Kadir Gök
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Engineering and Architecture Faculty, İzmir Bakircay University, İzmir, 35660, Turkey
Görkem Karagoz
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Natural Sciences Institute, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, 45140, Turkey
Arif Gök
Department of Industrial Design, Architecture Faculty, Kutahya Dumlupinar University, Kutahya, 43100, Turkey
The main focus of this study revolves around the problem of vibrations in unmanned aerial vehicles and aims to propose solutions using different designs of vibration dampers. Specifically, the study identifies the sources of vibrations in a Single Rotor Rotary Wing (Monocopter) type UAV. To assess the damping performance of the designed dampers, vibration tests were conducted in a controlled setup. Based on the measurement results obtained at three different speed stages, a particular damper, referred to as G2S2, exhibited the highest damping performance. At the first speed stage, it achieved damping percentages of 66% for the X-axis, 77% for the Y-axis, and 84% for the Z-axis. At the second speed stage, the percentages increased to 81% for the X-axis, 84% for the Y-axis, and 97% for the Z-axis. Finally, at the third speed stage, the damper demonstrated damping percentages of 85% for the X-axis, 84% for the Y-axis, and 98% for the Z-axis. This study successfully developed an experimental setup for measuring vibrations during UAV flight, particularly focusing on unmanned aerial vehicles. Furthermore, among the vibration dampers produced using additive manufacturing techniques, the damper with the highest performance, namely G2S2, was selected. Considering the measurement results, G2S2 emerged as the most effective vibration damper. It is worth mentioning that this damper can also be tested in real flight scenarios in the future, building upon the outcomes achieved through the experimental setup.
[1] Torun, A., 2017. İnsansız Hava Aracı (İHA) Sektörü Ve İHA Fotogrametrisinin Ölçme Bağlamında Konumlandırılması (Turkish) [The Sector of Unmanned Aerial Systems and Positioning UAS Photogrammetry Regarding Surveying Discipline] [Internet]. Available from: https://www.hkmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/ee7bb-21c93fa52e_ek.pdf
[2] DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms [Internet]. Available from: https://irp.fas.org/doddir/dod/dictionary.pdf
[3] Li, Z., Lao, M., Phang, S.K., et al. (editors), 2017. Development and design methodology of an anti-vibration system on micro-UAVs. International Micro Air Vehicle Conference and Flight Competition (IMAV). 2017 Sep 18-22; Toulouse, France. p. 223-228.
[4] Palaniswamy, H., Ngaile, G., Altan, T., 2004. Optimization of blank dimensions to reduce springback in the flexforming process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 146(1), 28-34.
[5] McCaldin, G. 3D Printed Anti Vibration Mount [Internet]. Available from: https://discuss.ardupilot.org/t/3d-printed-anti-vibration-mount/11472
[6] Review and Tests of Anti-vibration Systems [Internet]. Available from: https://diydrones.com/profiles/blogs/videophotography-gimbal-anti-vibration-systems-tests
[7] Changshuai, Y., Haitao, L., Siwei, G. (editors), 2019. Vibration test and vibration reduction design of UAV load radar. Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Automation, Control and Robotics Engineering. 2019 Jul. p. 1-6.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3351917.3351980
[8] Hadden, S., Davis, T., Buchele, P., et al., 2001. Heavy load vibration isolation system for airborne payloads. Smart Structures and Materials: Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies. 4332, 171-182.
[9] Deng, C., Mu, D., An, Y., et al., 2017. Reduction of satellite flywheel microvibration using rubber shock absorbers. Journal of Vibroengineering. 19(3), 1465-1478.
[10] Rogov, V.A., Ghorbani, S., 2015. Research on selecting the optimal design of antivibrational lathe tool using computer simulation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering. 229(3), 162-167.
[11] Zhao, H.M., Li, D.Y., Deng, W., et al., 2017. Research on vibration suppression method of alternating current motor based on fractional order control strategy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering. 231(4), 786-799.
[12] Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.custompartnet.com/wu/fused-deposition-modeling
[13] Varady, T., Martin, R.R., Cox, J., 1997. Reverse engineering of geometric models—an introduction. Computer-aided Design. 29(4), 255-268.
Copyright © 2023 Kadir Gök, Görkem Karagoz, Arif Gök
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
