Co-designed Practical Use of Probabilistic Climate Advisories among Smallholder Farmers: A Balance between Confidence and Caution


  • Mary Mwangi

    South Eastern Kenya University, Kitui, 90200, Kenya

  • Evans Kituyi

    Institute of Climate Change and Adaptation, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, 00625, Kenya

  • Gilbert Ouma

    Institute of Climate Change and Adaptation, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, 00625, Kenya



Especially for smallholder farmers with limited land and financial resources, farming in arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs), where season-to-season rainfall fluctuation dictates production, is a risky business. Through participatory approaches, this study compares deterministic and probabilistic interpretations of climate forecasts and their use by smallholder farmers through a crop-growing season. The study revealed that deterministic advisories are good for smallholder farmers only when formulated from forecasts with higher accuracy than the historical climatological distribution. Otherwise, they cause farm loss in terms of labor and inputs. On the other hand, probabilistic advisories help farmers spread the risk to cater to all the uncertainty and in so doing bring out a balance between confidence and caution. However, farmers must be supported with enough sensitization to comprehend forecast probability, translate it into probabilistic advisories and use that to plan and manage farm activities. The findings support the hypothesis providing packaged climate products in transparent probabilistic terms in place of deterministic form can overcome inherent credibility challenges. The study’s conclusion highlights important takeaways and new understandings of the advantage of using probabilistic advisories among resource-poor smallholder farmers.


Smallholder farmers, Deterministic advisories, Probabilistic advisories


[1] Ouedraogo, I., Diouf, N.S., Ouédraogo, M., et al., 2018. Closing the gap between climate information producers and users: Assessment of needs and uptake in Senegal. Climate. 6(1), 13.

[2] Hansen, J., Bradley-Cook, J., Apotsos, A., et al., 2020. Making climate services work for Africa’s farmers at scale. Learning Agenda on Climate Services in Sub-Saharan Africa Spotlight Series 5. Washington DC: climatelinks.

[3] de Andrade, F.M., Young, M.P., MacLeod, D., et al., 2021. Subseasonal precipitation prediction for Africa: Forecast evaluation and sources of predictability. Weather and Forecasting. 36(1), 265-284.

[4] Suarez, P., Patt, A.G., 2004. Cognition, caution, and credibility: The risks of climate forecast application. Risk Decision and Policy. 9(1), 75-89.

[5] Ziervogel, G., 2004. Targeting seasonal climate forecasts for integration into household level decisions: The case of smallholder farmers in Lesotho. Geographical Journal. 170(1), 6-21.

[6] Hansen, J.W., Vaughan, C., Kagabo, D.M., et al., 2019. Climate services can support African farmers’ context-specific adaptation needs at scale. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 3, 21.

[7] Blundo-Canto, G., Andrieu, N., Adam, N.S., et al., 2021. Scaling weather and climate services for agriculture in Senegal: Evaluating systemic but overlooked effects. Climate Services. 22, 100216.

[8] Dinku, T., Block, P., Sharoff, J., et al., 2014. Bridging critical gaps in climate services and applications in Africa. Earth Perspectives. 1, 1-13.

[9] Tall, A., Coulibaly, J.Y., Diop, M., 2018. Do climate services make a difference? A review of evaluation methodologies and practices to assess the value of climate information services for farmers: Implications for Africa. Climate Services. 11, 1-12.

[10] Patt, A.G., 2009. Learning to crawl: How to use seasonal climate forecasts to build adaptive capacity. Adapting to climate change: Thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. pp. 79-95.

[11] O’Brien, K., Leichenko, R., Kelkar, U., et al., 2004. Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: Climate change and globalization in India. Global Environmental Change. 14, 303e313.

[12] Williams, D.S., Costa, M.M., Kovalevsky, D., et al., 2020. A method of assessing user capacities for effective climate services. Climate Services. 19, 100180.

[13] Dayamba, D.S., Ky-Dembele, C., Bayala, J., et al., 2018. Assessment of the use of Participatory Integrated Climate Services for Agriculture (PICSA) approach by farmers to manage climate risk in Mali and Senegal. Climate Services. 12, 27-35.

[14] Ketiem, P., Makeni, P.M., Maranga, E.K., et al., 2017. Integration of climate change information into drylands crop production practices for enhanced food security: A case study of Lower Tana Basin in Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 12(20), 1763-1771.

[15] Owuor, B., Eriksen, S., Mauta, W., 2005. Adapting to climate change in a dryland mountain environment in Kenya. Mountain Research and Development. 25(4), 310-315.

[16] Gachathi, F.N., Eriksen, S., 2011. Gums and resins: The potential for supporting sustainable adaptation in Kenya’s drylands. Climate and Development. 3(1), 59-70.

[17] Doblas-Reyes, F.J., García-Serrano, J., Lienert, F., et al., 2013. Seasonal climate predictability and forecasting: Status and prospects. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 4(4), 245-268.

[18] Klemm, T., McPherson, R.A., 2017. The development of seasonal climate forecasting for agricultural producers. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 232, 384-399.

[19] Mason, S.J., Stephenson, D.B., 2008. How do we know whether seasonal climate forecasts are any good?. Seasonal climate: Forecasting and managing risk. Springer: Netherlands. pp. 259-289.

[20] Coelho, C.A., Costa, S.M., 2010. Challenges for integrating seasonal climate forecasts in user applications. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2(5-6), 317-325.

[21] Weisheimer, A., Palmer, T.N., 2014. On the reliability of seasonal climate forecasts. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 11(96), 20131162.


How to Cite

Mwangi, M., Kituyi, E., & Ouma, G. (2023). Co-designed Practical Use of Probabilistic Climate Advisories among Smallholder Farmers: A Balance between Confidence and Caution. Journal of Atmospheric Science Research, 6(2), 75–82.





Download data is not yet available.