Comparative Analysis of Prediction Model for Non destructive Testing based Compressive Strength Determination

Authors

  • Priyesh Gangele

    Department of Civil Engineering, Vedica Institute of Technology, RKDF University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462033, India

  • Arun Kumar Patel

    Department of Civil Engineering, Vedica Institute of Technology, RKDF University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462033, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jbms.v7i3.10097
Received: 19 May 2025 | Revised: 18 June 2025 | Accepted: 25 June 2025 | Published Online: 24 July 2025

Abstract

Evaluating the performance of existing concrete structures is essential in civil engineering, with compressive strength serving as an indicator of performance. Non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques are commonly employed due to their cost-effectiveness and the ability to assess structural integrity without causing damage. However, NDT methods often yield less accurate results than destructive testing (DT), which, although highly reliable, is costly and invasive. To address this limitation, recent research has focused on developing predictive models that correlate DT and NDT outcomes using machine learning techniques. This study explores the application of Support Vector Machine (SVM) models, enhanced with optimization techniques, to improve prediction accuracy. Experimental concrete practical samples, ranging from M10 to M40 grade, were prepared and tested at 14 and 28 days of curing, totaling 126 laboratory specimens. Additionally, 231 field samples were collected from a 20-year-old structure to reflect in situ conditions. The performance of SVM was improved using optimization algorithms such as Bayesian Optimization and Genetic Algorithms (GA). Among various kernel functions tested, the Gaussian non-linear kernel proved most effective in modeling the complex relationship between NDT and DT results. The SVM model optimized using Bayesian methods and a Gaussian kernel achieved superior performance, with a high coefficient of determination (R² = 0.9771) and significantly lower error metrics, including Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Bayesian-optimized SVM with a Gaussian kernel offers a highly accurate and practical tool for predicting compressive strength from NDT data, enhancing decision-making in structural assessment.

Keywords:

Destructive Test; Non-Destructive Testing; Support Vector Machine (SVM); Bayesian-Optimized SVM; Genetic Algorithm-Optimized SVM; ANN

References

[1] Poorarbabi, A., Ghasemi, M., Moghaddam, M.A., 2020. Concrete compressive strength prediction using non-destructive tests through response surface methodology. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 11(4), 939–949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.02.009

[2] Ali-Benyahia, K., Sbartai, Z., Breysse, D., et al., 2019. Improvement of nondestructive assessment of on-site concrete strength: influence of the selection process of cores location on the assessment quality for single and combined NDT techniques. Construction and Building Materials. 195, 613–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.032

[3] Dangi, V.P., Sohani, S.K., Patel, A.K., 2025. Experimental investigation on the utilization of e-waste, plastic waste, and crushed coconut shell as partial replacements for natural aggregates in concrete. Journal of Integrated Science and Technology. 13(5), 1102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62110/sciencein.jist.2025.v13.1102

[4] Asteris, P.G., Skentou, A.D., Bardhan, A., et al., 2021. Soft computing techniques for the prediction of concrete compressive strength using nondestructive tests. Construction and Building Materials. 303, 124450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124450

[5] Bilgehan, M., 2011. A comparative study for the concrete compressive strength estimation using neural network and neuro-fuzzy modelling approaches. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation. 26(1), 35–55.

[6] Kaboosi, K., Kaboosi, F., Fadavi, M., 2020. Investigation of greywater and zeolite usage in different cement contents on concrete compressive strength and their interactions. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 11(1), 201–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.008

[7] Poorarbabi, A., Ghasemi, M., Moghaddam, M.A., 2020. Concrete compressive strength prediction using neural networks based on non-destructive tests and a self-calibrated response surface methodology. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation. 39, 784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-020-00718-w

[8] Karahan, S., Buyuksarac, A., Isik, E., 2020. The relationship between concrete strengths obtained by destructive and non-destructive methods. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering. 44(1), 91–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00334-3

