Beyond Smart Buildings: The Emergence of Intelligent Places through Cutting-Edge Technologies and Material Foundations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jbms.v7i3.10438Abstract
The rapid emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT), immersive technologies, and spatial devices is transforming architecture by changing the built environment from a passive backdrop to an active participant in user activities. This shift creates complex sociotechnical networks and leads to what we call intelligent places adaptive systems that respond to user behavior, environmental signals, and interactions with architectural components. This study investigates how advanced material foundations and embedded technological objects shape human-building interactions and drive adaptive behaviors in intelligent place systems. We test the hypothesis that integrating virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and spatial sensors within smart materials creates continuous real-time feedback loops. These loops are expected to enhance user engagement, spatial adaptability, and environmental responsiveness. Employing a qualitative methodology that includes case studies and content analysis, augmented by AI-assisted image analysis, we explore recent trends in smart building design through two projects: the Spatially Intelligent Arts Centre in Geelong, Australia, and the iPortals network of interactive spatial components. The findings indicate that intelligent places are open, dynamic, and continually evolving systems. Technological objects mediate multiloop feedback among users, materials, and building automation, enabling more autonomous, energy-efficient, and responsive environments. This study contributes a conceptual framework for understanding how technological objects and their material Foundations mediate human-building interactions in intelligent places. Future research should consider scalability across different architectural contexts and explore the sociocultural impacts on diverse user groups.
Keywords:
Intelligent Places; AI-Assisted Image Analysis; Technological Objects; Smart Materials; Sociotechnical NetworksReferences
[1] Guney, Y.I., 2018. Embracing Today’s Economic and Technological Transitions. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs. 2(3), 107–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.4725
[2] Al Saigh, M.N., Mahmoud, K.F., 2023. The Impact of Smart Interactive Technologies in Creating Personal Internal Spaces: An Analytical Study of User Preferences for Interactive Shape Characteristics. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning. 18(8), 2339–2348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180804
[3] Knox, K., 2021. Communicative Performance of Interactive Space in Social Relationships Through Actor–Network Theory. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Engineering Management of Communication and Technology (EMCTECH); October 4–6, 2021; Belgrade, Serbia. pp. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCTECH53459.2021.9619170
[4] Boychenko, K., 2019. Agency of Interactive Architecture in Sociotechnological Relationships Through Actor–Network Theory. Proceedings of The Hello, Culture: 18th International Conference, CAAD Futures; June 8, 2025; Chicago, IL, USA. pp. 192–202.
[5] Gaha, I.S., 2023. Parametric Architectural Design for a New City Identity: Materials, Environments and New Applications. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs. 7(1), 122–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2023.v7n1-9
[6] Amini, M., Mahdavinejad, M., Bemanian, M., 2019. Future of Interactive Architecture in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities in Case of Tehran. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries. 24(1), 163–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2019.24.1.9
[7] Haque, U., Fischer, A.S., 2005. Low Tech Sensors and Actuators. Creative Commons. Available from: http://lowtech.propositions.org.uk (cited 14 June 2025).
[8] Jaskiewicz, T.J., 2013. Towards a Methodology for Complex Adaptive Interactive Architecture [Doctoral Thesis]. Delft, Netherlands: Technische Universiteit Delft. pp. 1–351.
[9] Heydarian, A., McIlvennie, C., Arpan, L., et al., 2020. What Drives Our Behaviors in Buildings? A Review on Occupant Interactions with Building Systems From the Lens of Behavioral Theories. Building and Environment. 179, 106928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106928
[10] Kocaturk, T., Greuter, S., Hoang, T., et al., 2024. Enhancing Human–Building Interaction and Spatial Experience in Cultural Spaces. International Journal of Architectural Computing. 22(2), 177–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771231225702
[11] Tyson, R., 2023. From Smart Buildings to Intelligent Placemaking. Available from: https://www.gensler.com/blog/from-smart-buildings-to-intelligent-placemaking (cited 22 August 2024).
[12] Ahmadi-Karvigh, S., Ghahramani, A., Becerik-Gerber, B., et al., 2017. One Size Does Not Fit All: Understanding User Preferences for Building Automation Systems. Energy and Buildings. 145, 163–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.015
[13] Nabil, S., Kirk, D., 2019. Interactive Interior Design and Personal Data. In: Schnädelbach, H., Kirk, D. (eds.). People, Personal Data and the Built Environment. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 103–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70875-1_5
[14] Weiser, M., 1995. The Computer for the 21st Century: Specialized Elements of Hardware and Software, Connected by Wires, Radio Waves and Infrared, Will Be So Ubiquitous That No One Will Notice Their Presence. In: Baecker, R.M., Grudin, J., Buxton, W.A.S., et al. (eds.). Readings in Human–Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, CA, USA. pp. 933–940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-051574-8.50097-2
[15] Frazer, J.H., 1993. The Architectural Relevance of Cybernetics. Systems Research. 10(3), 43–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3850100307
[16] Yu, B., et al., 2016. Living Surface: Biofeedback Through Shape-Changing Display. Proceedings of The TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction; February 14–17, 2016; Eindhoven, Netherlands. ACM, pp. 168–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839469
[17] Panya, D.S., Kim, T., Choo, S., 2023. An Interactive Design Change Methodology Using a BIM-Based Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality. Journal of Building Engineering. 68, 106030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106030
[18] Tuan, Y.F., 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience, 1st ed. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA.
