Congratulations to Professor Jianping Guo as a Clarivate Analytics Highly Cited Scientist in 2024!
2024-11-27
Assessing the Economic Value of Improvement in Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem Services Resulting from Ecological Stream Restoration in South Korea
Authors
-
Hyun No Kim
Division for Green Transition, Korea Environment Institute, Bldg B, 370 Sicheong-daero, Sejong 30147, Republic of Korea
-
Hwanhee Ryu
Division for Green Transition, Korea Environment Institute, Bldg B, 370 Sicheong-daero, Sejong 30147, Republic of Korea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i1.7499Abstract
Urbanization and environmental degradation have led to significant declines in water quality and aquatic ecosystem health, highlighting the urgent need for effective restoration efforts. This study applies an integrated analysis approach to estimate the economic value and benefits of improvements in water quality and aquatic ecosystem services resulting from the Ecological Stream Restoration Project. Using survey data analyzed through the choice experiment (CE) method, we assessed respondents’ preferences for various ecosystem services, including water-friendly services, ecological functions, water-level control, and water-quality purification. Three empirical analysis models—the Conditional Logit Model (CLM), Nested Logit Model (NL), and Error Component Logit Model (ECL)—were applied, with the ECL model identified as the most suitable for this study. From the physical impact assessment, we derived compensating variations to estimate the annual economic benefits of the project. The estimated annual economic value of water quality improvement due to the Anyangcheon Ecological Stream Restoration Project ranged from approximately KRW 10.54 billion to KRW 21.44 billion, while the economic value of aquatic ecosystem improvement was estimated to range from KRW 6.05 billion to KRW 12.30 billion annually. This study provides analytic framework that can inform future ecological restoration projects and sustainable water management policies.
Keywords:
Ecological Stream Restoration; Non-Market Valuation; Choice Experiment; Ecosystem Services; Integrated Environmental And Economic AnalysisReferences
[1] Deason, J.P., Dickey, G.E., Kinnell, J.C., et al., 2010. Integrated planning framework for urban river rehabilitation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 136(6), 688–696.
[2] Paul, M.J., Meyer, J.L., 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 32(1), 333–365.
[3] Violin, C.R., Cada, P., Sudduth, E.B., et al., 2011. Effects of urbanization and urban stream restoration on the physical and biological structure of stream ecosystems. Ecological Applications. 21(6), 1932–1949.
[4] Feld, C.K., Birk, S., Bradley, D.C., et al., 2011. From natural to degraded rivers and back again: A test of restoration ecology theory and practice. In Advances in ecological research. Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. Volume 44, pp. 119–209.
[5] Kurth, A.M., Schirmer, M., 2014. Thirty years of river restoration in Switzerland: implemented measures and lessons learned. Environmental Earth Sciences. 72, 2065–2079.
[6] Yoon, Y.Y., Hwang, Y.H., Shim, M.J., 2024. Influence of stream restoration on water quality in the gap stream, Daejeon, Korea. Desalination and Water Treatment. 317, 100083.
[7] Van Andel, J., Aronson, J. (Eds.), 2012. Restoration ecology: The new frontier. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA.
[8] Dharmarathne, G., Waduge, A.O., Bogahawaththa, M., et al., 2024. Adapting cities to the surge: A comprehensive review of climate-induced urban flooding. Results in Engineering. 22(19), 1–15.
[9] Aronson, J., Clewell, A.F., Blignaut, J.N., et al., 2006. Ecological restoration: A new frontier for nature conservation and economics. Journal for Nature Conservation. 14(3–4), 135–139.
[10] Verdonschot, P.F.M., Verdonschot, R.C.M., 2023. The role of stream restoration in enhancing ecosystem services. Hydrobiologia. 850(12), 2537–2562.
[11] MOE, 2021. Ecological Stream Restoration Technical Specification; Ministry of Environment: Sejong, Republic of Korea. (In Korean)
[12] An, J.H., Park, K., Lee, H.K., 2022. Evaluation on the restoration effects in the river restoration projects practiced in South Korea. Water. 14(17), 2739.