[9] Bogas, J.A., Gomes, M.G., Gomes, A., 2013. Compressive strength evaluation of structural lightweight concrete by non-destructive ultrasonic pulse velocity method. Ultrasonics. 53(5), 962–972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2012.12.012

[10] Mata, R., Ruiz, R.O., Nunez, E., 2023. Correlation between compressive strength of concrete and ultrasonic pulse velocity: a case of study and a new correlation method. Construction and Building Materials. 369, 130569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130569

[11] Rashid, K., Waqas, R., 2017. Compressive strength evaluation by non-destructive techniques: an automated approach in construction industry. Journal of Building Engineering. 12, 147–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.05.010

[12] Pucinotti, R., 2015. Reinforced concrete structure: non-destructive in situ strength assessment of concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 75, 331–341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.023

[13] Breysse, D., 2012. Nondestructive evaluation of concrete strength: an historical review and a new perspective by combining NDT methods. Construction and Building Materials. 33, 139–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.103

[14] Yilmaz, N.G., Goktan, R.M., 2019. Comparison and combination of two NDT methods with implications for compressive strength evaluation of selected masonry and building stones. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 78(6), 4493–4503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1382-7

[15] Erdal, M., 2009. Prediction of the compressive strength of vacuum processed concretes using artificial neural network and regression techniques. Scientific Research and Essays. 4(10), 1057–1065.

[16] Huang, Q., Gardoni, P., Hurlebaus, S., 2011. Predicting concrete compressive strength using ultrasonic pulse velocity and rebound number. Acids Materials Journal. 108(4), 403–412.

[17] Amini, K., Jalalpour, M., Delatte, N., 2016. Advancing concrete strength prediction using non-destructive testing: development and verification of a generalizable model. Construction and Building Materials. 102(1), 762–768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.131

[18] Shariati, M., Ramli-Sulong, N.H., Arabnejad, M.M.K.H., et al., 2011. Assessing the strength of reinforced concrete structures through ultrasonic pulse velocity and Schmidt rebound hammer tests. Scientific Research and Essays. 6(1), 213–220.

[19] Trtnik, G., Kavcic, F., Turk, G., 2009. Prediction of concrete strength using ultrasonic pulse velocity and artificial neural networks. Ultrasonics. 49(1), 53–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.001

[20] Lawson, I., Danso, K., Odoi, H., 2011. Non-destructive evaluation of concrete using ultrasonic pulse velocity. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology. 6(3), 499–504.

[21] Sbartai, Z., Breysse, D., Larget, M., et al., 2012. Combining NDT techniques for improved evaluation of concrete properties. Cement and Concrete Composites. 34(6), 725–733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.03.005

[22] Aydın, F., Sarıbıyık, M., 2010. Compressive strength of various ages concretes by non-destructive test methods. Scientific Research and Essays. 5, 1644–1648.

[23] Malek, J., Kaouther, M., 2014. Destructive and non-destructive testing of concrete structures. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering. 8(4), 432–441.

[24] Samson, D., Moses, O.T., 2014. Correlation between non-destructive testing (NDT) and destructive testing (DT) of compressive strength of concrete. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention. 3(9), 12–17.

[25] Aydin, F., Saribiyik, M., 2010. Correlation between Schmidt Hammer and destructive compressions testing for concretes in existing buildings. Scientific Research and Essays. 5(13), 1644–1648.

[26] Abdullah, B., Abdulkadir, M., 2016. Correlation between destructive and non-destructive tests results for concrete compressive strength. Journal of Zankoy Sulaimani. 18(4), 119–132.

[27] Güçlüer, K., Özbeyaz, A., Göymen, S., et al., 2021. A comparative investigation using machine learning methods for concrete compressive strength estimation. Materials Today Communications. 27, 102278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102278

[28] Kewalramani, M.A., Gupta, R., 2006. Concrete compressive strength prediction using ultrasonic pulse velocity through artificial neural networks. Automation in Construction. 15(3), 374–379.

