[1]Ren, J., 2022. Tianxia: The threefold connotation, vehicle of language, and journey to reestablishment. Journal of Chinese Humanities. 8(3), 339–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/23521341-12340140

[2]Auer, P., 1998. Introduction: Bilingual conversation revisited. In: Auer, P. (Ed.), Codeswitching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 1–24.

[3]Baker-Bell, A., 2020. Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315147383

[4]Bianco, J.L., 2010. Language policy and planning. In: Hornberger, N.H., McKay, S.L. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Education. Multilingual Matters: Clevedon, OH, USA. pp. 143–176.

[5]Hudson, A., 2002. Outline of a theory of diglossia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 157, 1–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2002.039

[6]Mordaunt, O.G., 1990. Swaziland's language policy. Educational Studies. 16(2), 131–140. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305569900160204

[7]Moser, M., 2020. The language question as a factor of influence on Ukraine's national security. Strategic Panorama. 1–2, 29–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53679/2616-9460.1-2.2020.04

[8]Videnov, M., 2000. Introduction to sociolinguistics. Delphi: Sofia, Bulgaria. 106p.

[9]Zokirov, M.T., 2021. To typology of language situations. Theoretical & Applied Science. 11(103), 706–710. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2021.11.103.71

[10]Auer, P., 2021. Language contact. Pragmatic factors. In The Routledge handbook of language contact. pp. 147–167. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346912381_Language_contact

[11]Clyne, M., 2003. Dynamics of Language Contact: English and Immigrant Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. 282p.

[12]Litvinyak, O., 2021. “Languages in contact” in the Soviet Union: Treading a dangerous ground. Respectus Philologicus, 45. Vilnius University Press: Vilnius, Lithuania. pp. 22–34.

[13]Wei, L., 2023. Contact linguistics of interlanguage. Studies in Linguistics and Literature. 7(4), 28–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22158/sll.v7n4p28

[14]Weinreich, U., 1953. Languages in Contact, Findings and Problems. Linguistic Circle: New York, NY, USA. 148p.

[15]Thomason, S.G., 2001. Language Contact. An Introduction. Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC, USA. 319p.

[16]Chambers, J.K., 2004. Studying language variation: An informal epistemology. In: Chambers, J.K., Trudgill, P., Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.). The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Blackwell: Oxford, UK. pp. 3–14.

[17]De Camp, D., 1961. Social and geographical factors in Jamaican dialects. In: LePage, R.B. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Creole Language Studies. Macmillan: New York, NY, USA. pp. 61–84

[18]Coupland, N., 2007. Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. 224p.

[19]Gumperz, J.J., 1971. Language in social groups: Essays by John J. Gumperz. Dil, A.S. (Ed.). Stanford University Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA. 350p.

[20]Holmes, J., 2013. An introduction to sociolinguistics. Routledge: London, UK. 512p.

[21]Halliday, M.A.K., 1976. Anti-languages. American Anthropologist. New Series. 78(3), 570–584.

[22]Labov, W., 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia, PA, USA. 344p.

[23]Sánchez Fajardo, J.A., 2017. The Anglicization of Cuban Spanish: Lexico-Semantic Variations and Patterns. Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Filología Inglesa. Septentrio Academic Publishing. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics. 6(2), 233–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7557/1.6.2.4120

[24]Nogueroles, N., Esperanza, E., 2017. The Use of Anglicisms in Various Thematic Fields: An Analysis Based on the Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies. 26/2. 123–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7311/0860-5734.26.2.08

[25]Pulcini, V., 2023. 1 Introducing the study of Anglicisms in Italian. In The Influence of English on Italian: Lexical and Cultural Features. De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA. pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110755114-001

[26]Turmys, O., 2021. English Borrowings in Chinese: Features of Functioning. Kitaêznavčì doslìdžennâ. (1), 229–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51198/chinesest2021.01.229 

[27]Stokoe, E., Albert, S., Buschmeier, H., et al., 2024. Conversation analysis and conversational technologies: Finding the common ground between academia and industry. Discourse & Communication. 18(6), 837–847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813241267118 [First published in 2024].

