Mapping Hotspots and Emerging Trends in Global Wetlands Research: A Scientometric Analysis (2002–2022)

Authors

  • Jingzhe Chi

    School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
  • Syamsul Herman Mohammad Afandi

    School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
  • Nitanan Koshy A/L Matthew

    Faculty of Forestry and Environment, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i2.7533
Received: 18 October 2024 | Revised: 1 November 2024 | Accepted: 7 November 2024 | Published Online: 23 January 2025

Abstract

Recent studies have focused on wetlands due to their benefits for human spiritual satisfaction and mental health. This paper conducted a scientometric analysis of 2,388 studies published in the Web of Science database between 2002 and 2022. Using VOSviewer, Origin, and CiteSpace software, this study identified research hotspots and emerging trends in wetland research. The analysis revealed an upward trend in global wetland research publications, with notable contributions from researchers in the United States, China, Australia, Canada, and India. Network keyword co-occurrence analysis highlighted primary research themes, including constructed wetlands, climate change, wastewater treatment, phytoremediation, restoration, and hydrology. The United States emerged as the central hotspot for wetland research, with China, Canada, Australia, and other countries following. Given the growing recognition of wetlands' importance, wetland research is expected to gain even more global attention. Moreover, improvements in the quality of wetland tourism research are recommended, as most related publications have low citation rates. This paper provides a methodological overview of scientometric techniques applicable to global wetland research, offering scholars a framework for using scientometric analysis to enhance their future research. The increasing recognition of wetlands' crucial role in human well-being, encompassing both spiritual satisfaction and mental health, has led to a surge in research interest in this field. This study presents a comprehensive scientometric analysis of  2,388 wetland-related publications indexed in the Web of Science database between 2002 and 2022. Employing VOSviewer, Origin, and CiteSpace software, we mapped research hotspots and identified emerging trends within global wetland research. Our analysis reveals a significant upward trend in the volume of publications, highlighting the growing international attention to wetland ecosystems. The United States, China, Australia, Canada, and India have emerged as leading contributors to this research landscape. A network keyword co-occurrence analysis identified core research themes such as constructed wetlands, climate change, wastewater treatment, phytoremediation, ecological restoration, and hydrology. The United States is a central hub for wetland research, with China, Canada, and Australia also demonstrating substantial research activity. Given the escalating importance of wetlands in addressing global challenges, this research area is expected to attract further scholarly attention. We recommend a greater emphasis on enhancing the quality and impact of wetland tourism research, which currently exhibits low citation rates. Furthermore, this paper provides a methodological framework, demonstrating the application of scientometric techniques in global wetland research, thus empowering scholars to utilise such analytical approaches to refine their research. Our study offers a valuable and comprehensive overview of the key research areas, emerging topics, and influential contributors within the field of global wetland research.

Keywords:

Scientometrics Analysis; Global Wetlands; Citespace; VOSviewer; Web of Science Database

References

[1] Vazquez-Gonzalez, C., Moreno-Casasola, P., Peláez, L.A.P., et al., 2019 The Value of Coastal Wetland Flood Prevention Lost to Urbanization on the Coastal Plain of the Gulf of Mexico: An Analysis of Flood Damage by Hurricane Impacts. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 37, 101180.

[2] Sandi, S.G., Rodriguez, J.F., Saintilan, N., et al., 2020. Resilience to Drought of Dryland Wetlands Threatened by Climate Change. Scientific Reports. 10(1), 13232.

[3] Shutes, R.B., Ellis, J.B., Revitt, D.M., et al., 2020. The use of Typha latifolia for heavy metal pollution control in urban wetlands. In Constructed wetlands for water quality improvement (pp. 407-414). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.

[4] Wu, H., Wang, R., Yan, P., et al., 2023. Constructed Wetlands for Pollution Control. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 4(4), 218–234.

[5] Zhao, Q., Bai, J., Huang, L., et al., 2016. A Review of Methodologies and Success Indicators for Coastal Wetland Restoration. Ecological Indicators. 60, 442–452.

[6] Lin, P., Chen, L., Luo, Z., 2022. Analysis of Tourism Experience in Haizhu National Wetland Park Based on Web Text. Sustainability. 14(5), 3011.

[7] Zhang, X., Zhao, T., Xu, H., 2023. GLC_FCS30D: The First Global 30-m Land-cover Dynamic Monitoring Product with A Fine Classification System from 1985 to 2022 Using Dense Time-series Landsat Imagery and Continuous Change-detection Method. Earth System Science Data Discussions. 2023, 1–32.

[8] Xia, L. Y., Yu, H. X., et al., 2016. Impact of Eco-education on Visitor’s Environmental Behavior Intentions in Wetland Park: A Case Study of 5 Wetland Parks in Harbin. Wetland Science. 14(1), 72–81.

[9] Ji, B., Zhao, Y., Vymazal, J., et al., 2021. Mapping the Field of Constructed Wetland-microbial Fuel Cell: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Chemosphere. 262, 128366.