[29] Abhilash, P.T., Satyanarayana, P.V.V., Tharani, K., 2021. Prediction of compressive strength of roller compacted concrete using regression analysis and artificial neural networks. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. 6, 218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00590-1

[30] Tsivilis, S., Batis, G., Chaniotakis, E., et al., 2000. Properties and behavior of limestone cement concrete and mortar. Cement and Concrete Research. 30(10), 1679–1683.

[31] Patel, A., Katiyar, S.K., Prasad, V., 2016. Bathymetric mapping of Bhopal City Lower Lake using IRS-P6: LISS-4 imagery and artificial neural network technique. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing. 44, 605–616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-015-0523-8

[32] Asteris, P.G., Skentou, A.D., Bardhan, A., et al., 2021. Soft computing techniques for the prediction of concrete compressive strength using non-destructive tests. Construction and Building Materials. 303, 124450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124450

[33] Chithra, S., Kumar, S.S., Chinnaraju, K., et al., 2016. A comparative study on the compressive strength prediction models for high performance concrete containing nano silica and copper slag using regression analysis and artificial neural networks. Construction and Building Materials. 114, 528–535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.214

[34] Zhang, W., Liu, D., Cao, K., 2024. Prediction of concrete compressive strength using support vector machine regression and non-destructive testing. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 21, e03416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03416

[35] Priyesh, G., Patel, A.K., 2025. Prediction of compressive strength by considering practical consideration non-destructive test by artificial neural network. Journal of Materials and Engineering Structures. 12(1), 47–62.

[36] Zhang, W., Liu, D., Cao, K., 2024. Prediction of concrete compressive strength using support vector machine regression and non-destructive testing. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 21, e03416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03416

[37] Roy, A., Chakraborty, S., 2023. Support vector machine in structural reliability analysis: a review. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 233, 109126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109126

[38] Dishaa, 2024. Introduction support vector machines (SVM) with Python implementation. Available from: https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2021/04/insight-into-svm-support-vector-machine-along-with-code/ (cited 18 October 2024).

[39] Viswa, 2024. Support vector regression: unleashing the power of non-linear predictive modeling. Available from: https://medium.com/@vk.viswa/support-vector-regression-unleashing-the-power-of-non-linear-predictive-modeling-d4495836884 (cited 18 October 2024).

[40] Chen, X.X., Huang, J., 2019. Odor source localization algorithms on mobile robots: A review and future outlook. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 112, 123–136.

[41] Snoek, J., Larochelle, H., Adams, R.P., 2012. Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 25, 2951–2959.

[42] Rashedi, E., Nezamabadi-pour, H., Saryazdi, S., 2009. GSA: a gravitational search algorithm. Information Sciences. 179(13), 2232–2248.

[43] Elshewey, A.M., Shams, M.Y., El-Rashidy, N., et al., 2023. Bayesian optimization with support vector machine model for Parkinson disease classification. Sensors. 23(4), 2085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042085

[44] Frazier, P.I., 2018. A tutorial on Bayesian optimization. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1807.02811.

[45] Goldberg, D.E., 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA.

[46] Shahriari, B., Swersky, K., Wang, Z., et al., 2016. Taking the human out of the loop: a review of Bayesian optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE. 104(1), 148–175.

[47] Mirjalili, S., 2019. Genetic Algorithm. In: Evolutionary Algorithms and Neural Networks. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 43–55.

[48] Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., 2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd ed. Springer: New York, NY, USA.

[49] Schölkopf, B., Smola, A.J., 2001. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[50] Keerthi, S.S., Lin, C.J., 2003. Asymptotic behaviors of support vector machines with Gaussian kernel. Neural Computation. 15(7), 1667–1689.

[51] Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J., 2011. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology. 2(3), 1–27.

Downloads

How to Cite

Priyesh Gangele, & Arun Kumar Patel. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Prediction Model for Non destructive Testing based Compressive Strength Determination. Journal of Building Material Science, 7(3), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.30564/jbms.v7i3.10097