., 2022. Bio-inspired materials for environmental remediation. In Design of Materials and Technologies for Environmental Remediation. Springer: London, UK. pp. 507–537.
[42] Nag, M., Lahiri, D., Ghosh, S., et al., 2024. Application of microorganisms in biotransformation and bioremediation of environmental contaminant: A review. Geomicrobiology Journal. 41(4), 374–391.
[43] Abubakar, A.M., Wali, S.A., Muhammad, D., et al., 2023. Biotechnology and chemical engineering synergy for environmental remediation. International Journal of Industrial Biotechnology and Biomaterials. 9, 6–11.
[44] Kumar, P., Singh, J., 2025. Perspective and challenges of synergistic removal of toxic contaminants from effluent using different treatment techniques. In Microbial Niche Nexus Sustaining Environmental Biological Wastewater and Water-Energy-Environment Nexus. Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 419–451.
[45] Li, Q., Wang, L., Fu, Y., et al., 2023. Transformation of soil organic matter subjected to environmental disturbance and preservation of organic matter bound to soil minerals: A review. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 23(3), 1485–1500.
[46] Kuppusamy, S., Palanisami, T., Megharaj, M., et al., 2016. In-situ remediation approaches for the management of contaminated sites: A comprehensive overview. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 236, 1–115.
[47] Shukla, K.P., Singh, N.K., Sharma, S., 2010. Bioremediation: Developments, current practices and perspectives. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Journal. 3, 1–20.
[48] Zhu, B., 2021. Constructing Innovative Engineered Enzyme Biocatalysts for Treatment of Emerging Environmental Contaminants [PhD Thesis]. University of Notre Dame: Notre Dame, IN, USA.
[49] Cai, J., Niu, B., Xie, Q., et al., 2022. Accurate removal of toxic organic pollutants from complex water matrices. Environmental Science & Technology. 56(5), 2917–2935.
[50] Gupta, V.K., Nayak, A., Agarwal, S., 2015. Bioadsorbents for remediation of heavy metals: current status and their future prospects. Environmental Engineering Research. 20(1), 1–18.
[51] Kyzas, G.Z., Fu, J., Matis, K.A., 2014. New biosorbent materials: Selectivity and bioengineering insights. Processes. 2(2), 419–440.
[52] Dwevedi, A., 2021. Polymer-based immobilized enzymes in environmental remediation. In Polymeric Supports for Enzyme Immobilization. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 105–166.
[53] Fortuna, M.E., Simion, I.M., Gavrilescu, M., 2011. Sustainability in environmental remediation. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal (EEMJ). 10(12).
[54] Beets, M.W., von Klinggraeff, L., Weaver, R.G., et al., 2021. Small studies, big decisions: The role of pilot/feasibility studies in incremental science and premature scale-up of behavioral interventions. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 7(1), 173.
[55] Vallero, D.A., Gunsch, C.K., 2020. Applications and implications of emerging biotechnologies in environmental engineering. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 146(6), 03120005.
[56] Ceschin, S., Bellini, A., Scalici, M., 2021. Aquatic plants and ecotoxicological assessment in freshwater ecosystems: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(5), 4975–4988.
[57] Ross, A., Lahann, J., 2015. Current trends and challenges in biointerfaces science and engineering. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering. 6, 161–186.
[58] Awoke, A.T., 2025. Exploring biopolymer degradation: Environmental effects and future insights. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. 08927057261423435.
[59] Guieysse, B., Norvill, Z.N., 2014. Sequential chemical–biological processes for the treatment of industrial wastewaters: Review of recent progresses and critical assessment. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 267, 142–152.
[60] Kudrin, M.R., Krasnova, O.A., Koshchaev, A.G., et al., 2019. Biological processing of renewable raw materials resources with regard to the environmental and technological criteria. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 20(11), 58–66.
[61] Alshehri, K., Gao, Z., Harbottle, M., et al., 2023. Life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of nature-based solutions for contaminated land remediation: A mini-review. Heliyon. 9(10), e20632.
[62] Snow, A.A., Andow, D.A., Gepts, P., et al., 2005. Genetically engineered organisms and the environment: Current status and recommendations. Ecological Applications. 15(2), 377–404.
[63] Mesa, J., González-Quiroga, A., Maury, H., 2020. Developing an indicator for material selection based on durability and environmental footprint: A Circular Economy perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 160, 104887.
[64] Rebello, S., Nathan, V.K., Sindhu, R., et al., 2021. Bioengineered microbes for soil health restoration: Present status and future. Bioengineered. 12(2), 12839–12853.
[65] Wang, Q., Hu, Z., Li, Z., et al., 2025. Exploring the application and prospects of synthetic biology in engineered living materials. Advanced Materials. 37(31), 2305828.
[66] Priyadarshini, P., Abhilash, P.C., 2020. Fostering sustainable land restoration through circular economy‐governed transitions. Restoration Ecology. 28(4), 719–723.
[67] Kapsalis, V.C., Kyriakopoulos, G.L., Aravossis, K.G., 2019. Investigation of ecosystem services and circular economy interactions under an inter-organizational framework. Energies. 12(9), 1734.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2026 Xikun Liu, Hongwei Chen, Hongwei Chen, Yan Wang

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.




Xikun Liu