[28]Hansson, S., Page, R., 2022. Corpus-assisted analysis of legitimation strategies in government social media communication. Discourse & Communication. 16(5), 551–571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221099202 [First published in 2022].

[29]Azhniuk, B., 2017. Ukrainian language legislation and the national crisis. Harvard Ukrainian Studies. 35(1/4), 311–329.

[30]Bahan, M., 2020. Anglicization of modern Ukrainian communicative space: Causes, circumstances and consequences. Journal Ukrainian Language. (73)(1). 38–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrmova2020.01.038

[31]Bakhmat, L., Panchenko, V., Bashkir, O., 2021. Using English borrowings in modern Ukrainian advertising. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Atlantis Press SARL: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Volume 557, pp. 28–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210525.004

[32]Leleka, T., Moskalenko, O., 2018. Psycholinguistic peculiarities of the assimilation of AngloAmericanisms by the speakers of Ukrainian-English bilingualism. Psycholinguistics. Series: Philology. 24(2), 144–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-2-144-162

[33]Nahorna, Y., 2016. The influence of Anglicisms and Americanisms on contemporary Ukrainian. Ukrainsky Smysl. 1, 291–299. Available from: https://ukrsense.dp.ua/index.php/USENSE/article/view/155

[34]Slabouz, V., Budnyk, S., 2018. Anglicisms in modern Ukrainian. “Pivdenniy Arkhiv” (Collected Papers on Philology). Kherson State University: Kherson, Ukraine. Volume LXXV, pp. 42–46.

[35]Taran, A.A., 2024. New Anglicisms in the Ukrainian language as a reflection of the development of ITeducation. Transcarpathian Philological Studies. 34(2), 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/tps2663-4880/2024.34.2.7

[36]Polyarush, V., 2010. The Influence of English on Ukrainian, with a Focus on the Language of Youth [Master's Thesis]. Middle East Technical University: Ankara, Turkey. Avalable from: http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12612527/index.pdf

[37]Bloshchynskyi, I., Mishchynska, I., Pasichnyk, N., et al., 2022. Peculiarities of linguistic analysis of the text as a language learning strategy. World Journal of English Language. 12(5), 49–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n5p49

[38]Jaafar, S.T., Buragohain, D., Haroon, H.A., 2019. Differences and classifications of borrowed and loan words in linguistics context: A critical review. In Learning in a Changing World. Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Perlis. pp. 95–112. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337338157_Differences_and_Classifications_of_Borrowed_and_Loan_Words_in_Linguistics_Context_A_Critical_Review#fullTextFileContent

[39]Pawitra, G.N.G., Suastra, M., Laksminy, L.P., 2023. English borrowing words in JagatPlay news articles. Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Education. 6(2), 11–22. Available from: https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/1854923

[40]Fairclough, N., 2001. Critical Discourse Analysis. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281506450_Critical_Discourse_Analysis#fullTextFileContent

[41]Unger, J., Wodak, R., KhosraviNik, M., 2016. Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media Data. In: David Silverman, ed. Qualitative Research, 4th ed. SAGE: London, UK. pp. 277–293.

[42]Creswell, J.W., 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3rd ed. SAGE Publications: London, UK. 270p.

[43]Rijkhoff, J., Bakker, D., 1998. Language sampling. Linguistic Typology. 2(3), 263–314. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.3.263

[44]Makarets, I., 2019. Language situation in Ukrainian print media. European Journal of Literature and Linguistics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29013/EJLL-19-4-18-22.