[10] Mahdianpari, M., Granger, J.E., Mohammadimanesh, F., 2020. Meta-analysis of Wetland Classification Using Remote Sensing: A Systematic Review of A 40-year trend in North America. Remote Sensing. 12(11), 1882.

[11] Mkonda, M.Y., et al., 2022. Sustainable Management of Wetlands in East Africa: A Case of Akagera Wetland in the North-western Tanzania. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 16, 100210.

[12] Hassan, N., Halim, B.A., 2012. Mathematical modelling approach to the management of recreational tourism activities at Wetland Putrajaya. Sains Malaysiana. 41(9), 1155-1161.

[13] Xu, S., He, X., 2022. Estimating the Recreational Value of A Coastal Wetland Park: Application of the Choice Experiment Method and Travel Cost Interval Analysis. Journal of Environmental Management. 304, 114225.

[14] Eric, A., Chrystal, M.P., Erik, A., et al., 2022. Evaluating Ecosystem Services for Agricultural Wetlands: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Wetlands Ecology and Management. 30(6), 1129–1149.

[15] Repanovici, A., 2011. Measuring the Visibility of the university's Scientific production through Scientometric methods: An Exploratory Study at the Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania. Performance Measurement and Metrics. 12(2), 106–117.

[16] Li, L.L., Ding, G., Feng, N., et al., 2009. Global Stem Cell Research Trend: Bibliometric Analysis As A Tool for Mapping of Trends from 1991 to 2006. Scientometrics. 80(1), 39–58.

[17] Bordons, M., Zulueta, M.A., 1999. Evaluation of the Scientific Activity through Bibliometric Indices. Revista Espanola de Cardiologia. 52(10), 790–800.

[18] Xu, D., Wang, Y.L., Wang, K.T., et al., 2021. A Scientometrics Analysis and Visualization of Depressive Disorder. Current Neuropharmacology. 19(6), 766–786.

[19] Syamimi, M.A., Herman, M.A.S., Mohamad, W., et al., 2022. Mapping Major Trends in Global Research in Marine and Coastal Tourism: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management. 17(8). 200–217.

[20] Koseoglu, M.A., Yick, M.Y.Y., King, B., et al., 2022 Relational Bibliometrics for Hospitality and Tourism Research: A Best Practice Guide. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 52, 316–330.

[21] Rivera, G., Gonzales, S. and Aponte, H., 2022. Wetlands of the South American pacific coast: a bibliometric analysis. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 30(4), pp.869-877.

[22] Wang, L.X., Li, J.W., Liu, H.M., et al., 2012. Bibliometric Analysis of Status Quo of Wetland Science in China. Advanced Materials Research. 518, 5984–5988.

[23] Powell, T.H., Kouropalatis, Y., Morgan, R.E., et al., 2016. Mapping Knowledge and Innovation Research Themes: Using Bibliometrics for Classification, Evolution, Proliferation and Determinism. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management. 20(3–4), 174–199.

[24] Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D.A., Schnell, J., et al., 2020. Web of Science as A Data Source for Research on Scientific and Scholarly Activity. Quantitative Science Studies. 1(1), 363–376.

[25] Chen, X., Yang, K., Xu, Y., et al., 2019. Top-100 Highest-cited Original Articles in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Bibliometric Analysis. Medicine. 98(20), e15718.

[26] Dong, R., Wang, H., Ye, J., et al., 2019. Publication Trends for Alzheimer's Disease Worldwide and in China: A 30-year Bibliometric Analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 13, 259.

[27] Perazzo, M.F., Otoni, A.L.C., Costa, M.S., et al., 2019. The top 100 Most‐cited Papers in Paediatric Dentistry Journals: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 29(6), 692–711.

[28] Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., et al., 2021. Forty Years of the International Journal of Information Management: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Information Management. 57, 102307.

[29] Van Eck, N.J., and Waltman, L., 2014. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice (pp. 285-320). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

[30] Tu, J.X., Lin, X.T., Ye, H.Q., et al., 2022. Global Research Trends of Artificial Intelligence Applied in Esophageal Carcinoma: A Bibliometric Analysis (2000–2022) via CiteSpace and VOSviewer. Frontiers in Oncology. 12, 972357.

[31] Gupta, T.R., Foster, J.H., 1975. Economic Criteria for Freshwater Wetland Policy in Massachusetts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 57(1), 40–45.

[32] Hirsch, J.E., 2005. An Index to Quantify An Individual's Scientific Research Output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102(46), 16569–16572.

[33] Bornmann, L., Daniel, H.D., 2007. What Do We Know About the H Index?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(9), 1381–1385.

[34] Liu, Y. and Hu, G., 2021. Mapping the field of English for specific purposes (1980–2018): A co-citation analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 61, pp.97-116.

[35] Asomani-Boateng, R., 2019. Urban Wetland Planning and Management in Ghana: a Disappointing Implementation. Wetlands. 39(2), 251–261.

