Welcome to Bilingual Publishing Group
Bilingual Publishing Group

The Worldview of Turkishness in Kazakh and Turkish Anthroponyms

Authors

  • Kuanyshbek Kenzhalin ORCID

    The Department of Kazakh Linguistics, L. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
  • Bekzhan Abdualyuly Email ORCID

    The Department of Kazakh Linguistics, L. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
  • Gulbaira Otelbay ORCID

    The Department of Practical Kazakh language, L. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
  • Ybray Turanov ORCID

    The Department of Kazakh Linguistics, L. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
  • Aigul Alimkhan ORCID

    The Department of Kazakh, Russian Philology and Journalism, S. Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University, Ust-Kamenogorsk 070000, Kazakhstan
  • Meiramgul Baimukhanbetova ORCID

    The Department of Kazakh Linguistics, L. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.11028
Received: 12 July 2025 | Revised: 18 July 2025 | Accepted: 24 July 2025 | Published Online: 11 September 2025

Abstract

This study explores the worldview of Turkishness reflected in Kazakh and Turkish anthroponyms with mythological roots, focusing on how names derived from celestial bodies, animals, and deities convey national identity and cultural continuity. The research aims to identify the symbolic and semantic values of mythologically embedded personal names (mythoanthroponyms) and their roles in representing collective memory and Turkic heritage. A mixed-method approach was adopted, combining descriptive linguistic analysis with survey-based quantitative data collected from 100 respondents– 50 Kazakh and 50 Turkish participants. The survey used Likert scales and multiple-choice questions to assess public attitudes toward myth-based names such as Böri, Arystan, Sholpan, Ayman, and Kambar. The results reveal significant cultural parallels and distinctions between the two linguistic communities. Kazakh respondents displayed higher acceptance of animal symbolism (especially the wolf and lion), while Turkish participants emphasized celestial and divine associations. The comparative analysis also indicated generational shifts, with younger respondents in both groups showing reduced awareness of mythological meanings. Diagrams isualize approval rates and symbolic associations across national lines. The study contributes to linguistic anthropology and onomastics by demonstrating how mythological semantics persist in naming practices and function as vehicles for identity transmission. It also highlights the relevance of interethnic comparative research in understanding cultural semantics. By bridging language, history, and mythology, this work provides valuable insight into the evolving nature of Turkishness in anthroponymic traditions. Future studies may expand the demographic scope and deepen the historical-linguistic analysis to include other Turkic-speaking populations.

Keywords:

Mythoanthroponym, Mythical Cognition, Names of People, Kazakh Anthroponymy, Turkish Anthroponymy

References

[1] Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors We Live by. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.

[2] Black, M., 1993. More about metaphor. In: Ortony, A. (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 19–43.

[3] Zhanuzakov, T., 2007. History of Kazakh names. Mektep: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[4] Tileuberdiyev, B., 2014. Ethnological Concepts in the Kazakh Language. KazUMOiMY: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[5] Gordlevsky, A.A., 1973. Essays on the Ethnography and History of Eastern Peoples. Nauka: Moscow, Ruaaia.

[6] Mukhamedova, Z.B., 1973. Research on the history of the Turkmen language of the XI-XIV centuries. Ilym: Ashgabat, Turkmenistan. p. 236.

[7] Kaskabasov, S., 2004. Kazakh Memories and Mythology. Gylym: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[8] Tileuberdiyev, B., 2007. Linguistic-conceptual foundations of Kazakh onomastics. Arys: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[9] Khisamitdinova, F.G., 2005. Reflection of mythological views in the Bashkir anthroponymic system. Voprosy onomastiki. 3(2), 112–125.

[10] Akberdiyeva, B.K., 2000. Mythic-cognitive structures in the lexical-phraseological system. Аbstract of the dissertation on the candidate of Philology: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[11] Begmetov, E., 1965. Anthroponomics of the Uzbek language. Аbstract of the dissertation on the candidate of Philology: Tashkent, Uzbekistan. p. 163.

[12] Buranbaeva, R., Mikhailova, M., 2011. Kazakh Culture and Traditions. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[13] Sattarov, G.F., 2019. Tatar names. Tatarskoe knizhnoe izdatelstvo: Kazan, Russia. p. 550.

[14] Zholdasbekov, M., 2005. Mythological Consciousness of Turks and Kazakhs. Gylym: Almaty, Kazakhstan.

[15] Shadkam, Z., Tokenova, A., 2022. Plant Interpretation in Kazakh and Turkish Onomastics. International Journal of Turkic Studies. 19(2), 144–158.

[16] Bigeldieva, M.M., 2010. Kazakh and Turkish female anthroponymy. Аbstract of the dissertation on the candidate of Philology: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 145.

[17] Qondybai, S., 2018. Basics of ancient Kazakh worldview. Mother tongue: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 480.

[18] Temirbekova, D., 2020. Arab-Persian names in modern Kazakh society. Modern Onomastics Review. 6(1), 55–66.

[19] Akar, M., 2019. The Transformation of Personal Names in Contemporary Turkish Society. Turkish Journal of Social Research. 23(3), 112–128.

[20] Herdalelen, A., 2014. Personal Names in Modern Turkey. Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.00049.pdf (cited 10 July 2025).

[21] Köprülü, F., 1944.The First Mystics in Turkish Literature. Maarif: Ankara, Turkey.

[22] Aydoğan, B., 2022. Mythical Representation in Turkish Names. Journal of Turkic Linguistics. 10(1), 34–50.

[23] Zhubanov, K., 1999. Studies on the Kazakh language. Science: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 434.

[24] Kurshunova, I.A., 2016. Anthroponymy-mythology in the regional onomasticon of the XV-XVII centuries. Scientific dialogue. 10(58), 54–69.

[25] Shadkam, Z., Tokenova, A., 2020. Plant interpretation in Kazakh and Turkish onomastics. Bulletin of KazNUU, Philological series. 1(177), 203–210.

Downloads

Issue

2025 Vol.7 No.9

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Kuanyshbek Kenzhalin, Bekzhan Abdualyuly, Gulbaira Otelbay, Ybray Turanov, Aigul Alimkhan, Meiramgul Baimukhanbetova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.