[45]Alek, A. 2023. Discourse analysis, its characteristics, types, and beyond. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Available from: https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/73450/1/Discourse%20Analysis%2C%20Its%20characteristics%2C%20Types%2C%20and%20Beyond.pdf

[46]Navalna, M., 2018. Stylistically neutral, stylistically and functionally marked vocabulary. In: Struhanets, L. (Ed.), Multidimensionality of Vocabulary in the Literary Language. LUMBERT Academic Publishing: Mitte Saarbrücken, Germany. pp. 78–87. Available from: http://dspace.tnpu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/13871/1/struhanets_monogr_Multidimensionality.pdf

[47]CNC Machines, 2024. Mtech Ukraine. Available from: https://mtech.com.ua/en/ (cited 14 June 2024).

[48]Cooperation with International Financial Institutions, (2023). National Bank of Ukraine. Available from https://bank.gov.ua/en/about/international/financial-institutions (cited 21 June 2024).

[49]The New Voice of Ukraine, 2022. “Publishing House “Media-DC” LLC. Power Generation Improves, Reducing Deficit, Says Ukrenergo. Available from: https://english.nv.ua/nation/powergeneration-improves-reducing-the-deficit-ukraine-news-50293683.html (cited 21 June 2024).

[50]Prime Minister inspects the construction of fortifications in Volyn region, 2024. Government portal. Available from: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/en/news/premier-ministr-oznaiomyvsia-zprotsesom-zvedennia-fortyfikatsii-u-volynskii-oblasti (cited 21 June 2024).

[51]We can do more “How the Ukrainian defense industry lives and what prevents it from growing”. 2024. Hromadske. Available from: https://hromadske.ua/en/economy/234038-we-can-do-more-how-the-ukrainian-defense-industry-lives-and-what-prevents-it-from-growing (cited 8 May 2024).

[52]Valeyeva, A., 2014. Linguistic behavior as a social and cultural potential in the multiethnic community. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 149, 984–989. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275544460_Linguistic_Behavior_as_a_Social_and_Cultural_Potential_i n_the_Multiethnic_Community

[53]Budiarsa, M., 2015. Language, dialect and register in a sociolinguistic perspective. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa. 1(2), 379–387. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314983260_Language_Dialect_And_Register_Sociolinguistic_Perspecti ve#fullTextFileContent

[54]Benlakdar, M., 2020. A Sociolinguistic Exploration of Sociolects in Translation. ALTRALANG Journal, 2(1), 88-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52919/altralang.v2i01.46

[55]Lighter, J., Dumas, B.K., 1978. Is slang a word for linguists? American Speech, 53, 5–17.

[56]Shevchenko, T.S., 2000. The effectiveness of advertising on television (on the example of modern Ukrainian TV). In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny. 146(6), 102–107. Available from: https://ird.gov.ua/sep/sep20206(146)/sep20206(146)_102_ShevchenkoTS.pdf

[57]Best ads. Ukraine, 2024. BEST ADS ontv. Available from: https://www.bestadsontv.com/search.php?q=&category=27&adtype=5&client=&agency=&a mp;prodco=&country=380&year=&month=&next=1 (cited 21 June 2024).

[58]Daniushina, Y., 2010. Business linguistics and business discourse. Calidoscópio. 8(3), 241–247. Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=571561875008

[59]Andersson, L., Trudgill, P., 1992. Bad language. Penguin. 208p.

[60]Grygiel, M., 2015. Business English from a linguistic perspective. English for Specific Purposes. Special Issue №1, (16), 1–12.

[61]Jargon buster: Common procurement words & expressions explained., 2013. Wellington, New Zealand. Available from: https://www.iberglobal.com/files/procurement_jargon.pdf (cited 21 June 2024).

[62]Slovnyk inshomovnykh sliv [Dictionary of foreign words], 2000. S. M. Morozov & L. M. Shkaraputa, Comps. Naukova Dumka. 683p. Available from: https://archive.org/details/slovninshomovn/page/537/mode/2up

[63]Klégr, A., 2023. Anglicisms: Towards defining their concept and typology. Linguistica Pragensia. 2, 103–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/18059635.2023.2.1