[36] Wan, Z., Wu, H., 2022. Evolution of Ecological Patterns of Poyang Lake Wetland Landscape over the Last One Hundred Years Based on Historical Topographic Maps and Landsat Images. Sustainability. 14(13), 7868.

[37] National Research Council, Division on Earth, Life Studies, Commission on Geosciences, & Committee on Characterization of Wetlands, 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Washington, D.C., USA: National Academies Press. pp. 1-312

[38] Palmer, M.A., Ambrose, R.F., Poff, N.L., et al., 1997). Ecological Theory and Community Restoration Ecology. Restoration Ecology. 5(4), 291–300.

[39] Finlayson, C.M., Gardner, R.C., 2020. Ten Key Issues from the Global Wetland Outlook for Decision Makers. Marine and Freshwater Research. 72(3), 301–310.

[40] Liu, W., Cui, L., Guo, Z., Wang, D. and Zhang, M., 2023. Wetland ecosystem health improvement from ecological conservation and restoration offset the decline from socio‐economic development. Land Degradation & Development, 34(1), pp.283-295.

[41] Wang, X., Xiao, X., Zhang, X., et al., 2023 Rapid and Large Changes in Coastal Wetland Structure in China's Four Major River Deltas. Global Change Biology. 29(8), 2286–2300.

[42] Zhao, M., Han, G., Wu, H., et al., 2020. Inundation Depth Affects Ecosystem CO 2 and CH 4 Exchange by Changing Plant Productivity in a Freshwater Wetland in the Yellow River Estuary. Plant and Soil. 454, 87–102.

[43] Bertoli-Barsotti, L., Lando, T. , 2017. A Theoretical Model of the Relationship between the H-index and other Simple Citation Indicators. Scientometrics. 111, 1415–1448.

[44] Yan, W., Zheng, K., Weng, L., et al., 2020. Bibliometric Evaluation of 2000–2019 Publications on Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy. Neuroimage. 220, 117121.

[45] Kačergytė, I., Pärt, T., Berg, Å., et al., 2022. Quantifying Effects of Wetland Restorations on Bird Communities in Agricultural Landscapes. Biological Conservation. 273, 109676.

[46] Lovelock, C.E., Adame, M.F., Bradley, J., et al., 2023.. An Australian Blue Carbon Method to Estimate Climate Change Mitigation Benefits of Coastal wetland Restoration. Restoration Ecology. 31(7), e13739.

[47] Parde, D., Patwa, A., Shukla, A., et al., 2021. A Review of Constructed Wetland on Type, Treatment and Technology of Wastewater. Environmental Technology and Innovation. 21, 101261.

[48] Ebrahimi-Khusfi, Z., Nafarzadegan, A.R., Ebrahimi-Khusfi, M., et al., 2022. Monitoring the Water Surface of Wetlands in Iran and Their Relationship with Air Pollution in Nearby Cities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 194(7), 488.

[49] Im, R.Y., Kim, T., Baek, C.Y., et al., 2020. The Influence of Surrounding Land Cover on Wetland Habitat Conditions: A Case Study of Inland Wetlands in South Korea. PeerJ. 8, e9101.

[50] Rodrigo, M.A., 2021. Wetland Restoration with Hydrophytes: A review. Plants. 10(6), 1035.

[51] Yang, X., Meng, F., Fu, P., et al., 2021. Spatiotemporal Change and Driving Factors of the Eco-Environment Quality in the Yangtze River Basin from 2001 to 2019. Ecological Indicators. 131, 108214.

[52] Caro, C., Cunha, P.P., Marques, J.C., et al., 2020. Identifying Ecosystem Services Research Hotspots to Illustrate the Importance of Site-specific Research: An Atlantic Coastal Region Case Study. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 6, 100031.

[53] Zedler, J.B., Kercher, S., 2005. Wetland Resources: Status, Trends, Ecosystem Services, and Restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 30(1), 39–74.

[54] Xu, T., Weng, B., Yan, D., et al., 2019. Wetlands of International Importance: Status, Threats, and Future Protection. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 16(10), 1818.

[55] Saeed, T., Sun, G., 2012. A Review on Nitrogen and Organics Removal Mechanisms in Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands: Dependency on Environmental Parameters, Operating Conditions and Supporting Media. Journal of Environmental Management. 112, 429–448.

[56] Stottmeister, U., Wießner, A., Kuschk, P., et al., 2003.. Effects of Plants and Microorganisms in Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. Biotechnology advances. 22(12), 93–117.

[57] Zedler, J.B., Kercher, S., 2005. Wetland Resources: Status, Trends, Ecosystem Services, and Restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 30(1), 39–74.

Downloads

How to Cite

Jingzhe Chi, Syamsul Herman Mohammad Afandi, & Nitanan Koshy A/L Matthew. (2025). Mapping Hotspots and Emerging Trends in Global Wetlands Research: A Scientometric Analysis (2002–2022). Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 7(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v7i2.7533

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 2 (February 2025): In Progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Jingzhe Chi, Syamsul Herman Mohammad Afandi, Nitanan Koshy A/L Matthew

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC