Uncovering the Influence of Taboos in African linguistic Tradition: An Ethnographic Study into their Role in Society
Authors
-
Khulisile Judith Nkuna 
Department of African Languages, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa
-
Innocent Zitha
Department of Academic Literacy, School of Languages, Faculty of Humanities, North-West University, Mahikeng 2745, South Africa
-
Sikhumbuzo Khoza
Department of African Languages, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa
-
Fikile Mashaba
Department of Science Foundation, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Agriculture, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i11.10139Abstract
Taboos are deeply ingrained in Indigenous knowledge systems and play a crucial role in shaping social behaviours. This study explored and evaluated Siswati taboos by examining their social, linguistic, religious, cultural, and psychological dimensions. Employing an ethnographic approach alongside qualitative research methods, the study investigates the roles and functions of Siswati taboos in contemporary society. The manifestations and perceptions of these taboos differ across various linguistic communities, influencing both written and oral communication. In many cultures, certain expressions are regarded as vulgar, obscene, or disruptive to social, religious, or ethical norms. The findings reveal that individuals frequently refrain from using such terminology in public contexts, acknowledging that specific actions may be either ethically sanctioned or condemned by deities. Furthermore, this study illustrates that taboos and superstitions are often viewed as essential components of traditional education. Unlike formal laws, which are documented in writing, taboos are transmitted through cultural traditions. Each civilisation cherishes its traditions, as their absence could undermine both traditional and formal education. The implications of this research suggest that the Swati people place a strong emphasis on traditional education due to its positive impact on societal growth, revitalisation, and development. Notably, the Swati community demonstrates a more pronounced use of taboos in spoken communication than in written expressions.
Keywords:
Taboos, Religion, Respect, Human Family, Norms, Ill-manneredReferences
[1]Almagor, E., Skinner, J., 2013. Ancient Ethnography: New Approaches. Bloomsbury: New York, NY, USA.
[2]Cassier, E., Applebaum, A., 1972. An Essay on a Man Introduction to Philosophy of Human Culture. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA. pp.1–21.
[3]Errickson, C.K., Stull, D.D., 1997. Doing Team Ethnography: Warning and Advice, 1st ed. SAGE Publications: Beverly Hills, CA, USA. pp. 50–68.
[4]Crowell-Collier Education Corporation, 1971. Collier’s Encyclopedia Yearbook. Collier and Son, LTD: New York, NY, USA. pp. 14–36.
[5]Hughes, G., 2006. The Encyclopedia of Swearing: The Social History of Oaths, Profanity, Foul Language and Ethnic Slurs in the English-Speaking Worlds. Mc Sharp: New York, NY, USA. pp. 17–41.
[6]Mkhondza, S., 2000. Teaching English and Siswati. Author House: Bloomington, IN, USA. pp.1–17.
[7]Osei, J., 2006. The Value of African Taboos for Diversity and Sustainable Development. Journal of Social Development in Africa. 8 (3), 41–42. Available from: https://jsdafrica.com/Jsda/Fall2006/PDF/Arc_the%20Value%20of%20Arican%20Taboos.pdf (cited 21 April 2025).
[8]Schapera, I.C., 1946. Traditional Literature: Bantu Speaking Tribes of Southern Africa. Maskew Miller: Cape Town, South Africa. pp. 100–116.
[9]Possa, R., Khotso, P., 2015. NAMING OF BASOTHO MEDICINAL PLANTS: SEMANTIC CONNECTION TO THEIR REMEDIES. Southern African Journal for Folklore Studies. 25(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/1016-8427/541
[10]Nkuna, K.J., 2001. The portrayal of Female Characters in Siswati Drama [Master thesis]. University of Zululand: KwaZulu-Natal , South Africa.
[11]Idowu, E.B., 1976. African Traditional Religion. Redwood Burn: London, UK. pp. 13–34.
[12]Mphasha, L.E., 2016. Taboos as Supernatural Interdictions in Folklore: The Constructors of Social Reality. Studies of Tribes and Tribals. 14(1), 29–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0972639X.2016.11886729
[13]Qanbar, N., 2011. A Sociolinguistic Study of the Linguistic Taboo in the Yemeni Society. Stabs: London, UK. pp. 37–51.
[14]Kesenene, P., 1993. Swazi Tradition Authority Religion and Society. Websters: Mbabane. Eswatini. pp. 1–19.
[15]Hammersley, M., 2018. What's wrong with Ethnography? Routledge: London, UK. pp. 16–37.
[16]McEnery, T., 2006. Swearing in English. Taylor and Francis: New York, NY, USA. pp. 20–41.
[17]Mills, S., 2003. Gender and Politeness, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238
[18]Brown, P., Levinson, S.C., 1978. Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. In: Goody, E.N. (eds.). Questions, and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 56–284.
[19]Kridge, E.J., 1950. The Social System of the Zulus. Shuter & Shooter: Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. pp.100–115.
[20]Saville-Troke, M., 1981. The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction. Basil Blackwell: Oxford, UK. pp. 61–84.
[21]Struwig, F., Stead, G.B., 2001. Planning, Designing, and Reporting Research. Pearson Education: Cape Town, South Africa. pp. 1–16.
[22]Cresswell, J.W., 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach. SAGE Publications: London, UK. pp. 205–225.
[23]Hymes, D., 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia, PA, USA. pp. 32–47.
[24]Cresswell, J.W., 2012. Research Design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. pp. 12–25.
[25]Brown, P., Levinson, S.C., Gumperz, J.J., 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 110–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
[26]Mills, S., 2003. Gender and Politeness, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238
[27]Steiner, F., 1967. Taboo. Penguin Books: London, UK. pp. 115–129.
Downloads
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Khulisile Judith Nkuna, Innocent Zitha, Sikhumbuzo Khoza, Fikile Mashaba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.