A Preliminary Exploration of the Functional Value Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Aral City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jasr.v5i1.4086Abstract
Using the principles and methods of eco-economics as the research object, Aral City comprehensively expounds the ecological service functions such as ecosystem regulation of climate, carbon sequestration, soil conservation, water conservation and purification environment, and evaluates its economic value.The total value of the estimated 2021 is 1303.65 million yuan. At the same time, the importance of ecological service functions of urban ecosystems, from large to small, is to sequester carbon and release oxygen, purify the environment, maintain soil, conserd water sources, regulate the climate. The ecosystem service function which needs to be paid attention to in the concept of ecological construction and restoration of the next stage of ecological construction in Aral City.
Keywords:
City of Aral; Ecosystem services function; Economic value assessmentReferences
[1] Costanza, R.D., Arge, R., De Groot, R., et al., 1997. The Nature of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature. 387(15), 77-81.
[2] Daliy, G.C., 1997. Nature’s services:societal dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC:Island Press. 38, 253-260.
[3] Guo, Zh.X., Deng, Y.L., Wang, Y.K., et al., 2007. Progress in Forest ecosystem ecosystem function. Journal of Northwestern Forest College. 22(1), 173- 177.
[4] Zhang, Y.L., Yang, F.W., Wang, B., et al., 2010. Research on Forest Ecosystem Service Function in China. Beijing: Science Press. 16-28.
[5] Costanza, R.D., Arge, R., De Groot, R., et al., 1997. The Nature of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature. 387(15), 253-260.
[6] Zhao, J.Zh., Xiao, H., Wu, G., 2000. Comparative analysis of the material quality and value quantity evaluation of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology. 11(4), 481-484.
[7] Chen, Y.X., 1995. Environmental and ecological benefits of mangroves. China Marine Environmental Sciences. 14(4), 51-56.
[8] Zhao, J.Zh., Xiao, H., Wu, G., 2000. Comparative analysis of the material quality and value quantity evaluation of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology. 11(2), 290-292.
[9] Ouyang, Zh.Y., Wang, X.K., Miao, H., 1999. Preliminary Exploration on the Service Function of Land Ecosystem in China. Journal of Ecology. 19(5), 607- 613.
[10] Cheng, H., Li, X., 2007. Waiting for equality. Field observation of windproof and sand fixation function of lower Tarim River. Desert of China. 27(6), 1022- 1026.
[11] Li, Sh.K., Lu, M., Wang, K.R., et al., 2008. The impact of soil wind erosion of the main surface types in southern Xinjiang on the formation of sandstorms. Chinese Agricultural Science. 14(10), 3158-3167.
[12] Meng, X.M., 2006. Preliminary study of soil wind erosion tolerance in semi-arid areas. Beijing: Beijing Normal University.
[13] Yang, X., 2007. The field worship Sultan, Chen Muxia, etc. Study on nutrient resource characteristics in major polluted irrigation areas in Xinjiang. Drought Zone Resources and Environment. 21(1), 140-144.
[14] Muheat Ayup, 2007. Study on soil and groundwater characteristics under different growth conditions of riparian Populus-Tarim River Bridge from Tarim River Bridge to Sand estuary as an example. Urumqi: Xinjiang University.
[15] Cheng, P., Pan, C.D., Zhu, Y.F., et al., 2011. Relationship between secondary forest community succession and soil fertility in Kanas Tourism Zone, Xinjiang. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University. 34(6), 459-464.
[16] Yang, L.W., He, B.Y., Huang, P.Y., et al., 2006. Evaluation of the ecological service value of natural Populus euphratica forest in Hetian River Basin. Journal of Ecology. 26(3), 681-689.
[17] Qin, Sh., Xiong, H., Xu, Ch.Q., et al., 2004. Estimation of land ecosystem service function and ecological benefits in Xinjiang. Journal of Xinjiang University (Natural Science Edition). 1(1), 38-44.
[18] Yu, X.M., Qin, Y.Sh., Chen, L.H., et al., 2002. Preliminary Study on service function and Value of mountain Forest Ecosystem in Beijing. Journal of Ecology. (1), 783-786.