Individual Happiness and Collective Justice: A Linguocultural Comparison of Western and Uzbek Fairy Tales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i11.11798Abstract
Fairy tales have historically reflected human morality and cultural heritage, conveying ethical teachings through evocative language and symbolic imagery. Among the most significant components of these narratives are moral lexemes, expressions that encapsulate values, such as benevolence, avarice, forbearance, and jealousy. This study examines the expression and interpretation of lexemes in the English tale Cinderella and the Uzbek tale Zumrad and Kimmat (Zumrad and Kimmat), both of which center on young female protagonists whose virtues are tested through adversity. The objective of the research is to examine the distribution, contextualization, and semantic significance of positive and negative moral lexemes in each narrative, as well as their reflection of the cultural values inherent in Western European and Uzbek traditions. The research uses a linguocultural and semiotic methodology alongside narrative analysis, emphasizing the significance of moral contrast in character development and plot progression. The results reveal both universal values, such as compassion and patience, as well as culturally specific elements such as the emphasis on forgiveness in Cinderella and the theme of retributive justice in Zumrad and Kimmat. The analysis is limited to the specific textual versions cited in the Methodology, which frames the scope and reproducibility of our findings. The study enhances comprehension of the relationship among language, culture, and morality in children's literature.
Keywords:
Moral Lexemes, Linguocultural Analysis, Fairy Tales, Sustainable Development Goals, Intercultural Competence, Comparative Literature, FolkloreReferences
[1]Zipes, J., 2013. When Dreams Came True: Classical Fairy Tales and Their Tradition, 1st ed. Routledge: London, UK. p. 240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203949672
[2]Warner, M., 2015.Once upon a time: a short history of fairy tale. Choice Reviews Online. 52(11), 52–5693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.190946
[3]Tatar, M., 1999. The classic fairy tales: texts, criticism. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 139–181.
[4]Aripova, S.T., 2023. Linguistic and Cultural Characteristics in the Translation of Stories between English and Uzbek Languages: a Comprehensive Analysis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10324184
[5]Dosbaeva, N.T., 2020. The Linguocultural Analysis of Literary Translation from Uzbek into English. Journal of critical reviews. 7(03). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.03.51
[6]Bennett, T., Grossberg, L., Morris, M., 2005. New keywords: a revised vocabulary of culture and society. Choice Reviews Online. 43(04), 452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.43-1940
[7]Chen, N., Liu, Q., 2025. Exploring Sacred Narratives: A Cross-Cultural Study of the Eleusinian Mysteries and Sa Worship. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.9006
[8]Mambetniyazova, A., Babaeva, G., Dauletbayeva, R., et al., 2024. Linguistic and cultural analysis of the concept “politeness.” Semiotica. 2024(258), 73–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2023-0141
[9]Muminova, M., 2022. Linguistic Studies of “Water” Component Language Units. Central Asian Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Culture. 3(5), 19–21.
[10]Serikkazykyzy, A., Avakova, R., Ibraimova, Z., et al., 2025. Lexical and Cultural Interactions between Armeno-Kipchak and Turkic Languages in a Medieval Context. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i2.8097
[11]Sodiqova, D., 2022. Linguistic Characteristics of Phraseologisms Involving Clothes Names in English and Uzbek. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7460841
[12]Sharifian, F., 2017. Cultural Linguistics: Cultural conceptualisations and language, Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 51–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.8
[13]Hofstede, G., 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, 2nd ed. Sage Publications: London UK. p. 621.
[14]Chandler, D., 2002. Semiotics: The Basics, 2nd ed. Routledge: London UK. pp. 2–47.
[15]Propp, V., Wagner, L. A., Scott, L., 1968. Morphology of the Folktale, 2nd ed. University of Texas Press: Austin, TX, USA. pp. 66–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7560/783911
[16]Nussbaum, M.C., 1992. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 168–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195074857.001.0001
[17]Haidt, J., Joseph, C., 2004. Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus. 133(4), 55–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365555
[18]Uktamovna, K.M., 2023. Comparative Typology of the English and Uzbek Languages. International Journal Of Literature And Languages. 03(06), 44–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume03Issue06-08
[19]Juraev, I., et al., (2025). Location-Based Philological Research: Securing Context-Aware Apps for Linguistic Fieldwork. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security, 15(2), 578–589. https://doi.org/10.58346/jisis.2025.i2.040
[20]Bialy, P., Kuczok, M., Zabawa, M. 2019. A contrastive perspective on figurative language. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Slaskiego: Katowice, Poland. pp. 125–161.
[21]Khodjamkulov, U., Makhmudov, K., Abduramanova, D., et al., 2025. Exploring Gothic-Themed Lexemes and Their Cultural Connotations in English and Uzbek: An Educational Perspective. International Journal of Language Education. 8(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v8i4.69997
[22]Makhmudov, K., Khodjamkulov, U., Saitkulova, N., et al., 2025. Linguocultural Analysis of Gothic Lexemes and Female Identity in Dahshat and the Yellow Wallpaper: A Cross-Cultural Study Toward Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). International Journal of Language Education. 9(1), 195–211.
[23]Bálint, Z., 2021. The role of women in Gypsy folktales: A comparative analysis between the Spanish and Hungarian corpus. Boletin De Literatura Oral. 11, 147–171. (in Spanish)
[24]Liu, Y., Li, D., 2024. Intersecting language and society: a prototypical study of Cinderella story translations in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 11(1), 223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02719-w
[25]Islamova, T., 2019. Some Problems of the Training English Language of Higher Education System. Scientific and Technical Journal of Namangan Institute of Engineering and Technology. 1(1), 45.
[26]Farida, F., Supardi, S., Abduh, A., et al., 2023. Technology and Hybrid Multimedia for Language Learning and Cross-Cultural Communication in Higher Education. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering. 4(2), 331–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ajse.v4i2.72609
Downloads
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Zukhra Juraeva, Kudratbek Makhmudov, Asalkhon Nabieva, Firyuza Orazova, Svetlana Samadova, Ramazan Tenelbaev, Zayniddin Zanakulov, Diana Abduramanova, Nodira Kholikova, Abdishukur Shofkorov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


Zukhra Juraeva 