[13] Barak, B., Katz, D., 2015. Valuing instream and riparian aspects of stream restoration–A willingness to tax approach. Land Use Policy. 45, 204–212.
[14] Kunwar, S.B., Bohara, A.K., Thacher, J., 2020. Public preference for river restoration in the Danda Basin, Nepal: A choice experiment study. Ecological Economics. 175, 106690.
[15] Chen, W.Y., Hua, J., Liekens, I., et al., 2018. Preference heterogeneity and scale heterogeneity in urban river restoration: A comparative study between Brussels and Guangzhou using discrete choice experiments. Landscape and Urban Planning. 173, 9–22.
[16] Brouwer, R., Bliem, M., Getzner, M., et al., 2016. Valuation and transferability of the non-market benefits of river restoration in the Danube river basin using a choice experiment. Ecological Engineering. 87, 20–29.
[17] Chen, W.Y., Cho, F.H.T., 2019. Environmental information disclosure and societal preferences for urban river restoration: Latent class modelling of a discrete-choice experiment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 231, 1294–1306.
[18] Anyang City, 2001. Anyang-Cheon Stream Ecological Restoration Report. Anyang City: Anyang, Republic of Korea. (In Korean)
[19] Choi, B., Choi, S.S., 2021. Integrated hydraulic modelling, water quality modelling and habitat assessment for sustainable water management: A case study of the Anyang-Cheon stream, Korea. Sustainability. 13(8), 4330.
[20] Ahn, S., Kim, H.N., Kim, C., et al., 2018. An Integrated Assessment to Environmental Valuation via Impact Pathway Analysis. Korea Environment Institute: Sejong, Republic of Korea.
[21] Kim, H.N., Ahn, S., Kim, C., et al., 2019. An Integrated Assessment to Environmental Valuation via Impact Pathway Analysis. Korea Environment Institute: Sejong, Republic of Korea.
[22] Börger, T., Hattam, C., 2017. Motivations matter: Behavioural determinants of preferences for remote and unfamiliar environmental goods. Ecological Economics. 131, 64–74.
[23] Boxall, P.C., Adamowicz, W.L., 2002. Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics. 23, 421–446.
[24] Pakalniete, K., Aigars, J., Czajkowski, M., et al., 2017. Understanding the distribution of economic benefits from improving coastal and marine ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment. 584, 29–40.
[25] Hess, S., Rose, J.M., 2009. Should reference alternatives in pivot design SC surveys be treated differently? Environmental and Resource Economics. 42(3), 297–317.
[26] Kim, H.N., Ahn, S., Ji, S., et al., 2018. An Economic Analysis of Converting Highland Agricultural Areas into Environment-Friendly Land Use for Water Quality Improvement. Korea Environment Institute: Sejong, Republic of Korea.
[27] Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J., Brown, T.C., 2017. A primer on nonmarket valuation, 2nd ed. Springer: Berlin, Germany.
[28] Kim, H.N., Boxall, P.C., Adamowicz, W.L., 2016. Analysis of the impact of water quality changes on residential property prices. Water Resources and Economics. 16, 1–14.
[29] Hensher, D., Shore, N., Train, K., 2005. Households' willingness to pay for water service attributes. Environmental and Resource economics, 32, 509–531.
[30] Walker, J.L., 2001. Extended discrete choice models: integrated framework, flexible error structures, and latent variables. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, USA.
[31] Ahn, S., Kim, H.N., Kim, C., et al., 2017. An Integrated Assessment to Environmental Valuation via Impact Pathway Analysis. Korea Environment Institute: Sejong, Republic of Korea.
Downloads
How to Cite
Hyun No Kim, & Ryu, H. (2025). Assessing the Economic Value of Improvement in Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem Services Resulting from Ecological Stream Restoration in South Korea. Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 7(1), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i1.7499
Issue
Article Type
Article
License
Copyright © 2025 Hyun No Kim, Hwanhee Ryu
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