[19] Relph, E., 1976. Place and Placelessness, 1st ed. Pion: London, UK.
[20] Canter, D., 2023. The Psychology of Place. In: Canter, D. (ed.), Readings on the Psychology of Place. London: Routledge, pp. 70–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003313052-8
[21] Falahat, M.S., Zarrin, K.A., 2025. The Relationship Between Intelligence and Place: From Smart Architecture to “Intelligent Place.” Naqshejahan – Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 14(4), 25–46.
[22] Kitchin, R., 2014. The Real-Time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism. GeoJournal. 79(1), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
[23] Shi, C., Lin, J., Ge, G., et al., 2023. Design and Manufacture of Lead-Free Eco-Friendly Cement-Based Piezoelectric Composites Achieving Superior Piezoelectric Properties for Concrete Structure Applications. Composites Part B: Engineering. 259, 110750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110750
[24] Ege, E.S., Balikci, A., 2023. Transparent Localized Haptics: Utilization of PVDF Actuators on Touch Displays. Actuators. 12(7), 289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/act12070289
[25] Sobczyk, M., Wiesenhütter, S., Noennig, J.R., et al., 2022. Smart Materials in Architecture for Actuator and Sensor Applications: A Review. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. 33(3), 379–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X211027954
[26] Tan, M.W.M., Wang, H., Gao, D., et al., 2024. Towards High Performance and Durable Soft Tactile Actuators: Mechanisms and Materials. Chemical Society Reviews. 53, 3485–3535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CS01017A
[27] Bekzhanova, Z., Memon, S.A., Kim, J.R., 2021. Self-Sensing Cementitious Composites: Review and Perspective. Nanomaterials. 11(9), 2355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092355
[28] Hu, J., Chen, W., Zhao, B., et al., 2017. Buildings With ETFE Foils: Review on Material Properties, Architectural Performance and Structural Behavior. Construction and Building Materials. 131, 411–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.062
[29] Flor, J.F., Liu, D., Sun, Y., et al., 2018. Optical Aspects and Energy Performance of Switchable Ethylene Tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE) Foil Cushions. Applied Energy. 229, 335–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.046
[30] Rabajczyk, A., Zielecka, M., Klapsa, W., et al., 2021. Self-Cleaning Coatings and Surfaces of Modern Building Materials for the Removal of Some Air Pollutants. Materials. 14(9), 2161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092161
[31] Arish, P., Reddy, P.G.K., Ramcharan, S., et al., 2025. Ambient Energy Capture From Human Footsteps Using Piezoelectric Sensors. Proceedings of The 2025 5th International Conference on Trends in Material Science and Inventive Materials (ICTMIM); April 20–22, 2025; New York, NY, USA. pp. 708–712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTMIM65579.2025.10988371
[32] Menges, A., Reichert, S., 2012. Material Capacity: Embedded Responsiveness. Architectural Design. 82(2), 52–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1379
[33] Oxman, N., 2010. Material Based Design Computation [PhD Thesis]. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. pp. 306–328.
[34] Hensel, M.U., 2012. Sustainability From a Performance-Oriented Architecture Perspective: Alternative Approaches to Questions Regarding the Sustainability of the Built Environment. Sustainable Development. 20(3), 146–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1531
[35] Hensel, M., Menges, A., Weinstock, M., 2006. Towards Self-Organisational and Multiple Performance Capacity in Architecture. Architectural Design. 76(2), 5–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.234
[36] Elkhayat, Y.O., 2014. Interactive Movement in Kinetic Architecture. Journal of Engineering Sciences. 42(3), 816–845. DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2014.115027
[37] Addington, M., Schodek, D., 2012. Smart Materials and Technologies in Architecture, 1st ed. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080480954
[38] Johnson, O.V., Alyasiri, O.M., Akhtom, D.A., et al., 2023. Image Analysis Through the Lens of ChatGPT 4. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence. 4(2), 31–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48185/jaai.v4i2.870
[39] Alkhammash, E.H., 2024. Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhanced Classification and Analysis: Fire Incidents Case Study. Fire. 8(1), 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8010007
[40] Jaskiewicz, T., 2008. ‘iPortals’ as a Case Study Pre-Prototype of an Evolving Network of Interactive Spatial Components. Proceedings of The 28th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA); October 16–19, 2008; Minneapolis, MN, USA. pp. 174–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.acadia.2008.174
[41] Lee, S.M., Kwon, J.H., Kwon, S., et al., 2017. A Review of Flexible OLEDs Toward Highly Durable Unusual Displays. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 64(5), 1922–1931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2017.2647964
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Fatah Bakour, Ali Chougui

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.